Larry Charles to direct Borat movie

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (819 of them)

I saw it last night. I laughed a lot.

― C J (C J), Monday, 6 November 2006 09:27 (nineteen years ago)

^^^hippy x-post

― If you fuck with Jimmy Mod, you call down the thunder (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 6 November 2006 10:48 (nineteen years ago)

???

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 10:53 (nineteen years ago)

>> To be frank, in countries like Finland the film is less likely to reinforce any stereotypes on Central Asians rather than the stereotype that all Americans are dumb and ignorant.

That's the point though isn't it??

― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Monday, 6 November 2006 11:42 (nineteen years ago)

I guess so, that was just an observation. But since a lot of people here already think that way, it's hardly a subversive stance. It would be more effective to try to reveal the hypocricies all Westerners share, but I guess that'd be too difficult even for someone like Cohen.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)

reveal the hypocricies all Westerners share

What hypocrisies do "all" Westerners share?

― ONIMO's losing the plot (GerryNemo), Monday, 6 November 2006 11:51 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I don't think it'd be too hard to get similarly racist or homophobic comments out of, say, Finns. But my comment was merely an observation, I don't think the film would've been improved by having Borat travel to every Western nation. It's just that the "American's are bigoted and don't know anything about the world outside US" joke is a bit played out, even if it's partly true.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 11:55 (nineteen years ago)

How is racism or homophobia hypocritical?

― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Monday, 6 November 2006 11:58 (nineteen years ago)

Perhaps that was a bad choice of words. Though I do think most Westerners would say they believe in equal rights in principle, even if in practice things aren't quite that way.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 12:03 (nineteen years ago)

Here's a new pitch for Cohen: dress up as an ignorant redneck American and come to, say, Helsinki or Paris, observe the snug comments you'll get.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 12:05 (nineteen years ago)

He doesn't have to do that because there are Americans vacationing in Paris 24/7/365, reinforcing all the typical American stereotypes. That's why Europeans believe those stereotypes. OTOH, 99.9999999999% of Americans have never met a naive, well-meaning but spectacularly rude and ignorant Kazakh journalist. That's why the joke works (and why it is NOT played out).

― NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Monday, 6 November 2006 12:15 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, on the other hand even places that don't have experience of real actual Americans have plenty of exposure to them due to TV.

― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 6 November 2006 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

Fave 'cameo' in the movie -- the other guy in the elevator.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 November 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

Least favourite part about it for me = leaving the cinema and going back to the car, my bloke decided to walk like Borat and say "very nice, how much?" every time he passed any women on the street. I hope he stops doing this soon.

― C J (C J), Monday, 6 November 2006 13:34 (nineteen years ago)

This was the first movie I've seen in a very long time in a completely sold out theater - and this was at 10:30 on a Sunday night!

This is a college town, there were lots of, um, let's just say "male college students" in the theater, and you would not BELIEVE how quiet it got during the Winnebago ride.

My only real qualm with the film is that "eh-HIGH eh-FIVE-ah!" is going to become this year's "I'm Rick James, bitch!", which will be a shame, because it was very well used in this (the telegram scene was one of my favorite least-likely-to-be-remembered moments [also the bear in the ice cream truck, staged as it seemed to have been]).

― hang down like sleeve of wizard (nickalicious), Monday, 6 November 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

during the wrestling scene @ my sister's screening in a satellite town of manchester, 2 scally hardnuts stormed out of the cinema banging and slamming doors as they went. how they larfed.

― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 6 November 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

I liked it, started slow (or maybe it's just that I had seen all the intro stuff in previews) but I laughed a lot more in the second half.

The only part that the audience was audibly uncomfortable with was when Borat was showing off the pics of his son's cock.

― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 6 November 2006 14:59 (nineteen years ago)

26.4 million opening weekend on 750 screens, next week it's gonna expand to 2,200.

― rems (x Jeremy), Monday, 6 November 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

"Borat made me depressed and unemployed!"

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 November 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)

Ha haa ha!

― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 6 November 2006 16:34 (nineteen years ago)

Tuomas, do you know who Bob Barr is? That makes the joke rise above mere gross-out.

― Eppy (Eppy), Monday, 6 November 2006 16:37 (nineteen years ago)

Similarly, the fact that he had a sit-down with Alan Keyes to talk about wrestling and showering with gay guys?

― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

The southern dinner party guests speak.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 November 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

"People in the congregation don't need to be embarrassed about anything I did in the movie," he said. "I can't endorse the movie. It's R-rated.

― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

This been posted yet?

Mahir "I Kiss You" wants to sue Borat, in November's Wired magazine:

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.11/play.html?pg=4

― StanM (StanM), Monday, 6 November 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

This movie is great

― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)

I thought the story was incredibly well tied to the humor and I think I could pretty well suss when something was rehearsed and when it was spontaneous. The frat boys didn't pick him up while he was hitchiking, obviously, but they were clearly unaware of who he was - they were just in on the hitchiking 'set-up.' Similarly, I'm sure the baywatch book worked the same way - the people acting were entirely unaware.

― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:44 (nineteen years ago)

So what is the story with the dinner party? That article makes it sound like "Satirist views politeness towards assholes as collaboration", which is one of the things that's making me not see it in the first place.

― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:45 (nineteen years ago)

Similarly, I'm sure the baywatch book worked the same way - the people acting were entirely unaware.

Even Pamela Anderson? I kinda doubt it.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)

the article is very tut-tutting. the scene is funnier, even if the set-up is a repeat from a TV bit. The pay-off is better, tho.

― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

Haha, check out the IMDb profile of "Luenell".

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

Even Pamela Anderson? I kinda doubt it.

This I admit was the one thing I've been wondering most about.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

I'm quite sure Pamela was not aware in advance. If she was, its much less funny.

― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)

Nice logic there.

Yeah, I know the article is obviously one-sided, but if it reflects reality at all, I don't get what they do to actually deserve it? Or is it just The Jerky Boys: The Film? (yes, I'm aware of what several of his other targets have done).

― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 6 November 2006 18:58 (nineteen years ago)

I honestly don't care if pahMELah was in on it or not, to be honest. It provided a funny and well-awkward climax to the narrative.

― polar bear flashback episode (nickalicious), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:02 (nineteen years ago)

I don't get what they do to actually deserve it?

with the dinner party, it's not that they actually deserve it, it's more just "japery amongst the upper classes."

― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)

I'm quite sure Pamela was not aware in advance. If she was, its much less funny.

If she wasn't in on the joke I really wouldn't find the last scene funny at all, because the bottom line is that then you would be laughing at a man sexually attacking a woman (nevermind that the woman in question is Pamela Anderson). Yes, the set-up was supposed to make it a satirical, but I found little satire in that particular scene. You're not laughing at Borat the sexist there (at this point he's already become a sympathetic character), you're laughing at him attacking a woman, and I don't think even Pamela Anderson deserves it. As I said, Borat's schtick is only funny when the bigot or the racist or the sexist (or anyone in power) is the object of the joke. Would it have been funny if Borat's would've grabbed the tits and ass of some random women on the street? Or if he would've hurled some racist epithets to the black guys he met?

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)

It was pretty funny when he was trying to kiss random dudes on the street.

― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:10 (nineteen years ago)

Probably.

xpost

― polar bear flashback episode (nickalicious), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:11 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, and that's exactly because men (as compared to women) are in power. It's the same reason you can laugh at black comedians making jokes about white people, but not vice versa.

(x-post)

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)

yes you can

― and what (ooo), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

Tuomos, he didn't try to sexually assault her he [censored to avoid ruining the ending]

― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

The inference made by the people there is that he was GOING to, but everyone watching the film is in on the joke so the thread never exists; we know he wouldnt actually do it because we know its a character.

― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

thread = threat

― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

Tuomos, he didn't try to sexually assault her he [censored to avoid ruining the ending]

Oh? If you were the woman in question, how would you interpret it? Few attacks by random men towards women are not sexual in nature.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)

Which is why I can only find some humor in the scene if I knew Pamela was in on the joke.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

she must have been in on the joke -- why else would she have RUN AROUND THE STORE like that?

― gbx (skowly), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)

because a man was chasing her?

― deej.. (deej..), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)

Borat & his producer would argue in hebrew, right?

― kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:19 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, it's a tight rope Cohen is walking in the film. Obviously we're supposed to be critical of his character, but making him a sympathetic fellow we're also kind of rooting for him.

― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 6 November 2006 19:19 (nineteen years ago)

Skipping 719 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.