most of the ppl itt who argue for Obama to use the bully pulpit do not describe themselves as liberals iirc
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Thursday, January 5, 2012 9:33 PM (55 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I didn't realize there was anyone itt who wouldn't describe themselves as liberal tbh.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:35 (fourteen years ago)
progressive != liberal
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:35 (fourteen years ago)
I describe myself as smitten by Ginger. That's as much as I'll commit to.
― clemenza, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:36 (fourteen years ago)
square!=rhombus
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:37 (fourteen years ago)
well no, actually a square IS a rhombus
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:39 (fourteen years ago)
but is a square is a rhombus!
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:39 (fourteen years ago)
haha crosspost
most progressives vacillate between begrudging affection for liberals & outright hatred of them
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:40 (fourteen years ago)
bono has never been a catholic, raised in the church of ireland(anglican) iirc
― Best-Penis (buzza), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:40 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u52Oz-54VYw
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Thursday, January 5, 2012 9:39 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
it's a KIND of rhombus
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:44 (fourteen years ago)
someone getting upset about being called a liberal when really they're a progressive... I dunno bros
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:46 (fourteen years ago)
these are not real stable categories
― goole, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:46 (fourteen years ago)
I mean I say this as a liberaltarian liberal progressive socialist interventionist.
I'd be upset if I was a square tbh
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:47 (fourteen years ago)
but it's hip to be one
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:48 (fourteen years ago)
All squares are rhombuses; not all rhombuses are squares. All Mitts are Romneys (as far as I know); not all Romneys are Mitts.
― clemenza, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:49 (fourteen years ago)
Liberals decided they wanted to be called progressives when they thought the L-word had too much Naive Gullible Ineffectual baggage attached to it. Well, guess what...
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
But the senator grimaced when he was introduced, and as Romney delivered his own stump speech, an increasingly impatient McCain pulled up his sleeve and checked his watch. McCain gave his endorsement address without mentioning Romney’s Iowa win until the end. “By the way, we forgot to congratulate him on his landslide victory last night,” he said, laughing. Romney ignored him.
Did McCain "endorse" Romney just to troll him?
― Nicole, Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
another political compass thread
let's split the progressive/liberal hairs here
also LOL @ Nicole's quote
― Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:56 (fourteen years ago)
btw aero, we need some new lyrics (again) to the Ochs song, I nominate you as this year's Jello Biafra.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 5 January 2012 21:57 (fourteen years ago)
I saw someone else yesterday wonder if McCain's endorsement was consciously meant to hurt Romney...CNN just played 90% of an attack ad against Romney, tried to get Matlin and Brazile to guess who'd put it out (neither could), then played the rest, and of course it was a McCain ad.
― clemenza, Thursday, 5 January 2012 22:02 (fourteen years ago)
I guess there's an ok track record for Presidents using speeches to scaremonger the country into war. But for major political and social movements and changes it's mostly a fantasy.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, January 5, 2012 4:31 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yah i read some poli sci research somewhere that said in a lot of cases a president can actually hurt his cause via over agressive selling due to obvs partisan factors
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:10 (fourteen years ago)
always thought progressive was just the new word for liberal once the gop machine successfully ruined that brand
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:11 (fourteen years ago)
anyway i like the word progressive, i mean progress yeah who doesnt love progress
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:12 (fourteen years ago)
liberal is cool too, its like do what you want and we will still love you be free be yrself alls good
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:14 (fourteen years ago)
u mean like smartphones? xp
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:14 (fourteen years ago)
conservative, yuck no fun daddyo
yes like smartphone who doesnt love a good smart phone u can do whatever you want on there
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:15 (fourteen years ago)
admire this mans balls
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/santorum-gets-into-testy-debate-on-gay-marriage/?hp
The session ended with many of the students booing Mr. Santorum as he left for his next event.
It takes a man willing to take risks or a total idiot to show up to an event and have the shit booed out of him...
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:51 (fourteen years ago)
well he was well known to be the stupidest senator
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:56 (fourteen years ago)
also he brought his stillborn child home and cuddled on it w/his family for a couple hours
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:57 (fourteen years ago)
i can't believe he has a law degree. he gets asked about why he opposes two men getting married, and repeatedly deflects to asking about what the questioner thinks about 3 or more men getting married? what? comparing his approach to the Socratic method, like the NYT does in that article, is just absurd.
― your pain is probably equal (Z S), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:04 (fourteen years ago)
tbf Socrates would've totally married three men
― The Silent Extreme (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:05 (fourteen years ago)
I might too on a Thursday.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:06 (fourteen years ago)
Socrates: may we do evil?Crito: of course not, Socrates.Socrates: so you're saying that no men ever do evil?Crito: what? no, I would never say that, you must-Socrates: and so you agree that all men must do as their masters command, even if the command is evil?Crito: i'm not following what you're-Socrates: we're going to have a civilized discussion here, ok?
― your pain is probably equal (Z S), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:09 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76p_ncbffCE
― strongly recommend. unless you're a bitch (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:09 (fourteen years ago)
itt socrates is waaaaaasted
Nah, Shakey. Socrates had a pretty conventional marriage to Xantippe and fathered some kids with her. According to Plato's Symposium (Xenophon wrote one, too) Socrates spurned Alkibiades's sexual advances. So, not much evidence for your assertion there.
― Aimless, Friday, 6 January 2012 00:12 (fourteen years ago)
Gay Marriage to Alfred: Your Thoughts
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:13 (fourteen years ago)
'twas just a lil joke Aimless
― The Silent Extreme (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
lol socrates u married someone named Xantippe
― Best-Penis (buzza), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:29 (fourteen years ago)
you guys Santorum said on Bill O'Reilly that he didn't say "black people," he said "blah people"
you guys you guys you guys
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:29 (fourteen years ago)
so tired of all these blah people on welfare. they need to put some zazz into it
― The Silent Extreme (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:36 (fourteen years ago)
he really said this
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:37 (fourteen years ago)
new internet meme
― Aimless, Friday, 6 January 2012 00:38 (fourteen years ago)
it really oughta be
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:40 (fourteen years ago)
you're already spreading it. all it really needs for rocket fuel is a 7 second video clip.
― Aimless, Friday, 6 January 2012 00:41 (fourteen years ago)
<iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=NNJ3CQ31QH8CNH7P&content_type=content_item&layout=&playlist_cid=&media_type=video&widget_type_cid=svp&read_more=1" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe>
he's actually doing this on multiple shows
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:44 (fourteen years ago)
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:56 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― lag∞n, Thursday, 5 January 2012 23:57 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
shall we just have a little micro-moment to stand up against this, c'mon pick something from the guy's portfolio of assholery if you want to talk trash
― quick brown fox triangle (schlump), Friday, 6 January 2012 00:51 (fourteen years ago)