http://www.deadline.com/2011/09/netflix-stock-9-4-as-wall-street-wonders-how-low-it-can-go/
― Corn Maze to the Dark Side (Eazy), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 06:56 (fourteen years ago)
I was disgusted by the arrogant email of a 60% increase for streaming and one DVD by mail so I cancelled upon receipt of email. At the same time, They lost streaming content from STARZ and now Disney, so they have NOTHING better to offer than any other streaming content competitor. It is a good deal still, but the insulting way of presentation just pi$$ed me off. I am now exploring other venues, HULU, Blockbuster, Amazon Streaming, but they are all the same as NF, so-so content of TV series and "B" movies. But, I would still rather pay Blkbstr or HULU more to bring them back to stomp NF, but I think that it's a planned tank by NF, so someone else buys them. aka wall-street suicide, but could be a total setup by Greed Hastings to dump DVD by mail (a, the USPS is failing, b, younger demos for streaming. c. International streaming new audience = big bux)so they get bought out and every stock holder collects. On the Big Board, Nflx has gone in the last 3 weeks from $350/share to $130/share at closing today. I am watching like a hawk to see how it plays out. Who else is watching this wild ride???
― Wiggywoo, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:03 (fourteen years ago)
im telling you guys, buy buy buy, i wish i had money
― max, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:07 (fourteen years ago)
the thing is you dont really need to guess at hasting's motives here--he's been really clear, basically since the start of the streaming service, that he wants to dump the DVD-by-mail business entirely, as soon as its feasible
― max, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:09 (fourteen years ago)
They lost streaming content from STARZ and now Disney, so they have NOTHING better to offer than any other streaming content competitor
netflix has between 20k and 30k titles streaming, costs $9/moamazon has between 5k and 10k, costs like $75 a year?hulu has between 2k and 5k, tv and movies, and costs a dollar more than netflix
― max, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:19 (fourteen years ago)
researching that i came across this totally clueless blog post
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/09/how-does-netflix-possibly-survive/245317/
― max, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:20 (fourteen years ago)
morelike netfmax
― buzza, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:21 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i dont know why i am treating netflix like i was treating apple when i was in 9th grade
― max, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:23 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.facebook.com/reed1960/posts/10150304609004584
― markers, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:25 (fourteen years ago)
― max, Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:23 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
braggin
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:28 (fourteen years ago)
haha sorry i meant that in a sad "why am i defending a huge corporation on the internet at 3:30am" not in a "im a stock wizzard" stylee
― max, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:31 (fourteen years ago)
eh it's no worse than arguing about sports or something.
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:36 (fourteen years ago)
I dunno what will happen to the stock or whatevs (I'm still skeptical in general about them providing high quality streams when isps start fucking with them/us), but this is an unmitigated PR disaster. It's hard to come up with a name that combines the horribleness and forgettableness of "qwikster."
― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:39 (fourteen years ago)
every time i looked at this thread's new title i'm like "ugh 'qwikster' what a tired joke" and then i remember it's REAL LIFE
― toy and candy planet (reddening), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 07:44 (fourteen years ago)
idg the big deali mean, pr disaster sure, but overall, netflix otm
― sorry for party blogging (D-40), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 08:14 (fourteen years ago)
god i love that the debate is "what a pr disaster" vs. "pr disaster LIKE A FOX!"
― da croupier, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 11:21 (fourteen years ago)
I had Netflix for a long time and I don't really get how people think there's variety in the selection of the streaming and the discs. A lot of the material is either those bargain bin documentaries, really old anime or cheesy movies. Even the TV selection sucks because of distribution fights. I also hate how I have to wait 3 weeks to see a new movie after it's on DVD and Blu so I just gave up my account. I'm trying a 3 month preview of Blockbuster and it's okay, about what I'd expect from renting at the actual store, a lot of the discs are unavailable.
― Square (MintIce), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 11:29 (fourteen years ago)
there is a shitload of variety in the streaming and the discs
― johnny crunch, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 11:39 (fourteen years ago)
sometimes when I check out the new movies list i'm like "christ there is nothing but the worst movies ever on streaming" until I realize that I've got a queue 200+ deep and, since I've rated like 3000 movies on netflix, most of the good stuff is in "watch it again." It's not a good service if you want This Movie Now, but if you want A Movie Now, there's more worth watching than I'll ever have time for.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 11:46 (fourteen years ago)
"I also hate how I have to wait 3 weeks to see a new movie after it's on DVD and Blu"
Yes this is truly awful awful... wait didn't you already wait a while? What's three more weeks?
I think the streaming selection is pretty great myself. I don't have any problem keeping my queue stuff to the gills with stuff to watch (lot of docs, true, but no shortage of good ones.)
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:02 (fourteen years ago)
yeah my reaction to the gap between retail release and Netflix availability is "uh if I was in a hurry to see this movie i would've gone to the theater 5 months ago"
― some dude, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:41 (fourteen years ago)
Right. I don't even know when new movies are released on DVDs. The Netflix date might as well be the real release date cause that's all I know.
― Jeff, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:50 (fourteen years ago)
― max, Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:07 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yeah if it werent for my total opposition to individuals owning individual stocks, still tempting
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:55 (fourteen years ago)
where's lorax he might actually take your advice
― iatee, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 13:38 (fourteen years ago)
I really want to buy some stocks, but being a manchild, I literally have no idea how to do that.
― kid ᒓᴥᒔ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 13:41 (fourteen years ago)
there's a big trading floor at the new york stock exchange, you just gotta go there and make some crazy hand signals, you'll probably end up with some stock
― iatee, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 13:43 (fourteen years ago)
I think I go there in a suit and yell BUY SELL SELL BUY NO! NO! BUY! AUUGHH! into my cellphone and then jump off the 50th floor that afternoon.
― kid ᒓᴥᒔ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 13:45 (fourteen years ago)
Man, just two or three weeks ago, I thought about how this thread title ("not bad"!) was understating folks's contentment with Netflix, price-hike bump aside.
― Corn Maze to the Dark Side (Eazy), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 14:09 (fourteen years ago)
do you own a suit
― remy bean, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 14:19 (fourteen years ago)
only after walking into a JC Penney and making some hand signals...
― Kerm, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 14:39 (fourteen years ago)
― kid ᒓᴥᒔ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, September 21, 2011 9:41 AM (35 minutes ago) Bookmark
just sign up with an online brokerage and buy some stuff, weep later
http://www.tradeking.com/
― black metal version of "the boy with the thorn in his side" (Edward III), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 14:45 (fourteen years ago)
talk to that creepy baby on TV
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:14 (fourteen years ago)
otm
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:15 (fourteen years ago)
ppl are just not being visionary about this
this "the masses are blind as are ppl on this thread" steez is nagl man, I mean my 5th grader knows streaming media is the future, but for netflix to rule they've gotta execute the strategy and the tactics, and they've been fumbling the latter.
they could be steering this transition in a user friendly way, but their recent moves telegraph "we don't give a crap about u" so if a significant competitor does rear its head they will be vulnerable. they're a service/distribution network, they don't own anything, and now they're blowing goodwill and brand allegiance in an arrogant way, just like blockbuster did before them. be a monopoly but don't act like one. companies can execute mass transformational strategies w/o turning their own consumers against them (e.g. amazon or apple). if ppl are booing your very mention on late night TV it might be time for some soulsearching. or chalk it up to the shittiest of all vision-lacking generations being shitty blind fools.
― black metal version of "the boy with the thorn in his side" (Edward III), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:29 (fourteen years ago)
agree that this is a misstep but likely doesnt even register as a footnote in the bigger scheme
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:31 (fourteen years ago)
they've got a real image problem right now - obv apple's made missteps and recovered, nobody's perfect but general satisfaction is high
netflix can def turn it around but CEO reed richards seems to be stockpiling cluelessness which is surprising since he like totally ran the fantastic four
― black metal version of "the boy with the thorn in his side" (Edward III), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:35 (fourteen years ago)
i said this upthread, but their entire value (to producers, studios, libraries, and media distribution co.s) is in their public face and catholic appeal. if consumer confidence in NF/QS drops too dramatically, the rights-owners of the online media are gonna hitch their wagon to another star.
― remy bean, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:36 (fourteen years ago)
if I ran amazon or hulu I'd be going crazy right now w/ the smell of blood in the water
― black metal version of "the boy with the thorn in his side" (Edward III), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:38 (fourteen years ago)
i think they're both good (but ultimately different) models of distro, and i feel like if each played their cards right they could survive together. As it is, though, netflix has exposed a big gap in their armor. Not sure this is gonna have a huge impact - espesh if NF actually has something in the wings - but it's a real opportunity for others to tear off a piece.
― remy bean, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:41 (fourteen years ago)
eh neither amazon or hulu has shown any signs of being able to do what netflix does - i mean ill just have to disagree w/remy here in that most of netflix appeal lies in the the quality of their product - the content providers will licence their content to lots of different distributors who give them money - but of course you have to get the viewers to watch the things in order to get the money and thats all abt the product
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:42 (fourteen years ago)
netflix has a benefit in that delivering media is the sole focus of their biz (unlike amazon or the studios) but streaming services start looking the same after a while, I've started using crackle on the ipad, maybe the future is a plethora of streaming channels just like we have cable channels and the netflix's comprehensive library was just a beautiful shining moment that is passing
― black metal version of "the boy with the thorn in his side" (Edward III), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)
working on a streaming channel library aggregator it's like a TV guide for the cloud age brb
― black metal version of "the boy with the thorn in his side" (Edward III), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:00 (fourteen years ago)
in the future instead of "what time is it on" we will ask "when does this streaming media's content license expire?"
― black metal version of "the boy with the thorn in his side" (Edward III), Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:03 (fourteen years ago)
the upcoming original kevin spacey content has the reek of yahoo! logic about it
― da croupier, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:09 (fourteen years ago)
eh people subscribe to hbo et al for one show all the time, p sound well tested logic imho
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:15 (fourteen years ago)
if they keep the price around pay cable and keep the rights to a large body of films, totally. but when you're losing pr and the owners of movies don't want to work with you, throwing your $$$ K-Pax might be a fools errand
― da croupier, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:19 (fourteen years ago)
that should be at K-Pax
― da croupier, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:20 (fourteen years ago)
eh i kinda doubt that either of those cons are long term trends, and if they are then nothing you do is gonna work anyway so might as well pack it up
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:21 (fourteen years ago)
really, everybody's saying the same thing. Netflix is pissing off customers but it all depends on if there's worthwhile competition in the future. only point debated is really people's faith in Netflix. Flipping off your customers while chasing Spacey just doesn't make me think they've got all the aces.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:22 (fourteen years ago)
every company is gonna make some mistakes, feel like if you look at a slightly longer trendline theyre doing p well, aka this will all blow over
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 16:24 (fourteen years ago)