met her through okc. supposed to be temporary although we've only spent three nights apart since we met.
― conrad, Friday, 9 March 2012 14:01 (fourteen years ago)
If I'm not at least slightly over-awed or intimidated for some reason, my libido is a blank
everyone likes the bad boys.
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 March 2012 14:55 (fourteen years ago)
yeah bin Laden was beating them off with a stick. well, beating them.
― Nultified Ancients of Man U (Noodle Vague), Friday, 9 March 2012 15:02 (fourteen years ago)
using this thing again sorta half-heartedly since the other half of the heart is miles away for a long while.
have a date set up for this week (with an okc newbie!), will report.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2012 23:30 (fourteen years ago)
What does one do for a headline???? Those have always been hard and now that I'm trying again, they're still hard.
Options I can think of:-Description of self - What you want (may or may not include "lQQking")- Wit - Meta wit ("insert witty headline here!")- Reference to art, lit, entertainment
HELP?
― free societies must let drunken gay Texans have sex (Je55e), Saturday, 10 March 2012 02:00 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.fortunecity.com/lavender/mitchum/953/ex_pics/exor_023.jpg
― free societies must let drunken gay Texans have sex (Je55e), Saturday, 10 March 2012 02:01 (fourteen years ago)
Jesse I will help when I am not out at a club with an okc date
― God: Huummm (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 10 March 2012 05:55 (fourteen years ago)
^^^fp'd
― mookieproof, Saturday, 10 March 2012 05:56 (fourteen years ago)
Oh shit my beautiful photo didn't post. It was from The Exorcist, Regan's abdomen w/ HELP ME scrawled on it.
Forks I hope your date quoted 4Chan memes to you all night.
― free societies must let drunken gay Texans have sex (Je55e), Saturday, 10 March 2012 13:35 (fourteen years ago)
I deleted mine last Sunday, just couldn't face it. Feels mostly good.
― I'm going to allow this! (LocalGarda), Saturday, 10 March 2012 14:24 (fourteen years ago)
um, it went well and i was serious? did you want help?
― God: Huummm (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 10 March 2012 14:45 (fourteen years ago)
Oh haha. Sure!
― free societies must let drunken gay Texans have sex (Je55e), Saturday, 10 March 2012 15:26 (fourteen years ago)
It's depressing when I email someone and they write back noncommittally with no questions or interest in me or further conversation. Like, "I'm too polite to ignore you, but let's just end this right now like adults, okay?"
― drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Saturday, 10 March 2012 17:41 (fourteen years ago)
How can they not like me? They don't even know me! Usually it takes at least a few meetings for people to get to that stage.
― drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Saturday, 10 March 2012 17:52 (fourteen years ago)
Had an account since end of last year -- half filled (has all the info I think I wanted to give) w/one B&W picture. Wrote in bursts -- 2-3 lines on any profiles of interest, and wrote to quite a few.
Went on a cpl of dates -- first one: really cool, met several times and we seem to be fairly good friends.
The other was quite remarkable -- talked for four hours, which went by in a blaze (couldn't believe my watch). Even more amazing that we never talked about anything movies or book or music related (talked quite a bit abut football tho'). We were keen on seeing one another but that had to wait for a week due to a trip (ws told about it before the date). Texted afterwards anyway to get in touch. Get a reply a week later then reply back to schedule...*tumbleweeds*
Since then I haven't got back on the site, w/other things having taken my time too.
Anyway a bit of a rollercoaster but in the end quite good. If it wasn't for this thread I'd never have thought about it.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 10 March 2012 18:12 (fourteen years ago)
Jesse, what's a headline? I wasn't aware that OKC had some sort of a calling card line.
― God: Huummm (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 10 March 2012 18:56 (fourteen years ago)
Oh, I guess OKC doesn't have a headline. I was working on a profile a different site, which does have headlines.
― free societies must let drunken gay Texans have sex (Je55e), Sunday, 11 March 2012 00:27 (fourteen years ago)
guess you could consider the self-summary a bit of a headline ...
― pearsonic, Sunday, 11 March 2012 00:33 (fourteen years ago)
Ugh the whole profile thing is just so daunting and makes me wish that if I'm going to die alone I would just hurry up and do it.
― free societies must let drunken gay Texans have sex (Je55e), Sunday, 11 March 2012 00:40 (fourteen years ago)
i need to figure out a way to bring up the "are we seeing other people or just each other or what" thing with someone in the least awkward way possible. help.
(i honestly will not be devastated if the answer goes one way or another but and just curious because this person is about to go away for a few weeks)
― bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 17:16 (fourteen years ago)
^ no need to ask this question imo
― post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:20 (fourteen years ago)
i feel like not asking could possibly lead to misunderstanding and heartache. what is your reasoning?
― bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:31 (fourteen years ago)
i never really ask those kinda questions....i don't really like talking about what 'a thing' might be - basically i'm wary of too-early requests for definition of what something might be, actually i don't really like asking for definition
what is the reason you need clarification so soon?
― post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:41 (fourteen years ago)
hmm well it's not really that soon? why are you assuming it's too soon i didn't say how long i'd been seeing this person.
― bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:44 (fourteen years ago)
because its at a stage where that answer is unclear
― post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:47 (fourteen years ago)
what effect will the answer have on your lifestyle during these weeks
― post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:48 (fourteen years ago)
depending on the status i will either1) make out with other people, or2) not make out with other people.
― bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:54 (fourteen years ago)
this seems to confirm it is at an early stage, where answers are not yet necessary and questions are too soon
why is the being away for 3 weeks relevant? would the possible answers to the question be the same even if they were not away for 3 weeks?
― post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
or rather...
what effect will the answer have on your lifestyle before and after those weeks
― post, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 21:05 (fourteen years ago)
post you make it sound like all new relationships reach an "obvious" point where without anyone stating it explicitly you know its exclusive.
I've had more than one experience with assuming that to be the case and it turning out not to be, so it doesnt work that way.
― Medical Dance Crab With Lesson (Trayce), Thursday, 15 March 2012 01:55 (fourteen years ago)
As in I mean Ive been with someone i saw almost daily, for months, then after many months got a very suprised "oh this isnt an actual RELATIONSHIP, wtf!?"
― Medical Dance Crab With Lesson (Trayce), Thursday, 15 March 2012 01:56 (fourteen years ago)
I never ask these kinds of questions, prefer not to worry about this kind of thing too much. If it 'feels' exlcusive then I guess it feels right for me to be exclusive, if it turns out not to be doesn't really matter because I was doing what feels right
― post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 06:52 (fourteen years ago)
I don't really like labeling things tho or thinking about definitions too much though
― post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 06:53 (fourteen years ago)
I mean I know I'm sorta writing a bit like a robot on this thread but in actual life I prefer just to go on instinct - horses for courses - but it seems to work out best that way if i trust them, for me at least
― post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 07:00 (fourteen years ago)
In my experience, "I prefer just to go on instinct" is guy speak for "I have appalling communications skills, I expect my partner to know my needs by ESP, and I will just assume that I know my partner's needs by similar methods, and project if necessary."
It also tends to have a side order of "My needs always have primacy (and even thinking that my partner might have needs of their own makes me uncomfortable.)"
I would feel uncomfortable being in an exclusive relationship, with someone whose communication skills are so poor that they cannot even have a conversation about whether a relationship is exclusive or not. Because poor communications impact other places outside the bedroom. Assuming that one knows what one's partner wants, without discussing it with them, is just a real red flag for me.
I'd say, BG, don't bring up the question unless you are absolutely certain that *you* want an exclusive relationship. Because there's no way to un-have the conversation. If you are still experiencing the desire to make out with other people, are you so certain you want to exclusify the relationship? Or are you worried your partner will get hurt if they find out that you made out with others while they were away? (Or just worried that they may be doing the same thing?) These are legitimate worries, but one needs to work out what the worry is, before asking a question to assuage it.
― ...I KERNOW BECAUSE YOU DO (White Chocolate Cheesecake), Thursday, 15 March 2012 08:33 (fourteen years ago)
WCC brings up good counterpoints, I definitely think its about finding out what is right for you and what approach is right for you, as there is no objective correct approach
I think I mostly have good communication skills, and have no problem in discussing a situation, relationship or thing at all. I have no problem in discussing the other person's needs or questions, and if the other person wants to discuss if something is exclusive or not, I'm totally happy to have that discussion. But I don't require that validation for myself, ie I don't PERSONALLY need to ask that question or have the question answered. The trusting in instinct refers to my own feelings about a particular situation (and in this particular scenario BG is asking the question for their own needs, not the other persons needs - if this was a question about BG's other persons needs then I would have answered this question differently)
― post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 09:45 (fourteen years ago)
I'd say, BG, don't bring up the question unless you are absolutely certain that *you* want an exclusive relationship. Because there's no way to un-have the conversation
ie I'm pretty much agreeing with WCC here because this is actually about BG and not the other person, and asking this question is kind of putting the other person on the spot, when you yourself don't actually know the answer to the question, or what answer you want. This is why I don't like this question, and this is why I think the question is too early, and putting pressure on the other person
― post, Thursday, 15 March 2012 09:48 (fourteen years ago)
I never ask about exclusiveness, or for that matter, even explicitly demand it from my partner.
― everything else is secondary (Lee626), Thursday, 15 March 2012 11:31 (fourteen years ago)
well, i'm just thinking of the possible outcomes of just making assumptions. there is a 50% chance that we would both make the same assumption, and that would be fine. but the 50% chance that we don't make the same assumption is where there is potential for getting hurt. i am fine with this being exclusive (i don't feel like i really need to be with anyone else right now) but if they want to not be exclusive then i'll go out with other people. if i'm cloistering myself and find out he is sleeping around, i'd be pissed, but if i'm sleeping around too, i'd be less pissed. and vice versa i'm sure. but i don't want to take not having the conversation yet as a mandate to go make out with other peeople.
of course i chickened out last night and didn't bring it up, though.
― bene_gesserit, Thursday, 15 March 2012 14:44 (fourteen years ago)
I told a friend of my frustration over writing a dating profile and she told me that Livingsocial recently ran a special on profile ghostwriters and she's encouraging me to use one.
It seems like a good idea but also weird and not genuine. But more like a solution to an overwhelming task.
Depending on price, I'm pretty sure I'm gonna hire a ghostwriter!
― free societies must let drunken gay Texans have sex (Je55e), Thursday, 15 March 2012 17:57 (fourteen years ago)
Ghostwriter!
― 1986 Olive Garden (Z S), Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:26 (fourteen years ago)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wASiu_X4a5A/Tu7fL2o5UOI/AAAAAAAAAMI/wSwsO9xjxE0/s1600/ghost+writer+tv+show.jpg
iirc, one of these teens will write the profile for you
― 1986 Olive Garden (Z S), Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:27 (fourteen years ago)
can't decide if getting a ghostwriter for your dating profile wd be the better synopsis for a romantic comedy or a horror movie
― Kony Montana: "Say hello to my invisible friend" (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
This just brought back the weirdest memory!
I had to ghostwrite someone's dating profile once! He had hired me to help him with his pronunciation, and I would meet him at work and we would basically just talk for an hour. I tried to give him some assignments, but he kept not doing them and changing the subject when I tried to talk about the book I asked him to read.
Then he showed me his dating profile and asked me to "give him advice" about it, and I did. Why not, he needed some help. Then things got a little weird when he took me to the car dealership on their free car wash day and asked me to just sit in the waiting room with him, so people could see that he was with a woman. Our professional relationship ended shortly after that.
― Laura Lucy Lynn (La Lechera), Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:31 (fourteen years ago)
tbf, if I was trying to do the bait-and-switch to make other ladies feel like they should compete to have me, you would definitely make the list
― mh, Thursday, 15 March 2012 18:50 (fourteen years ago)
"You're going to have to work extra hard, ladies. I'm dating at this level."
ha, i do make a good emergency wedding date even though no one has ever taken me up on this offer.
― Laura Lucy Lynn (La Lechera), Thursday, 15 March 2012 19:11 (fourteen years ago)
bene_, in your shoes I would probably seize a comfortable moment to say something like "hey, while you're gone, I'm gonna, like ... not make out with other people, you know?" and see if his eyes look like the eyes of someone who is being suddenly imposed upon.
― mick signals, Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:13 (fourteen years ago)
<3 <3
― drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:16 (fourteen years ago)
xpostyeah, I was going to say something similar earlier. Or you could casually mention that you were going to disable your okc profile tonight, or something like that.
― 1986 Olive Garden (Z S), Thursday, 15 March 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)