yah srsly he missed one hs football game is what happened
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 19:00 (fourteen years ago)
not loving this week's cover
http://www.newyorker.com/images/2012/02/13/p154/120213_2012_p154.jpg
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Monday, 6 February 2012 05:28 (fourteen years ago)
the picture is not loading, that is the actual cover
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Monday, 6 February 2012 05:31 (fourteen years ago)
the article about suicide is really, really good, though. so strange, now, how our lives can be reconstructed through our online breadcrumbs.
― Z S, Monday, 6 February 2012 05:31 (fourteen years ago)
Lol I like that cover
― max, Monday, 6 February 2012 12:36 (fourteen years ago)
the face transplant article is amazing
― johnny crunch, Monday, 6 February 2012 19:27 (fourteen years ago)
I think the cover is really nicely done
― post, Monday, 6 February 2012 19:39 (fourteen years ago)
it looks terrible on a tablet i can tell you that
― ELI OWNS YOUR HUSBAND (forksclovetofu), Monday, 6 February 2012 19:41 (fourteen years ago)
never loads completely
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY (dayo), Monday, 6 February 2012 19:42 (fourteen years ago)
haa
― lag∞n, Monday, 6 February 2012 19:44 (fourteen years ago)
lol
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Monday, 6 February 2012 19:45 (fourteen years ago)
so strange, now, how our lives can be reconstructed through our online breadcrumbs.
Yes, it reminded me of a book a professor of mine wrote recently about a murder-suicide that occurred on our college campus when I was a senior. Lots of details pieced together -- and psychological insights gleaned -- through e-mails and instant-message transcripts.
― jaymc, Monday, 6 February 2012 19:47 (fourteen years ago)
psychological insights, or pontificating?
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY (dayo), Monday, 6 February 2012 19:48 (fourteen years ago)
In both the New Yorker article and the book I read, there does tend to be a lot of extrapolation, but at least by reproducing the original sources, it's somewhat transparent about it.
― jaymc, Monday, 6 February 2012 19:52 (fourteen years ago)
tijuana food article from a couple weeks ago was interesting! definitely made me want to head down there the next time I'm in san diego...
― tylerw, Monday, 6 February 2012 20:07 (fourteen years ago)
the plagiarism article was crazy
― President Keyes, Monday, 6 February 2012 23:17 (fourteen years ago)
― lag∞n, Monday, 6 February 2012 23:18 (fourteen years ago)
the plagiarism piece was cray
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1tAYmMjLdY (dayo), Monday, 6 February 2012 23:22 (fourteen years ago)
Haven't read it yet. But I went to college with him and used to talk about spy novels and cold war paranoia movies when I saw him at the store he worked for. Crazy story.
― dan selzer, Monday, 6 February 2012 23:54 (fourteen years ago)
yeah plagiarism story was like high-level n/a-bait NYer story, wish it had been longer
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 16:38 (fourteen years ago)
I wish I had more access to my wife's iPad, because I get all jealous when you guys are talking about the new issue and I'm still waiting for the print edition to show up (yes I know I could read them online, but I refer reading either print or iPad on the train).
― Gonjasufjanstephen O'Malley (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:14 (fourteen years ago)
P psyched to have discovered that I can get it on my Nook every Monday for free, as a print subscriber. Looks great in this format (except the cartoons).
― Axolotl with an Atlatl (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:18 (fourteen years ago)
Agreed that last week's was fucking solid.
― Axolotl with an Atlatl (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:19 (fourteen years ago)
You can get this on the Nook now? I didn't know that.
― Gonjasufjanstephen O'Malley (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:24 (fourteen years ago)
plagiarism piece is p lol, some of the quotes from the guy are classic
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:35 (fourteen years ago)
i did end up feeling somewhat sympathetic to the guy but i did lol that the last paragraph or two was basically like "oh and now he's writing a book about his struggles being a plagiarist," def. made me feel not as sympathetic b/c it made it all seem like grist for his fancy memoir
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:39 (fourteen years ago)
finally read the rutgers suicide story
roommate sounds like an asshole, but not really a manslaughterer or purveyor of hate crimes
kind of amazed that the two roommates appear to have communicated almost exclusively electronically, but then here we are
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:41 (fourteen years ago)
yah roommate came off as a super-gossipy & entitled kid but im thinking that is par for the course among 18 yr olds
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:45 (fourteen years ago)
I spent almost an entire semester communicating with my roommate solely through post-it notes and whiteboard.
― Gonjasufjanstephen O'Malley (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:47 (fourteen years ago)
dharun's friends seemed like total assholes.
― Z S, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 18:47 (fourteen years ago)
whys the ipad always always telling me there are updates to issues, anyone know what these updates consist of
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 19:03 (fourteen years ago)
ugh facial transplant article is very intense and difficult to read (esp during lunch)
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 7 February 2012 20:34 (fourteen years ago)
yeah I stopped somewhere on the first page, wasnt quite ready
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 22:13 (fourteen years ago)
Was he really like an adult version of McLovin from Superbad?
― President Keyes, Tuesday, 7 February 2012 23:59 (fourteen years ago)
He's a really nice guy.
― dan selzer, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 03:07 (fourteen years ago)
was prob just trying to make u like him
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 03:10 (fourteen years ago)
In the Rutgers story, the webcam guy (who didn't post it) does come across as an erratic kid at first, prob confused about his own sexuality ("never known him to have a girl friend", etc etc from his fellow assholes). The first viewing (not a posting, but a gossip-hyped "experiment") scared him, he scared himself, basically. But then he tried to do it again, and set up a viewing party. All of this as loudly as possible online--bias intimidation? I dunno, of course the jury won't hear it just like we read it, the evidence might seem quite different in court. And the author depicts the mysterious aspects of suicide; what an ending to the article. But, even though Tyler did take it to his r.a., and was going to get another roommate, when he'd first discussed this with his friend online, he'd worried he'd end up with somebody even worse. And speaking of electronic breadcrumbs, he may have decided that, even if he started using motel rooms and got smarter online, all manner of shit could just go on and on. And in terms of death ny a thousand breadcrumbs, check this if you haven't already (Facebook is just the beginning, despite the title) http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/opinion/sunday/facebook-is-using-you.html?src=me&ref=general
― dow, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 03:33 (fourteen years ago)
LexisNexis has a product called Accurint for Law Enforcement, which gives government agents information about what people do on social networks.
First I've ever heard of Accurint and googling around doesn't bring up any articles or other information about it. What a tidbit to drop in the middle of a NYT article!
― Mordy, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 03:44 (fourteen years ago)
I don't think he was confused about his sexuality he prob just wasn't good w/ girls and stunts like this were just trying to get people to like him
xp
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 03:46 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39m06np3PjY
― buzza, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 03:53 (fourteen years ago)
Still pretty vague. Where does it pull this information from? Can it be used on anyone or do you need a warrant to look someone up? Is it all publicly available information?
― Mordy, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 03:58 (fourteen years ago)
weird. my agency deals with lexisnexis to help validate the identities of reporters of information, but i didn't know they got into THAT kind of stuff. makes sense, i guess.
uuuuugh, 2012 suuuuucks
― Z S, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 04:15 (fourteen years ago)
i stopped believing in privacy roughly around 1994not that this is good in any way or that i am special just gave up early
― ELI OWNS YOUR HUSBAND (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 04:58 (fourteen years ago)
u r special to us forks
― tinker tailor soldier sb (silby), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 05:35 (fourteen years ago)
giving up privacy is the first step towards liberation. well done.
― Banaka™ (banaka), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 09:33 (fourteen years ago)
iPad edition released on Monday: 160 MBUpdate released yesterday: 105 MBUpdate released today: 110 MB
Total for ONE ISSUE: 375 MB
― Wub wub wub wubwubwubwub wub Pzzzzzzz WUBB wubwub (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 09:40 (fourteen years ago)
But, even though Tyler did take it to his r.a., and was going to get another roommate, when he'd first discussed this with his friend online, he'd worried he'd end up with somebody even worse. And speaking of electronic breadcrumbs, he may have decided that, even if he started using motel rooms and got smarter online, all manner of shit could just go on and on.
a small point, but, I think this is k misrepresentative, & slightly mitigates how unacceptable what the other guy did, say bc it happened in a world of unacceptable thing - this was kinda addressed by the article's focus on "drama" vs "bullying"; going through whatever hassle and having to decide how you feel about it is part of going through something, and it feels wrong to use someone on the receiving end's uncertainty - or perhaps tendency to generously wish that they hadn't been put in a position where they'd have to 'get someone in trouble' &c - as a gauge of the thing itself. w/all the caveats about what you can possibly know from an article, it seemed like it sucked a lot for him & bothered him, stayed on his mind. the extent to which that's discernible from the image he's projecting while IMing his friend, trying to be breezier & non-personal about it while still expressing frustration, was one of the sadder things about the article imo.
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 10:17 (fourteen years ago)
I didn't get a chance to finish that whole webcame article yet, but one thing that really stood out for me from the first half was how depressing it was that everyone involved was so casually tossing out slurs in both directions over IM. Obviously the homophobia directed at Tyler, but also the when Tyler IMed about his roommate's parents "totally owning a Dunkin Donuts".
― Gonjasufjanstephen O'Malley (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 8 February 2012 14:24 (fourteen years ago)
I didn't mean to mitigate what Ravi did, or to make Tyler a poster child for cyber-dystopia, just speculating about the feelings which Ravi fatally intensified, though didn't originate. (Tyler's mother, who of course disavows the reaction to Tyler's coming out, as he'd described it in another electronic breadcrumb, and says there were no signs of suicidal thought, does mention T. having *her* take him around to look at various bridges.) Nineteen is such a dangerous age, I almost didn't make it through, and I've known several people who didn't.
― dow, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 15:59 (fourteen years ago)
"everyone involved was so casually tossing out racial slurs", yeah, quite a swath. The other Tyler C. made some pretty mature comments,though. Would like to see a more extensive interview with him. Oh, and Amy Davidson's post re Eastwood's Superbowl commercial was brilliant!
― dow, Wednesday, 8 February 2012 16:02 (fourteen years ago)