the thing about the mannequin story is that it's obvious that he's joking, but it says TONS that there was actually a brief, serious conversation about whether he could tell that it was a mannequin or not
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Friday, 13 January 2012 21:59 (fourteen years ago)
Rick has to be primaried next go-round in Texas right?
― Matt Armstrong, Friday, 13 January 2012 22:07 (fourteen years ago)
Meanwhile (consider the links Sullivan provides):
http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/01/does-romney-have-a-mormon-problem-with-evangelicals.html
― Ned Raggett, Friday, January 13, 2012 1:55 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i almost find it hard to believe that mitt WOULDN'T have a problem with evangelicals...like if voting your religion is a big part of your worldview, how could you justify voting for him?
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 13 January 2012 22:12 (fourteen years ago)
^^
alot of the mormons I knew were just as stupid close minded and uptight as most of these evangelicals.. its just a difference in details
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 13 January 2012 22:21 (fourteen years ago)
From Ned's link:
"In essense, they played the game, lost, and then complained that the rules were unfair," wrote Judge Gibney in his opinion released Friday afternoon in Richmond, Virginia.
― i couldn't adjust the food knobs (Phil D.), Friday, 13 January 2012 22:42 (fourteen years ago)
http://petswithnewt.com
― lag∞n, Saturday, 14 January 2012 02:50 (fourteen years ago)
Newt back-pedalling like a motherfucker:http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/gingrich-repudiates-super-pac-for-inaccurate-video
But probably not unhappy with the results:http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/south_carolina/election_2012_south_carolina_republican_primaryhttp://americanresearchgroup.com/pres2012/primary/rep/sc/
Also have we had this?<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tyFaWhygzjQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 14 January 2012 08:26 (fourteen years ago)
Hey let's try that again:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/tyFaWhygzjQ
Fuck it, you get the idea.
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 14 January 2012 08:31 (fourteen years ago)
heard on the radio something that made it sound like the new "back pedaling" might have actually been clever political judo---apparently the romney campaign was associated with a super-PAC produced video that was inaccurate, and didn't have it pulled because they claimed that they were not allowed to communicate with super-PACs, legally. sooooo this happens with the newt campaign and it makes him look like a stand-up guy who's against negative politics
― i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Saturday, 14 January 2012 16:02 (fourteen years ago)
Gingrich soundbite on NPR: "If we nominate a moderate who's anywhere near Obama, we will lose."
1) admits O is a 'mod' Repug and not a socialist!2) stoopid for not recognizing the only way to win!
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 14 January 2012 16:05 (fourteen years ago)
To a large extent Obama has followed a strategy of becoming a moderate republican as a way of forcing the republicans to further identify with their fringier elements as the only way to accentuate their differences with the democrats. The core problem with this strategy is obvious: the definition of a moderate republican keeps sliding rightward, the policies of the government keep sliding rightward and the plutocracy has become so entrenched we may never disodge it without actual bloodshed.
― Aimless, Saturday, 14 January 2012 17:56 (fourteen years ago)
Obama's not much further right than Nixon at this point
urgh
― mh, Saturday, 14 January 2012 18:10 (fourteen years ago)
eh I think that's reading a meta-strategy on top of something that's happening for other reasons. and 'moderate republican' doesn't really mean anything today so there's nowhere for it to slide.
― iatee, Saturday, 14 January 2012 19:26 (fourteen years ago)
@RobbieBrown07 Romney just handed a wad of dollar bills to a woman at an event in Sumter, S.C., who said she's homeless and jobless.
― polyphonic, Saturday, 14 January 2012 23:57 (fourteen years ago)
make it bain
― oneohtrix and park (m bison), Sunday, 15 January 2012 00:22 (fourteen years ago)
um
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Sunday, 15 January 2012 00:34 (fourteen years ago)
Newt would have given her audio cassettes of his old lectures. That's what she really needs to get her life in order.
― clemenza, Sunday, 15 January 2012 00:35 (fourteen years ago)
x-post imagine I said that sarcastically, then sighed heavily
― mh, Sunday, 15 January 2012 00:52 (fourteen years ago)
I've officially missed my first "debate"--just found out via Sullivan that there's another one of those I-Heart-Huckabee forums going on (minus Paul). He says Gingrich got booed for a mild reference to Romney (thereby contravening the no-criticism rule). Shades of Dylan at Newport, I'm sure.
― clemenza, Sunday, 15 January 2012 02:15 (fourteen years ago)
People are saying "um" a lot lately for reasons I can't fathom.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 15 January 2012 08:59 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/us/politics/mitt-romney-offers-praise-for-a-donors-business.html?_r=1
Mitt Romney and predatory for-profit secondary education, getting together to ensure that I hate them both that much more.
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Sunday, 15 January 2012 16:46 (fourteen years ago)
That's not particularly surprising
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Sunday, 15 January 2012 16:54 (fourteen years ago)
*sitcom clarinet*
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 15 January 2012 16:58 (fourteen years ago)
I don't even get a *muted trumpet*?
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Sunday, 15 January 2012 17:02 (fourteen years ago)
I'd even settle for a *Seinfeld slap bass*
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Sunday, 15 January 2012 17:03 (fourteen years ago)
you know, it COULD be a muted trumpet!
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 15 January 2012 17:03 (fourteen years ago)
how about the music that plays every time somebody bites into one of Aunt Bea's pickles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OF52pm_52o
― nah (crüt), Sunday, 15 January 2012 17:10 (fourteen years ago)
rip huntsman
― dayo, Monday, 16 January 2012 02:52 (fourteen years ago)
hardly knew ye
― tebow gotti (k3vin k.), Monday, 16 January 2012 02:53 (fourteen years ago)
Geez, and here I was at the movies during this monumental event. This changes everything.
― clemenza, Monday, 16 January 2012 03:39 (fourteen years ago)
Fox News poll: 2012 Obama-Romney race would be tight - Fox News
Totally, bro.
― Girl I want to take you to a JBR (jaymc), Monday, 16 January 2012 15:14 (fourteen years ago)
I know Abbbottt doesn't really cruise this thread, but I was thinking about her yesterday when my Mormon dad was going off on the Evangelical attacks on Romney: "It's 'Church of JESUS CHRIST - Latter Day Saints.' How much more can they spell it out?" and I was all UH.
― pplains, Monday, 16 January 2012 15:30 (fourteen years ago)
"Obviously 18, 19-year-old kids make stupid mistakes all too often and that's what's occurred here. What is really disturbing to me is the over-the-top rhetoric from this administration and their disdain for the military." —Rick Perry speaking on CNN's State of the Union today.
re: guess what
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Monday, 16 January 2012 15:51 (fourteen years ago)
As a proud graduate of Texas A&M, he probably does think that necrourination is just horseplay.
― pplains, Monday, 16 January 2012 15:55 (fourteen years ago)
Pissing on dead bodies, just kids havin' fun.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 16 January 2012 16:02 (fourteen years ago)
What is really disturbing to me is the over-the-top rhetoric from this administration and their disdain for the military urinating on corpses it's the notes he isn't playing
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Monday, 16 January 2012 16:08 (fourteen years ago)
Since Republicans have got their head start on calling Romney a socialist, and since we all know Obama is a socialist, it will really help both parties race to the right during the homestretch of voting season. At the very least, it gives both candidates that nice thick socialist stench during voting season, which provides a good cover while they continue feeding the oligarchy.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 16 January 2012 16:34 (fourteen years ago)
Eh, sorry that was really poorly written.
Basically we're all in a heap of trouble with these two candidates being portrayed as dangerously moderate/left wing.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 16 January 2012 16:37 (fourteen years ago)
glad to see america finally looking to give socialism a try
― Aesop Rizzle (a hoy hoy), Monday, 16 January 2012 17:03 (fourteen years ago)
^much lolz thx
― incredible shrinking man on euphonium (Drugs A. Money), Monday, 16 January 2012 17:14 (fourteen years ago)
Debate #79 tonight. Who will bring the noise and the jokes now that Huntsman's gone?
― clemenza, Monday, 16 January 2012 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
michelleinbklyn Michelle Goldberg Maybe I put too much faith in him, but I'm don't think Obama would ever use "Eye of the Tiger" as his intro music. #Santorum
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Monday, 16 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
Survivor hatred hurts us all as Americans.
― Nicole, Monday, 16 January 2012 22:07 (fourteen years ago)
Tim Wise wrote a bit about something that's bothered the shit out of me due to random Facebook posts appearing on my news feed; it's about ostensibly leftie-leaning folks posting about Ron Paul in glowing terms:
http://www.timwise.org/2012/01/of-broken-clocks-presidential-candidates-and-the-confusion-of-certain-white-liberals/
Yessir, legal weed and an end to the TSA: enough to make some supposed leftists ignore everything else Ron Paul has ever said, and ignore the fundamental incompatibility of Ayn Randian thinking with anything remotely resembling a progressive or even humane worldview. And this is so, even though he wouldn’t actually have the authority to end the TSA as president, a slight glitch that is conveniently ignored by those who are desperate to once again be able to take large bottles of shaving gel onto airplanes in the name of “liberty.”I want those of you who are seriously singing Paul’s praises, while calling yourself progressive or left to ask what it signifies — not about Ron Paul, but about you — that you can look the rest of us in the eye, your political colleagues and allies, and say, in effect, “Well, he might be a little racist, but…
I want those of you who are seriously singing Paul’s praises, while calling yourself progressive or left to ask what it signifies — not about Ron Paul, but about you — that you can look the rest of us in the eye, your political colleagues and allies, and say, in effect, “Well, he might be a little racist, but…
― Put another Juggle in, in the Juggalodeon (kingfish), Monday, 16 January 2012 22:43 (fourteen years ago)
You do have to ignore a lot of Ron Paul's actual actions and past to think his lip service to civil liberties trumps his faults/
― mh, Monday, 16 January 2012 23:26 (fourteen years ago)
he wants to pull troops out of the Middle East, right? smart people: would that increase or decrease the amount of bloodshed? that should be taken into consideration, right?
― incredible shrinking man on euphonium (Drugs A. Money), Monday, 16 January 2012 23:41 (fourteen years ago)
rooting for newt to have his inevitable on-air meltdown in tonight's debate
― demolition with discretion (m coleman), Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:59 (fourteen years ago)
I continue to feel the same--I want something in return for all the time I've invested in this. Gingrich keeps promising "Armageddon," and then, come debate time (and just like Def Leppard), he gives you nerf ballads.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:09 (fourteen years ago)
I want something in return for all the time I've invested in this
u mad
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 17 January 2012 01:11 (fourteen years ago)