2012 republican presidential nominee III: can romney get santorum out of his hair?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4660 of them)

"Newt"

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:57 (fourteen years ago)

I want a "I'm with Newt on this" T-shirt.

clemenza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 01:59 (fourteen years ago)

romney fathered trig palin iirc

buzza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:01 (fourteen years ago)

Wildly misplaced...his outrage wasn't forced to flee its homeland.

clemenza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:03 (fourteen years ago)

Wow, was Gingrich's speech ever loopy. Between being inaugurated and all the parties later that night, he's going to duck out for a few hours and sign about 10 things immediately into law. He's going to be exhausted.

clemenza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:27 (fourteen years ago)

i'm sure one of u guys will take care of biz & President Rubio will be invading Havana on the 21st.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 02:55 (fourteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/funny-pictures-im-a-pwofessional-gwump-i-take-my-job-vewy-sewious.jpg

Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 03:11 (fourteen years ago)

100% returns from FL:

Romney --- 46.4%
Gingrich --- 31.9%
Santorum - 13.4%
Paul --------- 7.0%

(shuffles off stage wearing bunny slippers)

Aimless, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 05:12 (fourteen years ago)

v curious how much of santorum's vote would go to newt if he dropped out.

Clay, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 05:48 (fourteen years ago)

Romney still less than #50 /talkingpoints

strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 05:51 (fourteen years ago)

I know it gets tricky for Newt but there's a lot to go. He'll hang in there as long as he can pull in the funds. Thankfully for him, the media has been carpetbombing the airwaves about the staggering difference in money/negative ads between him and Newt so nobody else int he country will be fooled by such salacious and ungentlemanly behaviour.

encarta it (Gukbe), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 05:53 (fourteen years ago)

@fakedansavage Santorum demonstrates his ability to stir audiences to new depths. pic.twitter.com/r8HxcX6K
31 Jan

http://www.balloon-juice.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Akg_EfcCIAEhZ28.jpg

You got to ro-o-oll me and call me the tumblr whites (Phil D.), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 13:55 (fourteen years ago)

i'm sure newt has the petulance to keep going forever, but

a) how long will sheldon adelson continue to fund a hopeless cause?

b) does callista?

mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 13:58 (fourteen years ago)

the title of this thread makes me nostalgic

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 14:17 (fourteen years ago)

hoping gingrich makes it to the convention just to non-violently re-enact this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjzKiEs_pHI

da croupier, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 14:19 (fourteen years ago)

Newt should sail into Tampa Bay in colonial garb

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:07 (fourteen years ago)

lmao at that santorum pic

lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:08 (fourteen years ago)

is that girl handing Santorum a chunk of mango?

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:08 (fourteen years ago)

i think she's fanning that kid who passed out from being inundated by bullshit

your dominican divorce (will), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:10 (fourteen years ago)

two girls back left are cracking up, attempting to conceal it

lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:11 (fourteen years ago)

it's like santorum is trying to compete with our very own santorum.jpg

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:11 (fourteen years ago)

the two lads on the right are every bored kid in church ever

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:15 (fourteen years ago)

Girl on the left with glasses -- my wife tells me this is the classic pose for sleeping in church while appearing to be in deep spiritual contemplation.

Steamtable Willie (WmC), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:22 (fourteen years ago)

Implosion time.

As a bunch of us has been writing around here for a while, the under-emphasized dynamic in this race isn’t that Romney isn’t conservative enough (though that’s obviously a real concern out there) it’s that he’s simply not a good enough politician. He may be the most electable on paper. He’s certainly a nice guy, decent father, smart, successful etc. But, every time he seems to get into his groove and pull away he says things that make people think he doesn’t know how to play the game. That can be reassuring to some, who take it as proof he’s not another politician. The problem, for others at least, is that because he isn’t a natural politician he breaks the language where it needs to bend. He uses language — “I like to fire people!” “It’s nothing to get angry about” etc — that doesn’t make him seem like an unconventional politician. Rather his language makes him seem like a caricature of a conventionally stiff country club Republican.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:50 (fourteen years ago)

yah 4 sure obscured by all the electablity talk is the obvs fact that hes just not a natural politician, hes worked v hard to become competent which is actually a v high bar for a presidential run, but he just does not at all have it

lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:56 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.coverbrowser.com/image/time/3630-1.jpg

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:58 (fourteen years ago)

^yeah. not an absolute impediment, why wd ppl think so?

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:00 (fourteen years ago)

does romney know about supermarket scanners y/n

mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:02 (fourteen years ago)

he's related to one

iatee, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:03 (fourteen years ago)

in retrospect doesn't it seem like bush's win in 88 was really a 3rd reelection for reagan? the contrast with dukakis probably helped him too (pour one out)

the point is ghwb WAS a president w/o "it". he borrowed someone else's it, and won against a man with even less of it.

kind of tautological tho i guess

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:04 (fourteen years ago)

in retrospect doesn't it seem like bush's win in 88 was really a 3rd reelection for reagan?

oh no – that's exactly how most observers viewed his win at the time.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:06 (fourteen years ago)

doesnt mean romney cant win but hed have a better shot if he had the juice

lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:08 (fourteen years ago)

i'm a little surprised at the cold feet from j goldberg up there. tho i suppose he is the type to want to hang with the cool kids at a moment too late to matter

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:08 (fourteen years ago)

Despite serious competition the '88 campaign season was the most moronic of my life.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:09 (fourteen years ago)

turnout was down from 08:

share
Eric Kleefeld January 31, 2012, 10:30 PM

Underneath tonight’s big win for Mitt Romney in the Florida Republican primary, is a statistic that might suggest enthusiasm is flagging among GOP voters in this large and crucial swing state: turnout was actually down significantly from 2008.

In the 2008 Republican primary in Florida, in which John McCain beat Romney by a margin of 36%-31%, a total of nearly 1.95 million votes were cast.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/florida-gop-turnout-actually-fell-big-time-from-2008.php?ref=fpb

But in tonight’s primary, turnout was actually much lower. At time of writing, with 98% of precincts reporting, the total turnout is only about 1.65 million — a drop-off of 15% in terms of the raw number of voters.

Romney did increase his own vote total, though. In 2008 he received about 605,000 votes. Tonight, it is up to about 765,000. (One can imagine him combining some of his old votes, with some of McCain’s in 2008, for his strong 46% plurality.)

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:15 (fourteen years ago)

er whoops i put the link in the middle there!

i believe that is a pattern in the other states, too? idk i'm getting this from liberal sources.

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:16 (fourteen years ago)

Despite serious competition the '88 campaign season was the most moronic of my life.

One of the '88 presidential debates was at UCLA just after I got there and I went down to mingle a bit and see what was being said by various types on either side out front. It probably helped confirm me in my belief, when I could first register to vote the following year, that there was no point in registering a party affiliation.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:18 (fourteen years ago)

yeah turnout was down everywhere but sc iirc?

iatee, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:19 (fourteen years ago)

Gingrich pulled a Hillary last night in his speech and didn't even acknowledge that he'd just been crushed--didn't mention Romney at all--which is a pretty good indication he's mad enough to keep running long past the point when it makes any sense to (which most people would say was yesterday, but he does have all those southern states to go).

Romney seem comfortable with what he's doing about half the time to me.

clemenza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:20 (fourteen years ago)

"seems"

clemenza, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:21 (fourteen years ago)

Gingristapo tactics?

Quand le déshonneur est public, il faut que la vengeance soit (Michael White), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:24 (fourteen years ago)

weren't Reagan's poll numbers in the toilet by '88 from Iran-contra etc?

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)

dukakis had a huge lead at the beginning of the campaign lol

lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:30 (fourteen years ago)

http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0309/images/life/dukakis.jpg

lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:31 (fourteen years ago)

http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyodeekXZQ1qzzg70o1_500.jpg

markers, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:31 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.achievement.org/achievers/bus0/large/bus0-029.jpg

pplains, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:31 (fourteen years ago)

nice socks bro

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:32 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, always seemed to me Reagan fatigue is the only reason a pathetic campaigner like Dukakis did even that "well" in November.

Literal Facepalms (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:34 (fourteen years ago)

that newt pic is amazing but how it looks like hes contemplating the watermark takes it to the next level

lag∞n, Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:40 (fourteen years ago)

god Reagan's hair was always perfect.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 February 2012 16:48 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.