what if physical media comes back from the dead and supplants THEM
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:49 (fourteen years ago)
point is blockbuster is not going to turn into some other company thats makes an amazing streaming product overnight, might as well say mcdonalds is going to be the next netflix, there just no correlation between blockbusters old retail rental business and streaming video
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:50 (fourteen years ago)
i could see amazon gaining some traction, def apple if they went w/subscriptions, idk who else some startup prob
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:51 (fourteen years ago)
...except they have relationships with every content provider out there pretty much?
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:51 (fourteen years ago)
the problem in getting these businesses off the ground isnt the tech, its trying to twist studios' arms into letting u actually do it
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
Night of the Living Physical Media 2 - Return of the Content
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
maybe if all the movie/tv studios formed a consortium and refused to licence their shit to anyone else, seems p unlikely theyd be able to play well together and make a product that anyone actually wants to use tho
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
blockbuster/dish will probably make a run at netflix but they have a lot of shit to work out first
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
the problem with blockbuster/dish is that theyre THE ENEMY, the last thing we want is cable companies involved in this
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)
But see, that's sort of it: streaming is something that doesn't take much know-how, right? What's going to win is not the technology but the exclusivity and muscle, which Netflix is currently losing. It could turn it around, sure, but I wouldn't bet on it against someone like Amazon or Apple or Google or whomever.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)
xpost
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:52 AM (46 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
naw its both, and once again blockbusters 'relationships with every content provider out there' consists of like buying dvds from them which is not at all like what has to happen w/streaming
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
i love when we all sit around pretending we know jackshit about the business world and stocks and stuff
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:52 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
eh, dont underestimate the value of UI and consistency, one reason why netflix is still well-positioned is that theyve got the best website in the business
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
Wouldn't we all subscribe to streaming HBO, if they never end up licensing their content (Larry Sanders excepted)?
― your way better (Eazy), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)
u find? the interface on stuff like ps3 sucks, and i dont find the website that great either. the recommendation algorithms are shit hot tho
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)
how is netflix losing the exclusivity and muscle? i mean starz and criterion arent on netflix anymore but... who* gives a shit about starz and criterion
*real people, not ppl who watch black orpheus for pleasure
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)
the redesign of the website isnt amazing--but their recommendation algorithm is fantastic--and its still much much better than amazon or hulu
i guess they need to fix the ps3 thing but i never watch it on ps3 so
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:56 (fourteen years ago)
starz has a lot of studio stuff, pixar etc
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:56 (fourteen years ago)
yeah oh well. theyre getting dreamworks!
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:57 (fourteen years ago)
http://pardon-my-french.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/pixar-dreamworks-tm.gif
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
By muscle I mean its pull/esteem/power. It's a matter of perception, and the appearance of weakness - say, massive overnight stock drops after months of bad business decisions - does not put Netflix in a position of power when it comes to negotiating content. Though yeah, it does have a big head start on the competition.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
But see, that's sort of it: streaming is something that doesn't take much know-how, right?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:53 AM (43 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
no not at all, god, every popular internet thing in the result of an incredible amount of know how, institutional agility, area business expertise - its no coincidence that like every really big internet thing google amazon twitter netflix etc were created by technology companies not like disney or time warner or w/e
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
They don't need to fix the PS3 interface since it loads everything you set up via the website; tbh, the PS3 is kind of a terrible unit to use for browsing anything so they're sort of handcuffed by the platform.
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:59 (fourteen years ago)
i still dont think anyone really has figured out how to present a gigantic library of content for browsing on any digital platform
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:00 (fourteen years ago)
Also yeah, reliably streaming something like mp3s, which are bandwidth-light, is a different ball of wax from reliably streaming high-definition movies, particularly on a heterogeneous network owned by several competing business entities.
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:00 (fourteen years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:58 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yeah this is fair--this is what i worry about most
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:01 (fourteen years ago)
besides world hunger, war, disease, etc.
worst case scenario, we're gonna end up with like 5 services with different shit on it with no way to figure out what's gonna be on what (cuz no one goes 'i wanna watch a warner brothers movie tonight!')
then again, paying $50 a month for unlimited movies/tv is actually NOT A BAD DEAL
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:02 (fourteen years ago)
Sure, but the website is always going to be a step ahead due to the expected keyboard input interface; it's always going to be less cumbersome to type than to point-and-click letters.
Now, if Netflix on PS3 integrated with, say, Dragon Naturally Speaking and developed a reliable voice interface, they could really go somewhere.
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:03 (fourteen years ago)
well the other part of the "worst case scenario" is if cable companies get involved and start throttling bandwidth, charging an extra $15/mo for the "streaming videos package" etc., and that the 5 services have horrible shitty UIs
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:04 (fourteen years ago)
Blockbuster already has a streaming service. Was this mentioned upthread? The problem, as ever, is that studios want more money per view.
― encarta it (Gukbe), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:06 (fourteen years ago)
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:03 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
appletv netflix is actually a better interface for a bunch of reasons - one of which is you can use your iphone as a controller/keyboard.
another is that it's just better laid-out, with more stuff on the screen. you can see a whole big grid of your queue instead of like 5 at a time. seems more designed for the "HD" in HDTVs
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:07 (fourteen years ago)
One thing that the Netflix web interface lacks is any kind of editorial/curatorial voice. Contrasting with eMusic, another service I subscribe to, the difference is striking. eMusic has a staff of editors who write regular features providing introductions to bands/periods/labels/genres, compile lists of picks, recommend new releases, etc. While I don't always agree with them, it's interesting to read the perspective of an informed curator, and it helps you to learn about stuff you might be interested in. I personally find this a lot more interesting and helpful than some technological black-box recommendation system that gives me a random list with no hint of any connecting logic or theme.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:08 (fourteen years ago)
ya that would require hiring like a billion people tho
(not that i would complain if all of the sudden there were a billion new jobs for film writers)
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:09 (fourteen years ago)
I'm curious how they got the numbers for this "$1 billion contract with the CW" deal
― da croupier, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:10 (fourteen years ago)
I love the current cable gambit of "watch movies currently in the theater in the comfort of your living room! (ps thx for the $60 lol)"; it seems like such a blatant preying on our current short-attention-span culture that I can really only just sit back and applaud.
Yeah, layout concerns aside I can't help but think this is a HUGE improvement over the PS3, which basically works like searching for stuff in Comcast's OnDemand menu without the detailed parametric hierarchical menus.
One thing that the Netflix web interface lacks is any kind of editorial/curatorial voice
This is a bonus IMO.
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:11 (fourteen years ago)
they ended up not doing this iirc
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:12 (fourteen years ago)
got to think its the wave of the future tho, maybe not $60 but you know
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:13 (fourteen years ago)
that'll only happen, imo, when the studios just give up on theatrical releases, which i think are still pretty profitable
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:15 (fourteen years ago)
Comcast was doing it for a while (with some terrible movies I can't remember now) although I think maybe they were only charging $30?
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:15 (fourteen years ago)
imho in the future theatrical release will be p much for promo purposes as a lot of people wont have movie theaters anywhere near them
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:18 (fourteen years ago)
will we live in the sky or the ground
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:19 (fourteen years ago)
important question
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:20 (fourteen years ago)
I would just like to announce that on behalf of ILX, I bought all of netflix's stocks
― dayo, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:20 (fourteen years ago)
who wants some netflix stocks, I got 'em
imho in the future theatrical release will be p much for promo purposes
Thought that said "porno purposes" and got pretty jazzed tbh
― Food! Trends! Men! Hate! (Phil D.), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:21 (fourteen years ago)
I will trade you some guess papers
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:21 (fourteen years ago)
hmmm intriguing offer but I feel like I am in a really good 'market position' right now, I can really 'capitalize' on these netflix stocks
― dayo, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:22 (fourteen years ago)
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:18 PM (53 minutes ago) Bookmark
and bands will make all their revenue from touring!
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:13 (fourteen years ago)