Do it, do it. Wait, I don't want you to feel trapped. There seems to be a fair crop of nice, earnest guys out there at the moment though, if you like that sort of thing.
Rrrobyn, I have a feeling you would really enjoy it, because you seem so open-minded and would maybe be into meeting random people (in an experiential sort-of-way).
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 5 October 2011 16:59 (fourteen years ago)
I met someone, but she kind of was on the verge of going exclusive with some other guy. I run into her when I'm out and about, good person to know, would recommend the okcupid experience. I think my friend met his girlfriend on there and I'm kind of pissed I didn't find her first, actually.
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 5 October 2011 18:23 (fourteen years ago)
I don't get what I did wrong, but after 12 months, I'm done with okc and eharmony forever.. I wrote to over 50 girls this past summer and nobody responded.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 6 October 2011 04:38 (fourteen years ago)
There are 2 things that make me guaranteed to not reply to someone. The first is if the message is short and unimaginative and just says "ur cute" or "hi baby wanna chat" because that just comes over as icky trolling.
The second, I'm reluctant to say, is I simply dont find the person attractive. And really, I'm not a fussy person, so they have to look pretty uh.. not my type (giant beards, very overweight, visually a lot older than me = all turn offs)
― Silent Hedgehogs (Trayce), Thursday, 6 October 2011 04:42 (fourteen years ago)
It amazes me how some ppl on OKC and similar sites really dont make any effort to put up a good/flattering shot. I think Ive said this before. It cant be that hard to get a complimentary photo of oneself, rather than one that's out of focus/too dark/caught pulling dumb face etc.
― Silent Hedgehogs (Trayce), Thursday, 6 October 2011 04:43 (fourteen years ago)
an old friend of mine worked for okcupid, so i heard a lot of fascinating stories from the 'inside'
i told him to hook me up with the top-secret algorithms, but no dice
― geeta, Thursday, 6 October 2011 05:43 (fourteen years ago)
fascinating stories from the 'inside'
can they be boiled down to 'ppl are animals'?
― mookieproof, Thursday, 6 October 2011 06:08 (fourteen years ago)
amazes me how some ppl on OKC and similar sites really dont make any effort to put up a good/flattering shot. I think Ive said this before. It cant be that hard to get a complimentary photo of oneself, rather than one that's out of focus/too dark/caught pulling dumb face etc.
― Silent Hedgehogs (Trayce), Thursday, October 6, 2011
I believe it is more complicated than that. I think some people are hesitant to drag friends into this to take photos, and they would really liked to be judged as much on their written profile as their looks (even if they possibly decide in part on others by looking at photos). Also some folks are out of shape. There are also profiles where people only have tight head shot photos (nicely taken) but one wonders about what the rest of that person looks like. There's graying hair and losing hair issues too. All kinds of factors.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 October 2011 14:30 (fourteen years ago)
I always try to respond to something specific in someone's profile, like "Whoa, high fives for video art and graphic design! So what's yr favorite typeface?"
― (╯° □≗)╯︵ ┻━ןɐıɔǝds━ʇɥbıן━pǝɹ━┻ (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 6 October 2011 16:39 (fourteen years ago)
^ is that bad? Am I doing it wrong?
No and no, I think.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 6 October 2011 20:31 (fourteen years ago)
Stevie: nah thats great, it shows you've paid attention. Ive had messages like "u have great smile lady" when the only photo I had up at the time was one I wasnt smiling in (perhaps they had an amusing sense of humour, ha).
One guy messaged me with "trayce is a bit of a bogan name isnt it?". Sry dude, I dont do negs.
― Silent Hedgehogs (Trayce), Thursday, 6 October 2011 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
You have said that before! Bogan is only a word in Aus, don't worry.
― ( ) (mh), Friday, 7 October 2011 04:42 (fourteen years ago)
Argh I have such a short memory span, haha, always repeating myself ;_;
― Silent Hedgehogs (Trayce), Friday, 7 October 2011 04:51 (fourteen years ago)
That's the way to do it, Stevie. I usually only write someone if I can make a joke or riff on something in their profile . . . it seems more natural that way. Otherwise it seems kind of stilted and like a shot in the dark. I haven't had time to write anyone lately though--I'm being kept busy enough with the people who are writing me (*braggin'*).
― Virginia Plain, Friday, 7 October 2011 14:24 (fourteen years ago)
Eh, both my scheduled dates cancelled on me this week, so I guess I can't brag too much.
― Virginia Plain, Friday, 7 October 2011 22:26 (fourteen years ago)
Scanning one of my quivers, she seemed really nice in a "thank god she didn't list any Ayn Rand," but then I read more closely and she lists Atlas Shrugged in her books section.
― foxes freud (Leee), Monday, 10 October 2011 00:48 (fourteen years ago)
hahaha
― ( ) (mh), Monday, 10 October 2011 01:01 (fourteen years ago)
which is worse, listing atlas shrugged or the secret?
― ⚓ (gr8080), Monday, 10 October 2011 01:04 (fourteen years ago)
"the shack"
― ( ) (mh), Monday, 10 October 2011 01:05 (fourteen years ago)
I just got favorited out of nowhere by a (married) girl into polyamory. Kind of not sure what to think about that?
― muus lääv? :D muus dut :( (Telephone thing), Monday, 10 October 2011 01:47 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah I get faved now and then and abour 70% of the time it is married/taken poly guys. I need to put back that sentence in my profile that says "if yr married or taken, keep moving, nothing to see here". I took it out cos it seemed combative.
― Silent Hedgehogs (Trayce), Monday, 10 October 2011 02:15 (fourteen years ago)
Does anyone end up making a lot of friends from this site? Because I think that's where I am headed. What do you do when you have a good time with someone but there's no obvious connection, but you would like them to be your drinking buddy or whatever? It seems strange to go on these dates and learn lots of personal stuff about someone and then never see them or talk to them again.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 16:50 (fourteen years ago)
that's happened to me a couple of times, which i think is good
― theosophy b. hawkins (donna rouge), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 16:55 (fourteen years ago)
I became friends with someone who turned out to know a bunch of ilxors and some of my irl friends, and we're still friends even though we still haven't met (NB he is in Boston).
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 16:57 (fourteen years ago)
The person I've gotten along the best with, I was sure was a closet ilxor, sent by this thread to report on my lack of game, but he says he's never posted, but that he'd heard of the site.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 17:12 (fourteen years ago)
Good, good, he's following right along with the script....
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 17:25 (fourteen years ago)
Ha! :)
I got a rejection notice from someone who emailed me first:
"Thanks for writing back, but I'm getting the impression that we're not such a good match -- sorry.
Good luck, all best, etc.,"
Wait, what?
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 17:40 (fourteen years ago)
a) how accurate do you find the percentages?b) do they appear the same for both people?
got a message from someone who is like 55% match, 23% enemy and i'm all what are you doing, the internet thinks we're doomed
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 18:46 (fourteen years ago)
The faux-ilx person is my 99% match and my 51% friend, which is quite a strange split. I wouldn't worry about the percentages...just meet the people you want to meet. (I think I'm 94% with once ilx poster m. matos.)
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 18:53 (fourteen years ago)
i guess it shouldn't be too hard to avoid the friend zone, then!
i am intrigued by the handful of ppl with whom i match below 10%
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 19:05 (fourteen years ago)
Now that you mention it, we did skip over that part(!)
I tried searching by the people I least matched with; it wasn't a good scene.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 19:25 (fourteen years ago)
Kinda want to say I only listen to rap and country as those seem to be the music genres most folks dislike
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 15:02 (fourteen years ago)
hahaha do it.
I just recently revised my profile to say that I am not looking for casual sex partners and also if you're married and poly to not message me.
I have received three messages in the last 24 hrs from dudes clearly looking for tail.
MEN OF INTERNET: LEARN TO READ PLS
― homosexual II, Tuesday, 25 October 2011 22:22 (fourteen years ago)
tbh we just skip to the pictures
― The boyboy young jess (D-40), Tuesday, 25 October 2011 22:27 (fourteen years ago)
(jk)
Ok, I'm bored with this now. Thinking I need to be much more selective about the people I choose to meet, because I don't like havin to explain to people that a second date is not in the cards.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 01:18 (fourteen years ago)
i would begin to seriously start looking into another online dating platform tbh
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 01:27 (fourteen years ago)
i'm not even considering okcupid!
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 01:28 (fourteen years ago)
but i am a bit of a snob/can't deal with too much cynicism these days/where is serious man who/etc etc
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 01:29 (fourteen years ago)
was supposed to go on a date but the person cancelled an hour beforehand...i need to institute a 24 hour cancellation policy like the doctor's office.
i have no idea why i am still on this site! it's so terrible.
― bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 02:14 (fourteen years ago)
I know... I think I am in the "ugly" pool. My first like 15 pages of matches are all poly people.
Match.com is almost worst.
I GUESS I WILL TRY AND MEET PEOPLE IN REAL LIFE????
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 02:48 (fourteen years ago)
Mands there is NO WAY you are in any pool that isn't marked "ONLY AWESOME ONES HERE, GET YER AWESOME ONES HERE."
― WE DO NOT HAVE "SECRET" "MEETINGS." I DO NOT HAVE A SECOND (Laurel), Wednesday, 26 October 2011 02:51 (fourteen years ago)
Laurel, that's sweet of you :)
― homosexual II, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 03:02 (fourteen years ago)
Nobody poly ever contacts me, except for I think one dude who was married and lives in California saved me to his favorites (?). Maybe it's because okc says I am less kinky than most straight women my age.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 03:03 (fourteen years ago)
for awhile creepy married dudes kept contacting me, and i was like wtf, and then i realized i had not checked off "must be single" under who i'm looking to meet.
― bene_gesserit, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 03:08 (fourteen years ago)
I did check "must be single" but one of my 99% matches kind of buries the lead at the end of his profle that he is a committed polyamorist. I keep forgetting what's wrong with him and click on his profile occasionally; luckily he's never contacted me.
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 03:27 (fourteen years ago)
Wait, so his profile says single, but he isnt? What a dick!
― Trayce, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 03:28 (fourteen years ago)
I guess maybe, because he comes up in my searches? Eh, he's not all that anyway....
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 04:12 (fourteen years ago)
Hm unless saying "must be single" also includes ppl who have it set as "available", which is poly code for "i'll take as much as i can" ugh.
― Trayce, Wednesday, 26 October 2011 04:25 (fourteen years ago)