read Norwegian Wood entirely off seeing this thread the other week. i dug the story lots, but at times i feel that utterly clean style is so 'in' as of now its become generic to me
does he change it up much?
― NO NUTRITIONAL CONTENT (kelpolaris), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 01:53 (fourteen years ago)
does he still write in that angsty teenager first person style
― ASPIE Rocky (dayo), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 02:06 (fourteen years ago)
I did the amazon.com thing too like the day it was released here and got a while you were out card on monday so I assume that's what it is
― conrad, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 02:10 (fourteen years ago)
The Mysterious Bookshop has both UK and US versions of 1Q84.
― Miss Piggy and Frodo in Hull (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:40 (fourteen years ago)
about a quarter of the way through. it's compelling but kind of gross in regard to the female characters.
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:42 (fourteen years ago)
I heard that this was... really bad? Can somebody who's read lots of other Murakami weigh in on this one?
― free banana man! free banana man! (remy bean), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:44 (fourteen years ago)
it's compelling but kind of gross in regard to the female characters.
This sums up a lot of his stuff that I've read so far.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:46 (fourteen years ago)
it's been so long since i've read his other stuff that i can't really compare 1Q84 relatively but the AV club gave it a D: http://www.avclub.com/articles/haruki-murakami-1q84,64876/
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:26 (fourteen years ago)
the first 50 or so pages have been p good imo
― the green (Lamp), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:30 (fourteen years ago)
― free banana man! free banana man! (remy bean), Wednesday, November 9, 2011 8:44 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
Seems just fine to me, with some bits of brilliance. I've been reading a few so-so reviews, and wonder if that is to do with the 'oh, i was into him years ago and now everyone likes him, he's rubbish'? Having said that, if you haven't read any before because it didn't appeal, this won't change your mind. And if you did read him and didn't like him, this will probably back up that opinion.
― Ned Trifle X, Thursday, 10 November 2011 08:22 (fourteen years ago)
tbh, his male characters have their..er..issues also.
― Ned Trifle X, Thursday, 10 November 2011 08:23 (fourteen years ago)
about 300 pages in. certainly very boob-centric to the extent of it being a worry. clunky expository passages & backstory, kinda wishing it was a birnbaum translation rather than rubin but that's maybe cos i've been teaching english for a couple of years since i read anything by him & come over all hypersensitive wrt grammatical/usage issues, despite that lazily recounted nugget that huki muki just translates back & forth on purpose to get that stilted feel. such a page turner, tho' - patterson style! makes me think of "lost" on the tv, pulpy, silly, in some places this is downright corny, but it's hooky as hell. i can't wait to find out what happens next even if it is the usual humu malarky. overall pleasantly surprised thus far. oh get this prize clunk tho' (no spoiler): "some kind of small, black thing shot across the sky. A bird, possibly. Or it might've been someone's soul being blown to the far side of the world".OW! bradbury class clunker. i'm looking forward to more !
― iglu ferrignu, Thursday, 10 November 2011 10:40 (fourteen years ago)
lol @ the quotes in that av club review
― this is unusual for batman. (Jordan), Thursday, 10 November 2011 15:48 (fourteen years ago)
the uk edition is translated by rubin in pts one and two, birnbaum in pt three
― thomp, Thursday, 10 November 2011 16:43 (fourteen years ago)
i have been wondering to what extent murakami is aware of the crepe-ness of it. when i am reading a new sword and sorcery novel and a new literary novel and the literary novel is the creepier, actually never mind that doesn't work i mean fuckin' jonathan franzen right
― thomp, Thursday, 10 November 2011 16:44 (fourteen years ago)
hahaha
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 10 November 2011 16:47 (fourteen years ago)
― thomp, Thursday, November 10, 2011 8:43 AM (8 minutes ago)
Philip Gabriel in pt 3 you mean. Birnbaum hasn't worked with Murakami since Underground, unfortunately.
― citation needed (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 10 November 2011 16:57 (fourteen years ago)
oop, my bad. here is an interview with him about the process, though
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/10/how-haruki-murakamis-1q84-was-translated-into-english/247093/#.TqYkHccXFY8.facebook
― thomp, Thursday, 10 November 2011 17:02 (fourteen years ago)
3.2% of the way into this and it's a bit bad so far I've read nothing by him before
― conrad, Monday, 14 November 2011 13:52 (fourteen years ago)
conrad do you like books
― ASPIE Rocky (dayo), Monday, 14 November 2011 13:55 (fourteen years ago)
so murakami is a big john irving fan, and is the guy who translates all of his novels into japanese. which makes a lot of sense, because, much like murakami, irvings first umpteen novels were all sort of variations on a theme, always with wrestlers, zoos, dysfunctional marriages, and vienna in them, yet are similarly addictive (to me anyway) even though they're all a little bit samey. just as 99% of all murakami novels have the everyman protaganist searching for the missing girlfriend and slowly slipping into some sort of surreal otherworld, yet i will continue to buy each variation of the same book and avidly reading them until murakami stops writing them.
just thought i'd throw that out there.
ps. hard boiled wonderland is his best book. norwegian wood is great if you are tired of everyman protaganists searching for the missing girlfriend and slowly slipping into some sort of surreal otherworld, yet still want to read a murakami novel. underground too, except more so. his short stories are awesome.
pps. somewhere, apparently, written in japanese, is a list of every song/album mentioned in all of his written works. has anyone ever seen that in translated into english? a murakami mixtape would probably be awesome, but going through each novel looking for the music he mentions by name and writing it down is way too much work (i tried)
― messiahwannabe, Monday, 14 November 2011 15:01 (fourteen years ago)
love em
― conrad, Monday, 14 November 2011 15:04 (fourteen years ago)
cool conrad what else do you love
― ASPIE Rocky (dayo), Monday, 14 November 2011 15:05 (fourteen years ago)
pps. somewhere, apparently, written in japanese, is a list of every song/album mentioned in all of his written works. has anyone ever seen that in translated into english? a murakami mixtape would probably be awesome, but going through each novel looking for the music he mentions by name and writing it down is way too much work (i tried)― messiahwannabe, Monday, November 14, 2011 7:01 AM (3 minutes ago)
― messiahwannabe, Monday, November 14, 2011 7:01 AM (3 minutes ago)
http://www.randomhouse.com/features/murakami/printable2.php?file=xml/music/classical.xmlhttp://www.randomhouse.com/features/murakami/printable2.php?file=xml/music/jazz.xmlhttp://www.randomhouse.com/features/murakami/printable2.php?file=xml/music/pop.xml
i finally got a(n unsigned) copy of 1q84 so I can finally start reading this.
― citation needed (Steve Shasta), Monday, 14 November 2011 15:06 (fourteen years ago)
humanity the internet dunno
― conrad, Monday, 14 November 2011 15:07 (fourteen years ago)
cool contad I love those things as well Im glad we have something in common
― ASPIE Rocky (dayo), Monday, 14 November 2011 15:22 (fourteen years ago)
this might have already been mentioned in some other thread, or even this one, but for those with spotify, some folks have already made playlists with the songs mentioned in various murakami books:
http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/spotify-playlists-for-writers-haruki-murakami_b34843
― rayuela, Monday, 14 November 2011 16:46 (fourteen years ago)
taking a break from 1Q84 at about halfway through to read other stuff for a while, not sure if i'll come back to it or not.
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 14 November 2011 17:04 (fourteen years ago)
q looks more like a 9 than Q
― conrad, Monday, 14 November 2011 17:23 (fourteen years ago)
this book is actually v bad
― conrad, Monday, 14 November 2011 18:58 (fourteen years ago)
it's almost as bad as I imagine dan brown or something
― conrad, Monday, 14 November 2011 19:18 (fourteen years ago)
One thing that does annoy me is the constant restating of what is currently occuring
― calstars, Tuesday, 15 November 2011 03:10 (fourteen years ago)
yeah that get's annoying. like a weekly serial or something, endless recaps. but no way is it in dan brown territory. i'd put it more with stephen king but w/ aspergers/blank jazz loving protagonists rather than king's hairshirt everymen.having read all the others but one, i think the translation & editing in this one is pretty flippin shoddy, tho. yesmen proofreaders. still enjoying it 500 pages in.
― iglu ferrignu, Tuesday, 15 November 2011 09:19 (fourteen years ago)
get's? gets
I finished the first book and a half or so. Really enjoying it - but then, it's the first of his that I have read.
― trapdoor fucking spiders (dowd), Tuesday, 15 November 2011 09:21 (fourteen years ago)
finished the first book last night. it's compelling despite its crepeness, i guess. did he always describe female characters in terms of their breasts? have i only just noticed this?
anyway i started wondering whether he'd read steig larsson; this book and his three seem to have something in common. (and the phrase 'men who hate women' showed up just as i was wondering this, so now i'm convinced of it.) like they're both about resistance to systemic male-on-female violence, but both very much immediately compromised in their form.
― thomp, Tuesday, 15 November 2011 09:57 (fourteen years ago)
(though they weren't available in english until he'd have been well on the way to finishing this. and it seems unlikely he read them in swedish.)
― thomp, Tuesday, 15 November 2011 09:59 (fourteen years ago)
"she scowled immensely" NO NO NO.intensely maybe. who let this through?yeh i'm guessing it all hinges on something to do with boobs in the third book.
― iglu ferrignu, Tuesday, 15 November 2011 11:13 (fourteen years ago)
v well may be the translator's fault but it's pretty relentlessly infuriatingly distracting
5.2%
― conrad, Tuesday, 15 November 2011 16:26 (fourteen years ago)
There seems to be a large Lynch influence on this novel (finished the first 2 books), especially Twin Peaks. *Spoilers?* there's a hint that birds, crows in this case (owls in TP), are agents of someone else. There are doubles, sexual abuse as portals/spiritually charged events, morally ambiguous 'little people' and the idea that the 'forest'/'woods' holds something more primitive and powerful. Okay, actually, looking at that list it isn't that strong, but towards the end of the second book I got a very strong Lynchian vibe.
― sleep daphnia (dowd), Tuesday, 15 November 2011 21:14 (fourteen years ago)
wow, thanks steve - i've been looking for those lists for ages!
― messiahwannabe, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 15:08 (fourteen years ago)
finished the first two books & not really in a major hurry to start the third.don't think it's a lynch influence ( although i believe hurakami is a fan ) so much as an overlap. there's deeper wellsprings than lynch i don't think he thought of evil or forests or mystery before anyone else. common themes.
― iglu ferrignu, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:11 (fourteen years ago)
this is either getting better or I'm getting used to it still occasionally annoying if not bad like I imagine dan brown then slow and repetitive like a kids' book have been kind of reluctant to pick it up but gonna give it a good go now
8.65%
― conrad, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:34 (fourteen years ago)
conrad do you like Japan
― dayo, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:45 (fourteen years ago)
Why do hate japan so much?
― Aerosol, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 18:49 (fourteen years ago)
don't know japan
― conrad, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 19:46 (fourteen years ago)
any good?
― conrad, Wednesday, 16 November 2011 19:47 (fourteen years ago)
Finished! By the way this is fun to read while blasting Janacek in your headphones.
― calstars, Thursday, 17 November 2011 13:34 (fourteen years ago)
conrad, dunno if you know this but japan is a country
― dayo, Thursday, 17 November 2011 14:04 (fourteen years ago)
where i am in book two i feel like i enjoy this a lot more. i don't think it's as 'deep' as his best stuff but whatever
idea that came to mind earlier: 'thriller as fugue'
probably not a v good idea
― thomp, Thursday, 17 November 2011 14:18 (fourteen years ago)