2012 republican presidential nominee III: can romney get santorum out of his hair?

he didn't say "“Thou shall not speak ill of any fellow Republican.”?

oh, someone else said it and then he repeated it like an asshole?

tbf, commandments 11 and 12 are about pokemon in herman's book

He "popularized" it because he was the only GOP satrap who wasn't personally an asshole.

what did romney say about europeÉ

err make that a ?

He went off on some tangent about Obama trying to remake America in the image of his favourite European cities...something like that. And then he went after Europe again towards the end. He's promising to take the fight against Europe to South Carolina and Florida.

If he wins in November, he may have to deal with some of those European people, right?

He said he wanted to do away with liberals who insisted on adding an extra E and accent aigu.

48% of the vote in, and Perry's at 704 votes--looking very good for over 1,000.

Memo to Alfred: David Gergen just called Romney's speech tonight "the most important of his life."

if obama remade america in the image of his favorite european cities he would easily be the best president in history

unless his favorite city is rome

Awesome, clem. Now I can go to bed. Gergen is like a glass of hot milk.

kathrynlopez a k-lo facebooker says of romney tonight: he was almost inspiring ... i was surprised

It felt very much like Romney was firing Europe, and was enjoying it a lot.

http://www.innovationsinnewspapers.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/paris-las-vegas-144.jpg

europe!

Looking forward to Romney's attack ads of Obama morphing into a topological map of Europe.

Phrase used in Romney speech: "The bitter politics of ENVY."

Just let me know when this is declared "the most important election of our lives."

yeah I know you guys aren't major deluded Dem hoes, with maybe one exception.

ayo morbs have you ever been to a 'red' state?

I went to Georgia twice in 2010, as well as Alabama. (And had barbecue in Lockhart, Texas.) I like how the really red ones here are brown:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states

haha deep santorum country

disappointed that perry is beating roemer

also that santorum's color on google isn't brown this time

I know who I would vote for in NH:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFXXAuDK1Ao

Pretty clear he's just another shill for the corporate gigivopology.

anyhoo, I'm glad we have some socialist candidates for president, if only for another week or two.

http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/romney_rivals_all_become_socialists_to_horror_of_conservatives/singleton/

(like p4reene calling BS on the 'firing ppl' outrage, too)

i missed this, from a couple days ago

It's one that I don't think we should be using as Republicans, "middle class." There are no classes in America. We are a country that don't allow for titles. We don't put people in classes. There may be middle-income people, but the idea that somehow or another we're going to buy into the class-warfare arguments of Barack Obama is something that should not be part of the Republican lexicon. That's their job -- divide, separate, put one group against another. That's not the language that I'll use as president. I'll use the language of bringing people together.

santorum, btw

I wonder if he pulled that out of his ass or if it's something we're gonna be hearing in the future.

gonna guess #1

daniel larison on why the gop contest has turned out the way it has:

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/2012/01/10/romneys-dreadful-inevitability-how-did-it-come-to-this/

The delusion that 2012 was supposed to represent “vindication” for the conservative movement helps explain why conservatives didn’t settle on a single candidate much earlier and stick with him. Because of the entirely unearned 2010 midterm victory, many conservatives seem to have concluded that 2008 was an aberration, and because of the slow recovery there has been overconfidence about Republican prospects in the fall.

That lowered the bar considerably as far as the quality of the presidential candidates was concerned. Some of these underqualified candidates joined the race in the belief that 2012 was bound to be a Republican victory, and for that reason they didn’t want to “waste” that victory on an insufficiently pure candidate such as Romney. Because of this, candidates had a much higher ideological standard to meet. Flawed and compromised candidates might have been all right back in 2007 at the nadir of the Bush era, but not now. As a result, none of the declared candidates with any of the necessary experience could measure up, and those that could measure up were woefully unprepared for the office.

The higher expectations of activists and pundits allowed the fantasy of additional candidates to linger for months and months (and it still hasn’t been snuffed out), which delayed the consolidation of the conservative vote behind one or two of the declared candidates. On the whole, the fantasy candidates put forward by pundits are just as underqualified as some of the flops, or they have just as much baggage as the flawed candidates, and their entry into the race would simply compound the problem that conservatives have, which is that they have too many choices and no way to reach consensus on any one of them. At the same time, Romney’s health care record was widely perceived as a major or possibly fatal liability for his candidacy, but when it came time for voters to register their views it evidently wasn’t nearly as damaging as almost everyone believed. Conservatives did not rally behind any one candidate to oppose Romney months ago because I think many of them expected Romney to falter or implode long before this, so they thought they had the luxury of time to choose from among the alternatives. Romney didn’t implode, and conservatives frittered away valuable time on various long-shot and incompetent candidates. Because they couldn’t really believe that Romney would ever prevail, most anti-Romney conservatives didn’t do what would have been required to stop him from winning the nomination.

ie. the wrong people thought it would be easy and the stronger people knew it would be hard. pretty perceptive imo

yeah that seems pretty otm

back in 2007 at the nadir of the Bush era

The nadir of the Bush era came during his last months in office, late 2008, when Lehmann Bros. collapsed, soon followed by AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, GM, and roughly $30 trillion vanished in a couple of months. It was a culmination, kind of like reaching the final circle of hell in the Inferno.

The pre-nadir of the Bush era when they were running to become candidates in 2008.

he means that 2007 was when the republican candidates for the 2008 election were getting started

ie. the wrong people thought it would be easy and the stronger people knew it would be hard. pretty perceptive imo

― goole, Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:41 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah the other thing is imo the gops strongest candidates r prob siting on the sideline not wanting to run against an imcumbent, another case of smart people knowing this was gonna be harder than it looked

who even are 'the strongest candidates' tho? I feel like the gop's so deep in the crazyhole that there's
a. nobody that can appeal to the whole party
b. nobody that's gonna have a CV that's attractive both to the base and the public at large

I mean when christie is your ace in the hole...

any of their non-texan governors

Speaking of which, other than get elected, make speeches and look presentable, what has Senator Rubio actually accomplished in the past couple of years?

a. hasn't had a sex scandal

b. hasn't had a financial scandal

c. looks presentable oh wait

he has presumably helped block the appointment of communist judges and bureaucrats -- what else do you want?

who even are 'the strongest candidates' tho? I feel like the gop's so deep in the crazyhole that there's
a. nobody that can appeal to the whole party
b. nobody that's gonna have a CV that's attractive both to the base and the public at large

― iatee, Wednesday, January 11, 2012 1:05 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol yeah its sort of just an assumption that there must be someone better out there

and im not talking abt christie!

remember when 'the media' was talking about whether chris christie was 'too fat' to be president and whether it 'was ok' to talk about that anyway.

good times.

too big to fail

Yeah, that sounds about right. It looks like the Republicans for some reason thought "Hey, beating up your candidates for being not hewing to your principles looks like a blast! Why have we been letting the Democrats hog this fun?"

The problems being that a) principled is not a good look for Republicans and b) it's really not something they've been selecting for.

being

I think 'one of those other governors' woulda just been another pawlenty. I mean it depends who we're talking about obv, but I think the way the ideological lines are drawn today make it just impossible for someone to have their cake and eat it too (other than christie obv.)