(not that i'd want to anyway because yuck)
― vitameatawalloginavegamin (donna rouge), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 20:26 (fourteen years ago)
according to their ad, they will grudgingly accept ppl from places like stanford/chicago/duke
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 20:28 (fourteen years ago)
hahaha.
― rayuela, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 20:32 (fourteen years ago)
an "introduction" network??
― rayuela, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 20:35 (fourteen years ago)
Ivy League match.com dating
wait is this a thing?
Ha. No, it was 2 women I met on match.com and I knew that they were lawyers before the dates but nothing more re their schooling. After a 2nd date with one, I found on my own that she had gone to an Ivy League school but she never mentioned it (kinda cool I think). The other date asked me about my schooling and then mentioned that she and her ex-husband had gone to Ivy League schools.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 20:58 (fourteen years ago)
wow. do people really care about that stuff?
― homosexual II, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 21:28 (fourteen years ago)
Oh my god do they. GF is working at an ivy right now, and buuuuuuugggghhhh.
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 21:41 (fourteen years ago)
I did not go to an Ivy League school and it does not matter to me, but to some people it does. Another friend of mine (a non-Ivy university grad with a decent job) said he would be intimidated by a date with a professionally successful, Ivy League college grad.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 21:44 (fourteen years ago)
few years ago, was having dinner w/some high school friends. one of them went to princeton, and she mentioned how senior year, everyone started hooking up w/each other and throwing themselves into relationships left & right -- we said why? -- and she said it was b/c they "knew" they would never find the type of "quality" people as those who go to princeton.
― rayuela, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 21:50 (fourteen years ago)
(barf)
― rayuela, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
it was b/c they "knew" they would never find themselves surrounded by quite so many horny people again the type of "quality" people as those who go to princeton.
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 21:57 (fourteen years ago)
see again i think this might be an east coast thing
no one ever, ever, ever asks me where i went to school.
― homosexual II, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:09 (fourteen years ago)
This also seems a very american thing (possibly UK upper classes too?), Ive never met anyone here who cares which uni one went to (likewise, no one would ever ask you if you even go to church let alone "which church").
― Trayce, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:18 (fourteen years ago)
You do get asked that question here, but to be fair, it's mostly to do with football.
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:27 (fourteen years ago)
I sometimes get asked if I went to school at all
― conrad, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:30 (fourteen years ago)
When I moved to the EC I was amazed and mystified by the whole ivy thing. Had never heard of such a thing being actually considered important in my life: people who went to ivies were so far away from the lives of most people that they were basically legends, where politicians and millionaires went but not "real" people.
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:31 (fourteen years ago)
So, I have this friend who is good looking, a lawyer, a really lovely funny smart guy. He's still on OKC, has been for forever. I just jokingly messaged him asking why the hell he's still there, he should be fighting the ladies off with a stick. He's all "THATS A GOOD QUESION TRAYCE" and then goes on to explain he's "picky".
I guess my ridiculously passive bait didnt work then, haha. (I'm not gonna outright ask him on a date. He's someone I'm already friends with IRL, I doubt he would be interested, haw. Mores the pity).
― Trayce, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 00:50 (fourteen years ago)
i kinda freak out when i see people i have 99% match with. never know what to say.
― what's happening to our based god??? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 06:44 (fourteen years ago)
"clearly the machines think we are made for each other"
― what's happening to our based god??? (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 06:45 (fourteen years ago)
someone wrote me with roughly that though! so it kinda works
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 06:46 (fourteen years ago)
I say p much every time I meet ppl irl xp
― vitameatawalloginavegamin (donna rouge), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 06:46 (fourteen years ago)
I have a 0% enemy person I'm supposed to be meeting. Life would be boring maybe?
― ljubljana, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 07:02 (fourteen years ago)
I met my 99% match on a whim--we'd only emailed a few times (over the course of a day or two) and then he came out randomly when I happened to be out for drinks in his neighborhood . . . and I didn't even remember how highly matched we were until he mentioned it. And then he broke my heart.
My other 99's in NYC are a committed polyamorist and an accountant musician. I haven't had any contact with them. I am having a fruitful e-mail discussion with a 99 in Austin who only moved away from Queens (the next neighborhood over from mine) two weeks ago.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 15:33 (fourteen years ago)
you say 'we are the 99%' obvs
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 16:31 (fourteen years ago)
omg
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 16:34 (fourteen years ago)
Already had that joke with my in-person 99:(
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 16:59 (fourteen years ago)
highest match i have is 92% but i haven't answered a ton of those qns either
― vitameatawalloginavegamin (donna rouge), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 17:10 (fourteen years ago)
Just got a message, all it said was "Tell me more." Um, no thanks. As if i haven't rambled on in my profile enough already.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 17:42 (fourteen years ago)
i got a weird cryptic message from someone who wants to "meat" me D:
― bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:15 (fourteen years ago)
I don't know about the match percentage thing. I dated my 96% match for about a month and it kinda seemed like we were just basically the same person. I don't want to date ME!
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:34 (fourteen years ago)
im in a pub waitin for a date to arrive!!
― conrad, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:37 (fourteen years ago)
i never used to look at the questions that the other person answered, but the other day i did, and i realized they ARE important. If someone responds to the question, "do you think a women should keep her legs shaved?" with a YES, then regardless of the high match of other questions, they're out. this might seem picky to some, but someone with those kinds of ideas about femininity is not going to be a good match for me anyway.
xp good luck w/your date! i had to postpone mine tonight.
― rayuela, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:39 (fourteen years ago)
i am intrigued by ppl (who do not appear to hail from belfast and seem otherwise non-religious) who would not consider dating a catholic
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:48 (fourteen years ago)
I consistently surprised by the guys who think that men should be the heads of household and also how few people get the Romeo & Juliet question right!!!
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:51 (fourteen years ago)
What IS the ansewr to that R&J thing??
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:52 (fourteen years ago)
also the STALE-STEAL thing
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:53 (fourteen years ago)
What is the Romeo and Juliet question?
― Juggy Brottleteen (ENBB), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 18:54 (fourteen years ago)
The question is what does "Wherefore" mean in "Wherefore art thou Romeo?"
The answer is 'Why'
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:04 (fourteen years ago)
i never used to look at the questions that the other person answered, but the other day i did, and i realized they ARE important. If someone responds to the question, "do you think a women should keep her legs shaved?" with a YES, then regardless of the high match of other questions, they're out.
definitely! i mean, it's online dating - it's ok to restrict the search results to weed out people who are going to say and do things that annoy the fuck out of you.
― double whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:04 (fourteen years ago)
i still remember my 9th grade teacher explaining that to us!
― vitameatawalloginavegamin (donna rouge), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:10 (fourteen years ago)
the wherefore thing, not the restricting search results thing, though i wished they HAD taught us that, lousy public school system
― vitameatawalloginavegamin (donna rouge), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:11 (fourteen years ago)
the leg shaving question is a dealbreaker for me too! as well as people who "strongly prefer" to date someone of their own race. those aren't picky things, just asshole weeding out things.
― bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:17 (fourteen years ago)
totally
same with religion for me. i'm cool with all answers except the ones that are like "i'm super religious and i pray every day and i have talked to god". that's just not gonna fly with me, ever, so why deal with it?
― double whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:20 (fourteen years ago)
i tend to look at the "things she cares about" questions to get a sense of what they're looking for, and if i'm anywhere close to it or not
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:38 (fourteen years ago)
i got the r&j question wrong, but i tbh we read a lot of Shakespeare plays in highschool and i always kinda sucked at keeping them straight! except for King Lear, Macbeth and Hamlet - that's some unfuckwithable business.
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 19:58 (fourteen years ago)
think this chick got the r&j q wrong
― conrad, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:06 (fourteen years ago)
I got it wrong, also! But I had kept my answer secret so that's not too bad.
The question about a left-hand glove, when turned inside-out, fits on: Right or Left? is funny. I got out some gloves and tried it.
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:09 (fourteen years ago)
hahaha. what's the answer? it's right, right?
oops i got the r&j question wrong. damn!
― rayuela, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:13 (fourteen years ago)
mookieproof, re: the catholic thing, it would depend on the intensity of their belief, but having been brought up catholic, i have a lot of personal baggage and animosity toward that religion that might make it hard for catholics to date ME. (again, depending on the intensity of their belief)
― rayuela, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:15 (fourteen years ago)
how many of your questions do you answer secretly? the majority of mine are open, so everyone will know that i know jack shit about romeo and juliet
― rayuela, Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:18 (fourteen years ago)