HIS DARK MATERIALS

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (460 of them)
I think King ... well, we could derail the thread and I could project like one of those things that ... you know ... projects a lot ... but I think he was raised with a certain powerful, compelling worldview, and even though he doesn't espouse it himself -- or not to the same degree or utility -- he draws on it for fiction because when he reaches for the fastball, that's what comes to hand.

... not, like I said, that I'm projecting or anything :)

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Nicely done. ;-) I have to say that based on a variety of essays and introductions I've read that King is generally a perceptive and excellent critic -- his recent one for the edition of Shirley Jackson's The Haunting of Hill House works not only as a discussion of her but of Lovecraft and he makes an excellent (and I think ultimately compelling) argument for Jackson as the better writer that moves beyond the usual attacks directed at Lovecraft.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned: just because a writer is a self-centered asshole doesn't mean his or her writing is bad. These three books kick more ass than Bear Bryant on a meth-fueled 1964 practice session, and screw what their author says in interviews.

And Stephen King is not innocent hisself. Maybe skeered though.

Neudonym, Monday, 7 July 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah, the Pullman books are still excellent. I've got a whole mental list of writers I just avoid outside-the-story.

I think in this case -- I'd have to read what he actually said -- King was just blinded. I like both Harry Potter and Pullman, but I can't see how anyone could argue that Order of the Phoenix is better than the Pullman books. It's got that whole "it's about damn time it came out"/"hunger is the best spice" thing going for it, granted.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned: just because a writer is a self-centered asshole doesn't mean his or her writing is bad.

Hey now, back up -- I wasn't saying THAT. As noted above, I haven't even read his books yet (though I know something of the general story and approve).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's the quote from King:

My own feeling is that they are much better than Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy, which is their only contemporary competitor. Will kids (and adults as well) still be wild about Harry 100 years from now, or 200? My best guess is that he will indeed stand time's test and wind up on a shelf where only the best are kept; I think Harry will take his place with Alice, Huck, Frodo, and Dorothy, and this is one series not just for the decade, but for the ages.

I would reprint the whole review but I don't want the copyright police after me.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.ciudadfutura.com/poprock/cheaptrickdream.jpg

PUT DOWN THE COMPUTER, NICOLE.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Nicole, keep your head down until Labor Day and the Copyright Police won't be able to come after you (unless they have winter uniforms).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)

THOSE ARE THE WINTER UNIFORMS YOU FOOL.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)

White after Labor Day? MAJOR FAUX PAX.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Copyright police arrest these men/they talk in maths, etc.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Some military strategist Perry is. CAMOFLAUGE YOU RIDICULOUS MAN.

http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/pic200_web/drp000/p043/p04307mc5wb.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)

(I am now wishing I'd said, "If those are their winter uniforms, the commanding officer of the Copyright Police must be Major Faux Pas.")

(Is it Pas or Pax? God, I'm hopeless.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)

The DanandNed collective would dress the Copyright Police in camo Pink.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)

just didn't want you to go too far with that 'if that's his attitude then he sucks' thing, Ned m'boy, you'd be depriving yrself, that's all

Neudonym, Monday, 7 July 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

My oldest friend (who shares a surname with the evil foster parents in HP) introduced me to Pullman, and loved the first two books - then listened to an interview with PP, and loathed him so much he's not read the last. I have therefore avoided interviews etc. with PP to avoid the risk of similar effects.

I suspect the substance of the themes and the brilliant bravura superscience will be lost in a movie adaptation, which will surely aim at the HP audience. I think these are genuinely great books on all kinds of levels, far better than Tolkien in pretty much every way. They are probably my favourite children's books ever, even ahead of Alan Garner. Well made, a lot of it will look really fabulous, especially duelling polar bears in armour. I hope they don't cop out on the seriousness, or the religious and scientific content.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I hope they don't skimp on the sheer loathsomeness of most of the adults. Lyra's parents = Ma and Pa Dickface.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

martin those are only yr fave children's books because you've never read mine! [insert emoticon indicating lighthearted way of making a point that's SERIOUS AS A HEART ATTACK]

Neudonym, Monday, 7 July 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't know you had written any, Matt! Sorry!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 July 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)

My mother sent me this trilogy, which I dutifully read and then set aside. I seem to have missed exactly what it is that is so grand about these stories. Actually, I do remember liking the first two. And I remember exactly nothing about the third. So maybe that was my problem with the series (I feel the same way about several of the books in the Chronicles of Narnia, too).

However, I wouldn't compare them to the H.P. tales - I think that _HDM_ is meant for a more mature audience, and the stories are infinitely more complex. While the H.P. story line is becoming increasingly complex and addresses more issues, the stories still make me think of fifth- and sixth-grade student readers, whereas I think of seventh- and eight-grades as being the starting points for _HDM_ (which is the same range for The Lord of the Rings in my mind, though The Hobbit works with younger little ones.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Monday, 7 July 2003 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm giving these books to my kids when they turn eight.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 20:48 (twenty-two years ago)

*laughing* An excellent plan.

Why eight?

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:06 (twenty-two years ago)

That's the age I was when I read _Watership Down_.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)

make them read shardik

mark s (mark s), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Read it to them in the womb you lazy man.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

But how will I fit in there with them, let alone turn pages?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Much better than Potter, like 3D is better than 2D. Though I now have the new Potter and am childishly excited about reading it.

HDM is very pompous, portentous, but full of excellent tales which do try and push the envelope (ick) for children's fiction. He's really made an effort, and while it all gets a bit up its own arse, it's pretty damn good reading.

Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)

But how will I fit in there with them, let alone turn pages?

I assume you're able to get in there already, surely.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I loved the first two but was never able to finish the Amber Spyglass. About halfway through it started getting extremely dull. Anyone else experience this?

That Girl (thatgirl), Monday, 7 July 2003 22:27 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread got me motivated enough to go buy these books--I am currently halfway through the first one and all I can say is:

ARMORED BEARS, MOTHERFUCKER!!!

I mean, has there ever been a better idea in all of literature anywhere? Aside from that it's quite good--nicely dark and I heartily approve of street urchins smoking and drinking.

adam (adam), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 05:25 (twenty-two years ago)

The first two were excellent, stay up all night for books.

That Girl (thatgirl), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 06:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't remember the last time ANY author came off well in an interview - totally irrelevant to the books in this case certainly. They pretty much rock. The Amber Spyglass goes veering off track though, for me. I think he's trying to cram too many ideas in without properly integrating everything, whereas up until then he'd been doing a great job. I mean, it's still hugely powerful, but I just plain don't like the wheelie things.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 07:23 (twenty-two years ago)

how timely. 1/3 through the second (subtle..) am having fun. will reread thread when i have no spoiler fear.

gaz (gaz), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Awesome books, but yes, the wheelie things were very... odd...

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

They're not the best children's books ever (Moomins obv) but yes they're very very good.

Is anyone going to buy/read Lyra's Oxford?

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)

What is Lyra's Oxford?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Pullman's new cash-in/book, set 2 years after HDM, lushly illustrated travelogue of Lyra wandering around fantasy Oxford, may or may not have any plot.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm reading Stephen Jay Gould on evolution right now and in hindsight I'm quite impressed with the wheelie things, from a design/evolutionary point at least.

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I quite liked the wheelie things, actually. So there.

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Wheelie things = grebt. Also because they are part of the MARY MALONE plot and Mary Malone = r0wr! (in a fictional sort of way)

("for the Dads")

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually why aren't there more for-the-Dads characters in children's lit?

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

http://members.aol.com/DadsWV/Graphics/dads.gif

Dada, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

harry potter <= ???

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:06 (twenty-two years ago)

hmm, I know not what these wheelie things are. Perhaps I shall try to finish off the amber spyglass then. . .

That Girl (thatgirl), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 15:15 (twenty-two years ago)

owen wilson should play iorek byrinson.

j fail (cenotaph), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Am I the only person who liked Amber Spyglass best of the three?

J (Jay), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I really liked the amber spyglass it is so good a potraying the final loss of innocence and the onset of adulthood. It is deeply ambiguous what the republic of heaven means and whether it is a good thing or not.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

four weeks pass...
finished these over my vacation last week. first: I don't think there is a chance in hell these will be filmed. "12 yr olds go into other world, kill god, fall in love. also, torture and mutilation of kids. also, gay angels." That said, Lee Scoresby = Sam Elliott, vox of Hester = Reba McEntire.

I thought the third was disappointing, but I don't know how it couldn't have been. Pullman was throwing his never ever-wider with every book (staring out in our world at the beginning of Knife was a great shock, and the dust = dark matter stuff was good too). But the third kept having to add more and more concepts, and then characters to explain concepts, to close all the doors it had opened (ha ha). Oh here's xx swooping in to explain what needs to happen next. Felt a little rickedy. Lots of compelling locales/events (land of the dead esp) but the overall shape was a little diffuse.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I really like how they killed God with absolutely no fanfare.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)

gah "throwing his net ever wider" up there. one metaphor at a time plz, i know i know

death of decrepit unhealthy pope-like god: not even a little narrator announcement 'and thus, they killed god' it's not even mentioned later, by anyone, 'uhh, d'you know what you did back there?'

Mary Malone's story of her childhood love and then leaving her faith was terrific, but otherwise I felt some of the NO GOD GEDDIT stuff near the end was a little too telegraphed, a little to SUCK ON THAT, CS LEWIS.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:30 (twenty-two years ago)

waiting with bated breath for the final book of dust book lol, but i will def check out this season. i have absolutely no idea how they're gonna manage to adapt this final book, but i am intrigued to see how they fail

comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 7 December 2022 18:55 (three years ago)

three weeks pass...

it's years since i read these and i remember book three as hurried -- this version has a measured pace to it that is maybe righting that?

mark s, Tuesday, 3 January 2023 19:17 (three years ago)

just got a massive goosebumps moment so that's a 👍🏽

sadly it involved lin-manuel miranda 👎🏽

mark s, Tuesday, 3 January 2023 22:13 (three years ago)

Didn’t watch the first season past a couple episodes as it seemed to be sticking to the original book so closely, and because I wasn’t enjoying McAvoy and the Lyra actress

Super curious to see this season though - thought the third book was disappointing but I’m interested to see how they do the final battle and God and the wheely creatures and whatnot

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 4 January 2023 00:01 (three years ago)

I enjoyed in the 3rd book how the literal actual death of god was like a passing thing buried in the middle of a paragraph and you might have missed it.

The land of dreams and endless remorse (hardcore dilettante), Wednesday, 4 January 2023 06:10 (three years ago)

It was the same in the show I now realise. There was this very brief scene with a large crystal cube that has a person/angel curled up in it that they disintegrated. I didnt understand what it was but I do now.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 4 January 2023 07:27 (three years ago)

the wheely creatures look a bit too like if snorky from the banana splits turned up in avatar -- and the rush through the plot-points is beginning to arrive: mary's discovery of the amber lens seemed both too easy and under-explained

its various settings are still great and i feel that dafne keen has grown into the role and the character now that lyra (like keen) is a little older

ruth wilson remains MVP

mark s, Wednesday, 4 January 2023 10:41 (three years ago)

iorek byrnison giving mcavoy a richly deserved hard time lol

claws shd have been out tho

mark s, Wednesday, 4 January 2023 18:47 (three years ago)

the battle in heaven was p well realised IMO, tho it also makes you realise how dr who-ish the steampunky dimension of this story can get -- like the story will be resolved when who (or whoever) gets to press a red button on the head villain's dash which reads "my evil universe-transforming plan into explodey ruins"

(does the book use the term "mutiverse"? it's not wrong exactly but i was wincing every time azrael said it)

one ep to go

mark s, Thursday, 5 January 2023 11:21 (three years ago)

Of what I remember, Asriel & Mrs Coulter's motives get increasingly confusing in the last book, like they're two characters from an old Gossip Girl episode whose motivations change on a dime, just because plot

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 5 January 2023 13:48 (three years ago)

in that case -- as my memory of the book is v spotty (i suspect bcz flaws in book but also a long time since i read it) -- the TV show handles this with rather more clarity even when their motivation is intensely conflicted (towards lyra, towards one another). with her especially -- more thx to ruth wilson than philip pullman maybe? -- we have learned always to read everything she does thru a "things not as they seem" filter. metatron is amusingly rude abt her to her face ("you are a cess-pit of moral filth") but she is NOT AT ALL BOTHERED and her face just says "i know you are but what am i"

mark s, Thursday, 5 January 2023 14:02 (three years ago)

Really enjoyed the whole series of this. The Amber Spyglass was prob my least favourite of the books and I did wonder how some things could possibly work on screen, but they pulled it off. Both young leads loads better in the last season. Not a spoiler, but the visuals for the physical battle in heaven and plunging fall were absolutely stunning.

that mustardless plate (Bill A), Thursday, 5 January 2023 17:00 (three years ago)

two years pass...

anyone start reading the last book of dust book? i'm gonna crack it open today

harper valley paul thomas anderson (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 5 November 2025 21:11 (seven months ago)

i totally forgot that it came out. need to go pick it up this weekend.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 7 November 2025 01:53 (seven months ago)

I am nearly at the end and really enjoying it. OK Pullman is hammering the metaphysical points home with jackhammer but it’s cracking story and he’s really nailing the dramatic moments.

Ed, Friday, 7 November 2025 08:41 (seven months ago)

And Michael Sheen is a cracking narrator for the audiobook.

Ed, Friday, 7 November 2025 08:42 (seven months ago)

yea i'm about a quarter of the way through and enjoying so far. tho i am bored by malcolm so far, hopefully he gets better

harper valley paul thomas anderson (voodoo chili), Friday, 14 November 2025 17:04 (six months ago)

three weeks pass...

finishing up the rose field, it feels like pullman saved a lot for this last book, and while it's very interesting from moment to moment, i am nearly done and the conclusion doesn't feel as grand as the amber spyglass, which for all its faults, definitely felt like the epic final chapter to a world-changing saga. this story is both bigger and smaller, with very good spycraft moments and metaphysical stuff, but way too much "will i or won't i?" dithering on lyra's part. he also killed off a beloved character from the his dark materials trilogy off-screen in a way i felt was very callous.

still, excited to finish this weekend. i still love spending time in pullman's worl

harper valley paul thomas anderson (voodoo chili), Friday, 5 December 2025 16:05 (six months ago)

two weeks pass...

I thought this roughly followed the pattern of the first series

Book 1 - Rattling adventure yarn, almost a standalone, solid cliffhanger

Book 2 - Broadens the story out, while keeping focus on the main characters, who never quite behave as we expect them to expecting, thrillingly

Book 3 - A big old mess

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 23 December 2025 02:16 (five months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.