wow it's like some awesome uruk-hai of dogs
― omar little, Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:56 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
as in "dreadlocked, easily decapitated"
― fuckhead (latebloomer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 11:56 (fourteen years ago)
It'd be funny if every decapitation in a horror film took several whacks and completely interrupted the flow of the film. Every "Friday the 13th" film would be 30 minutes longer.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 12:44 (fourteen years ago)
hahaha if jason was really serious about his business he'd be carrying a guillotine around with him
― fuckhead (latebloomer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 12:59 (fourteen years ago)
I may have mentioned this upthread, but I didn't at all care for Martyrs. Boring and pointless. Inside is marginally better, but when it comes to the “New French Extremity”, I'll take Trouble Every Day or Calvaire (Belgian extremity, I know).
sorry contendo, but i i don't think i can trust your opinion on horror anymore. Martyrs is the new euro extremity to beat, so fucking brutal and disturbing (admittedly, unfortunately, the very last scene sucked.) Inside is a complete joke. Calvaire was okay, but not operating on the same plane as Martyrs at all, it had some great bizarre visuals, but no tension. still need to see Trouble Every Day.
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:26 (fourteen years ago)
sorry contendo, but i i don't think i can trust your opinion on horror anymore.
yeah I draw the line at breathless enthusiasm for Pontypool
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:29 (fourteen years ago)
i am down with martyrs and inside, i dont really seem them in opposition at all.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:36 (fourteen years ago)
Then you draw the line at ME shakey!
xpost
― Axolotl with an Atlatl (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:37 (fourteen years ago)
sorry. I was really into Pontypool's first 20 minutes or so, but the it's central concept proved too slippery and elastic to sustain the film. I appreciate what it was trying to do, but it failed imho.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:38 (fourteen years ago)
sorry contendo, but i i don't think i can trust your opinion on horror anymore. Martyrs is the new euro extremity to beat, so fucking brutal and disturbing
that's cool. "brutal and disturbing" is hardly a plus in my book, whether we're talking about horror movies or heavy metal.
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:57 (fourteen years ago)
Pontypool is so awesome. I'd see that shit on stage.
Martyrs ... I mean, come on. It's like three different movies at once, each pretty intellectually facile.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:00 (fourteen years ago)
know what's intellectually facile, your mom
― the star of many snuff films (Edward III), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:01 (fourteen years ago)
was Pontypool a play first? seems more like a book-based thing.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:02 (fourteen years ago)
I think it was a book first, but it really would make a great play.
xpost Hah, my parents are both doctors, and whenever they saw me watching gory horror movies they'd always explain just how fake the effects were! Still had nightmares as a kid ... hmm, I wonder if anyone ever has nightmares with bad special effects? Like they're being chased by really fake looking werewolves?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:09 (fourteen years ago)
i get that pontypool isn't for everyone, but i love both the ideas and the execution (screenplay, performances, photography, editing and sound design). ken loney's description of the zombie attack is one of the most horrifying, surreal and gripping moments of carnage in modern horror, all the more impressive for the fact that it consists of nothing but words and reaction shots. pontypool does get a little thematically heavy-handed in its final scenes, but up to that point, i have no complaints.
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:09 (fourteen years ago)
and yeah, it'd make a great play
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:10 (fourteen years ago)
I like a lot of aspects of it - it's minimalism, the lead actors are really good, the sound design is great, the concept is interesting - but the sloppy explication of what is actually going on in the film as it drags on just really killed it for me. in the end it's hobbled by it's own "two (sometimes three) people in a room talking". it needed some kind of reveal/explanation that just never comes.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:12 (fourteen years ago)
own "two (sometimes three) people in a room talking" premise
that should say
i was satisfied by the explanation. words become infected. good enough for me. doesn't seem any more unreasonable than ghosts, demons or magical whatever. i prefer horror with fantastical/unexplained/symbolic elements to stuff that attempts to be realistic & convincing.
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
you know, generally speaking
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:18 (fourteen years ago)
Calvaire = Trouble Every Day > Inside >>>>> Martyrs = High Tension
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:23 (fourteen years ago)
and La Meute way below even those
i actually liked Pontypool a lot. i found it more creepy than horrifying, but that's okay.
i'll never get what people like about Inside, i thought it just fell flat on its face. its been a while since i saw it, but i remember my disbelief not being suspended whatsoever.
i have no idea what this is supposed to mean:
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Thursday, 26 January 2012 21:17 (fourteen years ago)
Well - umm spoilers - there's the first movie, where the girl escapes and they try to figure out what happened to her. Then there's the other movie about the girl being haunted/attacked by her demonic alter ego. And then there's the third movie, where the other girl is being tortured as part of some vague theological experiment. None are satisfying beyond the most, yes, facile dorm room parsing. Seemed totally padded out to fill a feature-length run time, which is how I feel about most torture porn - pretentious, silly or both.
In other words, yeah, HIgh Tension both raised and lowered the bar in one fell swoop.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 21:56 (fourteen years ago)
Basically, Ponypool is so rich in metaphor (which I'm sure I noted upthread), but Martyrs (and Insides, for that matter) is so literal minded it's totally gormless.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:00 (fourteen years ago)
Sorry, Pontypool.
see, I at least had fun w/ Inside as an over-the-top psycho gorefest; it felt much more modest than Martyrs, much to its credit.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:02 (fourteen years ago)
I can barely remember it (which is why I consider it vastly inferior to the already stupid Martyrs), but I think I recall finding it enjoyable in a OTT way UNTIL the policeman comes back as a zombie, and then I realized how much the filmmakers were just spinning their wheels. I was glad to hear the CGI baby inserts were allegedly done without their permission, though.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:09 (fourteen years ago)
oh man cop coming back as a "zombie" is one of the coolest things about that movie, its a very sly trick and tip of the hat.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:14 (fourteen years ago)
also im sorry but theres a million miles more legit depth to martyrs than pontypool, pontypool just wears "look at me i am thinking" right on its surface but thats all there is.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:15 (fourteen years ago)
nah.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:17 (fourteen years ago)
A million miles? Really?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:18 (fourteen years ago)
Legit depth?
I like Pontypool a lot, but then I'm a tremendous sucker for homegrown (Cdn.), well-executed high-concept genre stuff.
Speaking of which, anyone but me seen this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Flz5_JDGI3Q
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:19 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEUQUFvuV6I=Martyrs
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:20 (fourteen years ago)
so pontypool is about words acting as a virus because why? who knows? and then 90 minutes of movie happens and we learn nothing at all. its an empty movie wrapped up in an attempt to look smart while saying and signifying nothing at all.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:21 (fourteen years ago)
whoops, that was a misleading clip. it's not a cheap-looking period piece, it's about LARPing gone wrong. xxp
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)
Who says Pontypool is "about" anything?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:23 (fourteen years ago)
so pontypool is about words acting as a virus because why? who knows? and then 90 minutes of movie happens and we learn nothing at all.
^^^this
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:23 (fourteen years ago)
never heard of Martyrs before, now I'm curious
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:24 (fourteen years ago)
re: Pontypool, I've always taken it as principally being about french-english relations in Canada, or just cultural/linguistic hegemony in general if you like.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:25 (fourteen years ago)
Personally, I still think Pontypool is a metaphor for Quebecois independence, which is at least partly about language. Simon, you're Canadian, what do you think?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:25 (fourteen years ago)
I understood that going in but that didn't make it a better movie. the movie was still 2/3rds two people sitting in a room making up explanations for things
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:27 (fourteen years ago)
i do enjoy that this is a showdown between canadian horror films
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:29 (fourteen years ago)
well not inside i dont think, but the main contenders
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:30 (fourteen years ago)
I feel kind of weird about 'it thinks it's smart' as a dismissal? So it overreaches itself a bit, big deal! I like a thinkin' mess!
Oooh oooh I need opinions on The Wild Hunt! How izzit?
― Axolotl with an Atlatl (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:33 (fourteen years ago)
eh i dont think it thinks its smart as much as it really really wants us to think its smart. i was thinking of reading the book to see if it just got fucked up in transition actually
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:36 (fourteen years ago)
I think Pontypool could have been less vague but maybe the concept would have completely fallen apart with closer inspection. I doubt it tho cause I will accept pretty lamebrained explanations for things in horror movies.
― Frobisher (Viceroy), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:37 (fourteen years ago)
The Wild Hunt might be my fave QC flick of the last few years - funny, genre-defying, and surprisingly rousing. Only real flaw is the writing of the "queen" / girlfriend character, really underdeveloped.
And yeah Josh I definitely read it that way too, at least in part.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:39 (fourteen years ago)
I will accept pretty lamebrained explanations for things in horror movies.
yeah so will I! Instead we get ... nothing. we get the half-guesses (which turn out to be correct, for no apparent reason?) of the two main characters and that's it.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:41 (fourteen years ago)
I like that bit in Dawn of the Dead when the zombies hold up a sale banner that's been painted over with IT'S ABOUT CONSUMERISM in bloody letters.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:44 (fourteen years ago)