Y'all should convert this into an ILX instant view recommendations thread.
― All kinds of heinous things, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:11 (fourteen years ago)
There already is one of those.
Netflix Watch Instantly Recommendation Thread
― polyphonic, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:13 (fourteen years ago)
at least 2 of them actually
Netflix Streaming Film Recommendations: Because You Can't Always Play With Yourself
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
Ya u really gotta use the website or wtv if you're watching via ps3.
There isn't everything but there is a lot. All twilight zone eps in HD!
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:41 (fourteen years ago)
I find the HD stuff to be dubious, at best. Either it's not true HD, or it's been altered from its original format (ie HD, but cropped from 'Scope to 1.85). Basically, Netflix streaming is standard DVD quality, to my eyes.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:44 (fourteen years ago)
I know what HD looks like yall
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:48 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKYKyIObXyM
― ⚓ (gr8080), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:49 (fourteen years ago)
Also do you have your vid quality settings on high?
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 18:54 (fourteen years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, October 25, 2011 6:44 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
yeah it's not HD and it's miles away from bluray.
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 07:34 (fourteen years ago)
still way better than I thought it would be, though.
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 07:37 (fourteen years ago)
im telling you guys, buy buy buy, i wish i had money
― max, Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:07 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yeah if it werent for my total opposition to individuals owning individual stocks, still tempting
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:55 (1 month ago) Permalink
Well I hope you guys didn't.
Problem is it still is/was priced based on expectations of high growth. Yesterday we found out they actually are losing subscribers, which is way worse than just not growing really fast, obv. I guess the case for buying would be that they're going to grow internationally, but it's kind of hard to guess whether Netflix will take in, say, Latin America in 2012 the way it did in the US years earlier.
― pass the duchy pon the left hand side (musical duke) (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 10:59 (fourteen years ago)
Reed's interview in NY Times yesterday suggested that folks who want DVDs soon will be a) people in rural areas and b) "film-school types." Leaving out c) people who want to watch all those movies that aren't available for streaming.
― your way better (Eazy), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 11:25 (fourteen years ago)
Dude's ahead of the curve, but speaking to someone associated with Goldman Sachs yesterday, Netflix is approaching pariah status to the extent that there are predictions that Blockbuster will ultimately take it out on the streaming front. Which would be very ironic.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 11:40 (fourteen years ago)
Though to be fair, the more distribution heads to a streaming model and away from physical discs, the more films will be available for streaming. At least in theory. If no one rents, then studios aren't going to let thousands of films go unseen. Well, OK, they probably won't.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 12:04 (fourteen years ago)
I still think u should buy Netflix stock. I also don't think u should buy stocks for the short term.
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 12:26 (fourteen years ago)
If Netflix can maintain market share and pricing power as the streaming video pie grows, then I think it's a buy - but that's a big 'if'. It's hard to think that streaming is going to be anything other than a low-margin business. It seems like the only necessary participants are the content producers and the content consumers, and anyone in between is going to get squeezed.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:01 (fourteen years ago)
I heard a piece on the radio yesterday that explained Netflix's erratic behavior later as a desperate, pre-emptive attempt to avoid being the next AOL - that is, opening the door for others to take over. But Netflix may be predestined to do just that, because surely what it does is neither proprietary nor unique. It's value is its name, but its behavior is, ironically, devaluing that name.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:01 (fourteen years ago)
its a little worrying that they're losing so much market capitalization since their big advantage right now is that they have money to spend on deals--amazon doesnt, really, and i dont think hulu has the desire much less the cash--hastings says his strategy is to lock up content in exclusive deals at high prices, which is smart business but not great for the consumer, unfortunately.
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:11 (fourteen years ago)
i mean if yr buying stocks on a month-to-month basis you probably shouldnt buy netflix, as the last year has shown, but im willing to bet on it in the long-term. not 100 percent confident but then again im not actually spending the money on the stock
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:13 (fourteen years ago)
not 100 percent confident
You don't say.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 14:28 (fourteen years ago)
― pass the duchy pon the left hand side (musical duke) (Hurting 2), Wednesday, October 26, 2011 6:59 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol hurting im sympathetic to yr new explaining things persona but one bad quarter does not a pattern make
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:36 (fourteen years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, October 26, 2011 7:40 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
blockbuster tried to take netflix dvd by mail business as did walmart and it didnt work so good, if someone is going to supplant nexflix its gonna be a technology company who knows wtf theyre doing
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:42 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, but tbf, both of those guys only tried the mail part of the equation, not the streaming. But your point still stands.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:45 (fourteen years ago)
w/the streaming its more important that they not be the companies that they actually are
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:47 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, I'm talking about streaming. Blockbuster rules home video, Netflix supplants Blockbuster, Netflix switches to streaming, Blockbuster comes back from the dead and supplants Netflix. This all presupposes physical media is dead, which is pretty much is.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:48 (fourteen years ago)
what if physical media comes back from the dead and supplants THEM
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:49 (fourteen years ago)
point is blockbuster is not going to turn into some other company thats makes an amazing streaming product overnight, might as well say mcdonalds is going to be the next netflix, there just no correlation between blockbusters old retail rental business and streaming video
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:50 (fourteen years ago)
i could see amazon gaining some traction, def apple if they went w/subscriptions, idk who else some startup prob
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:51 (fourteen years ago)
...except they have relationships with every content provider out there pretty much?
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:51 (fourteen years ago)
the problem in getting these businesses off the ground isnt the tech, its trying to twist studios' arms into letting u actually do it
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
Night of the Living Physical Media 2 - Return of the Content
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
maybe if all the movie/tv studios formed a consortium and refused to licence their shit to anyone else, seems p unlikely theyd be able to play well together and make a product that anyone actually wants to use tho
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
blockbuster/dish will probably make a run at netflix but they have a lot of shit to work out first
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
the problem with blockbuster/dish is that theyre THE ENEMY, the last thing we want is cable companies involved in this
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)
But see, that's sort of it: streaming is something that doesn't take much know-how, right? What's going to win is not the technology but the exclusivity and muscle, which Netflix is currently losing. It could turn it around, sure, but I wouldn't bet on it against someone like Amazon or Apple or Google or whomever.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)
xpost
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:52 AM (46 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
naw its both, and once again blockbusters 'relationships with every content provider out there' consists of like buying dvds from them which is not at all like what has to happen w/streaming
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
i love when we all sit around pretending we know jackshit about the business world and stocks and stuff
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:52 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
eh, dont underestimate the value of UI and consistency, one reason why netflix is still well-positioned is that theyve got the best website in the business
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
Wouldn't we all subscribe to streaming HBO, if they never end up licensing their content (Larry Sanders excepted)?
― your way better (Eazy), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)
u find? the interface on stuff like ps3 sucks, and i dont find the website that great either. the recommendation algorithms are shit hot tho
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)
how is netflix losing the exclusivity and muscle? i mean starz and criterion arent on netflix anymore but... who* gives a shit about starz and criterion
*real people, not ppl who watch black orpheus for pleasure
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)
the redesign of the website isnt amazing--but their recommendation algorithm is fantastic--and its still much much better than amazon or hulu
i guess they need to fix the ps3 thing but i never watch it on ps3 so
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:56 (fourteen years ago)
starz has a lot of studio stuff, pixar etc
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:56 (fourteen years ago)
yeah oh well. theyre getting dreamworks!
― max, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:57 (fourteen years ago)
http://pardon-my-french.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/pixar-dreamworks-tm.gif
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
By muscle I mean its pull/esteem/power. It's a matter of perception, and the appearance of weakness - say, massive overnight stock drops after months of bad business decisions - does not put Netflix in a position of power when it comes to negotiating content. Though yeah, it does have a big head start on the competition.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
But see, that's sort of it: streaming is something that doesn't take much know-how, right?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:53 AM (43 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
no not at all, god, every popular internet thing in the result of an incredible amount of know how, institutional agility, area business expertise - its no coincidence that like every really big internet thing google amazon twitter netflix etc were created by technology companies not like disney or time warner or w/e
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
They don't need to fix the PS3 interface since it loads everything you set up via the website; tbh, the PS3 is kind of a terrible unit to use for browsing anything so they're sort of handcuffed by the platform.
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:59 (fourteen years ago)
i still dont think anyone really has figured out how to present a gigantic library of content for browsing on any digital platform
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:00 (fourteen years ago)