oh i don't agree with that at all, it's going to be wisconsin nationwide, candidates notwithstanding.
― goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:47 (fourteen years ago)
Obama isn't leading the national equivalent of the anti-Walker forces, I'm afraid.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:50 (fourteen years ago)
when's the last time two guys w/ such spotless bios faced off?
― iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:50 (fourteen years ago)
that reminds me, I saw eliot spitzer on the street today
If Romney does no worse than a very close second in both SC and Florida, then I agree that we can put 'paid' to the republican nomination. If he's blown out in SC or in Florida, or is pushed down to third place, even by a small amount, then we have a race to giggle about for a while longer.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:51 (fourteen years ago)
mitt romney isn't walker, either! i don't think it matters.
― goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:51 (fourteen years ago)
nah it's over xp
― iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:52 (fourteen years ago)
But goole just pointed out that he's doing quite well in SC.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:52 (fourteen years ago)
From a few days ago but you get the idea:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57354122-503544/romney-surges-in-south-carolina-poll-has-nearly-double-the-support-of-runner-up-santorum/
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:54 (fourteen years ago)
but you see, if Romney BARELY manages to get second place he may have a shot in the imaginary tea party I am holding in my mind
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:00 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.disorderlyreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/T-Alice-TeaPartySmall.jpg
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:02 (fourteen years ago)
This is going to be a boring election, gentlemen: Wonder Boy versus Flim-Flam Man.
OK, I have to be the one to ask who's who?
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
It doesn't matter.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:04 (fourteen years ago)
This is going to be a very entertaining election when y'all are freaking out over the electoral dead heat on Halloween. "For our children's sake, vote for the Detainer!"
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:05 (fourteen years ago)
OK, I see Nate Silver is calling it like this in South Carolina:
Mitt Romney 32.8%Newt Gingrich 23.0%Rick Santorum 22.8%
Which said result would be game over, imo. The remainder of the field would continue to squirm on the hook for a while, but they couldn't expect much longevity without a Mittplosion.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:09 (fourteen years ago)
Newt needs Santorum to keep doing Blah things
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:11 (fourteen years ago)
I don't know if this is sound or not:
http://theamericanscene.com/2012/01/09/win-place-and-show
The thing is, it leaves a number of obvious people--Rubio, Christie, Ryan--out of the equation. (If Romney were to lose against Obama, I would think anybody connected to this whole nomination cycle would be tainted going into 2016.) (Herman Cain included.)
― clemenza, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:15 (fourteen years ago)
A Big Check From a Billionaire, and Gingrich Gets a LiftBy NICHOLAS CONFESSORE and ERIC LIPTON A $5 million check from Sheldon Adelson underscores how a Supreme Court ruling has made it possible for a wealthy individual to influence an election.
idk if this is the guy or if they just used their stock tycoon.jpg
http://i1.nyt.com/images/2012/01/10/us/subADELSON/subADELSON-thumbStandard.jpg
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:16 (fourteen years ago)
http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/monopoly-man.jpg
― Oops, just a little Santorum surge... (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:39 (fourteen years ago)
as you might say, "which one is that"
― locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:42 (fourteen years ago)
also lol Obama is gonna wipe the floor with Romney, if there's a "dead heat" on Halloween I'll eat my hat
― locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:43 (fourteen years ago)
really? does Mitt have his own drone arsenal too? xp
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:43 (fourteen years ago)
It could happen, I suppose. And maybe not.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)
100% certain Mitt is pro-drone strikes and pro-indefinite detentions what is your point
― locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:47 (fourteen years ago)
romney in 2008 famously said we should "double gitmo". which you'll admit is very different from "reduce it by 12 to 15% over 45 years"
― goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:49 (fourteen years ago)
ah, I thought we were talking about things that HAVE been done by an actual president! Has Mittens prosecuted whistleblowers too?
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:49 (fourteen years ago)
what is the source of this "Obama is gonna wipe the floor with Romney" MEME, as you kidz call it? Was it the pared down "I love to fire people" distortion of typical Mittens blather?
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:51 (fourteen years ago)
I think Geir hasn't come back because he realized that Morbs has taken this singleminded approach to dead horse beating to an entirely new level.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:52 (fourteen years ago)
Romney lost his chance in November when the signs of an improving economy first showed themselves.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
man don't jinx it
― goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)
the economy i mean.
what is the source of this "Obama is gonna wipe the floor with Romney" MEME, as you kidz call it?
uh, I am the source of it? I've been predicting this for at least a year
― locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
yeah it's way too early to assume the economy's gonna be better than 'ehhhhh'
― iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:56 (fourteen years ago)
nothin means nothin til Labor Day
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:00 (fourteen years ago)
that's all the man in the White House needs
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:01 (fourteen years ago)
I dunno if 8% unemployment is really gonna sell as 'morning in america' but who knows
― iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:03 (fourteen years ago)
just clap yr hands and believe "he is gonna be sooooo liberal in his second term" /clinton96
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:06 (fourteen years ago)
The White House doesn't have to sell Morning in America (Reagan had 7% unemployment in '84) -- only Know Hope.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:08 (fourteen years ago)
no one here thinks this
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:33 (fourteen years ago)
ayo morbs have you ever been to a 'red' state?
― 2012 republican presidential nominee II: Hot, Ready and Legal! (will), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:38 (fourteen years ago)
leave morbs alone!!
― oneohtrix and park (m bison), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:43 (fourteen years ago)
He actually went to Birmingham, Alabama, last year iirc, but safe in a hermetically sealed bus.
― Steamtable Willie (WmC), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:46 (fourteen years ago)
^^^
― locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 23:22 (fourteen years ago)
well, context matters - that 7% was a huge drop from a year previous:
http://lh3.ggpht.com/_Ws8RVJ7UJ5I/SxsKHKt_fsI/AAAAAAAAAew/CzkNMTDcY-4/US%20unemployment%5B3%5D.png
7.2 percent gdp growth in 1984. anyone want to bet on whether 2012 is gonna be a year of 7.2 percent gdp growth?? half of that would be a miracle.
― iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 23:45 (fourteen years ago)
you gotta be fair morbs I don't hear anybody here making this claim. people did then though for sure but nobody is now, I think even the most ardent Obama supporters don't have illusions about how liberal he's gonna be after NDAA et al
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 23:46 (fourteen years ago)
Don't remind timellison.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 23:48 (fourteen years ago)
W_Stewart Will Stewart Santorum rally now playing Bob Marley's "Get Up, Stand Up." Gotta admit, did not see this one coming.15 minutes ago Favorite Undo Retweet Reply
― scream blahula scream (govern yourself accordingly), Wednesday, 11 January 2012 00:34 (fourteen years ago)
W_Stewart Will Stewart Now Santorum event playing George Michael. Not sensing any irony here.12 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply
― scream blahula scream (govern yourself accordingly), Wednesday, 11 January 2012 00:35 (fourteen years ago)
Santorum's sick and tired of the hism-schism
― locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 11 January 2012 00:35 (fourteen years ago)
I smiled so big at that 1 thank you Shakey Mo
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Wednesday, 11 January 2012 00:43 (fourteen years ago)