Indefinite Detention? But I Have Soccer Practice at 4: U.S. Politics 2012

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3203 of them)

Alex Boisvert @al_ex_b
Komen For The Cure = One Motherfucker #anagrams

jaymc, Friday, 3 February 2012 13:29 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_02/nice_surprise_for_a_change035174.php

January jobs numbers

curmudgeon, Friday, 3 February 2012 15:15 (fourteen years ago)

Komen just restored funding to PP per CNN

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:26 (fourteen years ago)

Well, that worked out badly for them, didn't it.

one little aioli (Laurel), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)

By which I mean FFFFFFF UUUUUUUUU !!!!!!

one little aioli (Laurel), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)

PP got a ton more donations too!

dayo, Friday, 3 February 2012 16:28 (fourteen years ago)

I know it wasn't a coordinated PR stunt but I like entertaining the idea that it was

I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:30 (fourteen years ago)

I know! Best possible outcome.

one little aioli (Laurel), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:30 (fourteen years ago)

I'm so pleased for PP and for the women who will get medical care b/c of the donated money, but I am positively GLEEFUL at the message it sends that they had to re-instate the funding in this atmosphere, because jesus christ but there's not much be gleeful about in women's health issues these days.

one little aioli (Laurel), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:31 (fourteen years ago)

man some people better be getting fired at komen, what a fucking pr disaster.

iatee, Friday, 3 February 2012 16:33 (fourteen years ago)

okay this is kind of o_O amazing

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/03/roseanne-is-running-for-president-not-a-joke/?hpt=hp_t2

I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:35 (fourteen years ago)

just to make it official and make you feel like you're on top of the social media wave

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2012/02/report-komen-reverses-decision-to-cut-planned-parenthood-funding/1

dayo, Friday, 3 February 2012 16:36 (fourteen years ago)

man some people better be getting fired at komen, what a fucking pr disaster.

― iatee, Friday, February 3, 2012 11:33 AM (4 minutes ago)

typical job killing socialist here

tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:38 (fourteen years ago)

If Rosie is on the ballot, I will recant my abstention intentions and vote for her. (She was making noise about doing this last summer.)

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:47 (fourteen years ago)

LOL! I can't believe I'm going to be voting for Roseanne!

Today is Cocaine's Birthday! (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:51 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/is-the-susan-g-komen-foundation-backing-down/2011/08/25/gIQAh6J2mQ_blog.html

your dominican divorce (will), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:58 (fourteen years ago)

But three sources with direct knowledge of the Komen decision-making process told me that the rule was adopted in order to create an excuse to cut off Planned Parenthood. (Komen gives out grants to roughly 2,000 organizations, and the new "no investigations" rule applies to only one so far.)But three sources with direct knowledge of the Komen decision-making process told me that the rule was adopted in order to create an excuse to cut off Planned Parenthood. (Komen gives out grants to roughly 2,000 organizations, and the new "no investigations" rule applies to only one so far.) The decision to create a rule that would cut funding to Planned Parenthood, according to these sources, was driven by the organization's new senior vice president for public policy, Karen Handel, a former gubernatorial candidate from Georgia who is staunchly anti-abortion and who has said that since she is "pro-life, I do not support the mission of Planned Parenthood." (The Komen grants to Planned Parenthood did not pay for abortion or contraception services, only cancer detection, according to all parties involved.)

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/02/top-susan-g-komen-official-resigned-over-planned-parenthood-cave-in-updated-with-statement-from-ex-komen-official/252405/

Unleash the Chang (he did what!) (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 3 February 2012 17:02 (fourteen years ago)

The consequences of redistricting in North Carolina—one of the most important swing states in the country—could determine who controls Congress and the presidency in 2012.

OK, I'm confused. Does NC or any other state assign their electoral votes for president based on who wins the most congressional districts?

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 February 2012 17:50 (fourteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure at least a couple of states assign their electoral votes on a per-district basis. Not at all common, though.

Aimless, Friday, 3 February 2012 17:56 (fourteen years ago)

lol at any of you planning on voting for Roseanne and lol at her for running

Mordy, Friday, 3 February 2012 17:58 (fourteen years ago)

I might! p sure Minnesota won't be plumping for Romney

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:03 (fourteen years ago)

xxpostif you live in a solidly blue or red state i say go for it!

but if you're in anything approaching a swing state >:(

your dominican divorce (will), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:04 (fourteen years ago)

seriously considering voting for Roseanne

max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:06 (fourteen years ago)

as many of us said on F'book when the NDAA was signed: fuck Obama. AND DON'T BACKPEDAL.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:09 (fourteen years ago)

A more potent rallying cry if you had a better electoral system.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 February 2012 18:15 (fourteen years ago)

oh who cares - morbz lives in NY, he can vote for whoever he wants. surely tho there's another third party candidate who deserves your vote more than Roseanne???

Mordy, Friday, 3 February 2012 18:17 (fourteen years ago)

have you seen the third party candidates recently

max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:18 (fourteen years ago)

not since last election, but it's hard to imagine there's no one better.

Mordy, Friday, 3 February 2012 18:19 (fourteen years ago)

you are welcome to write me in if you'd like

mookieproof, Friday, 3 February 2012 18:20 (fourteen years ago)

OK, I'm confused. Does NC or any other state assign their electoral votes for president based on who wins the most congressional districts?

maine, nebraska. I think nc dems almost got a system like this in 2007 but didn't. either way nc not gonna be a deciding state.

iatee, Friday, 3 February 2012 18:27 (fourteen years ago)

Roseanne has to get the Green Party nomination b4 any of you can actually vote for her.

jaymc, Friday, 3 February 2012 18:27 (fourteen years ago)

my bad

Today is Cocaine's Birthday! (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:28 (fourteen years ago)

wow, heretofore I have actually underestimated what a fraud the presidential election is.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:30 (fourteen years ago)

it's not a fraud if you live in like four states, you actually get to decide the fate of the free world

iatee, Friday, 3 February 2012 18:30 (fourteen years ago)

I might! p sure Minnesota won't be plumping for Romney

― i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Friday, February 3, 2012 12:03 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^^^dude, this is how we elected Ventura

Unleash the Chang (he did what!) (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:32 (fourteen years ago)

ha I was just about to post "TS: President Barr vs Governor Ventura" but I got distracted by an M.I.A video

I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:33 (fourteen years ago)

I actually like RB. I liked her show and it got better when she gained more controll. I don't care about her politics or her nut farm and I think the fact that she might be on a ballot is almost as shameful as the Republican primaries.

Unleash the Chang (he did what!) (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:37 (fourteen years ago)

Do you think Roseanne wd pick Ginsburg or Sotomayor to swear her in?

If the goal of the candidacy and the vote is to send a message on behalf of the 99%, it's hard to think of a more appropriate ("better") candidate than Roseanne, who is perhaps their biggest voice in US culture in the last 30 years.

I think Obama being renominated uncontested is shameful.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:44 (fourteen years ago)

what year is this? 1995?

Mordy, Friday, 3 February 2012 18:47 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, I am with you on RB and her voice. But voice /= competent governing. lol at voting to "send a message". Have you ever seen how people parse those "messages" from the voter? And what message does voting for a third party send anyway? Was it the same message with Perot as it was with Nader?

Unleash the Chang (he did what!) (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:52 (fourteen years ago)

Morbz loves the shame

max buzzword (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:53 (fourteen years ago)

I think Obama being renominated uncontested is shameful.

otm.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:53 (fourteen years ago)

perot and nader were also arguably washed-up from their professions when they ran, too. and roseanne isn't that much worse than either reagan or schwarzeneggar when those clods began their political careers.

i'll at least listen to what roseanne has to say.

wad of baloney (Eisbaer), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:58 (fourteen years ago)

I have to go soon, but I'm def in the 'morbz otm' camp

Today is Cocaine's Birthday! (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 3 February 2012 19:01 (fourteen years ago)

voice /= competent governing.

oh, spare me from the competence we've had the last 30+ years.

also, she's not going to win.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 February 2012 19:02 (fourteen years ago)

even if you want obama flanked from the left, there's no widely-agreed-upon figure that could do that job atm.

iatee, Friday, 3 February 2012 19:03 (fourteen years ago)

was gonna say (pace frank zappa in 1988 or so), even if roseanne doesn't know shit from shinola how could she do much worse -- what's she gonna do, crash the world economy or start a pointless war or use the Constitution for toilet paper or something like that?!?

wad of baloney (Eisbaer), Friday, 3 February 2012 19:05 (fourteen years ago)

are we seriously talking about how roseanne would run things if she became president

iatee, Friday, 3 February 2012 19:05 (fourteen years ago)

no, we are talking about how Nixon through Obama have run things since they've been President.

wad of baloney (Eisbaer), Friday, 3 February 2012 19:06 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.