2012 republican presidential nominee III: can romney get santorum out of his hair?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4660 of them)

http://gawker.com/353939/rip-david-lettermans-mitt-romney-looks-like-jokes

max, Thursday, 23 February 2012 16:54 (fourteen years ago)

William Peter Blatty, ladies and gentlemen:

When every culture in every part of the world from the beginning of history has entertained a belief in the likelihood that there is a Very, Very Bad Guy out there who “destroys the work of the Creator,” my tendency is to believe that where there is quite that much smoke there is probably fire — if you get my drift. To doubt the possibility of such a being out of hand is to regard Christ and/or the evangelists as either maniacs, liars, or very, very, very mistaken. As for Santorum’s outspokenness on the subject, I far prefer a man who has a position and lets us know what it is as opposed to Addison and Steele’s Sir Roger de Coverley whose answer to any difficult question put to him was always, “There is much to be said on both sides.” Yes, there is, but who is to say that Santorum’s side is the one that is incorrect?

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 February 2012 16:55 (fourteen years ago)

"Mitt looks like a former Tarzan"

max, Thursday, 23 February 2012 16:56 (fourteen years ago)

"he looks like the guy that would approve your check at a supermarket"

max, Thursday, 23 February 2012 16:58 (fourteen years ago)

"Mitt Romney looks like the American president in a Canadian movie."

is pretty accurate

silverfish, Thursday, 23 February 2012 17:00 (fourteen years ago)

Yes, there is, but who is to say that Santorum’s side is the one that is incorrect?

*Raises hand*

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 23 February 2012 17:09 (fourteen years ago)

Cathololics

erotic war comedy pollster (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 23 February 2012 17:11 (fourteen years ago)

When every culture in every part of the world from the beginning of history has entertained a belief in the likelihood that there is a Very, Very Bad Guy out there who “destroys the work of the Creator

Where did you get your comparative religion degree, a Bazooka chewing gum wrapper?

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 23 February 2012 17:14 (fourteen years ago)

yeah that's sort of startling in its wrongness. Conceptualization of satan was a fairly unusual theological development

erotic war comedy pollster (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 23 February 2012 17:16 (fourteen years ago)

“destroys the work of the Creator

Here is the root of this problem. The Very Bad Guy is the Creator himself, you imbecile. And if you think Very Bad Guy is something outside of your Creator then your Creator sort of has limits and isn't exactly all-powerful now, is he?

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 23 February 2012 17:51 (fourteen years ago)

Satan's not even present in early Judaism not to mention a zillion other religions

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Thursday, 23 February 2012 17:58 (fourteen years ago)

He wrote The Exorcist guys. I'm sure he knows exactly what he's talking about.

Suede - the fabric, not the band (DL), Thursday, 23 February 2012 17:59 (fourteen years ago)

"when every religion that is the two i am familiar with believes in satan that probably means something rite?"

Mordy, Thursday, 23 February 2012 18:04 (fourteen years ago)

To doubt the possibility of such a being out of hand is to regard Christ and/or the evangelists as either maniacs, liars, or very, very, very mistaken.

welp

catbus otm (gbx), Thursday, 23 February 2012 18:25 (fourteen years ago)

Needed to be a second 'and/or' in that sentence.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 23 February 2012 18:31 (fourteen years ago)

'mitt looks like the guy who winks when he shakes yr hand'

lag∞n, Thursday, 23 February 2012 18:36 (fourteen years ago)

To doubt the possibility of such a being out of hand is to regard Christ and/or the evangelists as either maniacs, liars, or very, very, very mistaken.

sounds familiar

“Logic!” said the Professor half to himself. “Why don’t they teach logic at these schools? There are only three possibilities. Either your sister is telling lies, or she is mad, or she is telling the truth. You know she doesn’t tell lies and it is obvious that she is not mad. For the moment then and unless any further evidence turns up, we must assume that she is telling the truth.”

Lord, liar or lunatic wasn't a convincing argument when I was 8 and I was a believer.

Unleash the Chang (he did what!) (Austerity Ponies), Thursday, 23 February 2012 19:04 (fourteen years ago)

lol gbx

drawn to them like a moth toward a spanakopita (Laurel), Thursday, 23 February 2012 20:09 (fourteen years ago)

http://media.salon.com/2012/02/Rick-Santorum-and-Mitt-Romney-460x307.jpg

"You know, that endorsement four years ago wasn't exactly what you'd call heartfelt..."

"Mind if I grab your arm and practice looking loose and spontaneous?"

clemenza, Thursday, 23 February 2012 20:37 (fourteen years ago)

just think, one crossed wire and Romneybot could have yanked Santorum's arm clean off

robbery by sudden snatching (DJP), Thursday, 23 February 2012 20:38 (fourteen years ago)

Amputation by sudden snatching.

clemenza, Thursday, 23 February 2012 20:40 (fourteen years ago)

i didn't watch last night's debate, but i have one silly question -- did either of the "devout" Catholics Santorum or Gingrich have Ash Wednesday schmutz on their foreheads?

der Truthahn des Giftes (Eisbaer), Thursday, 23 February 2012 21:37 (fourteen years ago)

Sans-torn-arm

joygoat, Thursday, 23 February 2012 21:38 (fourteen years ago)

Romney's left himself completely undefended against the imminent Santorum eye gouge.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 23 February 2012 21:40 (fourteen years ago)

i can live with someone believing in Satan. i suspect that Santorum and his supporters think that Satan looks and acts like the demon on a can of Underwood Deviled Ham.

der Truthahn des Giftes (Eisbaer), Thursday, 23 February 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)

no ash on head last nite

encarta it (Gukbe), Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:12 (fourteen years ago)

i think you guys are missing the point a little (along with wm p blatty). it's not that santorum believes that satan exists, it's that he believes satan's big plan on earth is to attack and subvert america, by means of controlling, in order: 1. american universities, 2. america's protestant churches, 3. popular culture & the arts, 4. politics & government

he's saying that satan has already done these things.

goole, Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:13 (fourteen years ago)

He must have a hard time sleeping.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:14 (fourteen years ago)

it certainly explains why he keeps putting his family through his political career

robbery by sudden snatching (DJP), Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:15 (fourteen years ago)

that kind of clarity of vision usually means a frighteningly untroubled interior life i'm afriad

goole, Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:16 (fourteen years ago)

But if Satan's taken over everything surely he's all "Can't sleep, Satan'll get me."

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:20 (fourteen years ago)

have at it, photoshoppers:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41E4DT12ZXL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

der Truthahn des Giftes (Eisbaer), Thursday, 23 February 2012 22:31 (fourteen years ago)

This was good: http://www.americantimes.org/blog/2012/02/21/america-is-one-hell-of-a-country-according-to-rick-santorum/

So I won’t talk about the culture wars. I’m more interested in the right’s incoherence than in its issue-arsenal at the moment.

What I don’t understand – what just baffles me endlessly – are these dueling notions of America as the greatest, most super-fantastic nation on Earth and America as an immoral, decayed society under assault from all sides. We are God’s people but we’re also so vulnerable to Satan himself that we need a super-hero, super-holy president like Rick Santorum to save us.

The cult of American exceptionalism is, perhaps unsurprisingly, comprised by the same people who make up the cult of American decline. There’s an insecurity about it that I think shines a little light onto the conservative movement and the Republican Party. The pretense of toughness; the rah-rah-rah nationalism; the sense of victimization, of being endlessly put-upon. These are all forms within the language of American conservatism, or at least mainstream movement conservatism, that give shape to the broader dialogue on the right.

A Full Torgo Apparition (Phil D.), Thursday, 23 February 2012 23:26 (fourteen years ago)

I find the strange sort of ambivalence among Christians w/r/t to Satan to be really fascinating (part of why I like Blatty's movies, maybe).

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 24 February 2012 00:03 (fourteen years ago)

errr "w/r/t to" sry for that

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 24 February 2012 00:04 (fourteen years ago)

Many xposts ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQWLQ1jWsDs

"As George Costanza would say, when they're applauding, stop." So he's not all that far off--better than if he'd said, "when they're applauding, terminate operations immediately"--but it does have that Romney clunkiness we've all come to love.

clemenza, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:10 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGX_7lMcEYI

lag∞n, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:12 (fourteen years ago)

My dream: "As Kramer would say, I'm out of the contest!"

clemenza, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:12 (fourteen years ago)

There was a time in this country when if you worked hard, and went to school, and if you learned the values of America in your home, and your dad was president of a big auto company, and then became governor of a thriving industrial state, that you could count on having a secure future and a prosperous life. That was an American promise, and it’s been broken by this president.

(Paraphrase)

clemenza, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:17 (fourteen years ago)

i can't tell... did he say that or is that a joke?

Mordy, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:18 (fourteen years ago)

I added the middle part--the rest is verbatim.

clemenza, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:19 (fourteen years ago)

you could count on having a secure future, a prosperous life, and a good job doing tax arbitrage as capital gains.

lag∞n, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:20 (fourteen years ago)

He looks right when he makes the Costanza joke--I'm trying to figure out if he thought Santorum or Paul was the big Seinfeld fan.

clemenza, Friday, 24 February 2012 02:25 (fourteen years ago)

Sorry--nothing makes me happier than these Mitt-tries-to-make-sense-of-other-people photos.

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/politics/gopdebateaz.banner.jpg

clemenza, Friday, 24 February 2012 12:17 (fourteen years ago)

"I know now why you cry, but it is something I can never do."

Nicole, Friday, 24 February 2012 13:17 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZbA5RM97DI

A Full Torgo Apparition (Phil D.), Friday, 24 February 2012 14:52 (fourteen years ago)

if he actually said "i love lamp" i would get US citizenship just to vote for him.

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 24 February 2012 15:04 (fourteen years ago)

that and to become a contestant on Survivor.

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 24 February 2012 15:04 (fourteen years ago)

There's something lacking there that has nothing to do with policy or opinion. I could hear Obama say those exact same words and get away with it. The president has this way sometimes of stepping briefly out of his role and acting like an ordinary guy, off-topic. "No, seriously. Listen - Detrot's got trees. I love it all." Clinton could do it. Bush Jr could do it too, whenever he's chance himself to stray from the speech for a moment.

Bush Sr, Dole, Gore, Kerry… not so much. These are huge challops, I know, but it's more proof offered that Romney's uncanny valley is just icing on the cake to his flip/flops and being a pirate of Wall Street.

pplains, Friday, 24 February 2012 15:09 (fourteen years ago)

Naw I don't think thats challops I think that's an a good observation. A top-notch politician has the ability to change from politico-register to "just givin' a speech here guys"-register, and know when its appropriate and will work to the crowd. I'm sure Romney could do it, but there's a mental block that's keeping him from knowing how to really do the stump speech... either that or THAT IS Romney, which is pretty scary.

#1 Inspector Spacetime Fanboy (Viceroy), Friday, 24 February 2012 15:55 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.