& these:
- Super Bowl in Indianapolis? Get ready, world- The president who saved football- Forgetting Watergate's lessons?- Rock on a ukulele?- Christianity's new abolition movement
― Milton Parker, Sunday, 5 February 2012 22:11 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.care2.com/causes/city-of-berkeley-plans-to-pull-300m-out-of-wells-fargo.html#ixzz1lS8YNe3W
― Chris S, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:21 (fourteen years ago)
lol how the hell does berkeley have 300 million dollars, they must have forgotten about it
― iatee, Monday, 6 February 2012 00:23 (fourteen years ago)
i dunno i live in a city just a big bigger and the operation budget is nearly $1 billion.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Monday, 6 February 2012 03:05 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EmU6giFUyg
i'm in this for about 2 seconds before the stampede starts
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 6 February 2012 11:54 (fourteen years ago)
http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/419929_10150560739908451_619898450_9018357_983379877_n.jpg
there are a lot of small things i love in this photo, but i just realized that the dude with his hand up is holding up a phone, not doing a solidarity fist like i'd thought, and i think that is awesome
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 6 February 2012 12:04 (fourteen years ago)
Despite having been given assurances that they could peaceably protest on the sidewalk outside Manhattan's glitzy Waldorf-Astoria, on Saturday the NYPD broke up the Occupy Wall Street demonstration during the Human Rights Campaign $650/plate gala to honor Goldman Sachs....
For those who don't know, HRC is a bunch of useless sellout faggots well-heeled gay 'activist' group with a history of comfy corporate laziness.
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2012/02/nypd-breaks-up-hrc-gala-protest.html
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Monday, 6 February 2012 15:41 (fourteen years ago)
Chris Hedges - Black Bloc: The Cancer in Occupy
http://www.truth-out.org/black-bloc-cancer-occupy/1328541484
The Black Bloc’s thought-terminating cliché of “diversity of tactics” in the end opens the way for hundreds or thousands of peaceful marchers to be discredited by a handful of hooligans. The state could not be happier.
Friends in Oakland understandably outraged by this article. My favorite comment so far: "I wonder if Chris would have escaped through the torn down fence or chained himself to it"
Haven't watched this yet, but comes heavily vouched for:
http://vimeo.com/36256273
― Milton Parker, Monday, 6 February 2012 20:35 (fourteen years ago)
I share some of his sentiments, but the way he closes that article loses me entirely. People were not throwing flowerpots at cops because it was fun. That's just clearly not what happened and I hope he walks it back a tiny bit before dismissing the term "diversity of tactics" as a cliché.
― Milton Parker, Monday, 6 February 2012 20:48 (fourteen years ago)
god it's like Seattle 1999 all over again.
nobody's learned anything on either side.
― sleeve, Monday, 6 February 2012 20:50 (fourteen years ago)
as someone who spent a lot of time with the Oakland Commune, I have to agree with Chris here. 'diversity of tactics' as invoked at the GAs was always specifically made in reference to the camp's position on violent protesters, who a lot of the regulars weren't willing to question due to the popular 'fuck the police' feeling around Oakland (understandable). know people like to assume everything is always provoked, but there really has been a group of Black Bloc kids only showing up to the marches, destroying things so aimlessly that it hardly qualifies as a 'tactic', basically rendering useless anything of value accomplished
― Chris S, Monday, 6 February 2012 22:24 (fourteen years ago)
and I think tactically-speaking, a diversity of tactics, if meaning tactics that contradict each other symbolically, is dysfunctional. house divided against itself etc
― Chris S, Monday, 6 February 2012 22:26 (fourteen years ago)
diversity in all other respects is good, but a unified movement can't be both violent and nonviolent. you have to pick one.
― Chris S, Monday, 6 February 2012 22:30 (fourteen years ago)
Violence (intentionally breaking shit) is self-defeating, tis true
Let us make (even SOME of) our money go away, and they will bleed.
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Monday, 6 February 2012 22:33 (fourteen years ago)
more eyerolliness re: Occupy Oakland
"You are blight, don't you see it?" retorted Aaron Merritt, a 39-year-old graphic designer.
The young Occupier shot back: "You're in the matrix. You've been indoctrinated."
*sigh*
― max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 00:43 (fourteen years ago)
you're totally ridiculous dude.
xpost
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 00:53 (fourteen years ago)
also i can pretty much promise that nothing will come out of the occupy oakland movement from here on out.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 00:56 (fourteen years ago)
Did jail solidarity today.
Mike, the Iraq vet, had his bullshit felony assault on a police officer charge dropped (what do you meaaaaaaan the cops invented a reason to target our loudest organizer of resistance to the eviction?) and he was released. Prosecutor tried to push a stay-away order on him for the whole District, effectively sending him back home to Alaska, but the judge only granted a stay-away from the Square itself.
Shangry, the Afghanistan vet with a fractured skull and a twice broken arm thanks to a police beating ("everything went black, then I woke up and I was getting choked, then I woke up and I was in the hospital"), has been denied medication throughout the weekend. Doctors fought with the cops to have him stay in the hospital for treatment, but cops wheeled him out and kept him at central. Judge, citing his prior arrests for CD in other states, thinks he's a "flight risk" will hold him for four more days til his hearing.
Ken, the artist who was beaten for sitting in a chair reading a book as a peaceful defense of the anarchist library, finally ate food today after his weekend hunger strike--"I'm a vegan. Apparently they starve vegans in DC jails."
There's an abandoned warehouse near Chinatown. Soon it's ours.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 03:32 (fourteen years ago)
damn man
stay safe out there
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 03:58 (fourteen years ago)
ken also had his "felony assault on a police officer" charge dropped, btw, when our lawyer used two windows running youtubedoubler to show the cops 4 simultaneous multi-angle videos of his unprovoked assault and unresisted arrest
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 04:15 (fourteen years ago)
Nothing like making the judge an eyewitness to help establish your case.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 04:19 (fourteen years ago)
my most popular tweet on eviction day, quoting our livestreamer:
hoosteen"they came at me with riot shields and I was like 'I came out of Connecticut Hardcore, yo, let's do this.'"
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 04:30 (fourteen years ago)
there was a 10 year old girl that got trampled on saturday when they fucked up kettling us. she's still in the hospital. i keep hearing her screams in my head when i walk home at night. that's a problem, right?
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 04:32 (fourteen years ago)
oh god
― horseshoe, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 04:32 (fourteen years ago)
motherfuck the police
― i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 04:35 (fourteen years ago)
HOOS, you might consider writing a short manifesto and leaving it on ilx as a means of collecting yr thoughts?
― ELI OWNS YOUR HUSBAND (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 04:56 (fourteen years ago)
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, February 6, 2012 10:32 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
christ.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 00:22 (fourteen years ago)
http://occupydc.org/this-friday-and-saturday-occupy-cpac-liberate-discourse/
Good luck with the weekend's activities
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 14:55 (fourteen years ago)
amen, go get em
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 15:04 (fourteen years ago)
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/396388_10150559708579401_29303624400_8993774_166091710_n.jpg
This just showed up in my fb feed. It is obtuse and OWS-related. I don't get it, but I figure maybe you guys would?
― beachville, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:36 (fourteen years ago)
Chris Hedges got himself in some hot water with a screed in TruthDig with the unappetizing title of "The Cancer in Occupy," in which he bashes the radical tactics of the Black Bloc anarchists in Oakland last month.
http://www.ww4report.com/node/10812
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:40 (fourteen years ago)
So a person who posted this picture would disagree with Hedges Black Bloc-bashing?
― beachville, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:41 (fourteen years ago)
I guess?
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:42 (fourteen years ago)
Oh, I see. He previously advocated to Black Bloc and then flip-flopped.
― beachville, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:43 (fourteen years ago)
“The Black Bloc can say they are attacking cops, but what they are really doing is destroying the Occupy movement,” the writer and environmental activist Derrick Jensen told me when I reached him by phone in California. “If their real target actually was the cops and not the Occupy movement, the Black Bloc would make their actions completely separate from Occupy, instead of effectively using these others as a human shield. Their attacks on cops are simply a means to an end, which is to destroy a movement that doesn’t fit their ideological standard.”
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_cancer_of_occupy_20120206/
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:45 (fourteen years ago)
When Hedges wrote about the Greeks, notorious for their black blocs, he praised them for “getting it.” Indeed, according to Hedges, they knew what to do. In Hedges own words:“They know what to do when they are told their pensions, benefits and jobs have to be cut to pay corporate banks, which screwed them in the first place. Call a general strike. Riot. Shut down the city centers. Toss the bastards out. Do not be afraid of the language of class warfare—the rich versus the poor, the oligarchs versus the citizens, the capitalists versus the proletariat. The Greeks, unlike most of us, get it.”Apparently for Hedges, that’s good enough for the Greeks. But, by God, don’t you dare bring this filthy resistance to his home! You might accidentally (horror of horrors!) break a window!
“They know what to do when they are told their pensions, benefits and jobs have to be cut to pay corporate banks, which screwed them in the first place. Call a general strike. Riot. Shut down the city centers. Toss the bastards out. Do not be afraid of the language of class warfare—the rich versus the poor, the oligarchs versus the citizens, the capitalists versus the proletariat. The Greeks, unlike most of us, get it.”
Apparently for Hedges, that’s good enough for the Greeks. But, by God, don’t you dare bring this filthy resistance to his home! You might accidentally (horror of horrors!) break a window!
http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20120207100008741
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:57 (fourteen years ago)
woops sorry, quote is from this piece
http://www.revolutionbythebook.akpress.org/to-be-fair-he-is-a-journalist-a-short-response-to-chris-hedges-on-the-black-bloc/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
the hedges piece makes the apparently endlessly renewable error of thinking that "the black bloc" is some kind of evil club with weekly meetings (and of assuming that all the property damage in the oakland incident was caused by people specifically setting out to break shit, when -- not that i was there -- i suspect at least some of it was caused by people who got hit in the head by cops until they got angry, which like i said upthread is why the cops were hitting them in the head) but here's the kind of thing i really don't get, from one of the hedges denunciations:
It was a welcome sight in today’s age of non-violent fundamentalism, where so many are beset with the crippling belief that if we just get beat up badly enough we’ll attract “the masses” with our moral superiority and somehow the wealthy and powerful will recognize the error of their ways and give us the world back that they’ve so successfully turned into their nightmarish, authoritarian, and wasted playground.
okay, it's easy to sneer at nonviolence (because it's wimpy) and at "the masses" (because they're hypnotized), but like what is your counterproposal? if a couple hundred people in bandanas just get rowdy enough the wealthy and powerful will become terrified and abandon their infinite supply of weapons and their tacit popular support? the "liberation" that supporters of violent tactics crow about is real, but it only happens for the people on the street and it only lasts until they get thrown in jail; it doesn't affect society at all (except to make it easier for the police to convince most of the country that their violence is justified). so i can't help but read it as essentially selfish: of a piece with the american corporate-culture ethos of isolated self-actualization, which never compromises and never violates the sanctity and beauty of the individual, and got the last bunch of righteously rioting young people to vote for reagan.
maybe there's an expectation -- not a totally insane one! -- that the Coming Ecological Apocalypse will do the work of destroying society for us, so all we have to do is raise our consciousnesses and prepare to live in the new world rather than bore ourselves trying to change this one, but i dunno if that's a bet i want to make.
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:08 (fourteen years ago)
(ha hoos and i linked the same piece. as for the greek contradiction, i dunno, i'm not defending hedges specifically. i've always liked him tho! he came out of the seminary and is thus literally preachy, which is why his essay on the AVN awards is a billion times worse than david foster wallace's, but i think his war coverage is righteous.)
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:10 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i kinda scratched my head at that particular quote too. it's a long argument tho about what really forces state change, with gandhi & MLK in one corner and franz fanon in the other, i guess.
and bad PR is a material and political fact no matter its fairness
i'm not getting billy clubbed tho so i guess i'll keep mum
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:13 (fourteen years ago)
his essay on the AVN awards
as in, porn?
yeah. it's in his kinda hysterically titled collection EMPIRE OF ILLUSION: THE END OF LITERACY AND THE TRIUMPH OF SPECTACLE
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:15 (fourteen years ago)
hmm. sounds a bit savonarola for my tastes
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:16 (fourteen years ago)
Here's where I can plug (again) the Taylor Branch bio of MLK for an analysis of how and why worked and failed. MLK had the unenviable task of staying ahead of a movement that was no longer coherent by 1967 and 1968, not to mention how the Vietnam War (MLK and his inner circle were as tortured about opposing it publicly as LBJ was in sending more troops), white backlash, and black frustration with the pace of federal aid put shall we say considerable strain on nonviolence as a tactic.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:19 (fourteen years ago)
xp Yeah, I feel like this is really an argument for people on the ground but everything I read by the AK/black bloc crowd (as opposed to people who, when pushed, might retaliate with violence) makes me think they're dangerous, dogmatic assholes who should be sidelined as much as possible.
― Suede - the fabric, not the band (DL), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:19 (fourteen years ago)
xxp fair. i can't find the right screencapture of woody allen telling carol kane "i'm a bigot, but, for the left".
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:19 (fourteen years ago)
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, February 8, 2012 5:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
loll
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:21 (fourteen years ago)
btw that AK Press piece links to a 3-part video of harsha walia talking about the black bloc for about 20 mins, she's pretty on point and kills it imo
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 17:23 (fourteen years ago)
"The Greeks, unlike most of us, get it."
I think most OWS would agree with this statement, at least in broad outline. The Greeks know the banks and capitalists are "more equal" citizens and they revolt at this injustice.
The difficulty is that other part of the statement, that most of "us", in the sense of most Americans, don't get it and those Americans who don't won't have a sudden satori by watching someone smashing things. You have to nurse them, like toddlers who are perfectly happy running out in front of a car, until they are able to recognize the world they live in and see the source of dangers.
You do not treat toddlers like adults, nor should OWS. You can't just skip ahead to the point where you'd prefer to be; you have to get there from here.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:08 (fourteen years ago)
what is your counterproposal? if a couple hundred people in bandanas just get rowdy enough the wealthy and powerful will become terrified and abandon their infinite supply of weapons and their tacit popular support? the "liberation" that supporters of violent tactics crow about is real, but it only happens for the people on the street and it only lasts until they get thrown in jail; it doesn't affect society at all (except to make it easier for the police to convince most of the country that their violence is justified).
people i know who bloc up would probably respond that property destruction on a one-action scale isn't intended to start "the revolution." it's symbolic in the way a march is symbolic--a signal that "people are resisting (insert target), some more militantly than others"--and an implicit (often explicit via statements) call for solidarity actions.
the counterproposal isn't "riot, then we win!" targeted property destruction is (should be, shouldn't be, i haven't decided, but IS) a part of a bloc's toolbox that includes de-arrest, hard block defense of passive resisters, and a willingness to fight back. i think the counterproposal is "let's provide some resistance to the violent arm of capital to remind people that their monopoly on violence and authority deserves to be challenged."
so i can't help but read it as essentially selfish: of a piece with the american corporate-culture ethos of isolated self-actualization, which never compromises and never violates the sanctity and beauty of the individual
this is a well heard critique, i think bookchin or somebody wrote an essay called "against lifestyle anarchism" that largely made this point.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 18:22 (fourteen years ago)