Also, but fucking with intrade, you can fuck with the punditry and CW name-dropping intrade, which then fucks with intrade etc etc
― Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Monday, 23 January 2012 18:53 (fourteen years ago)
romney going all aggro is prob nagl, makes him look desperate
Going from passive aggressive to aggressive aggressive somehow makes him seem more robot-like to me -- like he's been reprogrammed to go into terminator mode, he doesn't seem any more authentic or genuine than he did before.
― Seriously, who votes for Drake? (Nicole), Monday, 23 January 2012 18:55 (fourteen years ago)
Romney telling the truth is going all aggro for him, admittedly
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 January 2012 18:56 (fourteen years ago)
w/ intrade the thing to remember is that it's a very small market and one dude w/ $1000 can affect the price of something pretty substantially. it's very far from perfect but it's still probably a better way to follow the horse race than all but a few pundits.
― iatee, Monday, 23 January 2012 19:07 (fourteen years ago)
George Will craps himself:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/romneys-time-to-rally-himself-against-gingrich/2012/01/23/gIQAy4FULQ_story.html?hpid=z3
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 23 January 2012 19:32 (fourteen years ago)
― Seriously, who votes for Drake? (Nicole), Monday, January 23, 2012 1:55 PM (41 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol
― lag∞n, Monday, 23 January 2012 19:37 (fourteen years ago)
Busy as an intellectual beaver having big ideas by the bushel,
I STAB YOU FOR WRITING THIS
― “How you like that, Mr. Hitler!” (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 23 January 2012 19:42 (fourteen years ago)
I tried to place bets on Romney when the payout was $1.60 on the dollar, but those sites still won't accept my credit card, argh.
― the acquisition and practice of music is unfavourable to the health of (abanana), Monday, 23 January 2012 20:00 (fourteen years ago)
From Josh Marshall--excellent: "The problem Romney faces is that he’s a living breathing example of what many people see as the problem. And by his stated positions, he doesn’t think it’s a problem. If you’re running Mitt’s campaign, that’s a problem."
― clemenza, Monday, 23 January 2012 23:20 (fourteen years ago)
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/23/miriam-adelson-donates-5-million-to-a-pro-gingrich-super-pac/?partner=rss&emc=rss
― iatee, Monday, 23 January 2012 23:59 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.minhstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Brian-Williams.jpg
Smile now, my friend--less than two hours till you get the Full Newt.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:06 (fourteen years ago)
what channel is that gonna be on?
― iatee, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:07 (fourteen years ago)
I expect fireworks
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:07 (fourteen years ago)
fucked upxxxp
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:10 (fourteen years ago)
I hope Brian asks the candidates about their position on Lana Del Ray's SNL performance.
― Seriously, who votes for Drake? (Nicole), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:13 (fourteen years ago)
It's an NBC debate, so should be network (9:00 p.m.).
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:13 (fourteen years ago)
streaming here for anyone else tvless: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032553/ns/politics/
― iatee, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:14 (fourteen years ago)
I'm looking for Newt to ride the wave no matter what.
Williams: "Mr. Speaker, let me begin by congratulating you on your win in South Carolina. You must be enjoying this."
Newt: "Frankly, I'm amazed that you would begin a presidential debate by asking such a fundamentally silly question. It's no wonder that Americans everywhere--especially the good people of Florida--don't trust anything they hear or read anymore. You ought to be ashamed of yourself."
http://politic365.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/01/newt-gingrich-s-anger-over-question-about-ex-wife-dominates-cnn-debate.img_-495x330.jpg
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:21 (fourteen years ago)
kinda wish that ppl would refer to me as mr. [job i held 15 years ago]
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:24 (fourteen years ago)
mr. babysitter, let me begin by asking you
― iatee, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
― horseshoe, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
roflz
― Full Frontal Newtity (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
i thought it was only the president that gets called "mr president" for the rest of his life
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
it's kind of literally true in gingrich's case tho
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:26 (fourteen years ago)
"Mr. Disgraced Former Speaker" too many words.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:28 (fourteen years ago)
I'm seeing this debate as only available via streaming. Can't be, surely.
― encarta it (Gukbe), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:29 (fourteen years ago)
The NBC site's got it on at 9:00.
http://www.nbc.com/
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 00:30 (fourteen years ago)
My favourite apocalyptic quote today, from Steve Schmidt: "If Newt Gingrich is able to win the Florida primary, you will see a panic and a meltdown of the Republican establishment that is beyond my ability to articulate in the English language."
Beyond Rick Perry's, too, I bet.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 01:13 (fourteen years ago)
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Monday, January 23, 2012 7:25 PM (44 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
man i was just reading about this in the UN protocol book -- i think the president, the VP, the speaker, and the president of the senate all get to keep their titles forever. & maybe the majority leader too?
― max, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 01:13 (fourteen years ago)
this is true, which is why I demand that everyone continue to refer to me as Vice President in respect to my former service to the Farmington Junior High National Honor Society
― Z S, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 01:16 (fourteen years ago)
"Governor Romney"
― pplains, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 01:21 (fourteen years ago)
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/23/some-signs-g-o-p-establishments-backing-of-romney-is-tenuous/
do endorsements matter for romney? I mean there's something weird about measuring endorsements the way they're doing it here.
if you buy the narrative about the reactionary base not buying whatever's being currently sold, who knows.
― iatee, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 01:26 (fourteen years ago)
There's a gray area between "No one wants this guy to win under any circumstances" and actual-votes-will-determine-the-result that I'm trying to puzzle my way through.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 01:31 (fourteen years ago)
― clemenza, Monday, January 23, 2012 8:13 PM (52 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
its kinda pitiful how much I want to see this happen
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:09 (fourteen years ago)
can't manage to find the debate on tv for some reason. it's not on NBC? or MSNBC?
― Z S, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:11 (fourteen years ago)
Are you on the West Coast? It seems to be tape-delayed…
― carson dial, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:13 (fourteen years ago)
ah, finally found it. it's listed as Fear Factor on the cable menu thing. sorta appropriate
― Z S, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:14 (fourteen years ago)
lmao
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:14 (fourteen years ago)
― ⚓ (gr8080), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:15 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, the episode is titled "Leeches & Shaved Heads & Tear Gas, Oh My - Part 1". It definitely works.
― Nicole, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:16 (fourteen years ago)
This is pretty intense. Thought I'd miss all the hollering and yelling, but the silence is the perfect backdrop.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:35 (fourteen years ago)
Fidel!
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:45 (fourteen years ago)
ugh @ newt's naked pandering
― horseshoe, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:45 (fourteen years ago)
I'm almost proud that the Cuban-American lobby remains powerful enough to deserve pandering.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:48 (fourteen years ago)
― Z S, Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:14 AM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
tyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:49 (fourteen years ago)
Romney wants to bring back Teddy Roosevelt and his Bright White Carrier Fleet. Gingrich thinks dictatorships only respond to ballsy provocation.
― encarta it (Gukbe), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:52 (fourteen years ago)
It'd be great if they orchestrated the debate like the show that was on beforehand, where if you missed a question a big hole in the floor opened up and you vanished.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:56 (fourteen years ago)
wish the other candidates could have responded to Paul's "we blockaded them and we committed the act of war" comments
― encarta it (Gukbe), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:57 (fourteen years ago)
1,000 ways to leave a Republican Presidential Primary Debate xp
― encarta it (Gukbe), Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:58 (fourteen years ago)
On a side note, that gambling mogul who paid in $5 mil to Newt's Super PAC gave another $5 mil to it today. My real hope is that this kind of drag-out process keeps sucking up money from any/all those inclined to spend it.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 24 January 2012 02:58 (fourteen years ago)