We think of it as “beyond interface”, it’s the “intenterface”.― occupy the A train (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, January 25, 2012 3:08 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
otm
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
"its like, what if you could just tell the computer what you're thinking......and it knows man"
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:29 (fourteen years ago)
Mac users are probably the easiest to inflict change upon, and *nix users are probably the whiniest. Ubuntu users would be the most open of the *nix user spectrum, though that's not saying much. Intenterface is the worst name I have ever heard btw (and iOS autocorrects it to 'intent efface').
― Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:31 (fourteen years ago)
that is exactly backwards dude
― caek, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:42 (fourteen years ago)
Mac users have so much faith in the church that in most cases they hump every change like a dog, whereas *nix users (correctly imo) want every function in history to be available to them forever
― Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:49 (fourteen years ago)
if by *nix you mean linux then i cannot think of a group of users who care or think less about user interface. and i don't mean that in a "lol linux is ugly" way. i mean it seriously. i mean "flexibility"/"power" is, by a very long way, the most important thing to them. changes to the gui have pretty much no impact on what they mean by flexibility and power.
― caek, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:35 (fourteen years ago)
damn good point
― Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:36 (fourteen years ago)
um i don't know if you're paying attention but we're not talking about a user INTERFACE
― the "intenterface" (difficult listening hour), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:38 (fourteen years ago)
there are 30 page philosophical screeds on ui paradigms and the history of beos disguised as os reviews every time a new version of os x comes out. daring fireball got where it is today by being a pedant about ui. and he's read by regular os x users. i doubt anyone reads the discussion of linux ui revisions except the developers writing about it on their own mailing list.
― caek, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:40 (fourteen years ago)
not defending either approach btw
So really, when Linux has problems like this (which is increasingly rare, as you say) it's like giving away organic milk which you claim will work in cars whose manufacturers support it, and then blaming the manufacturer for not publishing the specifications of their engine when it doesn't work. The fact is, it doesn't work. Who gives a shit why apart from the dairy farmer?
― caek, Tuesday, 20 November 2007 10:41 (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i have read this post many times today and still have absolutely no idea what i was talking about.
― caek, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:43 (fourteen years ago)
that post is awesome
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:11 (fourteen years ago)
I have absolutely no idea what the default GUI will look like on any Linux distribution since I haven't regularly used one for years, but last I checked nearly all defaults look like some variation of the system task bar/start menu/docked status icons popularized by Windows 95. They may also have some sort of multi-desktop pager widget. With these expectations, I haven't been too surprised.
OS X has the most GUI complainers, by far, although it's diminished a lot in the last few years. The biggest complaints have been the change from Spaces to the current sliding-between-desktops (and apps) thing they've got going now. To be honest, the other biggest complaint has been that the default folder and disk icons are monochrome, which... sheesh, whatever.
― mh, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:33 (fourteen years ago)
well, there's the "The Finder" complaint
― caek, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:35 (fourteen years ago)
True, that.
btw this HUD thing is dumb when used as they said, because it's not solving the problem it's identifying -- unintuitive menu organization and structure. It's just replacing it with a free-form "type what you want to do".
Now, interfaces where there's a strong language behind it that later added visual tools, like mathematica? That's a different ballgame.
― mh, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:42 (fourteen years ago)
...to use linux but the mix of HPUX and Solaris elements confuses the shit out of me.
― StanM, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:00 (fourteen years ago)
Do you mean SYS V-style versus BSD-style?
― mh, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:01 (fourteen years ago)
LVM and df -k together! I'm only getting used to storage operations on our hpux and solaris servers and now they get in some linuxes... *shivers*
― StanM, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:05 (fourteen years ago)
there's also the "skeuomorph is bullshit" complaint. I can't loathe iCal enough now
― stet, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:40 (fourteen years ago)
ok I blocked that one out because it's a non-trivial complaint and makes me kill people. I mean, want to kill people.
I can only assume someone's going to build an app that uses all the APIs from iCal only works better and I'll never have to use it now.
tbf I use Sparrow almost exclusively for email now
― mh, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:44 (fourteen years ago)
the biggest threat to windows is, well windows, but also people using phones for what they used to use computers for
― The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:09 (fourteen years ago)
is there a hanleypedia entry on this?
― mh, Friday, 3 February 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)
I tihnk I was fired from being the admin - I cant even lead my own wiki :(
― The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Friday, 3 February 2012 16:43 (fourteen years ago)
:(
― mh, Friday, 3 February 2012 16:46 (fourteen years ago)
:(:(:(:(:(
sad crowd
― The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Friday, 3 February 2012 18:24 (fourteen years ago)
Ubuntu 12 = Quantal Quetzal" - I would have preferred Queer Queen
― The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Thursday, 26 April 2012 17:19 (fourteen years ago)
i bought a new laptop with windows 7 on it and i haven't uninstalled it yet :-/
linux user lost
― J0rdan, Diddy (tpp), Thursday, 26 April 2012 17:21 (fourteen years ago)
You're probably better off with Windows 7
― The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:03 (fourteen years ago)
's not bad
― ILX uh-huh-uh uh-huh uh-huh BEEP BOOP BOOP BEEP (snoball), Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:05 (fourteen years ago)
if you build a computer and install some form of linux on it is it possible to run osx apps on it? what about windows apps? is it a hassle or is it relatively straightforward.
― the late great, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:07 (fourteen years ago)
wine on linux is very good at running some windows apps, particularly some old ones you can't run on windows anymore.almost everything on linux is a hassle, but it's "good" for you in that it makes you smarter, while every hassle on windows makes you dumber? some rationalization like that.
will windows8 be the next cataclysm that makes linux users out of a generation?
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:10 (fourteen years ago)
on a personal level i feel like rebelling against apple, their product lines and software have been moving in a direction i don't like for awhile now - dumbing down, lots of surface-level improvements w/o a lot of substance, endless integration w/ web stuff i don't use like fb and twitter, etc etc etc
based on googling looks like the answer is no re: osx apps but all of the sources i found are a few years old
― the late great, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
the only thing I really wish for Apple stuff is that the frameworks they have that let you get at calendar, contact, and music databases recognize the possibility that your primary apps may not be the built in ones. I can understand them being squeamish about allowing alternative primary calendar and email apps on the iphone, but it'd be nice! Even more so on the desktop since iCal has switched from being minimal and a little feature-needy to being kind of dumb and only slightly feature-enhanced. The backend is nice, though!
― mh, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:21 (fourteen years ago)
not really linux-specific, but you could run osx under a virtual machine instance in order to use the apps. a lot of 3rd party osx apps have linux ports though.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:26 (fourteen years ago)
just use OS X and use a virtual instance of linux imo
― mh, Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:26 (fourteen years ago)
endless integration w/ web stuff i don't use like fb and twitter, etc etc etc
? this is not a thing
― caek, Thursday, 26 April 2012 23:38 (fourteen years ago)
maybe that is just my perception based on the direction of third-party osx apps and especially ios apps than the actual os itself
speaking of third-party apps i tried to use sparrow as my primary email on iphone and i must admit it kinda sucks compared to apple mail
― the late great, Friday, 27 April 2012 00:16 (fourteen years ago)
ubuntu also pushes the social media integration angle
― badg, Friday, 27 April 2012 00:54 (fourteen years ago)
ubuntuna
― mh, Friday, 27 April 2012 00:56 (fourteen years ago)
― badg, Friday, April 27, 2012 12:54 AM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yeah i thought i would love this but as it turns out i hated it
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 27 April 2012 01:12 (fourteen years ago)
― o s– man (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 27 April 2012 01:13 (fourteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/goi2m.png
― diamonddave85, Friday, 27 April 2012 03:04 (fourteen years ago)
ok but lol you use safari
― caek, Friday, 27 April 2012 08:38 (fourteen years ago)
didn't the ubuntu guy say he thought the future of linux was tablets/touch hence the push for these stupid new user interfaces that slow everything down? i fundamentally disagree with him really. h8 touchscreen so much - they slow down everything.
windows 7 is good yeah but i want to go back to linux soon.
― J0rdan, Diddy (tpp), Friday, 27 April 2012 09:25 (fourteen years ago)
desktop pc's themselves are for grahpic designers and radiologists and such - u can ILE on your tabby while you shatty on your enemy. ease of portability is pc on da potty. S Jobbs induringlegacy
― The Cheerfull Turtle (Latham Green), Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33 (fourteen years ago)
very deep bow
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 27 April 2012 10:36 (fourteen years ago)
ladies and gentlemen, Latham Green
― mh, Friday, 27 April 2012 14:04 (fourteen years ago)
lmao
― J0rdan, Diddy (tpp), Friday, 27 April 2012 14:06 (fourteen years ago)
i use chrome!!!
― diamonddave85, Friday, 27 April 2012 15:57 (fourteen years ago)
― caek, Friday, 27 April 2012 23:49 (fourteen years ago)