like, i doubt that "some pothead already had the @qwikster account" is what torpedoed the thing, they're a big company and it's only twitter etc, but nevertheless it makes me SO HAPPY whenever writers bring it up in articles
― lite-brite phrenology (reddening), Friday, 14 October 2011 00:49 (fourteen years ago)
also can't wait to finally watch all 700 episodes of one tree hill
stock down to 86. Was at 324 before they raised prices.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 04:12 (fourteen years ago)
lost 800,000 subscribers last quarter.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 04:13 (fourteen years ago)
yeah that's unbelievable
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 25 October 2011 04:13 (fourteen years ago)
i lol'd
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 04:44 (fourteen years ago)
feel like jim cramer right now
― max, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 12:37 (fourteen years ago)
Is anyone else positioned to pick up those subscribers? Even if there isn't is there any possibility that NetFlix can get them back? It's almost mind-boggling how much damage they've managed to do to their brand in such a short amount of time.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:05 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i kind of cant imagine they wont end up back with netflix? i suppose theyre going to hulu+ and amazon for now.
the company was still beat profit expectations, btw. likely wont turn a profit next quarter.
― max, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:09 (fourteen years ago)
I still don't really get it -- I thought the story was that they originally signed very good content deals with providers who didn't really get that streaming was going to be very big; and as those contracts ended and were renegotiated, Netflix was paying something closer to market value for movies and TV. I didn't have the impression they were raising the price just because they felt like it.
I guess I still don't quite grasp why 800,000 people are so pissed about paying 1/4 as much as cable costs instead of 1/6 as much as cable costs. But obviously the facts are what they are.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:11 (fourteen years ago)
kind of like how the same stores that will develop your 35mm film will also make prints from your SD card. Digital and film-based photography are completely different processes, but I don't have to take my exposed film to one place and my memory card to another.
You don't have to, but don't you? Film I would take to the drug store. Digital I would upload to Snapfish or something and order prints from there. They're totally different objects and I don't see why I would handle them in the same place. (Then again, film development and Benadryl are also totally different objects, and I handle those in the same place, so I guess there's no rhyme or reason.)
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:14 (fourteen years ago)
I get why people were annoyed at the price hike, but the Qwikster boondoggle didn't even last long enough to have a direct impact on consumers.
― A Lip in the Blandscape (jaymc), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:15 (fourteen years ago)
yeah it never even appeared on the website iirc
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:16 (fourteen years ago)
I guess I still don't quite grasp why 800,000 people are so pissed about paying 1/4 as much as cable costs instead of 1/6 as much as cable costs.
Maybe we should OCCUPY NETFLIX over this grave injustice
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:17 (fourteen years ago)
ya tbh netflix is so cheap (like, alarmingly cheap compared to what you would pay for like "unlimited entertainment" in the old days), the idea that people are quitting in disgust because they dont wanna pay $15 a month for like every movie and tv show ever DELIVERED TO YOUR DOOR or INSTANTLY APPEARING ON YOUR TV makes me think the entertainment industry has no future at all
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:23 (fourteen years ago)
There is no tv in star trek.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:40 (fourteen years ago)
hmm
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:42 (fourteen years ago)
Who created Holodeck content?
― Je55e, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:47 (fourteen years ago)
I loved when the Ferengi would try and sell people X-rated holodeck programs.
― fried chicken makes Alex cry, who'd vote for such a wimpy guy? (Abbbottt), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:48 (fourteen years ago)
― Je55e, Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:47 AM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark
^^ important question
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 13:48 (fourteen years ago)
my guess is most of the unsubscribers were people who never actually used netflix spurred into action via all the press
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 14:18 (fourteen years ago)
In addition to the unsubscribers, I bet there were also a lot of people who reduced their level of service.
― o. nate, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 14:52 (fourteen years ago)
stock is down 42 points right now
:-0
― brownie, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 14:57 (fourteen years ago)
RUSH ON NETFLIX, MOVE ALL DISCS OF SATANTANGO UP UR QUEUEUE WHILEST U CAN
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:04 (fourteen years ago)
it is deeply, deeply tempting to buy a shit-ton of Netfliz stock
I can't believe it won't go back up
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:09 (fourteen years ago)
ya i was thinking the same thing
(says the guy who knows nothing about "stocks")
― the jazz zinger (s1ocki), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:09 (fourteen years ago)
every movie and tv show ever
I think this is a big part of what pissed some people off, because, at least in terms of the streaming service goes, they are a LONG, LONG ways away from hitting this goal. The streaming selection is, as of the last few months, shockingly awful. The physical disc selection remains pretty great, but I think a lot of people switched to streaming (instant access, duh) but were disheartened by the selection and then felt like then being asked to pay even more for this limited selection was kind of offensive.
Not saying I buy into this argument completely, but I do see where some people I've talked with are coming from.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:09 (fourteen years ago)
yah im deeply opposed to the practice of owning individual stocks but i kinda want to buy a lil jus cause
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:11 (fourteen years ago)
I think the streaming selection is pretty great. All depends on what you like to watch. We watch something on streaming almost every night of the week.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:30 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i think ppl who bag on the streaming are v unimaginative & expect it to have like all the big studio blockblusters immediately?
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:32 (fourteen years ago)
part of me wanting to buy stock is tied to discovering they have the entire "Wolverine and the X-Men" series up for streaming
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:32 (fourteen years ago)
I wouldn't say unimaginative, it's just about what you like. And I'll admit that my taste level probably isn't as refined as most ppl on ilx.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:35 (fourteen years ago)
its more of a browsing experience than a place you can find the thing youre looking for
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:36 (fourteen years ago)
I'm seriously starting to wonder if the streaming via PS3 is a totally different streaming experience than most of you guys are having because, as of last night, I only had access to like a grand total of 200 movies via streaming on my PS3. Its an awful selection.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:44 (fourteen years ago)
I stream via PS3; the problem is that the interface severely limits the choices put directly in your face. I usually make a list of things I'm semi-curious about and go directly to the search screen.
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:49 (fourteen years ago)
http://instantwatcher.com/titles/all
13,500 titles
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:50 (fourteen years ago)
Hmm, I've never been able to get the search to reveal anything that isn't already available via those on-screen options though.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:51 (fourteen years ago)
I think this is pretty common on various platforms. If you really want to browse the entire streaming selection, do it on a computer.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:50 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
instant watcher is a sweet site 4 browsing
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)
#protip
yeah the ps3 interface is pretty terrible. I usually just browse netflix on my computer and add a bunch of stuff to my list and then when I want watch something just pick something out of my list. My list has about ~100 movies right now.
― peter in montreal, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:53 (fourteen years ago)
^^^ this is really the best way to do it IME
― he carried yellow flowers (DJP), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:54 (fourteen years ago)
Oh, so if I add it to my "watch instantly" queue from the computer, it'll be there when I access my list through the PS3? I didn't know that!
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:56 (fourteen years ago)
yes, your Instant Queue stays the same everywhere you log in, even on mobile.
― llurk, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
"The streaming selection is, as of the last few months, shockingly awful."
Every time someone says this I just roll my eyes.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:59 (fourteen years ago)
I feel kind of silly for not knowing that, but I'm glad to know it now.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:59 (fourteen years ago)
maybe all 800k ppl just didnt know how 2 search & build their instant queue!
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 16:00 (fourteen years ago)
Try reading the thread before you get all dickish about it. I was referring to what was being shown as available through the PS3 platform which really is shockingly awful.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 16:00 (fourteen years ago)
fwiw I have not and do not intend to cancel my membership, the price is still great!
You aren't the only person on this thread (or who I've had conversations with IRL) who has said this. Maybe all of them are PS3 hampered though.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 16:02 (fourteen years ago)