and Trayce, here's the video you mentioned upthread:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk6t_tdOkwo
― kate78, Thursday, 23 February 2012 19:36 (fourteen years ago)
This is kind of interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFC/AAT
― kinder, Friday, 24 February 2012 00:54 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.guernicamag.com/features/3535/ptacin_3_1_12
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)
oh god, three days for a D&E? I feel so bad for the writer :(
― mh, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 17:23 (fourteen years ago)
I feel the need to point out that the name of the procedure is a dilation and extraction or evacuation, not excavation. Her uterus isn't an archeological site.
― kate78, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
http://images.45cat.com/the-cramps-whats-inside-a-girl-big-beat.jpg
― the sir edmund hillary of sitting through pauly shore films (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 March 2012 18:19 (fourteen years ago)
Is a d&e the same as a d&c? I've only ever heard ”d&c” used in nz.
― just1n3, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:35 (fourteen years ago)
D&C happens in first trimester, D&E later.
― kate78, Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:46 (fourteen years ago)
Those 3 choices. "So, no to all of them but which one would I say no to the least." Fuck.
And the convo with the mother about giving birth to the dead baby just ripped me apart.
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:53 (fourteen years ago)
― kate78, Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:16 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
lol
― wolf kabob (ENBB), Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:56 (fourteen years ago)
yeah 'excavation' kinda threw me, I was like 'that's a bit of an extreme name for a procedure isn't it?'
I had images of frog dissection where the parts are splayed out and pinned and affixed with labels and I was v unhappy
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 14 March 2012 19:58 (fourteen years ago)
Tennessee to facilitate murder of abortion providers:
A new bill headed for a vote by a Tennessee House committee this week targets abortion providers by requiring the state’s Department of Health to publish detailed information about doctors on a public website.Known as H.B. 3308, or the “Life Defense Act of 2012,” the bill would not actually level any real “defense” of human embryos. Instead, it would require the Tennessee Department of Health to publish more detailed information about abortions carried out in the state, including the names of doctors who performed them and the hospitals they work with.It would also require detailed statistics on abortions, including time, date, the woman’s medical conditions at the time, the age of the fetus, the type of procedure performed, the location of the procedure, and the woman’s age, race and marital status, along with details on how many times she has been pregnant.While all states collect some basic information on abortions, H.B. 3308 would make Tennessee’s reporting the most detailed in the nation.
Known as H.B. 3308, or the “Life Defense Act of 2012,” the bill would not actually level any real “defense” of human embryos. Instead, it would require the Tennessee Department of Health to publish more detailed information about abortions carried out in the state, including the names of doctors who performed them and the hospitals they work with.
It would also require detailed statistics on abortions, including time, date, the woman’s medical conditions at the time, the age of the fetus, the type of procedure performed, the location of the procedure, and the woman’s age, race and marital status, along with details on how many times she has been pregnant.
While all states collect some basic information on abortions, H.B. 3308 would make Tennessee’s reporting the most detailed in the nation.
― butvi wouls (Phil D.), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:30 (fourteen years ago)
the amount of time that tennessee state legislators spend on mean-spirited vindicitve bullshit is just amazing
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:37 (fourteen years ago)
i sort of wish that story elaborated on what roeder's public justification for that bill is
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:38 (fourteen years ago)
I started doing some digging to see the number of politicians murdered in Tennessee versus the number of doctors who performed abortions and ran across this wholly fascinating case:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byron_Looper
― thuggish ruggish Brahms (DJP), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:39 (fourteen years ago)
yeahh
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:42 (fourteen years ago)
Texas State Senator's Office Firebombed: http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2012/03/20/sen-wendy-davis-fort-worth-office-hit-with-molotov-cocktail/
Apparently she is one of the very few pro-Planned Parenthood legislators in the state.
― bring back the dream of buzz bin (Phil D.), Wednesday, 21 March 2012 15:04 (fourteen years ago)
insane.
http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2012/03/31/at-11th-hour-georgia-passes-women-as-livestock-bill/
After an emotional 14-hour workday that included fist-fights between lobbyists and a walk-out by women Democrats, the Georgia House passed a Senate-approved bill Thursday night that criminalizes abortion after 20 weeks.The bill, which does not contain rape or incest exemptions, is expected to receive a signature from Republican Gov. Nathan Deal.Commonly referred to as the “fetal pain bill” by Georgian Republicans and as the “women as livestock bill” by everyone else, HB 954 garnered national attention this month when state Rep. Terry England (R-Auburn) compared pregnant women carrying stillborn fetuses to the cows and pigs on his farm. According to Rep. England and his warped thought process, if farmers have to “deliver calves, dead or alive,” then a woman carrying a dead fetus, or one not expected to survive, should have to carry it to term.The bill as first proposed outlawed all abortions after 20 weeks under all circumstances. After negotiations with the Senate, the House passed a revised HB 954 that makes an exemption for “medically futile” pregnancies or those in which the woman’s life or health is threatened.If this makes its seem like Rep. England and the rest of the representatives looked beyond their cows and pigs and recognized women as capable, full-thinking human beings, think again: HB 954 excludes a woman’s “emotional or mental condition,” which means women suffering from mental illness would be forced to carry a pregnancy to term. It also ignores pregnant women who are suicidal and driven to inflict harm on themselves because of their unwanted pregnancy.In order for a pregnancy to be considered “medically futile,” the fetus must be diagnosed with an irreversible chromosomal or congenital anomaly that is “incompatible with sustaining life after birth.” The Georgia “fetal pain” bill also stipulates that the abortion must be performed in such a way that the fetus emerges alive. If doctors perform the abortion differently, they face felony charges and up to 10 years in prison. Given all this, the so-called compromise suddenly does not look like much of a bargain.For anti-choice lawmakers, it is an item of faith that fetuses feel pain at 20 weeks. But scientists disagree. Reviews of all existing medical evidence have found that fetuses have not developed the neurological structures to feel pain until at least 25 weeks, and likely not until 28 weeks, in the third trimester.Although Roe v. Wade set the precedent for abortion to be legal up to 24 weeks, state legislatures continue to ram through restrictive anti-choice laws. Georgia will join six other states with fetal pain restrictions—Nebraska, Indiana, Idaho, Kansas, Oklahoma and Alabama. North Carolina prohibits abortion after 20 weeks.Arizona is now poised to join the roster, as the Senate passed a 20-week abortion restriction Tuesday. The bill, which awaits final approval from the House, also requires women seeking abortions to look at a state-run website littered with anti-choice propaganda.And in the Northeast, arguably the country’s most pro-choice region, the New Hampshire House voted Thursday to ban abortion after 20 weeks. The bill now moves to the Senate to join four other anti-abortion bills passed by the House this month.Although GOP’s war on women continues to deal blow after blow, this week held two small victories: The Oklahoma Supreme Court struck down mandated ultrasounds while the Idaho House dropped the ultrasound bill all together.
The bill, which does not contain rape or incest exemptions, is expected to receive a signature from Republican Gov. Nathan Deal.Commonly referred to as the “fetal pain bill” by Georgian Republicans and as the “women as livestock bill” by everyone else, HB 954 garnered national attention this month when state Rep. Terry England (R-Auburn) compared pregnant women carrying stillborn fetuses to the cows and pigs on his farm. According to Rep. England and his warped thought process, if farmers have to “deliver calves, dead or alive,” then a woman carrying a dead fetus, or one not expected to survive, should have to carry it to term.
The bill as first proposed outlawed all abortions after 20 weeks under all circumstances. After negotiations with the Senate, the House passed a revised HB 954 that makes an exemption for “medically futile” pregnancies or those in which the woman’s life or health is threatened.If this makes its seem like Rep. England and the rest of the representatives looked beyond their cows and pigs and recognized women as capable, full-thinking human beings, think again: HB 954 excludes a woman’s “emotional or mental condition,” which means women suffering from mental illness would be forced to carry a pregnancy to term. It also ignores pregnant women who are suicidal and driven to inflict harm on themselves because of their unwanted pregnancy.
In order for a pregnancy to be considered “medically futile,” the fetus must be diagnosed with an irreversible chromosomal or congenital anomaly that is “incompatible with sustaining life after birth.” The Georgia “fetal pain” bill also stipulates that the abortion must be performed in such a way that the fetus emerges alive. If doctors perform the abortion differently, they face felony charges and up to 10 years in prison. Given all this, the so-called compromise suddenly does not look like much of a bargain.
For anti-choice lawmakers, it is an item of faith that fetuses feel pain at 20 weeks. But scientists disagree. Reviews of all existing medical evidence have found that fetuses have not developed the neurological structures to feel pain until at least 25 weeks, and likely not until 28 weeks, in the third trimester.
Although Roe v. Wade set the precedent for abortion to be legal up to 24 weeks, state legislatures continue to ram through restrictive anti-choice laws. Georgia will join six other states with fetal pain restrictions—Nebraska, Indiana, Idaho, Kansas, Oklahoma and Alabama. North Carolina prohibits abortion after 20 weeks.
Arizona is now poised to join the roster, as the Senate passed a 20-week abortion restriction Tuesday. The bill, which awaits final approval from the House, also requires women seeking abortions to look at a state-run website littered with anti-choice propaganda.
And in the Northeast, arguably the country’s most pro-choice region, the New Hampshire House voted Thursday to ban abortion after 20 weeks. The bill now moves to the Senate to join four other anti-abortion bills passed by the House this month.
Although GOP’s war on women continues to deal blow after blow, this week held two small victories: The Oklahoma Supreme Court struck down mandated ultrasounds while the Idaho House dropped the ultrasound bill all together.
― gimme prizza (crüt), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 11:08 (fourteen years ago)
these people are basically medieval and totally beyond redemption
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 11:15 (fourteen years ago)
meanwhile, my friends decided that at six months of age, their baby is finally smarter than their cats, although much less agile
― mh, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 14:54 (fourteen years ago)
sounds like a fair fight
― john-claude van donne (schlump), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 17:31 (fourteen years ago)
Why Planned Parenthood won't take $500K
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanholiday/2012/04/03/why-wont-planned-parenthood-take-500000/
― dandydonweiner, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 18:52 (fourteen years ago)
The author and Tucker Max can both go jump off of a cliff.
― Respectfully, Tyrese Gibson (Nicole), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 18:53 (fourteen years ago)
PP wouldn't even accept an anonymous donation from him.
Out of "principle" I guess.
― dandydonweiner, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 18:54 (fourteen years ago)
P: “I guess it’s the way you write about women.”
Tucker “What do you mean? I’m not negative towards women in my writing. Women love my writing; more than half my fans are female.”
PP: “Well…there are certain jokes you make we feel can be perceived in a certain negative manner.”
Tucker: “So because I made a fat girl joke you won’t accept a $500,000 donation?”
PP: “I wouldn’t characterize it that way.”
Tucker: “How would you then? I’m listening and I want your best quote.”
PP: “We don’t feel it would be appropriate, given Planned Parenthood’s mission and your body of work, to accept your donation.”
Tucker: “What? I thought Planned Parenthood’s mission was about helping women, not passing judgment on humor.”
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 18:56 (fourteen years ago)
planned parenthood otm
don where are you going with this?
surely an 'anonymous' donation in this particulars would not have been so, rendering the gesture moot
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 18:58 (fourteen years ago)
http://feministing.com/files/2012/04/tuckermaxtweet.jpg
yeah i wonder why this didn't work out, what a bunch of self righteous bitches
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 18:59 (fourteen years ago)
http://jezebel.com/5898721/tucker-maxs-bizarre-campaign-to-use-planned-parenthood-for-publicity
― y'tulip, y'pea-brained earwig (donna rouge), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:00 (fourteen years ago)
This, a million times
― mh, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:03 (fourteen years ago)
plus the author spelled judgment wrong in the UPDATE
― 69, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:05 (fourteen years ago)
"humor"
― the late great, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:06 (fourteen years ago)
maybe if we were in a pre-james-o'keefe age PP might have bitten, but big name liberal orgs are hypersensitive to trolling.
he could always give it to komen for the cure
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
you can spell judgment w/ the e or without
― iatee, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
I have no idea how the anonymous donation works with PP.
It's an interesting discussion why people would reject (allegedly) anonymous money or if PP would return it if they found out later it was from someone like Tucker Max.
Then again, most abortion discussions always end with some form of absolutism.
(xp)
― dandydonweiner, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
Also, I call bullshit on Tucker Max having $500k to donate
― mh, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
yeah I mean his movie made "$1.4 million at the box office on a $7 million budget"
― iatee, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:09 (fourteen years ago)
Tucker thought about it for a few days and called me back, “They really did help me and my girlfriend when I was poor, I really do believe in their mission, and if this money doesn’t go to them it goes to the government anyway. Let’s do it.”
I am sure this is an exact transcript.
― mh, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:10 (fourteen years ago)
well basic logic would indicate that an anonymous donation from tucker max is not actually an anonymous donation
― the late great, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:10 (fourteen years ago)
my hatred for Tucker Max needed no further justification but RAGH WHAT A DOUCHECANOE
god I hate that fucking guy
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:11 (fourteen years ago)
your lines of "absolutism" don't have to be drawn all that tightly that so that tucker max is outside them, come off it
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:13 (fourteen years ago)
Never said it was, didn't imply it either. Just saying that with abortion, it usually comes down to one way or another with no space in between.
― dandydonweiner, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:15 (fourteen years ago)
Are there some charitable orgs that don't accept anonymous donations?
― dandydonweiner, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:17 (fourteen years ago)
well, if you mean the two sides are "no abortions, ever" and "abortions can happen" then yeah it's pretty black and white, but that kind of ignores the fact that there are a lot of opinions in that range
― mh, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:18 (fourteen years ago)
that guy holiday is a straight-up liar, wouldnt trust anything he says/his version of events
no one has talked about tucker max in like 4 years and now all of a sudden hes on the front page of jezebel and salon and stuff
― max, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:18 (fourteen years ago)
well dandy don straw men aren't much noted for intellectual depth
― the late great, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:19 (fourteen years ago)
if tucker max gives you $500k the world is going to know
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:19 (fourteen years ago)
― iatee, Wednesday, April 4, 2012 7:08 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
not if u are a real american
― 69, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:19 (fourteen years ago)
jez hed should read tucker max's successful campaign to use planned parenthood for publicity
― max, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:19 (fourteen years ago)
So PP advocates any opinions any opinions that restrict abortion on demand? Honestly, I don't know the answer to that.
― dandydonweiner, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:23 (fourteen years ago)
haha this sentence from his publicist's roman is great:
As long as I’ve known Tucker—a card-carrying member of the University of Chicago School of Economics who also has a law degree from Duke—he has been pro-choice.
chicago econ AND duke law? there's no way he's an asshole!
― goole, Wednesday, 4 April 2012 19:24 (fourteen years ago)