(local = MN)
all anecdotal from attendees, tho...
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 13:40 (fourteen years ago)
santorum would be a pretty crappy vp pick
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 14:38 (fourteen years ago)
I don't know, they might be able to mop up the social conservatives
― I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 14:39 (fourteen years ago)
yeah but you can do that w/ someone less boring
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 14:40 (fourteen years ago)
There were two dudes on the dais with Rick last night who were def. NOT finding him boring. They were hanging on every word of his speech like true believers, sorta teary eyed, nodding and affirming on the key lines like some sort of church revival meeting. (I'm sure this goes on at Dem caucuses, too, but these guys were just super-notable to me. Don't know who either of them are; one of them is partially obscured behind Rick's head, the other is blue shirted on the right.
http://20poundsofheadlines.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/santorum-wins-missouri.jpg
― Ham House showdown (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 15:02 (fourteen years ago)
But the three victories for Mr. Santorum also place a fresh burden on him as he tries to swiftly build a structure to compete with Mr. Romney’s battled-tested campaign team. His aides predicted that the evening would bring an outpouring of financial support. He also may be able to expect more help from the “super PAC” that supports him, the Red, White and Blue Fund. Its leading benefactor, the mutual fund executive Foster Friess, was standing directly behind Mr. Santorum as he gave his victory speech.Asked by e-mail whether he would invest more heavily in the super PAC, Mr. Friess wrote back, “With him doing so well tonight, he won’t need me!”
Asked by e-mail whether he would invest more heavily in the super PAC, Mr. Friess wrote back, “With him doing so well tonight, he won’t need me!”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/us/politics/minnesota-colorado-missouri-caucuses.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
― pplains, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 15:04 (fourteen years ago)
i.e., "no"
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 15:13 (fourteen years ago)
Foster Friess is to Santorum's right, I was looking behind his head. That guy got a lot of inadvertant camera time last night. No big deal, just curious.
― Ham House showdown (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 15:27 (fourteen years ago)
http://content9.flixster.com/rtmovie/7_ori.jpg
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:14 (fourteen years ago)
man Santorum surging ... this is the lolziest GOP primary ever
― max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:20 (fourteen years ago)
Wolcott weighs in on Santorum's C-list:
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/wolcott/2012/01/Rick-Santorum-The-Grate-White-Hope
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:28 (fourteen years ago)
But Santorum said Wednesday that his campaign would compete hard in Michigan on Feb. 28 and in the March 6 “Super Tuesday” states. He said his campaign raised about $250,000 online Tuesday night but insisted that funding alone was not the key to the race.
this is a pathetic amount - is Santorum the only one without major financial backing?
― max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:01 (fourteen years ago)
yes
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:02 (fourteen years ago)
that's what santorum needs a CUMbomb
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY (dayo), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:52 (fourteen years ago)
They had a graphic on CNN last night about how much ad money each campaign has spent so far. Romney's margin was ungodly--something like $23 million to five or six million for the next guy. This makes his current problems even more embarrassing.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:05 (fourteen years ago)
money can only do so much
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:06 (fourteen years ago)
Money can't buy you love.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:07 (fourteen years ago)
romney spent nothing on the airwaves in these three states
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:08 (fourteen years ago)
romney spent plenty on south carolina tho
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:09 (fourteen years ago)
Money changes everything. Unless you're Mitt Romney.
(True about these three states; I think Santorum spent the most in Minnesota, where Gingrich spent exactly zero dollars.)
― clemenza, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:09 (fourteen years ago)
this factoid comes ultimately from a politico church piece
http://www.politico.com/morningscore/0212/morningscore528.html
ABSENCE OF COMMERCIALS HELPED DOOM ROMNEY: For the first time in any of the early contests, Romney and his affiliated super PAC did not blanket the airwaves with ads. It may not be the only reason Romney won some of his races, but it certainly was a big one — and it helped in a paid media state like Florida.
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:10 (fourteen years ago)
im sure romney thought w/e santorums not gonna win all three no one will care move onto super tuesday
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:11 (fourteen years ago)
he coulda done better w/ ads, maybe even won colorado, but those other margins aren't things you can buy w/ ads
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:11 (fourteen years ago)
these were all non-binding on the delegates so more likely Romney just didn't give a fuck and figures he either a) doesn't need those delegates or b) can pick them up later in some kind of deal
― max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:14 (fourteen years ago)
primaries almost never abt the delegates
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
right
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
mitt romney is not doing any math
*sigh*
The poll shows that 53 percent of self-identified liberal Democrats — and 67 percent of moderate or conservative Democrats — support keeping Guantanamo Bay open, even though it emerged as a symbol of the post-Sept. 11 national security policies of George W. Bush, which many liberals bitterly opposed.
― max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:51 (fourteen years ago)
oops wrong thread
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:51 (fourteen years ago)
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lz2zp42VeG1qa2rino1_400.gif
― A funnier, sunnier (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:51 (fourteen years ago)
oh no fucking way
― I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 19:03 (fourteen years ago)
He's either doing what we think or miming sticking a knife into his campaign.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 19:05 (fourteen years ago)
Santorum describes his plan to criminalize spilling of seed.
― Ham House showdown (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 19:17 (fourteen years ago)
Funny you mention that...
― Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 19:59 (fourteen years ago)
he's saying that he really feels something in his gut
(the "something" is anal froth)
― Z S, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
The previously mentioned Leon Wolf at RedState begins to realize something about all the candidates.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:37 (fourteen years ago)
Also from there, this bit:
Mitt Romney, I’ve come to sincerely believe, considers those not from his own rather isolated Cheyenne Village to be something else. It explains how he could even accidently articulate the fact that he doesn’t worry about the very poor. He’s willing to be nice to people like myself, but it’s not like he’ll any more use for me after Election Day than he would for a prophylactic after an act of sexual intercourse.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:40 (fourteen years ago)
Romney in bad need of a "Checkers speech"
― max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:42 (fourteen years ago)
yup, time 2 take the dog off the top of the car
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:43 (fourteen years ago)
and someone who they want to mount Pickett’s Charge with
Telling at several levels
― le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:43 (fourteen years ago)
awkward, inconclusive insertion of Bill James/baseball sabermetrics in there, but hey. xxxxp
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:43 (fourteen years ago)
hoo boy, yeah
xp re: pickett
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:44 (fourteen years ago)
poor Mittens, he's so doomed
re-iterating my plea to rename this thread "needs more booing"
― max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 23:57 (fourteen years ago)
Shakey this really does seem like your first election
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 February 2012 01:46 (fourteen years ago)
(morbs, are you as much of an asshole IRL as you are here? if not, why not?)
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Thursday, 9 February 2012 02:55 (fourteen years ago)
(he is def. not, although i've not particularly provoked him, either)
― mookieproof, Thursday, 9 February 2012 03:02 (fourteen years ago)
So even George Will sees through Romney's foreign policy bluster
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/republicans-need-more-than-rhetoric-on-defense/2012/02/07/gIQA5SF1zQ_story.html?hpid=z2
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 9 February 2012 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
am, let's wait and see if Bam landslides Mitt b4 we decide if I'm an asshole for thinking calling an election 9 months in advance is premature, mmmmkay?
and the answer is: Opinions differ.
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 February 2012 18:20 (fourteen years ago)
lol morbs havent you been calling the primary for mitt for months
― lag∞n, Thursday, 9 February 2012 18:22 (fourteen years ago)