saluted your shorts
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:51 (fourteen years ago)
formed a silent circle of american college christians around that post you made
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:52 (fourteen years ago)
I'm still ready to hear what the new policies are. Do you have to have the same post KerPowed 51 times? 51 posts once each? Is 51 even a number anymore? Are the 30 day temp bans still the same?
― pplains, dinsdag 31 januari 2012 23:40 (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
and, as sincerely as possible, thanks stet for the great work.
This, and this. Still would like to know about the rules, but thanks Stet
― future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:52 (fourteen years ago)
joined the boy scouts to learn how to fold your post because you just got flagged
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:53 (fourteen years ago)
f.l.a.g.
― the parable is the parable of the (Lamp), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:53 (fourteen years ago)
wind moves everything around me
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:54 (fourteen years ago)
― future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:52 PM (2 minutes ago)
^^flagging these posts as awesome and not-to-be-missed
― ⚓ (gr8080), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:55 (fourteen years ago)
lol at "as sincerely as possible"
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:56 (fourteen years ago)
Serious question: Does Flag Posts have anything to do with why bookmarking is muffed up for me now? Now when I click "Bookmark" on a post, I am redirected to uppermost post displayed. This was not the case about 30 minutes ago.
― garbage corn fan (Je55e), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:56 (fourteen years ago)
tbh I unfairly didn't give the mods any real warning abt this change after it was discussed on sandbox, so don't have any real policy changes yet. That said, I feel that 51 individual users saying "take action about this user" is still a strong signal, and is about the right level for action to be taken.
We can potentially focus thinking more on posts now than before -- "51 users objected to these specific posts by this user" -- and I'm thinking about tools that would help with that. We can certainly start weeding out any spurious or baffling flagged posts.
This would lead to maybe taking different actions, like (off the top of my head) if all the posts are on one specific board, why not just ban the user from that board as a first step?
If a user does get a site ban after a load of users flag their posts, I think that should still stay at a month off for the first offence, getting progressively steeper until potentially permaban. But again, need to discuss this a bit.
tldr: if 51 users have flagged your posts in the past six months, and they strike us as reasonable complaints, I'd expect a ban of some kind.
― stet, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:56 (fourteen years ago)
Je55e: yeah, this is another change -- thinking is that it takes you right back to the list of bookmarks so you can choose another one to read.
― stet, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:57 (fourteen years ago)
This the way Suggest Ban should've worked in the first place (as me and many others tried to say back then)
<3 you always tuomas, but you best believe i flagged the shit out of this post
xp fair enough stet- what's different apart from the name of the link tho?
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:58 (fourteen years ago)
On the mod side, I don't think anything has changed.
Do you have to have the same post KerPowed 51 times? 51 posts once each?
No and no. As before, if a poster, not a post, gets flagged 50 times within 6 months, the rule of thumb has been to give them a one month ban on the 51st.
xps
― Rotary Boy of the Month (WmC), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:58 (fourteen years ago)
Oh.... I dunno about anyone else, but that's not how I use bookmarks. I can take this topic to another thread tho. xps
― garbage corn fan (Je55e), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 22:59 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i prefer the old bookmarks tbh
needless to say you're a hero for getting rid of SB
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:00 (fourteen years ago)
I didn't Sb Whiney this time, so it came as a surprise to me that he got 51ed because I hadn't seen anything uncool written by him.
Oh shit. Will the death of the suggbann mean the death of Dave Cool?
― beachville, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:00 (fourteen years ago)
flagged a bunch of posts itt. let me know how that works out exactly, policy seems pretty vague so far
― am0n, Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:46 PM (12 minutes ago)
------
Confirming this will flag the post for the attention of the moderators.
Just wondering what about these posts you think needs moderator attention.
― Rotary Boy of the Month (WmC), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:01 (fourteen years ago)
if mods ever do something dumb i'm gonna post "mods suck" or "suck it mods" or something and the flag my own post so i know they got the message
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:02 (fourteen years ago)
We can certainly start weeding out any spurious or baffling flagged posts.This would lead to maybe taking different actions, like (off the top of my head) if all the posts are on one specific board, why not just ban the user from that board as a first step?
amazing that its taken three and a half years but thank you
― ⚓ (gr8080), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:03 (fourteen years ago)
only the words have changed
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:04 (fourteen years ago)
it's kinda like the end of Prohibition
― sarahell, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:04 (fourteen years ago)
lol gr80 otm
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:04 (fourteen years ago)
quick qn: if i sb'd somebody w/in the last 60 days will my clicking 'flag post' contribute towards a possible temp ban?
― the parable is the parable of the (Lamp), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)
did all SB's get wiped out today?
― ⚓ (gr8080), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)
That's EXACTLY how I use bookmarks tho - thank you Stet. xp
― get ready for the banter (NotEnough), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)
Je55e: stet/keith question or whoever is in charge of code these days
what's different apart from the name of the link tho?Have changed some of the mod tools, but yea, this is semantic -- but in ways that I'm much happier about and I think are important. I'd prefer people to be going "look at this post" than "look at this poster".
(Which is really how I've thought of it for a long time, but the wording didn't reflect that.)
― stet, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:07 (fourteen years ago)
statesmanlike solution imo
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:07 (fourteen years ago)
― Rotary Boy of the Month (WmC), Tuesday, January 31, 2012 6:01 PM
do u intend to ask that question to every person that flags a post
― am0n, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:08 (fourteen years ago)
All the former SBs have been being recorded against actual posts for some time. Might be we need to scan over them, but haven't wiped them out wholesale. xxp
― stet, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:08 (fourteen years ago)
xp well, there was uproar when the moderators were unquestioningly applying the 51, can't have it both ways
― teaky frigger (darraghmac), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:09 (fourteen years ago)
The name change is enough imo, there's no longer a negative vibe hanging off every single post.
― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:10 (fourteen years ago)
am0n: no, I just didn't see anything objectionable in that batch
― Rotary Boy of the Month (WmC), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:10 (fourteen years ago)
test
― omar little, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:11 (fourteen years ago)
ya i know, i was just elaborating on my question upthread about 'flag post' abuse
― am0n, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:13 (fourteen years ago)
i suppose it can't really be abused any more than sb could huh
I think the spirit of the rules are pretty clear. Don't get down and dirty with personal attacks. Don't indulge your meanest instincts here. Don't do stuff that is socially taboo, like spouting racist nonsense, or DOS attacks. We users get to call attention to posts we think violate these rules and the mods get to decide how to handle it.
Works for me.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:15 (fourteen years ago)
very cool new system
― dave cool, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:15 (fourteen years ago)
See, I have a habit of bookmarking a thread as I'm scrolling down it. If I'm reading through a hundred posts or whatever, I won't have to re-read them all to find my place again. I'll obviously just have to adjust, but I feel like the new style impedes on the utility a little.
Good job on the suggbans though, stet. It's time for a new era.
― beachville, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:16 (fourteen years ago)
xp: but what's gonna happen to you dave?
dave cool editor of the rolling stones likes it
― am0n, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:16 (fourteen years ago)
beachville otm
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:17 (fourteen years ago)
See, I have a habit of bookmarking a thread as I'm scrolling down it.
I didn't realise that I do this way more than I thought, too. Turns out I also have been clicking bookmark on the last post before reading it, for some reason. Going to give this one a few days and see what people think. I'm already finding it a bit more useful, tbh.
― stet, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:17 (fourteen years ago)
I agree with Aimless, the spirit of the rules are clear and otm. But I do encourage the mods to sort out the rules into details rather quickly; there are a lot of "we can potentially", "maybes", "I think" and "still need to discuss this" in Stet's reply.
― future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:18 (fourteen years ago)
I think dave cool will start a new Twitter feed to rate the flagged posts out of 10.
― Gonjasufjanstephen O'Malley (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:18 (fourteen years ago)
Oh and please keep the bookmark-jump-to-top thing. Why because it's awesome
― future debts collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:19 (fourteen years ago)
i like that the 'flag post' warning text is a gentle but authoritative blue, not alarm the-airlock-is-opening red
thx for all the work on this, stet
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:19 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FP4jerUBr7Q
― When a German communicates, you listen (LocalGarda), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:20 (fourteen years ago)
Any concerns about over-flagging being a PITA for you mod folk?
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:21 (fourteen years ago)
lol
― am0n, Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:22 (fourteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/8Aumh.jpg
― ⚓ (gr8080), Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:22 (fourteen years ago)
https://media.pitchfork.com/photos/5d14dd8e227be70008c58645/2:1/w_790/Elvis-Presley.jpeg
― Vini C. Riley (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 2 July 2019 18:26 (six years ago)