in retrospect doesn't it seem like bush's win in 88 was really a 3rd reelection for reagan?
oh no – that's exactly how most observers viewed his win at the time.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:06 (fourteen years ago)
doesnt mean romney cant win but hed have a better shot if he had the juice
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:08 (fourteen years ago)
i'm a little surprised at the cold feet from j goldberg up there. tho i suppose he is the type to want to hang with the cool kids at a moment too late to matter
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:08 (fourteen years ago)
Despite serious competition the '88 campaign season was the most moronic of my life.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:09 (fourteen years ago)
turnout was down from 08:
shareEric Kleefeld January 31, 2012, 10:30 PM
Underneath tonight’s big win for Mitt Romney in the Florida Republican primary, is a statistic that might suggest enthusiasm is flagging among GOP voters in this large and crucial swing state: turnout was actually down significantly from 2008.
In the 2008 Republican primary in Florida, in which John McCain beat Romney by a margin of 36%-31%, a total of nearly 1.95 million votes were cast.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/florida-gop-turnout-actually-fell-big-time-from-2008.php?ref=fpb
But in tonight’s primary, turnout was actually much lower. At time of writing, with 98% of precincts reporting, the total turnout is only about 1.65 million — a drop-off of 15% in terms of the raw number of voters.
Romney did increase his own vote total, though. In 2008 he received about 605,000 votes. Tonight, it is up to about 765,000. (One can imagine him combining some of his old votes, with some of McCain’s in 2008, for his strong 46% plurality.)
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:15 (fourteen years ago)
er whoops i put the link in the middle there!
i believe that is a pattern in the other states, too? idk i'm getting this from liberal sources.
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:16 (fourteen years ago)
One of the '88 presidential debates was at UCLA just after I got there and I went down to mingle a bit and see what was being said by various types on either side out front. It probably helped confirm me in my belief, when I could first register to vote the following year, that there was no point in registering a party affiliation.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:18 (fourteen years ago)
yeah turnout was down everywhere but sc iirc?
― iatee, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:19 (fourteen years ago)
Gingrich pulled a Hillary last night in his speech and didn't even acknowledge that he'd just been crushed--didn't mention Romney at all--which is a pretty good indication he's mad enough to keep running long past the point when it makes any sense to (which most people would say was yesterday, but he does have all those southern states to go).
Romney seem comfortable with what he's doing about half the time to me.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:20 (fourteen years ago)
"seems"
― clemenza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:21 (fourteen years ago)
Gingristapo tactics?
― Quand le déshonneur est public, il faut que la vengeance soit (Michael White), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:24 (fourteen years ago)
weren't Reagan's poll numbers in the toilet by '88 from Iran-contra etc?
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)
dukakis had a huge lead at the beginning of the campaign lol
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:30 (fourteen years ago)
http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/images/life/dukakis.jpg
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:31 (fourteen years ago)
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyodeekXZQ1qzzg70o1_500.jpg
― markers, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:31 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.achievement.org/achievers/bus0/large/bus0-029.jpg
― pplains, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:31 (fourteen years ago)
nice socks bro
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:32 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, always seemed to me Reagan fatigue is the only reason a pathetic campaigner like Dukakis did even that "well" in November.
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:34 (fourteen years ago)
that newt pic is amazing but how it looks like hes contemplating the watermark takes it to the next level
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:40 (fourteen years ago)
god Reagan's hair was always perfect.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:48 (fourteen years ago)
Reagan's poll numbers.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:49 (fourteen years ago)
eh Clinton gets a similar "benefit" from hindsight
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:53 (fourteen years ago)
i like how that angle lets you see underneath gorbachev's combover.
and by angle i mean penis
― SELF DEPORTATION (Z S), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:54 (fourteen years ago)
Reagan's last two Gallup job approval ratings before he left office were 57% in mid-November and 63% in December 1988.
The highest job approval rating of the Reagan administration was 68% -- reached twice, in May 1981 and as previously indicated, in May 1986. As noted, the low point was 35% in January 1983.
Both in and out of office, Reagan was always well-liked by the American public -- based on ratings measuring the public's personal opinion rather than its assessment of his job performance. Between 1984 and 1988, Gallup consistently found more than 6 in 10 Americans holding a favorable view of Reagan, including a substantial 81% in October 1986. Even during the 1982 recession, when only about 4 in 10 Americans approved of the job Reagan was doing as president, 6 in 10 Americans rated him on the positive end of a 10-point rating scale. In Gallup's most recent measure of favorability about Reagan, taken in January 2001, 74% of Americans had a favorable opinion of him, and only 23% were unfavorable.
Americans' perceptions of Reagan's presidency have risen considerably in recent years. His average approval rating for 1988, his last full year as president, was 53% -- identical to the average for the entire eight years of his presidency. Yet, when Americans were asked in 2002 to state whether they approved or disapproved of the way Reagan handled his presidency, retrospectively, 73% approved.
This increase in retrospective approval didn't occur at once. Three Gallup ratings in 1990, 1992, and 1993 showed Reagan's job approval rating in the 50% to 54% range -- little different from the average while he was in office. Reagan publicly announced that he was suffering from Alzheimer's disease in 1994, and it's possible that the sympathy and concern his condition has elicited over the last decade are in part responsible for the elevated retrospective job approval ratings he has received since.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:54 (fourteen years ago)
OK, so the Iran dip came in '87
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:00 (fourteen years ago)
Romney "not concerned about the very poor"
can't make this shit up
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:34 (fourteen years ago)
I'm concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.
lol 95% of the country cannot be middle class that just doesnt make any sense
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:42 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, the speech functions of this robot are not very well engineered, are they?
― Hawaiian mime montage (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:43 (fourteen years ago)
yes but 90-95 percent of Americans consider themselves middle class
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:43 (fourteen years ago)
http://pixel.nymag.com/content/dam/slideshows/2012/01/florida-primary-christpher-anderson/_MG_4889.jpg
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:43 (fourteen years ago)
together we will break the power of Big Poor
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:44 (fourteen years ago)
^^^Newt's fourth wife?
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:45 (fourteen years ago)
goole r u newts fourth wife
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:45 (fourteen years ago)
pareene Alex Pareene In Mitt's defense "not concerned about" is better than "obsessed with punishing"1 minute ago
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:46 (fourteen years ago)
romney had a new debate coach, Brett O'Donnell, formerly Liberty University
http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/sarahposner/5621/romney%27s_debate_coach_and_his_religion_answer/
here's his web bio:
http://odacommunications.com/Meet_Brett_O_Donnell.html
he's been busy this campaign season already:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-candidate-whisperer-the-man-behind-michele-bachmann/2011/09/21/gIQARXgEmK_story.html
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:48 (fourteen years ago)
i am not his wife so much as his wifey
ty for clarifying
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:50 (fourteen years ago)
btw i want to be a political svengali how to i get this job
CITIZEN
YO GOD AND POSSE
YOU ARE...
?
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:50 (fourteen years ago)
lag00n you need to say shit like this:
Liberty was a door for O'Donnell to the political world; he's moved on from college students to politicians on the national stage. He worked for the 2004 Bush/Cheney campaign, and now has his own consulting firm. He admitted to Chafetz that he's a "Christian ideologue" (Chafetz's term), but "would I work for a candidate who isn't a Christian, somebody with the same core principles as mine? Sure. Mitt Romney for example; he's a Mormon, but our beliefs are similar. I'd work for an atheist if he shared my values." Although I doubt even he could persuade an atheist to say the country was founded on "Judeo-Christian values.
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:51 (fourteen years ago)
I'd work for an atheist if he shared my values.
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:53 (fourteen years ago)
only a matter of time now
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:53 (fourteen years ago)
who do i talk to abt setting up direct deposit
at this time i feel i should encourage you to pray on it
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:54 (fourteen years ago)
man this is a terrible job wtf!
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 17:55 (fourteen years ago)
really, why tell them they're wrong?
― Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:01 (fourteen years ago)
found a picture of Newt Gingrich with Jane Fonda. Let's swift boat his azz!
http://p.twimg.com/AklWi0tCIAAwoE7.jpg:large
(SI_Vault one of my favorite tweeters.)
― pplains, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:12 (fourteen years ago)
yah thats a great account 4 sure
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:13 (fourteen years ago)
guys
http://f.cl.ly/items/2c070m3a1b1S080Y2B2s/zzzzz.jpg
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 18:55 (fourteen years ago)
95% is two standard deviations off the mean, so yeah it is possible that most ppl are making about the same amount. ...this is where the 99% meme comes from!
― i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 19:53 (fourteen years ago)