I HATE CLUBBING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (522 of them)
Hey kids, don't hate Clubs/Clubbing. Why not make it better? :

We're Night-Clubbing.

Everybodydance, Saturday, 12 June 2004 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, Gem. Go to settings and you can choose to have the page only show you the last 20 or 50 messages.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 12 June 2004 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorta -- if you go to the settings page, you can choose whether to load all of a thread's answers or a certain number of the most recent at a time, though I don't think you can specifically ask to load only new answers.

Bah x-post.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 12 June 2004 13:42 (twenty-two years ago)

aaaaah found it! thank you very much for taking pity on a stupid person.

gem (trisk), Saturday, 12 June 2004 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Nonsense, yer not stupid! It's not the most obvious link in the world. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 12 June 2004 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Many people who are attracted to subcultures have felt rejected by mainstream culture/'normals' first and then see the social patterns in a particular scene mirror those they see as conformist already, then decide to reject the group forcefully rather than be shunned twice. It's kind of like the difference between being the dumper and the dumpee.

I think you've got that quite wrong. At least, that hasn't been my experience. It's not fear of being "dumped" or shunned, it's the awful sickening realisation that your newfound friends within the subculture are as conformist, cliqueish and narrow-minded as the oxo-culture you rejected in the first place. It's not fear of being shunned, it's "Holy, shit, we really don't have the same values at all, just the same haircuts."

it's that anybody can look good, attractive, sharp, in the "right" clothes and haircut;

Now that's just not true. It's a bit Rikki Lake of you to assume that anyone can look good with a makeover. But it just doesn't work that way.

or, why are people suspicious of 'image'?

I wrote several long paragraphs on that back there, and I can only assume that you didn't read them from the fact that you didn't comment on anything I said.

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

apologies, kate. i did read them. the reason i asked again, is because, you're not actually one of the people that exhibits the particular trait i'm criticizing here, and i was hoping one of the others that do exhibit it (mark, chris et al) would give me their take also

charltonlido (gareth), Saturday, 12 June 2004 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, the line between Dandy and Hipster is an interesting one, because it seems like a lot of people (perhaps including Gareth) are trying to equate them. Dandyism, to me at least, is a flamboyant rejection of the mainstream code of dress and behaviour. Hipsterism is more like attempting to live on the cutting edge of what will eventually be mainstream, the Hipster just triest to get there before most other people do.

Hipsterism is about setting or being close to the crest of a trend. Dandyism is a flagrant and willful denial that trends even exist.

x-post...

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

(Plus, I scored an excellent outfit in Primark for exactly £10, once I let Colette talk me into actually wearing ::on no:: a tank top.)

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)

((I have nothing against Dandys, by the way, though I am suspicious of Hipsters. I have had quite distinct Dandy tendencies in the past. Some of my best friends of have been Dandys. Some of my friends have even been Dandy Warhols, but that's another story.)

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

categories, categories, categories

My friends are a subset of Set B. Some used to be A. Some are B on Tuesday.

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:09 (twenty-two years ago)

It's not fear of being "dumped" or shunned, it's the awful sickening realisation that your newfound friends within the subculture are as conformist, cliqueish and narrow-minded as the oxo-culture you rejected in the first place. It's not fear of being shunned, it's "Holy, shit, we really don't have the same values at all, just the same haircuts."

This is completely, totally, absolutely OTM and goes back to my point about "Fuck the cover; read what's actually in the book."

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)

http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:8otp20vkXlAJ:www.mauritia.de/de/empire/dandy.jpg

Somebody please photoshop dog latin's face into this picture.

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I am honestly confounded as to people who genuinely, honestly believe that "hipster" clique culture is as bad as most other youth tribes - I mean, it's just not. It may not be perfect or anything, but I mean... (maybe I just know the wrong (ie, right) hipsters).

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)

My understanding of the word "dandy" is more along the lines of what we now call a "metrosexual". I guess "dandy" has shifted meaning. Can a woman now be a dandy?

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)

(I'm not sure anyone would really argue about whether to fuck the cover! With the possible exception of, y'know, hipster-haters and dandies.)

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)

(And obviously I'm not saying that hipsters are better people or anything, I'm just saying that since tribe-membership DOES homogenize (which is a totally valid but not-for-everyone reason to spurn it entirely) what hipsters are homogenized into seems /reasonably/ close to what eg. ILXORS are homogenized into, and (largely unrelatedly)reasonably close to sympatheticish. Maybe.)

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:32 (twenty-two years ago)

xpost

So in the hipster-hating world view, if you try to anticipate the crest of a trend, you're suspicious. But if you give it up and just go "oxo-culture", you're narrow-minded. But if you go Dandy, you're flamboyant (read: gay) - so what choices are left?

When I was younger, my friends and I dressed the same and I chose friends based more or less on whether they looked cool to me. I'm glad I grew up. This gets too confining. There are such great conversationalists with poor fashion sense. You miss out on too much if you're concerned about whether you and your friends look "right".

Some days I dress like a hipster, some days I don't. I suppose if a hipster-hater saw me one day, they'd make assumptions about who I am that they wouldn't make if they saw me the next day. Really it just has to do with which of my clothes are in the laundry.

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Greg, it's that closeness that causes the prejudice of tiny differences to magnify.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)

*nod Dan*, that Nabisofreud thing about the narcissism of small differences should be in the FAQ or something.

(Thanks for calling me Greg btw! I am hoping that people will magically catch on to this without me having to aid the process in any way).

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I have no idea what oxo-culture means. I don't even know what I was semi-drunkenly trying to type. Perhaps exo-culture? I haven't the foggiest clue.

Of course a Dandy can be a woman, don't be so narrow minded and sexist! Words mean what we say they mean, not what the Victorians who dreamed them up thought they meant!

Different people dress provocatively or flamboyantly or as Display for many different reasons. I'm interested in the reasons, not in what they wear.

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)

That's fine and perfectly valid. It's also perfectly fine and valid to be interested in what they're wearing. And it's valid but not particularly fine for both sides to roll their eyes at each other and toss denigrations back and forth.

The problem with a truly egalitarian world view is that everyone you want to insult is perfectly justified in insulting you back. I may have to become a fascist; then I can verbally crush people underneath my bootheels without being a hypocrite. (Yes, I'm rambling now.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

You need more donuts.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I am an oxo-moron. Ha ha.

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Oxo-culture is an incredible term though! It conjures up all these ace images of Bovril and Oxo-cube ads from the fifties, with 2.4 gleaming children, etc.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)

It's not fear of being "dumped" or shunned, it's the awful sickening realisation that your newfound friends within the subculture are as conformist, cliqueish and narrow-minded as the oxo-culture you rejected in the first place. It's not fear of being shunned, it's "Holy, shit, we really don't have the same values at all, just the same haircuts."

But this makes no sense! It's just some theoretical situation whereby one hipster hangs out with only those similar to himself/herself, or something. Like hipsterism begats empty hipsterism or something.

Also this "Fuck the cover; read what's actually in the book." stuff just is further cliché in this sort of argument. What if one is interested in the cover? Where does the human cover end and the person begin? There is no exact science.

I just hate this sense of GROUNDING about the "fuck the cover" attitude. The sense of attempting to pull some people back to a certain level.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)

There is no practical difference between the cover and the book. That is my point when I say "Fuck the cover". You are agreeing with me but objecting to my terminology.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)

No, it's not a theoretical situation at all. I used to hang out with a gang of kids who vaguely called themselves "hipsters" - we all wore black clothes, listened to alternative music, had punky haircuts. I thought "Wow, I've finally found a place where I can be accepted for who I am, rather than being judged by the clothes that I wear." Wow, was I disillusioned of that idea pretty quickly. I don't speak from theory, I speak from my own life's experience.

Possibly Kate Again (kate), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

If there's no practical difference why say "fuck the cover" and thus draw a distinction.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)

It's kinda cool and interesting that all this developed from an I Hate Clubbing thread, actually - one of the things I found really revelatory when I started going to raves and stuff was just how liberating nobody caring how you danced could feel. That nobody was judging you on it. The last time I was in a real, first-post-of-this-thread-type club, a bouncer walked up to me and said, really menacingly, "don't dance like that". I left pretty soon after.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Because everyone is always going on about the cover! Who cares? It's all a part of who you are; how you decide where "the cover" ends, anyway? It's a false distinction.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

(Dan startlingly on the money about everyone deciding where the cover ends and the book starts for themselves, I was sorta thinking this and failing to formulate it in words).

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)

But you can put an exciting sci-fi novel cover on a phone book and it's still just a phone book on the inside isn't it? Sometimes a cover is just a cover.

Kim (Kim), Saturday, 12 June 2004 20:12 (twenty-two years ago)

It's a phone book that has decided it'd like a sci-fi cover, though! That definitly makes a difference.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)

It'd be better than some of the sci-fi novels I've read anyway.

Kim (Kim), Saturday, 12 June 2004 20:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Of course a Dandy can be a woman, don't be so narrow minded and sexist!

I was just asking! Trying to catch up on your lingo. I've not heard it used this way until now.

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

It's kinda cool and interesting that all this developed from an I Hate Clubbing thread, actually - one of the things I found really revelatory when I started going to raves and stuff was just how liberating nobody caring how you danced could feel. That nobody was judging you on it. The last time I was in a real, first-post-of-this-thread-type club, a bouncer walked up to me and said, really menacingly, "don't dance like that". I left pretty soon after.

This is IT. I didn't think I liked dancing or dance music at all until I went to a rave. Obviously drugs had a help in that, but I feel that going to raves in the UK is a much nicer experience than going to a club. This is basically down to the fact there's a lot less surface and a lot more feeling. People wear their shitest gear to go raving and yet their best clobber to go clubbing. I feel uncomfortable in clubs because I'm constantly worried about the image I'm giving off. I get that thing where you think everyone's looking at you and judging you by your clothes and the way you walk and how much gel is in your hair. You certainly don't get this at a rave because no-one gives a flying fuckslash what you're wearing. Just so long as you're a decent, friendly person. I tried to explain this to a girlfriend who had never been raving before and was pretty much anti drugs. The only argument she came up with was "but the music's shit and it's full of hippies". That's about the time I realised we weren't meant to be.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 12 June 2004 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Was she unwilling to come along and check it out just once?

Maria D., Saturday, 12 June 2004 22:08 (twenty-two years ago)

DL, come to Brighton next Saturday!

Yeah, you're totally spot-on. It's like the drugs power these scenes of acceptance that would be totally amazing even if you weren't on drugs. Universal impotence = no cockwaving, maybe? (The squatter scene is my favourite version of this, actually, 'cos it's got this brilliant dynamic between people who squat because their father is a Tory MP and doesn't understand them, maaan, and people who squat because they don't have houses). I love how you can tell what subcultures people were into before rave from the dancing style they bring to it, all these 120bpm versions of metal, indie, pop, jarvis-cocker-does-cruel-imitation-of-rachel-stevens-pastiche (may just be me).

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, when we first met she said she was interested in trying ecstasy. Later on she decided that she never wanted to try it, which was fair enough and then even later she would tell me off for smoking pot on the weekends, even if it wasn't in front of her. So no, she wasn't interested in going to a rave. Also festivals were beneath her because they are "disgusting and dirty". Anyway, this is all off topic since this thread is about hipsters.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, this thread isn't about hipsters, it's about morphing pictures of your face onto things, have you read it?

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I love how you can tell what subcultures people were into before rave from the dancing style they bring to it, all these 120bpm versions of metal, indie, pop, jarvis-cocker-does-cruel-imitation-of-rachel-stevens-pastiche (may just be me).

Hahahahahah! YEh, all my metal friends do weird punching-circle dances when they go to raves, like a friendly but more ballistic style of moshing.

What's happening in Brighton? I'd really like to go but I'm not very rich and I want to lay off getting rat-arsed again until Glastonbury. Tell me next time something's on and I'll definitely turn up.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

The circle punching dance is amazing! It's like they have a big lump of putty in their hand that they're squashing really flat.

Brighton is this big outdoor party, it sounds awesome, I'm pretty excited about it. I only know one person who's going, so I'll get the details off them tomorrow or something...

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Saturday, 12 June 2004 23:55 (twenty-two years ago)

hangon, this isn't the Glade festival is it?

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3647/heresdoggy.jpg

Heeeeeeeere's DOGGY!

don (don), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Nah, I am going to Glade though! I'm sharing a tent with these four gorgeous fashionista girls, somehow, I kinda can't wait.

xpost: HAHAHAHAHA

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)

http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/971/cometodoggy.jpg

Come To Doggy

don (don), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:26 (twenty-two years ago)

JESUS CHRIST! AARGH! I really do have a freakish face! I'm not sure I can look at those! Nice one though!

greg: you lucky bastard. my friend told me about Glade and I think he wants to go. Well, so do I but I really have to save money before my bank manager puts me in thumbtacks and makes me be the Queen's personal rickshaw monkey for not paying back my overdraft. I'm quite pissed off about not going to either of those.

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)

F: I'm really worried about it! I've never done any drugs, really.
G: F____, you do coke all the time.
F: That's different though!

Couldn't you sell your time-travelling memoirs, D?

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Sunday, 13 June 2004 00:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm quite pissed off about not going to either of those.

um, I meant Brighton and the Glade, not thumbtacks and rickshaws.

Anyway, onwards and upwards.

dog latin (dog latin), Sunday, 13 June 2004 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.