"Hipster" as pejorative.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2399 of them)
hipsters:Dwell Mag aesthetic::"nice pressed shirt and well shined shoes":The Room Store

milo z, Saturday, 17 March 2007 04:30 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, whatever. A room full of all-new furniture from the same (or same family of) catalog/boutique is still fucking boring no matter who designed the pieces. That's not hip, it's just...aspirational.

I can't even tell what argument we're having anymore! Is that just my fever talking or has this thing jumped the daybed?

Laurel, Saturday, 17 March 2007 04:53 (nineteen years ago)

i dunno! i guess i just have a hard time getting worked up about this stuff. i'm sure some people order rooms by the catalog just cuz they're too busy to think about every individual piece and they can feel comfortable knowing everything will look ok together. not what i would do, but i can't hate 'em for it.

s1ocki, Saturday, 17 March 2007 05:23 (nineteen years ago)

the store owner with overhead can't just expect to breeze into a flea or some craigslist ad and make easy 11am scores

well no, but given that the thrifts ostensibly are there in the first place so ppl without a lot of $$ can buy clothes.. i'm not feeling real bad about, say, the guy in alexandria va who runs a vintage shop & picks a good part of his wares from several thrifts around the block.. personally i only buy what i wear unless it's something incredibly special. or *maybe* a really hot trend. the stores with inventory and overhead don't turn around their merch as fast as the trends, often, or else don't even pay attention.. being accustomed to pulling wild 70's polyester and passing over hideous 80's glitter tunic tops.. but guess which one the hipsters might actually want

i'm kind of fascinated by it. there are vintage sellers who are super knowledgeable and particular about vintage & i do feel like it's too bad when carefully restored older pieces with amazing detail don't command the same prices as the item of the moment.. take ebay seller mama stone vintage.. most of that stuff is basically h&m style/quality, but they put it on pretty models and rake in the cash

daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 17:10 (nineteen years ago)

thrifts are still goldmines you just have to know what the gold is today & how to advertise, is all.

daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)

Where's the "hipster superhero" thread? I can't find it. It was funny.

Sundar, Saturday, 17 March 2007 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...

http://www.zoilus.com/rsz_cg0455riddle.jpg

jaymc, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/79/hipster.html

am0n, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)

christ

latebloomer, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:53 (seventeen years ago)

SOMEONE didnt get invited to the gallery opening!!!!

max, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)

omg, i am only a few paragraphs in and...wow

dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:56 (seventeen years ago)

Gavin McInnes, one of the founders of Vice, who recently left the magazine, is considered to be one of hipsterdom’s primary architects.

and what, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:56 (seventeen years ago)

“If only we carried rocks instead of cameras, we’d look like revolutionaries.”

kingkongvsgodzilla, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

no momus no credibility

max, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

Hipster Dom

J0rdan S., Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

& adbusters has the temerity to subtitle their march issue 'the reconquest of cool'

goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

explain to me adbuster

deej, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:59 (seventeen years ago)

Is that a Thomas Frank ref?

http://www.whsmith.co.uk/Images/Products%5C226%5C260%5C9780226260129_m_f.jpg

jaymc, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:59 (seventeen years ago)

Punks wear their tattered threads and studded leather jackets with honor, priding themselves on their innovative and cheap methods of self-expression and rebellion. B-boys and b-girls announce themselves to anyone within earshot with baggy gear and boomboxes

what?

dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:00 (seventeen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51KVR30YH1L._SL500_AA240_.jpg

kingkongvsgodzilla, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)

explain to me adbuster

-- deej, Thursday, July 31, 2008 3:59 PM

if you're familiar with 'buy nothing day' which is supposed to grind the capitalist consumer system to a halt, i believe they are the ones behind that

am0n, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)

haha oh man i just decided to go look at momus's blog

We don't like how they make their great kids great

The Vice Guide to North Korea is a 14-episode account -- made at some risk to the journalists -- of a heavily-guarded journey through North Korea. I found it fascinating, but I did notice some dubious ideology creeping in, especially in Episode 12, A Schoolchildren's Palace, billed as "meeting the country's creepily over-talented future generation".

Here Shane Smith edged towards that journalistic-political cliché I call the "we don't like how they treat their women / children" school. Basically, the idea behind this move is that in any given culture, men are responsible for the ideology, and women and children are helpless victims and hostages. The implication is that, although the men are a lost cause, the women and children could be captured and brought to some other culture, where they'd be much happier.

This "much happier", in Smith's account of North Korean children, involves being a lot less motivated and talented. "One of the most fun-slash-sad times," Smith says in Episode 12, "was to see the best-of-the-best school in Pyongyang." After showing some child prodigies playing musical instruments larger than themselves, Smith decides that "it's so sad because these great kids are learning and learning for the state". But what's wrong with learning -- to exceptionally high standards -- for the state, and at the expense of the state? Are these children really to be pitied? Mightn't they be -- as well as "great kids" -- fervently ideological admirers of Kim Jong Il, believers in North Korea's superiority over South Korea, and convinced that their "creepy talents" could only have been advanced so far in the particular system they were born into?

and what, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)

jesus, i have my own personal issues with feeling bummed-out as what i see as a somewhat nihilstic streak which runs throughout much of "youth culture" nowadays, but talk about some absurd lazy-ass writing

dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)

#1 conversational turnoff for me these days when meeting chicks is when they start talking about 'hipsters' zzzzzzzz

happens far too often

deej, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:06 (seventeen years ago)

It...does?

Laurel, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)

The half-built condos tower above us like foreboding monoliths of our yuppie futures

wow

dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)

has the writer of this article ever actually spoken with actual human beings before? also, i half-suspect that most of the quotes in the article are completely made-up

dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:09 (seventeen years ago)

It...does?

-- Laurel, Thursday, July 31, 2008 3:07 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Link

It .... does. yes.

deej, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:09 (seventeen years ago)

“You’re not some club kid in New York in the nineties. This shit is so hipster!”

“He’s 17 and he lives for the scene!”

who honest-to-god really talks like this??

dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:10 (seventeen years ago)

The American Apparel V-neck shirt, Pabst Blue Ribbon beer and Parliament cigarettes are symbols and icons of working or revolutionary classes that have been appropriated by hipsterdom and drained of meaning.

"I'm going back to the bar, do you want anything?"
"Yeah, get me another PBR, I've almost drained this one of all its meaning."

some dude, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:10 (seventeen years ago)

I don't know. Who talks about hipsters at all? I mean, like, out?

xp hee hee

Laurel, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)

Doug Haddow

Name:
Doug Haddow
Network:
Shell Oil

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)

lol

am0n, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)

american apparel v-necks are symbols of the 'revolutionary class'?

max, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:12 (seventeen years ago)

working or revolutionary classes
that's a damn big OR there

velko, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:12 (seventeen years ago)

I don't know. Who talks about hipsters at all? I mean, like, out?

actually, i totally know people who complain about "hipsters", but i think they are just being lazy in how they encounter and conceptualize other people

dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:13 (seventeen years ago)

I thought V-necks were symbols of not wanting your undershirt to show.

Oilyrags, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:14 (seventeen years ago)

you'd think a shirt made by a company that uses sweatshops would have more working class cache than an AA shirt

some dude, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:14 (seventeen years ago)

i went to a party with a friend of mine once and as soon as we entered this one girl who lived there squealed at him, "a hipster!" and just physically dragged him off to her bedroom for an hour.

omar little, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:14 (seventeen years ago)

Oh I'm totally lazy. It just seems like a...boring kind of thing that's been done to death, maybe? I mean I guess apart from maybe an eye-roll at the Pratt brats across the bar or something.

Laurel, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:15 (seventeen years ago)

Laurel otm! now, rollerderby girls… I FUCKING HATE THEM!!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)

i think people just like to project douchebaggery onto others and "hipsters" are the easiest target nowadays, like "yuppies" were in the '80s.

omar little, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:17 (seventeen years ago)

rollerderby vs kickball

am0n, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:18 (seventeen years ago)

can't wait for the blipster bingo remix of "lookin' boy"

some dude, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:18 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, I'm behind the times, I just saw that kickball is a weekly thing at McCarren Pool apparently?

Laurel, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)

xposts
yeah, don't get me wrong, i write off people all the time in lazy, prejudicial ways. i guess everybody does.

but i don't get all irate about people who (gasp) own fixed-gear bikes. i can think of, like, a million things that are actually worth getting upset over

dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)

I guess its because most people have been priced away from the yuppie-classics (eg gabbneb) so they only see hipstre yuppies in their social circles / drinking haunts.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)

My problems with fixed gear riders are practical not ideological. Stop riding two abreast on bike paths!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:21 (seventeen years ago)

The latency period is typified by a solidifying of the habits that the child developed in the earlier stages. Whether the Oedipal conflict is successfully resolved or not, the drives of the id are not accessible to the ego during this stage of development, since they have been repressed during the phallic stage. Hence the drives are seen as dormant and hidden (latent), and the gratification the child receives is not as immediate as it was during the three previous stages. Now pleasure is mostly related to secondary process thinking. Drive energy is redirected to new activities, mainly related to schooling, hobbies and friends. Problems however might occur during this stage, and this is attributed to inadequate repression of the Oedipal conflict, or to the inability of the ego to redirect the drive energy to activities accepted by the social environment.

am0n, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:21 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.