i changed mine a bit...fairly sure the net difference in the grand cosmic scheme is very little, the net result very much the same :)
― When a German communicates, you listen (LocalGarda), Saturday, 5 November 2011 20:42 (fourteen years ago)
If anyone has suggestions regarding my profile, either message me or write them here. Be gentle: Like most criticsl people, I am very fragile.
― Virginia Plain, Saturday, November 5, 2011 4:32 AM (16 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
whats yr username? or if you don't want to give it, that's fine. i didn't see it when skimming earlier messages.
i just got back from a boozy brunch and am slightly tipsy. i've also decided that this is the perfect frame of mind in which to delete all the questions i've answered and to re-answer them. tell me, do you believe contraception is morally wrong? would you date someone who already had a partner? what about children? IS MORALITY UNIVERSAL OR RELATIVE?
― rayuela, Saturday, 5 November 2011 21:08 (fourteen years ago)
no no yes both
― mh, Saturday, 5 November 2011 21:10 (fourteen years ago)
are you happy with your life?
― rayuela, Saturday, 5 November 2011 21:14 (fourteen years ago)
By the way, trayce (90%).
Mandee (69%) great profile! Very individual and readable narrative (even with the murakami!). I like how you keep coming back to the voyeur theme--this helps me feel like I am getting to know you. I think you give a good sense of both who you are and what you may be looking for, while still keeping it light-hearted and not over-serious. I might nix the not conventially attractive thing, because that's kind of hard to pull off when you are beautiful, but otherwise, no complaints.
― Virginia Plain, Saturday, 5 November 2011 21:15 (fourteen years ago)
Donna rouge (77%), good profile and hello, fellow virgo. Nice pics. No suggestions, except for maybe update it, so it seems like you are still around and interested (if you are).
― Virginia Plain, Saturday, 5 November 2011 21:27 (fourteen years ago)
omg, after re-answering nearly 100 questions, my compatibility with someone with whom i was previously highly compatible just dropped to extremely low.
― rayuela, Saturday, 5 November 2011 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
Thanks VP/ljub! It never occurred to me to do a whole-body pic, I guess I wasnt thinking in such "hey look at me!" terms, which I suppose a dating site is all about ha. Also, dont have many.
I have wavered about getting rid of the grammar turn-off thing. Its probably more prudent to have something more important mentioned, like "go away poly/married people", lol.
I should prob focus less on shit like Futurama and video games too but then again... thats who i am?
― Trayce, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:38 (fourteen years ago)
Thanks for taking the time to look, VP! btw, an ILXor took my current default pic
― vitameatawalloginavegamin (donna rouge), Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:59 (fourteen years ago)
I've been surprised by people who didn't "full-body" so now I wonder when I only see faces. Yea, trayce, if you wanted to meet more random people, I would say take some of that stuff out, but I think if you want to meet specific people who like that stuff or at least tolerate that you like it, I would say leave it in.
B_g, how was your thing? This guy is really taking it slow! Also, how did you stealth rate me? I only found out when I rated you.
― Virginia Plain, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:02 (fourteen years ago)
reawakened my account on this thing tonight, after reading this thread, but it seems pretty likely i'll end up doing what i did before and shutting my account down because i feel awkward about it
― I like to think of myself as a Young Money-ologist so (c sharp major), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:51 (fourteen years ago)
VP, my date had food poisoning and cancelled today, so instead i had a fabulous lady date with a dear friend for italian food in the west village.
no idea if it was food poisoning or "food poisoning" but he rescheduled for monday. if he flakes on monday then i guess i'll really know how he feels!
i uploaded a picture of my new haircut to okc yesterday and have had a zillion more profile views than normal, but no messages! it might be because i was doing an interpretive dance with my cat to kate bush when i took the picture :/
― bene_gesserit, Sunday, 6 November 2011 03:06 (fourteen years ago)
Men need time to message you, b_g; they'll get around to it--don't worry.
I embarassed myself in front of the faux ilxor last night--I used to be so cool and unbothered but somehow I have developed into a terribly needy person. I think I need to go to dating remedial school.
― Virginia Plain, Sunday, 6 November 2011 14:58 (fourteen years ago)
I don't like to hear you say that. :( People have needs, they need things from other people sometimes. It's not your FAULT for being human.
PS: I have not been embarrassing in matters of romant, but I have been drunk/over-friendly/inexpert in public a couple of times lately and I'm trying to forgive myself, too.
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Sunday, 6 November 2011 16:03 (fourteen years ago)
Robyn told me something like that in the spring, when I was saying I don't know how to have relationships, I do it wrong, and she was like why is the narrative that we are doing things wrong, why can't we allow ourselves to be who we are and seek out what we need?
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Sunday, 6 November 2011 16:22 (fourteen years ago)
Thanks, Laurel! :) It all makes sense. Still, I am not drinking Manhattans again. Truth serum, or more like vocalizing agent.
― Virginia Plain, Sunday, 6 November 2011 16:34 (fourteen years ago)
I guess because I'm a pale fatty I've never thought of myself as conventionally attractive. Out here in CO most dudes seem to want a thin, blonde athletic type who wants to go trail running with them.
― homosexual II, Sunday, 6 November 2011 16:52 (fourteen years ago)
If I had to go trail running, I'd find a nice cliff and fall off it. So gross.
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:01 (fourteen years ago)
dude out in Colorado reporting: I can confirm this.
xpost
― NO NUTRITIONAL CONTENT (kelpolaris), Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:02 (fourteen years ago)
altho i gravitate towards shoulder-length brown hair w/ girls w/ such propensity that sometimes it takes me days after meeting them to realize they aren't as good looking as when i first became enamored by their hair
― NO NUTRITIONAL CONTENT (kelpolaris), Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:04 (fourteen years ago)
blame freud
Virginia Plain, you could be telling the story of one of my happy hours, except substitute manhattans for whiskey neat. I have definitely been more measured at all future happy hours. i feel your pain! :/
― rayuela, Sunday, 6 November 2011 20:27 (fourteen years ago)
I wrote to someone this AM, a comment about some similarities between our profiles. His response was like this: Pleasantry, non-committal comment about similarities, book recommendation, closed with "Thanks for writing." No questions, nothing to take further, and I'm reading "Thanks for writing" as a dismissal. Right?
I'll be in the lump thread if anyone needs me.
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Sunday, 6 November 2011 21:44 (fourteen years ago)
Don't assume.
― bamcquern, Sunday, 6 November 2011 21:48 (fourteen years ago)
See this is why I just dont reply if I'm not taken by someone's profile that messages me... its a little cutthroat, I know, but this is a dating site, these are strangers, I dont want to waste anyone's time getting their hopes up.
On that note: anyone get put off if someone's profile includes "casual sex" as one of their looking fors?
― Trayce, Sunday, 6 November 2011 22:57 (fourteen years ago)
(I think I do, even though Im not actually averse to such a thing)
i highly recommend this website
― double whooooaaaaa! (Z S), Sunday, 6 November 2011 23:00 (fourteen years ago)
Kinda jealous of your quick good luck, dammit ;P
But yay for you! <3
― Trayce, Sunday, 6 November 2011 23:03 (fourteen years ago)
ZS I think you have to have an N>1 to assert that.
That said, yay ZS!
― quincie, Sunday, 6 November 2011 23:32 (fourteen years ago)
I just tweaked my profile a bit and added the pic I posted on WDYLL the other day. Asked N to look at it, apparently mine says I reply often. I didnt think I did!? I ignore as many messages as I respond to.
― Trayce, Monday, 7 November 2011 00:00 (fourteen years ago)
Laurel, quick replies on this site are fairly uncommon. I don't think this reply means disinterest. Write back and see if you can get a conversation going.
I did some damage control texting to try and mitigate the mess I created last night. Anyway, realized I'm not interested in this dude anymore, so thats a good thing.
― Virginia Plain, Monday, 7 November 2011 00:28 (fourteen years ago)
Re casual sex, yea I think it's bit offputting when someone explicitly states that. My feeling is that this is a dating site, of course there will be some casual sex happening at some point.
― Virginia Plain, Monday, 7 November 2011 00:35 (fourteen years ago)
There are some people on OKC who - like CL, I suppose - are explicitly looking for hookups/shags/affairs. Its kind of ew but I guess it comes with the territory.
― Trayce, Monday, 7 November 2011 00:37 (fourteen years ago)
EACH TO THEIR OWN I GUESS
― conrad, Monday, 7 November 2011 00:45 (fourteen years ago)
i'm not opposed to casual sex but i am mortified at the idea of my cousin or coworker stumbling across my profile or something like that.
also i've heard that if you list it and you are a woman you are immediately inundated with 394058430953 messages.
i wish there was an option for "wants something a little bit more than casual sex, but i swear i do not want to marry your or have babies, so we can keep hanging out like normal people who like each other without things getting stupid".
― bene_gesserit, Monday, 7 November 2011 00:55 (fourteen years ago)
Ljublijana (87%) very nice profile and cute haircut!
― Virginia Plain, Monday, 7 November 2011 01:07 (fourteen years ago)
thanks!
― ljubljana, Monday, 7 November 2011 01:09 (fourteen years ago)
xxp even that would have the same result, i believe...
― Nhex, Monday, 7 November 2011 01:15 (fourteen years ago)
VP, yours is extremely intriguing and interesting! I think you were not to keen upthread on public comments so I'll webmail you.
― ljubljana, Monday, 7 November 2011 01:20 (fourteen years ago)
Zora, can't find.
Rayuela (93%), your profile totally works for me. I like the recovering grad student part. I also like the mention of the progressive organization. Also,thanks for big upping qbpl. We should hang. I didn't put my name here bc I have shyness syndrome, but if you notice a creepy lady paying a visit to your profile that is me.
Is that everyone? Mh, do you live in mpls and have a slight kink predilection? If so, nice profile.
― Virginia Plain, Monday, 7 November 2011 01:23 (fourteen years ago)
Thanks, lj! I look forward to your comments.
― Virginia Plain, Monday, 7 November 2011 01:24 (fourteen years ago)
Really do appreciate yr comments, VP, I'd comment on everyone elses profile but I really dont feel like I'm any expert at this crap :/
― Trayce, Monday, 7 November 2011 02:04 (fourteen years ago)
hahaha no, but I'm intrigued
― mh, Monday, 7 November 2011 02:13 (fourteen years ago)
As am I (j/k). Of course, no problem on the comments, trayce. Those who can't do, teach. Thanks lj for your excellent feedback. I tried to write you back but the ilx robot may have poxy fuled it.
I just sent someone a message (9 sentences).
― Virginia Plain, Monday, 7 November 2011 03:25 (fourteen years ago)
trayce -- yeah, i also ignore a ton of messages, but when i checked yesterday it said i reply often. i guess it's good to know that those that actually have REPLY SELECTIVELY must hardly reply to any messages!
vp, i <3 qbpl.
― rayuela, Monday, 7 November 2011 04:01 (fourteen years ago)
someone just wrote me to say "you look angry in all of your pictures". that is the only message i've received this evening.
:(:(((((why do i repel other humans?
― bene_gesserit, Monday, 7 November 2011 04:58 (fourteen years ago)
wow, what an asshole that person is.
― horseshoe, Monday, 7 November 2011 05:00 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah thats really rude :(
Someone messaged me the other day to ask if I was [insert the name of a presumed back door porn actress I am not repeating for google purposes] from some dodgy sex website?
I mean ew, wtf!?
― Trayce, Monday, 7 November 2011 05:01 (fourteen years ago)
When I first joined okc the first message I received said "your pics, make you look angry."
Then I had this random guy messaging me and suggesting which pics he thought were more flattering.
Then I had a guy write and offer to take me out to take better pics of me.
― Virginia Plain, Monday, 7 November 2011 05:11 (fourteen years ago)
fuck all that noise
― new rap guy (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Monday, 7 November 2011 05:11 (fourteen years ago)