Fringe (new JJ Abrams show) : Mad scientist, flesh eating virus, a cow and talks with the dead

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (885 of them)

Definitely neither Chris Carter nor Joss Whedon. The former had really sharp character work every episode and the latter had a sense of humor. I think what really disappoints me the most is the female protagonist. I can't even remember her name she's so unmemorable. I don't know if she's just getting awful writing from the writers, or she's just a poor actress.

Mordy, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 07:55 (seventeen years ago)

they really fucked themselves by starting this show off admitting there's a "pattern" to all of these things. oh, and the old guy just happened to work on anything involved in the pattern. magic computer can tell you EXACTLY where magic photo from dead girl's eye was taken. there weren't enough machinas in this episode for deuseses to be ex-ing from.

REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 09:26 (seventeen years ago)

HOWEVER, i am still giving it a shot. but along with house tonight, this was kinda like fox's "ugh, come on, no way" tuesday.

REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 09:27 (seventeen years ago)

I actually liked House tonight. But I don't think I've ever seen a House ep that I didn't enjoy.

Mordy, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 09:34 (seventeen years ago)

The point is really that a writer (or writers) should do well enough for someone not to notice. The eye thing has been done many, many times before, and it is usually a pretty cheap trick when someone's written themselves into a hole/can't be bothered to come up with something better. And the Aliens gag was weak.

As you might've gathered, it didn't really chafe me quite as much, tho I can't recall the eye thing being done before, and you can't really do a pregnancy "gag" without inadvertently referencing "Aliens". But to each their own -- I've got plenty of reservations about this thing (including my fear that it's going to resort to having a WACKY SCIENCE GIMMICK for every episode) (oooh do cold fusion next!), but I'm not not enjoying it. One request, tho (since the show makers are of course reading this): more Kirk Acevedo.

BTW, Gubke, sorry for getting pissy w/ my earlier comment. (I blame the internet.)

David R., Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:19 (seventeen years ago)

They Macgyver defibrillator bit was just ridiculous.

I'm right right and you're wrong left (Susan), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:22 (seventeen years ago)

the pregnant thing made me think of cronenberg's "shivers," but that's because "shivers" was on flix the day before yesterday.

REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:28 (seventeen years ago)

more Kirk Acevedo

And maybe a Dean Winters cameo amirite?

rogermexico., Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)

This show would be better if it had Cate Blanchett in it instead of her doppleganger.

lol (HI DERE), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)

that's the name i was lookig for last night!

carne asada, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:18 (seventeen years ago)

The only character in this show that is remotely endearing, entertaining or empathy inducing is Walter Bishop. This show sucks because all of the characters suck.

Carl Magnusssen (petey_carnum), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah...I liked last night's episode way better than the pilot, but mainly just because they really didn't have enough story to fill out 90 minutes and it works much better as an hour. Walter Bishop is definitely the best part of the cast but he's treading a fine line of occasional, somewhat unexpected wackiness right now and that character could get tiresome or cheesy very quickly if they don't handle it right. Shows like this with a 'strong female lead' that don't bother casting a good actress or writing much of a personality for the character are so depressing.

some dude, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 15:48 (seventeen years ago)

So what is the playing god part, is the kid a clone of Walter or just otherwise genetically messed with?

mh, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)

The only character in this show that is remotely endearing, entertaining or empathy inducing is Walter Bishop

Statement fails to account for RIDDICK FACTOR

rogermexico., Thursday, 18 September 2008 00:55 (seventeen years ago)

I'm annoyed by the LOST music being recycled.

Also, yes, Joshua Jackson is just a bizarre form of Pacey - does he have any way of delivering his lines beyond bored/upset/ironic?
"Yah dad, we sorta figured that out. OK? You can't retrieve images from eyeballs."

The show is pretty goofy - the previews made me yell "Don't steal from heroes!", and then my BF and I had a conversation about episodic series and, I dunno, chapter series..

I don;t know what the definitions are between the two. Episodic, to me, would imply episodes. But that's not the case?

aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 01:22 (seventeen years ago)

Episodic means self-contained, largely, as opposed to serialized what's-its.

This show would be better if it had Cate Blanchett in it instead of her doppleganger.

I'd even take the original Poor Man's Cate Blanchett, Sarah Wynter, over whoever plays Olivia.

lol @ Walter having the Doctor's hand-in-a-jar.

Leee, Thursday, 18 September 2008 01:34 (seventeen years ago)

Was X-Files episodic or serialized or both? This is a serious question.

aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:01 (seventeen years ago)

Both

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:03 (seventeen years ago)

I'm not all that familiar with much of Joss Whedon's work... He's just my go-to whipping boy whenever plot devices, government conspiracies, and powerful underworlds are too flippant to take half seriously. That may be just as much an Abrams trademark, but I don't watch his shows either.

Joshua Jackson hasn't been half as interesting as the description of him in his "file" in the first episode.

Kerm, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:07 (seventeen years ago)

^^ wow do you not get Joss Whedon.

rogermexico., Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:17 (seventeen years ago)

This show sucks because all of the characters suck.

Yes.

Leee, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:26 (seventeen years ago)

Abrams is more the plot device/conspiracy guy and Whedon is more the touchy-feely clever homey dialogue dude, I thought

mh, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:27 (seventeen years ago)

Also: along with Aaron Sorkin, Whedon pretty much pioneered the serious treatment of season-as-arc in network drama.

rogermexico., Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:34 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, Kerm, I think you might be confusing Whedon with someone else.

Mordy, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:36 (seventeen years ago)

I mean the guy with the show about the high school cheerleader that fights demons.

Kerm, Thursday, 18 September 2008 03:43 (seventeen years ago)

The West Wing?

David R., Thursday, 18 September 2008 03:44 (seventeen years ago)

I kind of enjoyed this ep - goofy is the right word for it. This show has way more of an Alias vibe than Buffy/X-Files/Lost, right down to the bad sci-fi - never mind eyeball-imaging/accelerated growth, but also the gimmicky, guess-what-awesome-gadget-we're-using-this-week. Said gadget will probably never be used again, even when they inevitably start recycling plotlines.

Olivia looks more like Poppy Montgomery (another generic-TV aussie blonde) from Without A Trace than Cate Blanchett. She's still pretty bland but i think she might grow on me (whereas Pacey/dad are more likely to get tiresome fast) - in the same way i thought Jennifer Garner on Alias was pretty boring before that show's wtf-ness completely sucked me in.

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:35 (seventeen years ago)

I would give this show kudos if I got any hint from the writing that it is intentionally goofy, and that the writers are aware; but I get none of that

still, it is utterly goofy and not unenjoyable; I wouldn't buy the DVDs or nuthin but I wouldn't step out if it were on

cozen (cozwn), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:39 (seventeen years ago)

also: it is the x-files

cozen (cozwn), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:40 (seventeen years ago)

I know ppl have said it above but it bears restating and restating: this show is the x-files

cozen (cozwn), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:40 (seventeen years ago)

It is the x-files in content but not in form.

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:42 (seventeen years ago)

The X-Files was good.

I'm right right and you're wrong left (Susan), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)

good job outing the browncoats, Kerm

some dude, Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)

i saw the second episode of this. it's not the worst thing i've ever seen but i was happy to not get hooked on it at all (who has time to watch tv etc.).

Jordan, Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)

The X-Files didn't assume that putting something in the script made it believable.

Kerm, Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:45 (seventeen years ago)

c'mon, dudes, first couple of x-files episodes aren't what the show is famous for...

REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)

these guys could pull it out! i mean, they blew everything in their pilot but maybe...

REIGN IN FUDGE (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 18 September 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)

This show is so boring that I want Pacey to steal Joey from the tiny Tom Cruise.

aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:11 (seventeen years ago)

Tom Cruise is no Dawson!

aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:12 (seventeen years ago)

More entertaining than one minute of Fringe.

Nicole, Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

Or the entirety of Fringe. Whatever, it's been a long day.

Nicole, Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:14 (seventeen years ago)

Anywhoo, there are too many holes. it's not believable - at all - that the lab at Harvard was just sitting there for decades. And then, suddenly it's up and running.
And the whole thing with her going into the tank? I was like, tetanus shot.

I like the idea of monsters who need pituitary glands to live.

Always confused why the guy who needs this only goes for beautiful women. Men don't work? it's just so typical - he's a serial killer of women! But it doesn't make sense. He could get the gland from a whole range of folks.

I JUST really want Pacey to break up Joey's marriage to fake, short Dawson.

aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:30 (seventeen years ago)

The biggest problem I have with the show is the same problem I have with every show/movie set at Harvard; film crews are not allowed in Harvard Yard, so the school they're using in the show looks nothing like the actual Harvard.

i am the small cat (HI DERE), Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:32 (seventeen years ago)

Hahah, Dan, do you know where Michael Cimino filmed the Harvard prologue of Heaven's Gate?

Oxford.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:34 (seventeen years ago)

And the whole thing with her going into the tank? I was like, tetanus shot.

You get tetanus from deep puncture wounds that allow anaerobic bacteria to grow. I think the tank was a smooth surface, but the urban legend linking rust and tetanus persists.

mh, Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

Always confused why the guy who needs this only goes for beautiful women. Men don't work?

YOU try picking up guys at strip clubs!

David R., Thursday, 18 September 2008 18:57 (seventeen years ago)

Well, that would be easy for me, I guess. maybe not. who knows.
But, whatever, lots of people have pituitary glands - the simple solution would be to work with the elderly.

Ok, on the tetanus thing - I don't care how deep the gash has to be. Wires in water? It's all pretty silly.

Dan, it's really good that you didn't go to Columbia. For many reasons.
They shoot L&O episodes there.
(Although it would be cool if you appeared in an episode of L&O.)

Harvard should get over itself.

aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 20:46 (seventeen years ago)

Are you all complaining about strained/fanciful logic on a JJ Abrams joint? For shame!

Leee, Thursday, 18 September 2008 21:37 (seventeen years ago)

i like pacey from dawson's creek in this.

his dad in the show is awesome.

the dude from the wire is badass.

can't really dig the lead actress though. she bothers me.

decent show...i'll keep watching for awhile.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 18 September 2008 21:45 (seventeen years ago)

I've missed the last two weeks but seeing as this hasn't bumped, it's like I haven't missed anything at all.

Leee, Thursday, 2 October 2008 21:21 (seventeen years ago)

The first episode I saw of this show was the second one in season four back when it just came out. I enjoyed it enough to go back and watch the whole thing. It made things slightly confusing until I caught up

treefell, Thursday, 30 April 2026 08:41 (one month ago)

ok i've watched the first maybe eight episodes

a) so much body horror! eyes bleeding, organs boiling, heads bursting, pregnancy explosions, crab-like heart parasite, etc. it's a lot

b) i don't require scientific verity in my sci-fi shows but this shit is ludicrous. already they have *twice* had our protagonists read the thoughts of comatose or literally dead subjects bc electricity (yet for some reason only the hot chick had to get naked and submerged in water to do it hmm)

c) also supposedly a dude subjected himself to the crab-like heart parasite and almost died JUST IN CASE our hero went to germany, sweet-talked a terrorist and relied on dead-brain reading to learn a two-word catchphrase

d) acting is v. good, although peter has had to sell some shitty dialogue. john noble is grebt, but a little walter weirdness goes a long way, and i don't really need so many closeups of his face

e) i'm okay with the endless closeups of everyone else's face (although i do wonder what peter's grooming regime is to keep that precise pseudo-beard going eternally)

f) idk anything about tv production, but this seems expensive? lotta external shots, people running through cars, swat teams attacking buildings based on any of our protagonists' random whims

g) love how, based on a literal psycho's demand, they'll send critically injured patients or corpses to walter's lab with no supervision

h) lance reddick had hella presence

i) tbh i probably wouldn't be continuing with it if olivia/anna torv weren't so riveting (yes she's lovely, but honestly mostly acting-wise)

mookieproof, Thursday, 7 May 2026 03:41 (one month ago)

I think the Anna Torv casting is actually really crucial because she just grounds the show so well, and provides a good balance with whatever wonderful eccentricity Walter’s doing, or whatever emo-yearning Peter’s doing. I love Joshua Jackson but it’s very “The WB channel” school of acting. Torv is the secret third thing. she can think in closeup and be believable, or bring needed silence. She’s a wonderful actor.

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 7 May 2026 03:57 (one month ago)

otm

mookieproof, Thursday, 7 May 2026 04:24 (one month ago)

her smiles can mean almost anything!

mookieproof, Thursday, 7 May 2026 05:29 (one month ago)

Fringe is also a show that gets better in Seasons 2 and 3, when they figure out what the show is about.

The Quaker Gurvitz Army (President Keyes), Thursday, 7 May 2026 13:37 (one month ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.