2012 republican presidential nominee III: can romney get santorum out of his hair?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4660 of them)

the facts are both GHWB and Reagan were establishment candidates

locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:22 (fourteen years ago)

no way GHWB would ever have been the nominee in '80 even knowing how history unfolded.

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:23 (fourteen years ago)

Reagan had more money and (obv) lots more name recognition, iirc.

Aimless, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:25 (fourteen years ago)

He definitely crushed Bush in NH (50-23) and SC (55-15). But from Santorum's point of view, I think "And if it wasn't for New Hampshire, Ronald Reagan would never have been president" is a good way to plant doubts in NH voters.

clemenza, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:25 (fourteen years ago)

Ladies and gentlemen, we win elections when our people are excited about who to vote for...

Find this pretty funny considering I don't think many Republicans are excited about Santorum. Self-identified conservatives (R & I) I've heard on CSPAN are way more excited by Paul, and the freeper fringe are salivating over unleashing the Newtron bomb on Obama.

Oops, just a little Santorum surge... (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:26 (fourteen years ago)

(As Hail Marys go, I mean.)

clemenza, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:27 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah--Santorum's calculus would be a lot more convincing if he had an ounce of charisma.

clemenza, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:28 (fourteen years ago)

unleashing the Newtron bomb on Obama.

too easy to make Goldwater/daisy connection.

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:29 (fourteen years ago)

Apparently Stephen Colbert is polling better than Jon Huntsman in South Carolina.

Bon Ivoj (jaymc), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:30 (fourteen years ago)

ha

Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:30 (fourteen years ago)

"The new Public Policing Polling survey also found that 67 percent of the GOP debate's likely voters think that 'only people are people.'"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW-ftxIrhBc

clemenza, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:33 (fourteen years ago)

The South Carolina primary will be the first truly meaningful moment in this phase of things. If Romney is soundly rejected by the first pack of southern republicans to cast votes, he'll def be wounded. I say chances are good that things will be genuinely chaotic heading into Super Tuesday.

Aimless, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:33 (fourteen years ago)

*sigh*

u trying so hard to bleeve in Tinkerbell

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:38 (fourteen years ago)

The South Carolina primary will be the first truly meaningful moment in this phase of things.

lol come now, Aimless

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:41 (fourteen years ago)

romney is polling just fine in SC. republicans are coalescing nicely around the frontrunner and this thing is going to be over cleanly. sorry everyone!

goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:44 (fourteen years ago)

This is going to be a boring election, gentlemen: Wonder Boy versus Flim-Flam Man.

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:46 (fourteen years ago)

oh i don't agree with that at all, it's going to be wisconsin nationwide, candidates notwithstanding.

goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:47 (fourteen years ago)

Obama isn't leading the national equivalent of the anti-Walker forces, I'm afraid.

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:50 (fourteen years ago)

when's the last time two guys w/ such spotless bios faced off?

iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:50 (fourteen years ago)

that reminds me, I saw eliot spitzer on the street today

iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:50 (fourteen years ago)

If Romney does no worse than a very close second in both SC and Florida, then I agree that we can put 'paid' to the republican nomination. If he's blown out in SC or in Florida, or is pushed down to third place, even by a small amount, then we have a race to giggle about for a while longer.

Aimless, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:51 (fourteen years ago)

mitt romney isn't walker, either! i don't think it matters.

goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:51 (fourteen years ago)

nah it's over xp

iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:52 (fourteen years ago)

But goole just pointed out that he's doing quite well in SC.

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:52 (fourteen years ago)

From a few days ago but you get the idea:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57354122-503544/romney-surges-in-south-carolina-poll-has-nearly-double-the-support-of-runner-up-santorum/

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 20:54 (fourteen years ago)

but you see, if Romney BARELY manages to get second place he may have a shot in the imaginary tea party I am holding in my mind

Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:00 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.disorderlyreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/T-Alice-TeaPartySmall.jpg

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:02 (fourteen years ago)

This is going to be a boring election, gentlemen: Wonder Boy versus Flim-Flam Man.

OK, I have to be the one to ask who's who?

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:03 (fourteen years ago)

It doesn't matter.

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:04 (fourteen years ago)

This is going to be a very entertaining election when y'all are freaking out over the electoral dead heat on Halloween. "For our children's sake, vote for the Detainer!"

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:05 (fourteen years ago)

OK, I see Nate Silver is calling it like this in South Carolina:

Mitt Romney 32.8%
Newt Gingrich 23.0%
Rick Santorum 22.8%

Which said result would be game over, imo. The remainder of the field would continue to squirm on the hook for a while, but they couldn't expect much longevity without a Mittplosion.

Aimless, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:09 (fourteen years ago)

Newt needs Santorum to keep doing Blah things

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:11 (fourteen years ago)

I don't know if this is sound or not:

http://theamericanscene.com/2012/01/09/win-place-and-show

The thing is, it leaves a number of obvious people--Rubio, Christie, Ryan--out of the equation. (If Romney were to lose against Obama, I would think anybody connected to this whole nomination cycle would be tainted going into 2016.) (Herman Cain included.)

clemenza, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:15 (fourteen years ago)

A Big Check From a Billionaire, and Gingrich Gets a Lift
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE and ERIC LIPTON

A $5 million check from Sheldon Adelson underscores how a Supreme Court ruling has made it possible for a wealthy individual to influence an election.

idk if this is the guy or if they just used their stock tycoon.jpg

http://i1.nyt.com/images/2012/01/10/us/subADELSON/subADELSON-thumbStandard.jpg

quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:16 (fourteen years ago)

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/monopoly-man.jpg

Oops, just a little Santorum surge... (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:39 (fourteen years ago)

This is going to be a very entertaining election when y'all are freaking out over the electoral dead heat on Halloween. "For our children's sake, vote for the Detainer!"

as you might say, "which one is that"

locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:42 (fourteen years ago)

also lol Obama is gonna wipe the floor with Romney, if there's a "dead heat" on Halloween I'll eat my hat

locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:43 (fourteen years ago)

really? does Mitt have his own drone arsenal too? xp

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:43 (fourteen years ago)

It could happen, I suppose. And maybe not.

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)

100% certain Mitt is pro-drone strikes and pro-indefinite detentions what is your point

locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:47 (fourteen years ago)

romney in 2008 famously said we should "double gitmo". which you'll admit is very different from "reduce it by 12 to 15% over 45 years"

goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:49 (fourteen years ago)

ah, I thought we were talking about things that HAVE been done by an actual president! Has Mittens prosecuted whistleblowers too?

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:49 (fourteen years ago)

what is the source of this "Obama is gonna wipe the floor with Romney" MEME, as you kidz call it? Was it the pared down "I love to fire people" distortion of typical Mittens blather?

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:51 (fourteen years ago)

I think Geir hasn't come back because he realized that Morbs has taken this singleminded approach to dead horse beating to an entirely new level.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:52 (fourteen years ago)

Romney lost his chance in November when the signs of an improving economy first showed themselves.

lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:53 (fourteen years ago)

man don't jinx it

goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)

the economy i mean.

goole, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)

what is the source of this "Obama is gonna wipe the floor with Romney" MEME, as you kidz call it?

uh, I am the source of it? I've been predicting this for at least a year

locally sourced stabbage (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)

yeah it's way too early to assume the economy's gonna be better than 'ehhhhh'

iatee, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 21:56 (fourteen years ago)

nothin means nothin til Labor Day

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 10 January 2012 22:00 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.