xxpost Really misleading trailer, tho
― dead-trius (Eric H.), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 04:13 (fourteen years ago)
attack the block is not horror. kidstyle sci-fi action, imo. it's way fun.
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 07:36 (fourteen years ago)
lol Eric, great minds. It's amazing how much would-be-hokey material you can pull off when you effectively dial up intensity.
― Simon H., Wednesday, 25 January 2012 07:51 (fourteen years ago)
Slightly off-topic but I read The Woman in Black tonight, in one sitting. incredible book.
― Autumn Almanac, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 11:11 (fourteen years ago)
i'm not necessarily arguing "attack the block" is horror but it's barely sci-fi. if they just called the creatures "monsters" instead of "aliens" it would be hard to classify it as sci-fi. either way, i really enjoyed it and think a lot of the horror fans would like it too (though it's nowhere near as gory as most of these movies, some blood/gore but not a lot).
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 14:50 (fourteen years ago)
I enjoyed Attack the Block, but think it's massively overrated. Like Tucker and Dale, it's sort of a slightly different take on the same ol', albeit tonally the two couldn't be more dissimilar.
Still amazed that Martyrs has gotten as much OMG mileage as it has. I thought the movie was padded out to the point of absurdity, and silly to boot. Though I suppose that is better than Insides, which is just ridiculous on so many different levels.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 15:21 (fourteen years ago)
well, though they both clearly aim to entertain a broad audience, attack the block is more thematically substantial than tucker and dale. it's also more ambitious and takes bigger risks. none of that necessarily makes it the better film, but i got more out of it.
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
I really want to see The Grey! I have a irrational fear of wild animals especially dogs of any kind.There are wild dogs that roam the woods behind my mother's house and at night you can hear them howling. They have bred with the coyotes and now they look like wolves. No one really knows what they are at this point.
― JacobSanders, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:10 (fourteen years ago)
just saw a trailer for silent house, a remake of a uruguayan film that looks like a mashup of ils and russian ark, starring the olsen twins younger sister
― the star of many snuff films (Edward III), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:19 (fourteen years ago)
also watched the six degrees of hell trailer which has one of the creepiest taglines in recent memory: "Corey Feldman is back"
― the star of many snuff films (Edward III), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:21 (fourteen years ago)
If you really want a Corey Feldman horror flick, seek out The Birthday.
― Simon H., Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:51 (fourteen years ago)
Or even if you don't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEfx7XEEixA
― Simon H., Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:54 (fourteen years ago)
― JacobSanders
wow it's like some awesome uruk-hai of dogs
― omar little, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:56 (fourteen years ago)
At least one overeager animal-rights fellow got annoyed w/ my review; I can only imagine the onslaught Ebert is gonna inspire w/ his not-so-lupine-friendly writeup.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 07:04 (fourteen years ago)
ok, my ctrl-f isn't working, so apologies if I:ve street-teamed for this before on this thread, but I finally got around to seeing Absentia recently and it was an excellent scrappy indie horror movie. A friend of mine from middle-school made it with her husband and I kept watching their updates from the horror festival circuit last year, where it did fairly well. Anyway, it's available On Demand through a bunch of cable providers and will be on dvd in March. Sorry for steetteaming, but this is also an honest recommendation.
― put a boner at the top of the site (beachville), Thursday, 26 January 2012 10:58 (fourteen years ago)
― omar little, Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:56 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
as in "dreadlocked, easily decapitated"
― fuckhead (latebloomer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 11:56 (fourteen years ago)
It'd be funny if every decapitation in a horror film took several whacks and completely interrupted the flow of the film. Every "Friday the 13th" film would be 30 minutes longer.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 12:44 (fourteen years ago)
hahaha if jason was really serious about his business he'd be carrying a guillotine around with him
― fuckhead (latebloomer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 12:59 (fourteen years ago)
I may have mentioned this upthread, but I didn't at all care for Martyrs. Boring and pointless. Inside is marginally better, but when it comes to the “New French Extremity”, I'll take Trouble Every Day or Calvaire (Belgian extremity, I know).
sorry contendo, but i i don't think i can trust your opinion on horror anymore. Martyrs is the new euro extremity to beat, so fucking brutal and disturbing (admittedly, unfortunately, the very last scene sucked.) Inside is a complete joke. Calvaire was okay, but not operating on the same plane as Martyrs at all, it had some great bizarre visuals, but no tension. still need to see Trouble Every Day.
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:26 (fourteen years ago)
sorry contendo, but i i don't think i can trust your opinion on horror anymore.
yeah I draw the line at breathless enthusiasm for Pontypool
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:29 (fourteen years ago)
i am down with martyrs and inside, i dont really seem them in opposition at all.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:36 (fourteen years ago)
Then you draw the line at ME shakey!
xpost
― Axolotl with an Atlatl (Jon Lewis), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:37 (fourteen years ago)
sorry. I was really into Pontypool's first 20 minutes or so, but the it's central concept proved too slippery and elastic to sustain the film. I appreciate what it was trying to do, but it failed imho.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:38 (fourteen years ago)
sorry contendo, but i i don't think i can trust your opinion on horror anymore. Martyrs is the new euro extremity to beat, so fucking brutal and disturbing
that's cool. "brutal and disturbing" is hardly a plus in my book, whether we're talking about horror movies or heavy metal.
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:57 (fourteen years ago)
Pontypool is so awesome. I'd see that shit on stage.
Martyrs ... I mean, come on. It's like three different movies at once, each pretty intellectually facile.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:00 (fourteen years ago)
know what's intellectually facile, your mom
― the star of many snuff films (Edward III), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:01 (fourteen years ago)
was Pontypool a play first? seems more like a book-based thing.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:02 (fourteen years ago)
I think it was a book first, but it really would make a great play.
xpost Hah, my parents are both doctors, and whenever they saw me watching gory horror movies they'd always explain just how fake the effects were! Still had nightmares as a kid ... hmm, I wonder if anyone ever has nightmares with bad special effects? Like they're being chased by really fake looking werewolves?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:09 (fourteen years ago)
i get that pontypool isn't for everyone, but i love both the ideas and the execution (screenplay, performances, photography, editing and sound design). ken loney's description of the zombie attack is one of the most horrifying, surreal and gripping moments of carnage in modern horror, all the more impressive for the fact that it consists of nothing but words and reaction shots. pontypool does get a little thematically heavy-handed in its final scenes, but up to that point, i have no complaints.
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:09 (fourteen years ago)
and yeah, it'd make a great play
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:10 (fourteen years ago)
I like a lot of aspects of it - it's minimalism, the lead actors are really good, the sound design is great, the concept is interesting - but the sloppy explication of what is actually going on in the film as it drags on just really killed it for me. in the end it's hobbled by it's own "two (sometimes three) people in a room talking". it needed some kind of reveal/explanation that just never comes.
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:12 (fourteen years ago)
own "two (sometimes three) people in a room talking" premise
that should say
i was satisfied by the explanation. words become infected. good enough for me. doesn't seem any more unreasonable than ghosts, demons or magical whatever. i prefer horror with fantastical/unexplained/symbolic elements to stuff that attempts to be realistic & convincing.
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
you know, generally speaking
― his hands are a dirty fountain through which lives spurt (contenderizer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:18 (fourteen years ago)
Calvaire = Trouble Every Day > Inside >>>>> Martyrs = High Tension
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 20:23 (fourteen years ago)
and La Meute way below even those
i actually liked Pontypool a lot. i found it more creepy than horrifying, but that's okay.
i'll never get what people like about Inside, i thought it just fell flat on its face. its been a while since i saw it, but i remember my disbelief not being suspended whatsoever.
i have no idea what this is supposed to mean:
― karl...arlk...rlka...lkar..., Thursday, 26 January 2012 21:17 (fourteen years ago)
Well - umm spoilers - there's the first movie, where the girl escapes and they try to figure out what happened to her. Then there's the other movie about the girl being haunted/attacked by her demonic alter ego. And then there's the third movie, where the other girl is being tortured as part of some vague theological experiment. None are satisfying beyond the most, yes, facile dorm room parsing. Seemed totally padded out to fill a feature-length run time, which is how I feel about most torture porn - pretentious, silly or both.
In other words, yeah, HIgh Tension both raised and lowered the bar in one fell swoop.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 21:56 (fourteen years ago)
Basically, Ponypool is so rich in metaphor (which I'm sure I noted upthread), but Martyrs (and Insides, for that matter) is so literal minded it's totally gormless.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:00 (fourteen years ago)
Sorry, Pontypool.
see, I at least had fun w/ Inside as an over-the-top psycho gorefest; it felt much more modest than Martyrs, much to its credit.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:02 (fourteen years ago)
I can barely remember it (which is why I consider it vastly inferior to the already stupid Martyrs), but I think I recall finding it enjoyable in a OTT way UNTIL the policeman comes back as a zombie, and then I realized how much the filmmakers were just spinning their wheels. I was glad to hear the CGI baby inserts were allegedly done without their permission, though.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:09 (fourteen years ago)
oh man cop coming back as a "zombie" is one of the coolest things about that movie, its a very sly trick and tip of the hat.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:14 (fourteen years ago)
also im sorry but theres a million miles more legit depth to martyrs than pontypool, pontypool just wears "look at me i am thinking" right on its surface but thats all there is.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:15 (fourteen years ago)
nah.
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:17 (fourteen years ago)
A million miles? Really?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:18 (fourteen years ago)
Legit depth?
I like Pontypool a lot, but then I'm a tremendous sucker for homegrown (Cdn.), well-executed high-concept genre stuff.
Speaking of which, anyone but me seen this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Flz5_JDGI3Q
― Simon H., Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:19 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEUQUFvuV6I=Martyrs
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:20 (fourteen years ago)
so pontypool is about words acting as a virus because why? who knows? and then 90 minutes of movie happens and we learn nothing at all. its an empty movie wrapped up in an attempt to look smart while saying and signifying nothing at all.
― blurgh (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 January 2012 22:21 (fourteen years ago)