Michelle Bachmann, the new Phyllis Schafly:
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/138006423.html
I might opine she's more like Andy Schafly, but whatever...
― Hawaiian mime montage (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:54 (fourteen years ago)
Seriously, I thought Pawlenty had left the presidential race.
http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/oOctFYskBYeMPnkD0tR3mQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9aW5zZXQ7aD00Mjk7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://l.yimg.com/os/152/2012/01/25/Unknown-15-jpeg_181420.jpg
― pplains, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:23 (fourteen years ago)
Love the expression on the toady's face.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:24 (fourteen years ago)
they're walking into the store to purchase even more vests. it's another big vest procurement day for the santorum campaign
― SELF DEPORTATION (Z S), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:25 (fourteen years ago)
the sweater vest says "avuncular, yet dynamic"
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:27 (fourteen years ago)
the sweater vest says "don't leave me alone with your kids"
― I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:28 (fourteen years ago)
Hey, guys, they're sweater vests. You still gotta iron the shirt sleeves.
― You got to ro-o-oll me and call me the tumblr whites (Phil D.), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:28 (fourteen years ago)
he ironed them that morning, but with all of the phone holding, shit gets wrinkled by noon
― SELF DEPORTATION (Z S), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:33 (fourteen years ago)
Best part of a sweater vest is you can wear a t-shirt underneath with a design on the back.
― pplains, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:37 (fourteen years ago)
For as much as I dislike Pawlenty, and it's a lot, I do have to thank him for this quote:
"For Republicans and conservatives all across this country, a question is going to have to be asked as they consider Newt Gingrich as a potential nominee for president: Really? I mean, really?"
― Hawaiian mime montage (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:11 (fourteen years ago)
I really can't wait until this whole "Really?" meme is over.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:39 (fourteen years ago)
I usually only read the politics threads, but I'm compelled to contribute here: Dr Morbius, you are truly a monster and a hideous bitch of a human being.
― Je55e, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:49 (fourteen years ago)
really?
― dead precedents politics as usual (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)
uh thanks for that dude xp
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
Dr Morbius, you are truly a monster and a hideous bitch of a human being.
Please, don't encourage him.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:04 (fourteen years ago)
Pawlenty's right, of course, and he's also pathetic--a guy whose own campaign was such a disaster, and who bowed out almost immediately because he had a bad debate, ought to go light on the sarcasm. This is not a defense of Gingrich the candidate, but I do give him credit for hanging in there when no one was paying any attention to him early on.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:04 (fourteen years ago)
Morbius may be truly a monster but how many people has Obama killed today?
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:05 (fourteen years ago)
"Monster" was hyperbole. So was "human being." "Hideous bitch" = OTM.
― Je55e, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:12 (fourteen years ago)
did obama say anything about tUnE-yArDs in his SOTU??
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:12 (fourteen years ago)
I've got to quote this, because it's almost a word-for-word reflection of my own feelings (give or take "two really smart guys")--I've got a post way upthread, or on the earlier Republican thread, that makes virtually the identical point.
Romney versus Obama will be a snoozefest, mainly because Romney elicits no passion from anybody. Newt versus Barak, however, could be vastly entertaining. Two really smart guys, both of whom are good speakers, and both of whom will be at least affecting being really pissed off at the other and the other's base. If the Newt who tore into John King the other day shows up at the debates, they will be truly great TV. Since I don't think anybody in Washington or running to be in Washington can fix the problems we face, why not vote for the circus?
http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2012/01/the-gingrich-temptation.html
― clemenza, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:15 (fourteen years ago)
Tbf, it'll be tough for Newt to have to face the horrible liberal media for months of debates, talk shows, etc. What a brave, brave man.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:18 (fourteen years ago)
that post is totally stupid
someone in the comments uses the "SCOAMF" acronym, nice bit of code from the past year or so.
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)
Je55e explained: it's ILXmarys Heave Their Pearls Week
Chicago girlz love their Dronebama!
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)
xxpost
that is idiotic on its face. the whole tweedledee/tweedledum line is something only privileged folks who don't rely on the safety net can repeat so bombastically.
on the other hand newt has no way of winning a general election, so bring it on i guess?
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)
Before I googled it, I assumed it meant Supreme Commander of American Military Forces…. like they didn't respect Obama, but did respect the office.
I gave them waaaayyy too much credit.
― pplains, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:25 (fourteen years ago)
i mean the 2-party system is corrupt, obama is not the best leader by any means, he's done terrible things w/r/t to foreign policy (like truly terrible things the full impact of which we won't even understand for years), and he has not had the best strategy when it comes to domestic policy. on the other hand i don't see how he could get anything done domestic policy-wise w/ the present congress and senate.
BUT. but. to imagine that a pres romney much less a pres newt would not very possibly mean changes for the worse in the lives of a lot of people in this country is fantasy. the fact that i have to spell this out i guess suggests how much the tweedledee/tweedledum line has charmed its way into the hearts of so many People of the Left. i'm not really going to get into this here, because we've done it before, but WTF people.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:26 (fourteen years ago)
don't bother, am
― I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:27 (fourteen years ago)
are there going to be as many presidential debates as there have been GOP primary debates? if so, uuuuuuuuuuuuuuugh
i want just one, in primetime, no shirts
― SELF DEPORTATION (Z S), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:30 (fourteen years ago)
This is what makes you insufferable. You argue against positions that no one on the thread or board puts forth, and/or which others explicitly deny, and you do it with the same nicknames and un-clever "zings" over. and over. and over. As someone said above, you're basically as worthwhile as a bot.
Also, you didn't stay gone.
But me, I'm going back to lurking and learning.
― Je55e, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:32 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.yellmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/top-10-cage-fights-3.jpg
xpost
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:32 (fourteen years ago)
on almost any topic morbs clearly fancies himself the most cynical, world-weary sophisticate in the room but you could predict the gist of what he will write on almost any topic with 80% accuracy. actually his pretensions w/r/t to film are so transparent and hokey that i've done literal /facepalms/ when reading them. and yet he persist in this persona, so obviously he gets some satisfaction from it. or he really is a bot.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:35 (fourteen years ago)
If you (not specifically you, am) live in a swing district then by all means vote for Obama; if you're in a safe lib district you have other ways to vote your conscience.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:39 (fourteen years ago)
agreed.
― flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:39 (fourteen years ago)
thank you for the false binary where it's impossible for an Obama vote to be voting your conscience
― I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:40 (fourteen years ago)
It's safe to guess that frequent posters to this thread agree with the following statement: "obama is not the best leader by any means, he's done terrible things w/r/t to foreign policy (like truly terrible things the full impact of which we won't even understand for years), and he has not had the best strategy when it comes to domestic policy."
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:44 (fourteen years ago)
that guess and the bullying that happens when someone disagrees is why these threads are such an unbearable, unfriendly echo chamber
― I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:46 (fourteen years ago)
they will be truly great TV. Since I don't think anybody in Washington or running to be in Washington can fix the problems we face, why not vote for the circus?
any scenario that places newt gingrich within actual reach of the presidency is not my idea of entertainment
― demolition with discretion (m coleman), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:50 (fourteen years ago)
"obama is not the best leader by any means, he's done terrible things w/r/t to foreign policy (like truly terrible things the full impact of which we won't even understand for years), and he has not had the best strategy when it comes to domestic policy."
i don't agree with this, at least not beyond the extent one could level these charges at any president
― demolition with discretion (m coleman), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:53 (fourteen years ago)
today newt informed a floridacrowd that when his proposed permanent lunar base reaches a population of 13,000 it can apply for statehood
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:53 (fourteen years ago)
like truly terrible things the full impact of which we won't even understand for years)
self-fulfilling prophecy
― demolition with discretion (m coleman), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:57 (fourteen years ago)
moon base will be for "science, tourism and manufacturing", and will be operational by end of 2nd term
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:59 (fourteen years ago)
I'm partially responsible for some of the bullying. It's borne in part of both my impatience with fandom in any degree.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 23:02 (fourteen years ago)
honestly i prefer his foreign policy to his domestic
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)
or rather, i was way more disappointed by the latter
guys we are talking about the 51st state being on the moon now, keepup
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)
I vote for secession
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 23:09 (fourteen years ago)
president gingrich and the first lady will spend memorial day weekend at their lunar retreat
guaranteed if obama was pro-nasa newt would be decrying space travel as an expensive boondoggle
― demolition with discretion (m coleman), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 23:12 (fourteen years ago)
mmm no
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 23:14 (fourteen years ago)
newt is a sci-fi nerd to the core
if Obama was pro-NASA newt would take him to task for not being pro-NASA ENOUGH