I'd like to use Linux but...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (797 of them)

...to use linux but the mix of HPUX and Solaris elements confuses the shit out of me.

StanM, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:00 (fourteen years ago)

Do you mean SYS V-style versus BSD-style?

mh, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:01 (fourteen years ago)

LVM and df -k together! I'm only getting used to storage operations on our hpux and solaris servers and now they get in some linuxes... *shivers*

StanM, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:05 (fourteen years ago)

there's also the "skeuomorph is bullshit" complaint. I can't loathe iCal enough now

stet, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:40 (fourteen years ago)

ok I blocked that one out because it's a non-trivial complaint and makes me kill people. I mean, want to kill people.

I can only assume someone's going to build an app that uses all the APIs from iCal only works better and I'll never have to use it now.

tbf I use Sparrow almost exclusively for email now

mh, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:44 (fourteen years ago)

the biggest threat to windows is, well windows, but also people using phones for what they used to use computers for

The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:09 (fourteen years ago)

is there a hanleypedia entry on this?

mh, Friday, 3 February 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)

I tihnk I was fired from being the admin - I cant even lead my own wiki :(

The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:43 (fourteen years ago)

:(

mh, Friday, 3 February 2012 16:46 (fourteen years ago)

:(:(:(:(:(

sad crowd

The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:24 (fourteen years ago)

two months pass...

Ubuntu 12 = Quantal Quetzal" - I would have preferred Queer Queen

The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Thursday, 26 April 2012 17:19 (fourteen years ago)

i bought a new laptop with windows 7 on it and i haven't uninstalled it yet :-/

linux user lost

J0rdan, Diddy (tpp), Thursday, 26 April 2012 17:21 (fourteen years ago)

You're probably better off with Windows 7

The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:03 (fourteen years ago)

's not bad

ILX uh-huh-uh uh-huh uh-huh BEEP BOOP BOOP BEEP (snoball), Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:05 (fourteen years ago)

if you build a computer and install some form of linux on it is it possible to run osx apps on it? what about windows apps? is it a hassle or is it relatively straightforward.

the late great, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:07 (fourteen years ago)

wine on linux is very good at running some windows apps, particularly some old ones you can't run on windows anymore.
almost everything on linux is a hassle, but it's "good" for you in that it makes you smarter, while every hassle on windows makes you dumber? some rationalization like that.

will windows8 be the next cataclysm that makes linux users out of a generation?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:10 (fourteen years ago)

on a personal level i feel like rebelling against apple, their product lines and software have been moving in a direction i don't like for awhile now - dumbing down, lots of surface-level improvements w/o a lot of substance, endless integration w/ web stuff i don't use like fb and twitter, etc etc etc

based on googling looks like the answer is no re: osx apps but all of the sources i found are a few years old

the late great, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:16 (fourteen years ago)

the only thing I really wish for Apple stuff is that the frameworks they have that let you get at calendar, contact, and music databases recognize the possibility that your primary apps may not be the built in ones. I can understand them being squeamish about allowing alternative primary calendar and email apps on the iphone, but it'd be nice! Even more so on the desktop since iCal has switched from being minimal and a little feature-needy to being kind of dumb and only slightly feature-enhanced. The backend is nice, though!

mh, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:21 (fourteen years ago)

not really linux-specific, but you could run osx under a virtual machine instance in order to use the apps. a lot of 3rd party osx apps have linux ports though.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:26 (fourteen years ago)

just use OS X and use a virtual instance of linux imo

mh, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:26 (fourteen years ago)

endless integration w/ web stuff i don't use like fb and twitter, etc etc etc

? this is not a thing

caek, Thursday, 26 April 2012 23:38 (fourteen years ago)

maybe that is just my perception based on the direction of third-party osx apps and especially ios apps than the actual os itself

speaking of third-party apps i tried to use sparrow as my primary email on iphone and i must admit it kinda sucks compared to apple mail

the late great, Friday, 27 April 2012 00:16 (fourteen years ago)

ubuntu also pushes the social media integration angle

badg, Friday, 27 April 2012 00:54 (fourteen years ago)

ubuntuna

mh, Friday, 27 April 2012 00:56 (fourteen years ago)

ubuntu also pushes the social media integration angle

― badg, Friday, April 27, 2012 12:54 AM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah i thought i would love this but as it turns out i hated it

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 27 April 2012 01:12 (fourteen years ago)

otm

o s– man (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 27 April 2012 01:13 (fourteen years ago)

? this is not a thing

http://i.imgur.com/goi2m.png

diamonddave85, Friday, 27 April 2012 03:04 (fourteen years ago)

ok but lol you use safari

caek, Friday, 27 April 2012 08:38 (fourteen years ago)

didn't the ubuntu guy say he thought the future of linux was tablets/touch hence the push for these stupid new user interfaces that slow everything down? i fundamentally disagree with him really. h8 touchscreen so much - they slow down everything.

windows 7 is good yeah but i want to go back to linux soon.

J0rdan, Diddy (tpp), Friday, 27 April 2012 09:25 (fourteen years ago)

desktop pc's themselves are for grahpic designers and radiologists and such - u can ILE on your tabby while you shatty on your enemy. ease of portability is pc on da potty. S Jobbs induringlegacy

The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33 (fourteen years ago)

very deep bow

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 27 April 2012 10:36 (fourteen years ago)

ladies and gentlemen, Latham Green

mh, Friday, 27 April 2012 14:04 (fourteen years ago)

lmao

J0rdan, Diddy (tpp), Friday, 27 April 2012 14:06 (fourteen years ago)

ok but lol you use safari

i use chrome!!!

diamonddave85, Friday, 27 April 2012 15:57 (fourteen years ago)

otm

caek, Friday, 27 April 2012 23:49 (fourteen years ago)

what is a nice lightweight distro for an old laptop?

So Efficient! (doo dah), Sunday, 29 April 2012 01:15 (fourteen years ago)

I put lubuntu on a old laptop I gave to my nephew and it worked pretty well.

svend, Sunday, 29 April 2012 01:48 (fourteen years ago)

i always suggest puppy if you can deal with Win98-inspired GUI

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 29 April 2012 02:31 (fourteen years ago)

CrunchBang Linux is another goodie for reviving old gear.

millmeister, Sunday, 29 April 2012 09:22 (fourteen years ago)

Just program your own OS.

Jeff, Sunday, 29 April 2012 11:20 (fourteen years ago)

I like the disclaimer (x-post):

CrunchBang Linux is not recommended for anyone needing a stable system or anyone who is not comfortable running into occasional, even frequent breakage. CrunchBang Linux could possibly make your computer go CRUNCH! BANG!

Bob Six, Sunday, 29 April 2012 11:32 (fourteen years ago)

or anyone who dislikes black.

seriously, i tried it recently and the theme is white and black for everything. changing the openbox theme / background was easy enough but even things like the firefox url box were white on black.

(dark backgrounds on glossy screens = lots of reflections. maybe ok if you program in the a basement...)

koogs, Sunday, 29 April 2012 11:42 (fourteen years ago)

Yup can't say I'm a huge fan of the CrunchBang colour scheme (or lack of it).

I ran Linux Mint Xfce on an old net book last year and that worked a treat. Not sure what the current release is like however - the relentless release schedule is a bit overwhelming.

millmeister, Sunday, 29 April 2012 16:12 (fourteen years ago)

what about one of the red hat enterprise derived distros like centos or scientific linux? they seem relatively stable / well supported

los blue jeans, Sunday, 29 April 2012 16:35 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.junauza.com/2008/11/7-deadly-linux-commands.html

mv /home/yourhomedirectory/* /dev/null
<--- made me lol irl

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 29 April 2012 16:45 (fourteen years ago)

have heard good things about centos from our server guys at work

original bgm, Sunday, 29 April 2012 16:57 (fourteen years ago)

i just want something that i can incrementally upgrade forever, no reinstalling every couple of years, too much of a wrench. am on ubuntu 10.04 so have another year to find something. not keen on unity. tried kubuntu but didn't like it... don't like the idiot menu in mint (how reconfigurable is that?) but cinnamon / mate sounds useful.

koogs, Sunday, 29 April 2012 17:54 (fourteen years ago)

Arch Linux!

raw feel vegan (silby), Sunday, 29 April 2012 18:29 (fourteen years ago)

Now I remember why I didn't dual boot on that laptop, it has that wireless problem with the Broadcom card. :-/

Anyways, I couldn't install puppy, but Lubuntu seems to be okay (booting from CD). Tried Tiny Core too, but I hate those Apple-y pop up icons.

So Efficient! (doo dah), Monday, 30 April 2012 14:12 (fourteen years ago)

I am using virtual Ubuntu on oracle virtual box at work. I feel special. now I can use clementine

The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Monday, 7 May 2012 17:46 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.