i feel like maybe at one point albums actually did reflect that sort of thing, but people seem to really stretch for finding meaning as it pertains to current events sometimes. that rolling stone review of the new coldplay album is p hilarious in that regard.
― omar little, Monday, 7 November 2011 20:52 (fourteen years ago)
I'm with morbz re: the term "action movie" tho
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, November 7, 2011 3:46 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
i dunno i feel like its useful to have a term that encompasses all kinds of movies where dramatic conflict is rendered as a physical struggle. its like how a zillion different types of movies get to be 'comedies'
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Monday, 7 November 2011 20:58 (fourteen years ago)
actioner
― scott seward, Monday, 7 November 2011 21:02 (fourteen years ago)
when was the "action movie" genre term coined...?
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:08 (fourteen years ago)
movies where dramatic conflict is rendered as a physical struggle
like when Andre Gregory and Wallace Shawn got into that fistfight at the end of My Dinner With Andre rite
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:09 (fourteen years ago)
inaction movie^^^
― mark s, Monday, 7 November 2011 21:10 (fourteen years ago)
I doubt "action movie" was widely used until the industry had decided it had to aim for the priorities of a Schwarzenegger vehicle or Bad Boys instead of, say, Frankenheimer's The Train.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:10 (fourteen years ago)
that's my guess/hazy memory too - I can't recall this term ever appearing prior to the 80s
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:12 (fourteen years ago)
my dinner with andre is psychological thriller.
― scott seward, Monday, 7 November 2011 21:15 (fourteen years ago)
I think the 80s also spawned my favorite genre term ever, the "erotic thriller"
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:16 (fourteen years ago)
Like, this page doesn't really see the Action Movie existing as a genre until the 1980s, despite its roots in the Bond movies, the "maverick cop" thrillers, etc.
http://www.filmbug.com/dictionary/action-movies.php
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:19 (fourteen years ago)
kael's objections to the french connection declare preemptive war on action movies
― chief rocker frankie crocker (m coleman), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:19 (fourteen years ago)
she lost that one, obv
― chief rocker frankie crocker (m coleman), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:20 (fourteen years ago)
should have a poll
Dressed to Kill (1980)Body Heat (1981)Cat People (1982)Body Double (1984)Tightrope (1984)Fatal Attraction (1987)Sea of Love (1989)Basic Instinct (1992)Blown Away (1992)Poison Ivy (1992)Single White Female (1992)Body of Evidence (1993)Boxing Helena (1993)The Crush (1993)Sliver (1993)Color of Night (1994)The Last Seduction (1994)Jade (1995)Bound (1996)Wild Things (1998)Eyes Wide Shut (1999)Unfaithful (2002)In the Cut (2003)Killing Me Softly (March 2003)Swimming Pool (2003)Lust, Caution (2007)Chloe (2009)Secret Love (2010)The Housemaid (2010)
― omar little, Monday, 7 November 2011 21:20 (fourteen years ago)
Action film is a film genre where one or more heroes is thrust into a series of challenges that require physical feats, extended fights and frenetic chases. They occasionally have a resourceful character struggling against incredible odds such as, life-threatening situations, an evil villain, and/or being chased in several ways of transportation (car, bus, truck, etc.), with victory achieved at the end after difficult physical efforts and violence.[1][2][3] Story and character development are generally secondary to explosions, fist fights, gunplay and car chases.[4]
― scott seward, Monday, 7 November 2011 21:22 (fourteen years ago)
so if it doesn't do that it isn't that.
There was an article years ago in S&S (ie mid-90s), when I was subbing there, by a Hollywood screenwriter* called Larry something (sorry, his surname's gone completely out of my head), which was basically a history of the idea of the action movie: he traced it to Bond as a concept, fast cars, gunplay, explosions, sex and -- and this was the key, in his opinion -- a certain kind of flippant banter. Did this mix exist prior to Bond (which was important** as much as anything as a franchise)? If I remember his argument correctly, the sub-species only really took off in the 80s (the explosion-filled 70s blockbusters contain zero banter).
*significant because this was the type of movie he wrote (or aspired to)**in the nuisance-innovation sense
― mark s, Monday, 7 November 2011 21:23 (fourteen years ago)
i feel like the hitchcock film 'the 39 steps' was kind of ahead of its time in that regard, having (iirc) a hero facing difficult odds, on the run, engaging in flippant banter.
― omar little, Monday, 7 November 2011 21:25 (fourteen years ago)
Dressed to Kill (1980)
wins
― dor Dumbeddownball (Eric H.), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:27 (fourteen years ago)
north by northwest always felt like a proto-action movie to me too
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:27 (fourteen years ago)
x-post - please make that a real poll
― Juggy Brottleteen (ENBB), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:30 (fourteen years ago)
wtf have you guys never seen an Errol Flynn movie
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:31 (fourteen years ago)
also yes I would vote in all these erotic thriller polls
well, that's bcz the Bond films ripped it off rather profitably. (esp From Russia with Love)
xxxp
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:31 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs/31777_o.gif
― omar little, Monday, 7 November 2011 21:31 (fourteen years ago)
i was thinking a car chase poll would be cool too, but probably too specialized
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:32 (fourteen years ago)
I think the Kael thread is over.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:32 (fourteen years ago)
it was over when they started talking about boring novelists
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:34 (fourteen years ago)
can't remember if there was any 'flippant banter' in this one lol
― The Uncanny Frankie Valley (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 7 November 2011 21:36 (fourteen years ago)
(actually i'd like to see a poll of what morbs calls "ambitious films" upthread -- though the battle to establish an agreed-on definition might destroy us all)
― mark s, Monday, 7 November 2011 23:12 (fourteen years ago)
just like aguirre!
― vitameatawalloginavegamin (donna rouge), Monday, 7 November 2011 23:13 (fourteen years ago)
Nashville, first two Godfathers, Intolerance, the Apu trilogy, On the Waterfront, The Wild Bunch, The Unbearable Lightness of Being...whether or not you think they did what they set out to do or fell woefully short, they're all pretty ambitious, no?
― clemenza, Monday, 7 November 2011 23:18 (fourteen years ago)
I dunno if Waterfront is *that* ambitious, at least as ambition is defined by the other films listed there. I love it and all, but its a fairly straightforward drama no matter how much emphasis you choose to place on Kazan's issues.
― jer.fairall, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 01:32 (fourteen years ago)
it's likely one of the first A-pictures cast almost entirely with NY Method actors.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 17:03 (fourteen years ago)
I was being a bit disingenuous yesterday, in that I agree with Morbius that she had less patience for high ambition the last few years of her career. I don't think it's a fair charge through the '60s, '70s, or most of the '80s.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 17:47 (fourteen years ago)
I was talking mostly about ppl who latch onto her NOW -- yay, she likes American junk and not that weird Antonioni shit. But she doesn't seem to have liked many '60s European auteurs besides Godard (to a point).
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 17:55 (fourteen years ago)
She loved L'Avventura, The Leopard, some Truffaut films, Bellochio, Bertolucci, Chris Marker, other stuff; not Fellini, Resnais, Pasolini, or most of Anotonioni's output. She was back and forth on Bergman. I agree she's now thought of as being anti-European-art-film, and that some people gravitate to her for that reason, but I think it's an exaggerated characterization.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:07 (fourteen years ago)
i can't remember her writing about bunuel, but she must have somewhere, right?
― scott seward, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:11 (fourteen years ago)
The one criticism of Kael I'll accept is that she didn't bother with Fassbinder or Ozu – how could you review film in the seventies and not write about the six or seven Fassbinder films playing in a given year?
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:14 (fourteen years ago)
She loved Buñuel - one of her favorites.
her rave for discreet charm made me check it out
― da croupier, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:15 (fourteen years ago)
I wasn't sure whether to mention Bunuel--yes, Spanish born, Mexico later. Anyway, I think she generally wrote favorably about Bunuel.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:15 (fourteen years ago)
well there ya go he was ambitious and arty and european. and tons of fun.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
Her long review of Simon of the Desert contains some of her most considered judgments.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:16 (fourteen years ago)
if he were around today hollywood would have lured him here to direct chris tucker movies.
It was Fassbinder she never wrote a single word about, the last I heard.
― Miss Piggy and Frodo in Hull (James Redd and the Blecchs), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:19 (fourteen years ago)
She alluded to him in a Sirk review.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:20 (fourteen years ago)
i never hear anyone anywhere talking about fellini anymore. or pasolini or antonioni or any of those guys. maybe i hang with the wrong people. 70's american movies though? i hear about that stuff all the time from people. all kinds of obscure american 70's movies.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:21 (fourteen years ago)
i'm the same way though, sadly. dr morbz' nightmare american film fan. when was the last time i watched a fassbinder movie? 20+ years? something like that.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:22 (fourteen years ago)
All That Heaven Allows
US (1955): Drama 89 min, No rating, Color, Available on videocassette
A trashy love story about the attraction between a natural man (Rock Hudson, as a New England tree surgeon) and a frustrated-by-respectability rich widow (Jane Wyman) who is some fifteen years older than he and has two grown children. Hudson and Wyman are hardly an electric combination, but this Ross Hunter production is made with so much symbolism that some people actually see it as allegorical. Its reputation derives from the slurpy, peculiarly glossy intensity of Douglas Sirk's direction-the same sort of pop spirituality that he had brought to Ross Hunter's MAGNIFICENT OBSESSION, with the same two stars, the year before. Sirk's blend of Germanic kitsch and Hollywood kitsch was a major influence on the young German director Fassbinder, whose work is a further formalization of Sirk's schematic sentimentality.
― lumber up, limbaugh down (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:22 (fourteen years ago)