2012 republican presidential nominee III: can romney get santorum out of his hair?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4660 of them)

can't they teach romney to switch up from his monotone voice and add a little character to it?

Mordy, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:31 (fourteen years ago)

he sounds the same no matter what he says

Mordy, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:32 (fourteen years ago)

I think they can program him to do that, yes.

clemenza, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:32 (fourteen years ago)

santorum is going off the deep end here

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 27 January 2012 02:33 (fourteen years ago)

lol Santorum thinks Chavez is Cuba's puppet huh

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:33 (fourteen years ago)

dude that is prevailing Miami Cuban sentiment

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 January 2012 02:33 (fourteen years ago)

Sorry about allowing the cancer you voted for, Bolivia.

Plato’s The Cave In Claymation (Sanpaku), Friday, 27 January 2012 02:34 (fourteen years ago)

fivethirtyeight Nate Silver
I don't think Romney has much of a chance of winning the Obamacare vs Romnecare debate in the fall.
10 minutes ago

this will be a riot

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:34 (fourteen years ago)

Missed this:

9.28 pm. Holy shit. Romney actually reminded people that his only wife had both multiple sclerosis and cancer and he stuck with her. Wow. When he wants to stab someone in the front, he knows how.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 January 2012 02:36 (fourteen years ago)

this will be a riot

otm

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 27 January 2012 02:36 (fourteen years ago)

presumably it'll go something like: "no, romney, you don't understand. i really, really, really want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for designing the program that i based our national healthcare system on."

Mordy, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:37 (fourteen years ago)

palestinian republicans: the forgotten electoral demographic

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:39 (fourteen years ago)

are palestinian republicans the nascar dads of 2012

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:39 (fourteen years ago)

looking forward to the Log-Cabin/Palestinian Republican coalition

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:41 (fourteen years ago)

just tuned in

delicious

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Friday, 27 January 2012 02:45 (fourteen years ago)

I think Newt has said "I agree with Governor Romney" about four times in the past 15 minutes. Goodbye, Newt.

clemenza, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:47 (fourteen years ago)

DAMMIT SOMEBODY SAY MORMON SOMEBODY SAY MORMON

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:48 (fourteen years ago)

I thought Mitt was winning this huge until Santorum boxed him in on the mandate.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:48 (fourteen years ago)

i like that the fringe dudes are literally on the fringe

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Friday, 27 January 2012 02:48 (fourteen years ago)

yeah I pretty much agree w/ that take matt

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 02:48 (fourteen years ago)

Maybe that Romney-Santorum confrontation on health care will hurt Romney in October debates, but I don't think it hurt him at all in this contest--I thought he dodged it pretty well.

clemenza, Friday, 27 January 2012 03:04 (fourteen years ago)

obama's a much more coherent debater than any of these dudes and if he really wants to make romney squirm w/ health care it won't be hard

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 03:06 (fourteen years ago)

Maybe they'd both just sidestep the issue. Obama never seems eager to bring the issue up (what'd get the other night, two minutes?), and I'm sure that would be fine with Romney. Obama making Romney squirm because Romney created the blueprint for a program that has been a political liability (thus far) for Obama is...confusing.

clemenza, Friday, 27 January 2012 03:16 (fourteen years ago)

People in that audience cheered when Romney alluded to Romneycare!

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 January 2012 03:22 (fourteen years ago)

audience seemed pretty pro-romney from the start

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 03:23 (fourteen years ago)

It's insanity and cowardice for Obama not to campaign on the most popular elements the AHCA. He can say, "My plan is far from perfect, but thanks to it your children don't have to worry about not having insurance at college. Thanks to this, you needn't worry that your daughter won't get coverage because she was born with diabetes."

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 January 2012 03:30 (fourteen years ago)

*of the AHCA

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 January 2012 03:30 (fourteen years ago)

it's gop redmeat too, which means romney is going to have to campaign against it whether it's totally awkward or not

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 03:31 (fourteen years ago)

Support for those things in the AHCA has never waned! It's a good record to campaign on!

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 27 January 2012 03:33 (fourteen years ago)

that's a good point

iatee, Friday, 27 January 2012 03:34 (fourteen years ago)

It's one of those pieces of legislation where if you went down the list and asked if voters agreed with each provision, they'd agree with 99%. Then if you asked if they agreed with Obama's healthcare reform policies, they'd get angry and denounce all the things they just said yes to.

mh, Friday, 27 January 2012 04:05 (fourteen years ago)

DAMMIT SOMEBODY SAY MORMON SOMEBODY SAY MORMON

GET A BRAIN MORMANS

Let A Man Come In And Do The Cop Porn (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Friday, 27 January 2012 05:17 (fourteen years ago)

no surprise but they basically told that "palestinian-american republican" dude to go fuck himself

demolition with discretion (m coleman), Friday, 27 January 2012 10:28 (fourteen years ago)

Bob Dole releases Gingrich dis track

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 27 January 2012 13:43 (fourteen years ago)

Can't believe pitching a permanent moon base isn't a campaign killer.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 27 January 2012 14:34 (fourteen years ago)

that's newt has all this 'supported policy now considered left-wing' in his past
― iatee, Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:58 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

that's true of like 50+% percent of republicans in federal gov't before 2000

:-(

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Friday, 27 January 2012 21:15 (fourteen years ago)

it was a lol moment like 10 debates ago when mitt was all I got the idea for Romneycare from you newt I just wanted u to like me why don't u like me

lag∞n, Friday, 27 January 2012 21:27 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.theonion.com/articles/time-traveler-from-the-year-1998-warns-nation-not,27178/

Time Traveler From The Year 1998 Warns Nation Not To Elect Newt Gingrich

January 26, 2012 | ISSUE 48•04

WASHINGTON—Saying he came bearing an important message from the past, a stranger from the year 1998 appeared on the Capitol steps Thursday and urged voters not to elect Newt Gingrich president in 2012. "In the late 20th century, Newt Gingrich is a complete disgrace!" said the time-traveling man, warning Americans that 14 years in the not-so-distant past, Gingrich becomes the only speaker in the history of the House of Representatives to be found guilty on ethics charges, and is later forced to resign. "In my time, he shuts down the federal government for 28 days because his feelings get hurt over having to sit at the back of Air Force One. Gingrich gets our president impeached for lying about marital infidelities when, at the same time, Gingrich himself is engaged in his own extramarital affairs. And for God's sake, he divorced his first wife after she was diagnosed with cancer. Won't anyone listen to me?!?" When asked about Donald Trump, the time-traveler said he had no information on the man, as no one from 1998 cared about a "washed-up fake millionaire."

Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Friday, 27 January 2012 21:41 (fourteen years ago)

you guys talk about the lengthy Ron Paul ads before Youtubes yet?

ban dejar (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 27 January 2012 23:50 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.therightscoop.com/sarah-palin-cannibals-in-gop-establishment-employ-tactics-of-the-left/

Palin's usually as transparent as you'd expect someone so dumb to be (she's one of the few people I feel comfortable calling dumb), but I find her sudden attachment to Gingrich puzzling. I'm not sure what she expects to get out of this.

clemenza, Friday, 27 January 2012 23:54 (fourteen years ago)

another book deal? a spot next to him on the couch?

Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 27 January 2012 23:55 (fourteen years ago)

a spot next to him on the moon

lag∞n, Friday, 27 January 2012 23:55 (fourteen years ago)

veep

unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:01 (fourteen years ago)

I don't get it. Her own political standing has all but vanished, and she's jumped on board with someone who looks to be headed for oblivion himself. As an expression of her own consuming resentment over her fall from the party's good graces, it makes sense, but otherwise, not at all.

clemenza, Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:03 (fourteen years ago)

My read: she waited until a candidate began to emerge who was gaining the majority of the tea party's support -- and now Gingrich has emerged as their guy. It doesn't matter atm whether he wins the nomination or not. She needed to show she was on the same wavelength with the people who buy her books, who watch her on Fox, who put bread on her table and fill up her bank account.

Aimless, Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:22 (fourteen years ago)

how did u guys get SO CYNICAL

lag∞n, Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)

We learned it from YOU!!! (Or Morbs, I forget)

nickn, Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:28 (fourteen years ago)

If she has indeed given up on the idea of ever holding elective office again--especially the delusion of the presidency--then Aimless's interpretation makes sense. I was working from the assumption she hadn't, that she was moving around chess pieces in her head. (Okay, Snakes and Ladders.)

clemenza, Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:29 (fourteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure she's aware enough to know that if Romney/Paul/Santorum get the nom she won't be brought along for anything.

nickn, Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:32 (fourteen years ago)

We learned it from YOU!!! (Or Morbs, I forget)

― nickn, Friday, January 27, 2012 7:28 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i learned it by watching you dad or mom or someone i cant remember so fn high damn

lag∞n, Saturday, 28 January 2012 00:33 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.