2012 republican presidential nominee III: can romney get santorum out of his hair?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4660 of them)

oh i forgot i came here to post this

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/291000/20120201/anonymous-ron-paul-neo-nazi-bnp-a3p.htm

mainly for the lolzy gems of excerpts from supremacists

He was reportedly attracted to Paul because he believed the Republican's followers would be receptive to his white supremacist views. He described Paul as "implicitly white" and started to actively organise Paul's events.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 2 February 2012 23:54 (fourteen years ago)

they say this ron paul is implicitly white--SHUT YO MOUTH

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 2 February 2012 23:55 (fourteen years ago)

B___________, a former member of the neo-N__i group the N_____ S_____ M____, became disillusioned with Paul after a spokesman for the Republican candidate called white supremacy "a small ideology".

Following the incident, he wrote on a popular white supremacist website: "Both Congressman Paul and his aides regularly meet with members of the Stormfront set, American Renaissance, the Institute for Historic Review, and others at the Tara Thai restaurant in Arlington, Virginia, usually on Wednesdays," he said. "I have attended these dinners, seen Paul and his aides there, and been invited to his offices in Washington to discuss policy."

"Paul is a white nationalist of the 5t0rm4r0nt type who has always kept his racial views and his views about world Judaism quiet because of his political position," he added.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 2 February 2012 23:58 (fourteen years ago)

woops i missed a s-front sorry

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 2 February 2012 23:59 (fourteen years ago)

woah if true

Mordy, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:01 (fourteen years ago)

he might even be explicitly white ill have to think abt that

lag∞n, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:04 (fourteen years ago)

You know if you read books from the early years of personal computing they are all very optimistic that in the future (now, basically) machines will do the work for us, leaving us with so much free time to create and play and stuff. It's so optimistic they forgot about the arbitrary need to earn the paycheck.

Well yeah, but the arbitrary need for the paycheck is just that - arbitrary, based on scarcity.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:06 (fourteen years ago)

it's like that george carlin sketch. he's openly white. xp

Mordy, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:06 (fourteen years ago)

guilty of being (implicitly) white

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0tzZ__Z5Qw

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:08 (fourteen years ago)

arbitrary, based on scarcity.

― Andrew Farrell, Friday, February 3, 2012 12:06 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

^

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:08 (fourteen years ago)

w/e commies

lag∞n, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:09 (fourteen years ago)

SOMEONE has to do the WORK for u while u occupy carharts and black bandanas

lag∞n, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:10 (fourteen years ago)

why would they meet at a Thai restaurant?

I DIED, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:11 (fourteen years ago)

isn't there a dc ilx fap happening at a thai restaurant ~~right now~~

makes u think

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:46 (fourteen years ago)

*covers mouth in horor*

lag∞n, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:48 (fourteen years ago)

oh no i have revealed tza's secret identity

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:56 (fourteen years ago)

as ron paul

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 3 February 2012 00:56 (fourteen years ago)

@DennisThePerrin
Gingrich has a Napoleon complex. The pig from Animal Farm, I mean.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 February 2012 08:21 (fourteen years ago)

ha

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 3 February 2012 08:25 (fourteen years ago)

I can vouch that tza is not actually ron paul

corportate/Illuminati controlled (crüt), Friday, 3 February 2012 10:04 (fourteen years ago)

I was reading that redacted excerpt and had a moment where I was confusedly thinking "neo-Niggi????"

I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Friday, 3 February 2012 12:39 (fourteen years ago)

LOOOOOOLLLL

LOOOOOLLLLLLLLLL

lol

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 3 February 2012 14:09 (fourteen years ago)

Lenny Curry, chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, said Thursday all candidates knew how Florida’s delegates would be awarded since the state GOP voted in September.
“All campaigns and the RNC have known since then that Florida was winner take all. RNC’s legal counsel has, on numerous occasions, noted their understanding and acceptance of Florida’s rule,” Curry said in a statement. “Florida was winner take all before Election Day, we were winner take all on Election Day, we will remain winner take all.”
He added, “It is a shame when the loser of a contest agrees to the rules before, then cries foul after losing.”

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 3 February 2012 14:09 (fourteen years ago)

Lenny Curry, chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, said Thursday all candidates knew how Florida’s delegates would be awarded since the beginning of the Triassic Period.

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Friday, 3 February 2012 14:18 (fourteen years ago)

He added, “It is a shame when the loser of a contest agrees to the rules before, then cries foul after losing.”

this is kind of unassailable.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 3 February 2012 21:28 (fourteen years ago)

so assuming unemployment/economic trends continue the way they are now, this seems very probable, right?

1. Romney wins nom.
2. Obama beats Romney
3. Republican party decides they lost bc Romney was too centrist.
4. 2016 primaries bring even more lulz than 2012 primaries????

Mordy, Friday, 3 February 2012 21:30 (fourteen years ago)

like, 2016 primaries probably joe the plumber v. the disembodied head of newt v. a holographic image of megatron?

Mordy, Friday, 3 February 2012 21:31 (fourteen years ago)

That is one possible future, but prediction is a difficult game. Too many trends have to remain intact in order to be correct. You never know when there will be big, unpredictable reversal.

Aimless, Friday, 3 February 2012 21:36 (fourteen years ago)

so assuming unemployment/economic trends continue the way they are now, this seems very probable, right?

1. Romney wins nom.
2. Obama beats Romney
3. Republican party decides they lost bc Romney was too centrist.
4. 2016 primaries bring even more lulz than 2012 primaries????

― Mordy, Friday, February 3, 2012 3:30 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this would be a nice way of running their party into the ground

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 3 February 2012 21:36 (fourteen years ago)

after 8 years i wonder if rank and file republicans are more willing to make a deal

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Friday, 3 February 2012 21:38 (fourteen years ago)

Sharon Angle wearing the decomposing hide of Regan vs. some dude who just straight-up hates non whites and was let off on a technicality after trying to blow up the IRS

Unleash the Chang (he did what!) (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 3 February 2012 21:41 (fourteen years ago)

wow, all that and he still has time for freelance criticism

I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Friday, 3 February 2012 21:42 (fourteen years ago)

after 8 years i wonder if rank and file republicans are more willing to make a deal

I think the fringe will conceivably be even more insane. I think 8 years of the cultural change (and generational change, too, I guess) may have altered the party nationally, though. The base is clearly turning into a southern party which is yet again on the wrong side of history. If the economy improves enough that the politics of rage is set aside, cultural wedge-issues may not work as well

le ralliement du doute et de l'erreur (Michael White), Friday, 3 February 2012 22:21 (fourteen years ago)

m white otm

iatee, Friday, 3 February 2012 23:13 (fourteen years ago)

That is one possible future, but prediction is a difficult game. Too many trends have to remain intact in order to be correct. You never know when there will be big, unpredictable reversal.

So effectively you're saying that "always in motion is the future"

Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Friday, 3 February 2012 23:20 (fourteen years ago)

you may think you are a motherfucker, but that just means you haven't met rick santorum yet xxp

dayo, Friday, 3 February 2012 23:50 (fourteen years ago)

like, 2016 primaries probably joe the plumber v. the disembodied head of newt v. a holographic image of megatron?

taco mayor

mookieproof, Saturday, 4 February 2012 00:17 (fourteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/Ypqlb.png

lag∞n, Saturday, 4 February 2012 16:43 (fourteen years ago)

free children for everyone!

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 4 February 2012 16:46 (fourteen years ago)

i found this lil guy in the planned parenthood dumpster, who wants him

lag∞n, Saturday, 4 February 2012 16:48 (fourteen years ago)

can someone shop him, a minute later. having eaten up to the child's torso

quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Saturday, 4 February 2012 16:50 (fourteen years ago)

wallace shawn screams as his grandson is consumed

quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Saturday, 4 February 2012 16:51 (fourteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/we3Pc.png

lag∞n, Saturday, 4 February 2012 16:54 (fourteen years ago)

That picture of Romney is so great. Belongs in the write-your-own-caption Hall of Fame. (The man and the woman directly underneath the baby look crazed.)

clemenza, Saturday, 4 February 2012 17:08 (fourteen years ago)

wallace shawn screams as his grandson is consumed

― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Saturday, February 4, 2012 11:51 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hahahahaha

Also, Romney-throwing-kid would slide brilliantly into Santorum.jpg imo.

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 4 February 2012 17:31 (fourteen years ago)

Those darn rock bands!

“What happens is the rock groups object to who’s playing their music,” said Ed Rollins, the longtime Republican campaign strategist. “They never seem to yell and scream at the other side. It’s always the Republicans that they become unhappy with. They don’t want their great music involved in the impure business of politics.”

(And yes, enjoy the Survivor pic too.)

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 4 February 2012 18:35 (fourteen years ago)

The bit the Survivor singer did on Colbert was hilarious.

Let A Man Come In And Do The Cop Porn (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Saturday, 4 February 2012 23:11 (fourteen years ago)

santroum in a bolo tie

http://p.twimg.com/Ak2sZT1CQAESStr.jpg

pplains, Sunday, 5 February 2012 03:57 (fourteen years ago)

Nobody cares at this point, and it doesn't mean anything, but Gingrich's press conference was fascinating, topped off by David Gergen saying he doesn't remember a presidential candidate who was "so driven by hatred." Geez, David, think hard--you might have worked for one.

clemenza, Sunday, 5 February 2012 04:44 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.