2012 republican presidential nominee III: can romney get santorum out of his hair?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4660 of them)

no, libs have long moved on to "What are their demands?" and "You have to vote like a grownup"

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:40 (fourteen years ago)

by using the term 'libs' to describe people you don't like, you're p much speaking in fox news

iatee, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:42 (fourteen years ago)

sorta the political equivalent of complaining about 'white people'

iatee, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:44 (fourteen years ago)

I'm quoting liberal friends p much verbatim

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:51 (fourteen years ago)

damn, it's so long since I heard that excuse

― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:35 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

how is this an excuse, u have no idea what youre talking abt ever, shit you dont even bother to read the thread before inserting yr lame zings, i think you might be a bot!

lag∞n, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:51 (fourteen years ago)

Dems "couldn't do anything" in 2009-10 bcz they didn't have 60 votes in the Senate, right? how is this NOT an excuse as it is commonly utilized in public discourse? if u have a diff pt I apologize for not pickin it up.

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:54 (fourteen years ago)

i definitely get a whiff of "well may the world go" from morby. given his equal opportunity contempt and unending cynicism, i wonder what he thinks is the way forward....

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:55 (fourteen years ago)

he doesn't think there IS a way forward and his incessant yammering is intended to make the rest of us give up as well

I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:56 (fourteen years ago)

morbs, i'm not saying you have to unconditional approve everything or even much that obama says or does. lord knows i don't. but when you basically blanket everybody associated w/ electoral politics in your contempt, then react cynically when people bring up e.g. the possibility of 3rd parties, it's like... do you just want to be the most world-weary person in the room or what?

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:57 (fourteen years ago)

unconditionally

i always leave off the -ly on adverbs

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:57 (fourteen years ago)

he does!

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:57 (fourteen years ago)

oh this is bound to be productive

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:58 (fourteen years ago)

I don't want anything; plz put "unending cynicism" on the pros where it belongs.

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:58 (fourteen years ago)

I don't want anything

well that's obviously untrue. at some level you want self-approval, and i guess you get it by reacting as cynically as possible to every conceivable turn of the political discourse.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:59 (fourteen years ago)

also, this is supposed to be the GOP-monkeys-throwing-shit thread, so bye

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:00 (fourteen years ago)

the filibuster is a real thing you really need 60 votes to pass most things in the senate, its not some imaginary excuse mechanism

lag∞n, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:00 (fourteen years ago)

also, this is supposed to be the GOP-monkeys-throwing-shit thread, so bye

― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:00 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

good riddance. you'll probably be back, though.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:02 (fourteen years ago)

This probably is a poor thread in which to discuss SotU, but I did notice that Obama took pains to distance himself from Congress. He was all 'send me something, you lazy louts, and I'll sign it right away'.

The diabolic republican plan of stuffing up congress seems unstoppable and it will do a number against any smart optimistic idea Obama gets applauded over

They've only had Congress for two years, tho.

^^this and the GOP has been furiously flogging the line that the GOP House members have been busy little bees diligently crafting and passing jobs legislation, only to be tabled by that dastardly Harry Reid in the Senate

your dominican divorce (will), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:05 (fourteen years ago)

sorta the political equivalent of complaining about 'white people'

― iatee, Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:44 PM (41 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

tumblr dems

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 18:27 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3bYBkGgRCE

pplains, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:32 (fourteen years ago)

every single person in that ad is white

Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:35 (fourteen years ago)

What wins in America is a plan, a plan that includes large amounts of fairy dust mined out of my arse. I'd tell you what this plan is, but then you might not like it.

Aimless, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:45 (fourteen years ago)

Michelle Bachmann, the new Phyllis Schafly:

http://www.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/138006423.html

I might opine she's more like Andy Schafly, but whatever...

Hawaiian mime montage (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:54 (fourteen years ago)

Seriously, I thought Pawlenty had left the presidential race.

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/oOctFYskBYeMPnkD0tR3mQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9aW5zZXQ7aD00Mjk7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://l.yimg.com/os/152/2012/01/25/Unknown-15-jpeg_181420.jpg

pplains, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:23 (fourteen years ago)

Love the expression on the toady's face.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:24 (fourteen years ago)

they're walking into the store to purchase even more vests. it's another big vest procurement day for the santorum campaign

SELF DEPORTATION (Z S), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:25 (fourteen years ago)

the sweater vest says "avuncular, yet dynamic"

Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:27 (fourteen years ago)

the sweater vest says "don't leave me alone with your kids"

I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:28 (fourteen years ago)

Hey, guys, they're sweater vests. You still gotta iron the shirt sleeves.

You got to ro-o-oll me and call me the tumblr whites (Phil D.), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:28 (fourteen years ago)

he ironed them that morning, but with all of the phone holding, shit gets wrinkled by noon

SELF DEPORTATION (Z S), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:33 (fourteen years ago)

Best part of a sweater vest is you can wear a t-shirt underneath with a design on the back.

pplains, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:37 (fourteen years ago)

For as much as I dislike Pawlenty, and it's a lot, I do have to thank him for this quote:

"For Republicans and conservatives all across this country, a question is going to have to be asked as they consider Newt Gingrich as a potential nominee for president: Really? I mean, really?"

Hawaiian mime montage (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:11 (fourteen years ago)

I really can't wait until this whole "Really?" meme is over.

o. nate, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:39 (fourteen years ago)

I usually only read the politics threads, but I'm compelled to contribute here: Dr Morbius, you are truly a monster and a hideous bitch of a human being.

Je55e, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:49 (fourteen years ago)

really?

dead precedents politics as usual (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)

uh thanks for that dude xp

tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)

Dr Morbius, you are truly a monster and a hideous bitch of a human being.

Please, don't encourage him.

o. nate, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:04 (fourteen years ago)

Pawlenty's right, of course, and he's also pathetic--a guy whose own campaign was such a disaster, and who bowed out almost immediately because he had a bad debate, ought to go light on the sarcasm. This is not a defense of Gingrich the candidate, but I do give him credit for hanging in there when no one was paying any attention to him early on.

clemenza, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:04 (fourteen years ago)

Morbius may be truly a monster but how many people has Obama killed today?

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:05 (fourteen years ago)

"Monster" was hyperbole. So was "human being." "Hideous bitch" = OTM.

Je55e, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:12 (fourteen years ago)

did obama say anything about tUnE-yArDs in his SOTU??

the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:12 (fourteen years ago)

I've got to quote this, because it's almost a word-for-word reflection of my own feelings (give or take "two really smart guys")--I've got a post way upthread, or on the earlier Republican thread, that makes virtually the identical point.

Romney versus Obama will be a snoozefest, mainly because Romney elicits no passion from anybody. Newt versus Barak, however, could be vastly entertaining. Two really smart guys, both of whom are good speakers, and both of whom will be at least affecting being really pissed off at the other and the other's base. If the Newt who tore into John King the other day shows up at the debates, they will be truly great TV. Since I don't think anybody in Washington or running to be in Washington can fix the problems we face, why not vote for the circus?

http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2012/01/the-gingrich-temptation.html

clemenza, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:15 (fourteen years ago)

Tbf, it'll be tough for Newt to have to face the horrible liberal media for months of debates, talk shows, etc. What a brave, brave man.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:18 (fourteen years ago)

that post is totally stupid

someone in the comments uses the "SCOAMF" acronym, nice bit of code from the past year or so.

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)

Je55e explained: it's ILXmarys Heave Their Pearls Week

Chicago girlz love their Dronebama!

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)

xxpost

Romney versus Obama will be a snoozefest, mainly because Romney elicits no passion from anybody. Newt versus Barak, however, could be vastly entertaining. Two really smart guys, both of whom are good speakers, and both of whom will be at least affecting being really pissed off at the other and the other's base. If the Newt who tore into John King the other day shows up at the debates, they will be truly great TV. Since I don't think anybody in Washington or running to be in Washington can fix the problems we face, why not vote for the circus?

that is idiotic on its face. the whole tweedledee/tweedledum line is something only privileged folks who don't rely on the safety net can repeat so bombastically.

on the other hand newt has no way of winning a general election, so bring it on i guess?

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)

that post is totally stupid

someone in the comments uses the "SCOAMF" acronym, nice bit of code from the past year or so.

Before I googled it, I assumed it meant Supreme Commander of American Military Forces…. like they didn't respect Obama, but did respect the office.

I gave them waaaayyy too much credit.

pplains, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:25 (fourteen years ago)

i mean the 2-party system is corrupt, obama is not the best leader by any means, he's done terrible things w/r/t to foreign policy (like truly terrible things the full impact of which we won't even understand for years), and he has not had the best strategy when it comes to domestic policy. on the other hand i don't see how he could get anything done domestic policy-wise w/ the present congress and senate.

BUT. but. to imagine that a pres romney much less a pres newt would not very possibly mean changes for the worse in the lives of a lot of people in this country is fantasy. the fact that i have to spell this out i guess suggests how much the tweedledee/tweedledum line has charmed its way into the hearts of so many People of the Left. i'm not really going to get into this here, because we've done it before, but WTF people.

flesh, the devil, and a wolf (wolf) (amateurist), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:26 (fourteen years ago)

don't bother, am

I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:27 (fourteen years ago)

are there going to be as many presidential debates as there have been GOP primary debates? if so, uuuuuuuuuuuuuuugh

i want just one, in primetime, no shirts

SELF DEPORTATION (Z S), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 22:30 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.