We’d be looking at four more years of Obama’s economic policies, four more years of strained relations with allies, several new Supreme Court justices and an unprecedented power shift to the executive branch.
Hi I write for the Washington Post and I don't know what the word "several" means
― Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 22 January 2012 22:11 (fourteen years ago)
It's a day for unsolicited advice!
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/288866/how-mitt-lost-south-carolina-charlotte-hays
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 22 January 2012 22:13 (fourteen years ago)
weird seeing 'strained relations w/allies' wheeled out by someone on the right; i can't think what it means beyond israel?, & would've thought that anything that made allies plural would be referring to a relationship that wasn't gonna get better under gop rule
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Sunday, 22 January 2012 22:13 (fourteen years ago)
These guys are pathetic:
[Approved commenter] Rook: 01/22/12 15:11
LOL, I've not talking about brie-eaters. I'm talking about relatively educated, non-evangelical suburbanites, many of whom probably eat cheddar and mozzarella.
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 22 January 2012 22:20 (fourteen years ago)
Yay for food-based stalinism!
― Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Sunday, 22 January 2012 22:58 (fourteen years ago)
At some point, you want to go to the local Safeway or Meijers or Walmart even and stand in the grocery aisles, pointing at each item on a shelf and ask these people if Real Americans(tm) would eat that flavor.
"So, the arugula is out but the romaine is in? what about the iceberg?"
― Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Sunday, 22 January 2012 23:01 (fourteen years ago)
Really? Asking Haley Barbour to run? Maybe that WAPO writer should ask Mike Huckabee why he's not running and go from there.
― pplains, Sunday, 22 January 2012 23:27 (fourteen years ago)
Maybe Haley made those obnoxious last-day pardons to draw a couple of lines under "I'M NOT RUNNING, GET ME?"
― "Blue" Meme Tyranny (WmC), Sunday, 22 January 2012 23:33 (fourteen years ago)
http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs4/1324222_o.gif
― pplains, Monday, 23 January 2012 00:00 (fourteen years ago)
I'M OUT! *klunk*
― Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Monday, 23 January 2012 00:11 (fourteen years ago)
Pretty much every suburban party I have been to has had brie. Parties with Republicans even.
― tokyo rosemary, Monday, 23 January 2012 00:21 (fourteen years ago)
good piece http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/did-gingrichs-win-break-the-rules
― lag∞n, Monday, 23 January 2012 03:27 (fourteen years ago)
well put:
In the case of presidential primaries, previous beliefs ought not be accorded all that much weight: Americans have not been picking presidential nominees in quite this way for all that long, and yet a presidential nomination process is complex. In more abstract terms, both conceptual and statistical models of the presidential nomination process may be “overfit” and draw too many conclusions from idiosyncratic examples.
― iatee, Monday, 23 January 2012 03:31 (fourteen years ago)
SIAP, but I've never seen this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEaef07rD6c
― pplains, Monday, 23 January 2012 05:11 (fourteen years ago)
Ali G has a point on this idea of women loving bastards, Newt is on woman #3
― mh, Monday, 23 January 2012 05:17 (fourteen years ago)
stoked http://nasawatch.com/archives/2012/01/gingrich-to-giv.html
― caek, Monday, 23 January 2012 10:54 (fourteen years ago)
I'll be giving a speech. But not just any old speech. A VISIONARY speech...
― Oops, just a little Santorum surge... (Dan Peterson), Monday, 23 January 2012 12:04 (fourteen years ago)
Gingrich the strategist: everyone's worried about unemployment, not sure if Obama's up to the job, so I'll give a speech on Jupiter.
― clemenza, Monday, 23 January 2012 12:25 (fourteen years ago)
just heard Mittens on NPR pointing out to a crowd that Ging ended his speakership an exposed crook. "I don't know whether you knew that."
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 January 2012 12:54 (fourteen years ago)
There's a ton of stuff out there explaining why Gingrich can't win the nomination, and it's pretty convincing. Nonetheless, just like the first go-round, this is fun for as long as it lasts:
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/updates/4518
― clemenza, Monday, 23 January 2012 14:47 (fourteen years ago)
No person who is wavering or independent who actually remembers the 90s would vote for Gingrich, would they?
― mh, Monday, 23 January 2012 14:58 (fourteen years ago)
Not many of those ppl are primary voters
(This is America, only the last 2 weeks are important, except for 9/11)
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 January 2012 15:02 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.frumforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/newt-power-ranger.jpg
never forget
― Euler, Monday, 23 January 2012 15:09 (fourteen years ago)
wait what
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Monday, 23 January 2012 15:15 (fourteen years ago)
the power rangers take themselves so seriously all the time, it's really annoying
― do it, Rockapella! (Z S), Monday, 23 January 2012 15:16 (fourteen years ago)
see, we forgot
― Euler, Monday, 23 January 2012 15:17 (fourteen years ago)
Newt Gingrich, down in the boondocks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz0TJfFLQ9U
― pplains, Monday, 23 January 2012 15:29 (fourteen years ago)
love how he goes right for the part of the store where you buy rubbers
― Euler, Monday, 23 January 2012 15:34 (fourteen years ago)
also I guess Alpharetta is the boondocks for guys like Our Newt
THE ONLY NEWT GINGRICH IN THE WORLD
― tokyo rosemary, Monday, 23 January 2012 16:49 (fourteen years ago)
man newt is such a comedy goldmine
― “How you like that, Mr. Hitler!” (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 23 January 2012 16:53 (fourteen years ago)
I think the photo goes with the article below, but I love the juxtaposition:
http://jimromenesko.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/400x381x1201FakeWashingtonPostCover-400x381.jpg.pagespeed.ic_.2gT_7eI8e1.jpg
Alas, reality will soon set in. (Sullivan, allowing for his usual frenzied melodrama, has actually been pretty good, I think, on why what's going on is the inevitable consequence of the last 12 years.)
― clemenza, Monday, 23 January 2012 17:59 (fourteen years ago)
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, January 23, 2012 7:54 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
haha this is a v good point by mitt
― lag∞n, Monday, 23 January 2012 18:00 (fourteen years ago)
newt to win florida at 58.8% on intrade
― iatee, Monday, 23 January 2012 18:13 (fourteen years ago)
romney going all aggro is prob nagl, makes him look desperate
― iatee, Monday, 23 January 2012 18:14 (fourteen years ago)
its desperate for sure but not sure he has a choice, the establishment apparently failed to kill newt, and one of people big complaints abt romney is that hes a pushover
― lag∞n, Monday, 23 January 2012 18:22 (fourteen years ago)
i don't really trust intrade on anything
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Monday, 23 January 2012 18:23 (fourteen years ago)
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwvc4xP2VA1qz581wo1_500.jpg
Newt on the other hand is no pushover.
― Euler, Monday, 23 January 2012 18:27 (fourteen years ago)
nate silver mentions intrade pretty frequently fwiw. it's nothing but quantified conventional wisdom, but I think there's something interesting in that.
― iatee, Monday, 23 January 2012 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
i suppose so, yeah. i think its audience has to be properly understood tho; quantified conventional wisdom of knowitall dudes on the internet with money
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Monday, 23 January 2012 18:29 (fourteen years ago)
Also, but fucking with intrade, you can fuck with the punditry and CW name-dropping intrade, which then fucks with intrade etc etc
― Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Monday, 23 January 2012 18:53 (fourteen years ago)
Going from passive aggressive to aggressive aggressive somehow makes him seem more robot-like to me -- like he's been reprogrammed to go into terminator mode, he doesn't seem any more authentic or genuine than he did before.
― Seriously, who votes for Drake? (Nicole), Monday, 23 January 2012 18:55 (fourteen years ago)
Romney telling the truth is going all aggro for him, admittedly
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 23 January 2012 18:56 (fourteen years ago)
w/ intrade the thing to remember is that it's a very small market and one dude w/ $1000 can affect the price of something pretty substantially. it's very far from perfect but it's still probably a better way to follow the horse race than all but a few pundits.
― iatee, Monday, 23 January 2012 19:07 (fourteen years ago)
George Will craps himself:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/romneys-time-to-rally-himself-against-gingrich/2012/01/23/gIQAy4FULQ_story.html?hpid=z3
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 23 January 2012 19:32 (fourteen years ago)
― Seriously, who votes for Drake? (Nicole), Monday, January 23, 2012 1:55 PM (41 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol
― lag∞n, Monday, 23 January 2012 19:37 (fourteen years ago)
Busy as an intellectual beaver having big ideas by the bushel,
I STAB YOU FOR WRITING THIS
― “How you like that, Mr. Hitler!” (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 23 January 2012 19:42 (fourteen years ago)
I tried to place bets on Romney when the payout was $1.60 on the dollar, but those sites still won't accept my credit card, argh.
― the acquisition and practice of music is unfavourable to the health of (abanana), Monday, 23 January 2012 20:00 (fourteen years ago)
From Josh Marshall--excellent: "The problem Romney faces is that he’s a living breathing example of what many people see as the problem. And by his stated positions, he doesn’t think it’s a problem. If you’re running Mitt’s campaign, that’s a problem."
― clemenza, Monday, 23 January 2012 23:20 (fourteen years ago)
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/23/miriam-adelson-donates-5-million-to-a-pro-gingrich-super-pac/?partner=rss&emc=rss
― iatee, Monday, 23 January 2012 23:59 (fourteen years ago)