Is the Guardian worse than it used to be?

i enjoy the work of 3 of those hipster scumbags :(

If some of this lyricism sounds familiar, it is because July is perfecting the various themes and emotions associated with other "whimsical" and "ironic" artists, working especially in film. They would include actors like Michael Cera and Zooey Deschanel, who are both wildly popular with the "hipsters" of fashionable neighbourhoods such as Williamsburg in New York, Silver Lake in Los Angeles, Portland in Oregon and Hoxton in London.

missed out Greatfield in Hull.

god... what complete tools.

that new miranda july movie is absolutely wonderful, tbh.

Public Enemy's Chuck D famously called hip-hop "The Black CNN", in reference to its ability to help its audience make sense of the world.

However, if anyone, black or white, were to look to the multimillion selling Detroit hip-hop duo Insane Clown Posse as their main source of information, they might find this particular channel a little limited in its output.

ICP's 10 albums to date have been characterised by misogynistic sub-gangsta lyrics and cod-mystic circus "themes"; few would mistake this for reliable news content.

ICP - The White Sky News

yet another opinion that sounds like alan partridge. xpost

; few would mistake this for reliable news content.

; few would mistake this for reliable news content.

; few would mistake this for reliable news content.

; few would mistake this for reliable news content.

"An obituary of the film-maker George Kuchar was illustrated with a photograph that did not show him, as the caption said, but his twin brother, Mike (20 October, page 35)."

In 10 years, the 'little fat bloke' from Reading has become a comedy god. But after the 'mong' row, and on the eve of his new TV show Life's Too Short, have we fallen out of love with Ricky Gervais?

http://gu.com/p/3375e
unchecked guardian dadrock-dimwit-on-the-loose interviews UK "national treasure" (twee, mawkish) poet.
made me want to kill.
is this GCSE English for remedial school?
or are you adults?
step da fung UP!
worthless toss.
go advertise an iphone it's all you whores are good for

simon armitage is a dreadful poet. so fucking britpop

If Depp spends more than 183 days in France, he explains indignantly, he'd have to start paying income tax. "I'm certainly not ready to give up my American citizenship. You don't have to give up your American citizenship," he adds sarcastically, but then he'd have to pay tax in both countries, "so you essentially work for free."

And all of a sudden, he sounds exactly like your average corporate Middle America multimillionaire – anti-government, anti-tax and apparently oblivious to the part these twin monstrous affronts might play in creating a country where he doesn't have to worry about being mugged by crack dealers on every street.

Really if you want seventeen more years of Tory government keep printing drivel like this.

It does, indeed, surprise me to learn that someone who's made four Pirates of the Caribbean films cares about money.

Zing!

lol at being "mugged by crack dealers". Aitkenhead, I'm guessing?

Yeah, stupid, it's crack addicts that mug you not dealers

EMI Decca Stockaitkenhead it was, indeed.

that method of interspersing commentary on the interviewee's remarks (however stupid they may be) after the fact is infuriating, and something other Guardian hacks do too- Hattenstone springs to mind.

"I kept smiling at him, longingly, however...."

"...imagining how I could feed my crack habit with the bulging contents of his wallet."

I remember getting really cross about that technique when I was at the NME in the mid-80s: several writers would use it to gotcha interviewees after the fact. It's a real dick's trick IMO: pick them up on it t the time, going back to it if you don't want to break the flow -- and if you didn't think of it at the time (=you are as bad as they are), fkn say this. Don't abuse yr power: it guts any politics you profess. (Well, not any politics...)

Slot it on the list next to "Change the question to make the answer look more xxxx in your article"

I expect quite a lot of these writers were influenced at an impressionable age by the malign nature of eighties NME/Blitz/Face interview techniques. The thing that always bugged me about Morley’s Ask – recently confirmed on re-reading – is that, boiled down, the only question PM ever asked anyone was: “why aren’t you me?”

I was going through my garage, and actually found my copies of "Ask" (I forgot I had one), and the original press of "Rock and the Pop Narcotic".

So, shall update myself re:it.

(My memory of other interviewers: The Stud Brothers' only question was "Why aren't you Front 242?")

The other 'refresher' was watching some of the extras on the "Stone Roses" 2DVD set, where Ian and john were being 'interviewed'. Of course, surly/shy/reticent was the order of the day, but blimey the questions were all totally hopeless. "What do you feel like, about how long it's taken to be critically acclaimed, do you think?"

http://legalbizzle.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/comment-is-free-but-woo-is-sacred/

am all for printing both sides, but where do you draw the line? these guys were just talking obvious shit

I've spent some time corresponding with 'freemen' (for work). They are kinda endearing but they are talking absolute bollocks of course. There's no way the Guardian should be publishing it really.

Freemen who think they are clever by quoting legal stuff are tedious fuckers. The ones who get really obsessed with language and writing names in capital letters and putting punctuation in odd places are interesting (but generally appear ill).

I'd never heard of them until Ben Goldacre started tweeting about this stuff.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Freeman-on-the-land

In my experience they are usually mentally ill people, but there are a few who are just stupid/sad/idiotic anarchists.

website front page is currently v much worse than it used to be.

all better now.

Via Matos, the film and music section is no more after today: "They're folding it into the rest of the paper, doing more online, that sort of thing."

It's going into Friday's G2 from next week.

Think some things will still disappear? There's no Tom Ewing column as of now sadly.

And as this seems to be my last column for the Guardian (the first paper I read seriously), I say farewell in the hope that you have had some pleasure from it.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2012/jan/05/david-thomson-on-michael-fassbender/print

COPYING AND PASTING IS NOT PERT HUMOUR

DON'T FUCKING DO IT

xpost: From what I've heard, almost all of Friday's G2 will be Film & Music, except for Marina Hyde at the front and presumably the telly at the back. Dunno about specific regular features from the old F&M, though.

It's going to be most of Friday's G2, as Mike says. New commissioning and editing model, in which "pod heads" for film and music - for music, that's Caspar Llewellyn Smith - commission in their subject areas, and then Monday-Friday print editors take their pick of what they want. So G2 editor will compile F&M from stuff commissioned by others.

"pod heads"!

The question we've all been asking: Why doesn't Ireland do musicals?

We aren't lacking in raw materials, after all. Aren't we the country that brought you Enya, Sinead O'Connor, Westlife and U2?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/theatreblog/2012/jan/11/ireland-turned-off-musicals-bono

queequeg7

11 January 2012 6:50PM

Because musicals are generally shite

otm

are guardian comments always this stupid and annoying?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/jan/12/voivod-to-the-death-demo-metal

Generally only happens when the articles are linked on the front page. You get a lot of people who don't usually comment on the music sections.

normally the comments are really good

Well, you don't get people coming along to say 'WHO? I have never heard of them!" all the time.

yeah usually they would just blame pandemics on THE JEWS

You're thinking of Oi VeyVod