Most of the time I just use the TV itself. I like the interface the best and I only have to turn one device on.
― Jeff, Monday, 19 September 2011 19:46 (fourteen years ago)
No sir. xp and no S-video, either. And no VGA input on the TV.
― Je55e, Monday, September 19, 2011 3:29 PM Bookmark
But wait, don't you have an HDMI input on the TV? If so I think they make USB-to-HDMI adapters for pretty cheap.
― Jews Did Irene (Hurting 2), Monday, 19 September 2011 19:53 (fourteen years ago)
If I find out that I missed an option after all the Googling, forum asking, and talking to assholes at Computer Coven, I'm going to be really annoyed with myself and everyone else. I'll get back to you.
― Je55e, Monday, 19 September 2011 19:58 (fourteen years ago)
Computer Coven? is that a cult?
― Jeff, Monday, 19 September 2011 19:59 (fourteen years ago)
OK. What. The. Fuck.
I am stunned and really annoyed with myself b/c it looks like you are right. I'm sorry I said you were wrong, and I'm sorry I was so wrong. I would be happy that I learned about this option (which is REALLY REALLY OBVIOUS) but that laptop is on its last legs, so this info doesn't do much for me now except make me question my problem solving capacity.
― Je55e, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:03 (fourteen years ago)
Actually, those converters are still kinda pricey - $60-$100.
― Je55e, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:04 (fourteen years ago)
The thing about the letter that really seems odd to me is that he frames it as an apology for his other communications, but the letter is actually an announcement of a major restructuring of their service. It seems very bizarre to announce a major change in a company's structure and function by first saying "sorry I was so arrogant months ago".
― polyphonic, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:12 (fourteen years ago)
"sorry I was so arrogant months ago, that was just a warm-up for THIS"
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:14 (fourteen years ago)
next he'll apologize for not including the pop-up virus he meant to attach to the post
― da croupier, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:19 (fourteen years ago)
I think they want to force the studios/distributors to realize that streaming is the future and Netflix is the juggernaut that they'll have to work with to get their content out.
The thing is, the studios aren't going to give up something like On Demand, which would be pointless if new releases became available on streaming.
― Gukbe, Monday, September 19, 2011 12:35 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^^ this is otm
― max, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:20 (fourteen years ago)
"Getting some blowback on the Qwikster news...so while we won't be reintegrating the search functions I will personally fart on every 100th DVD."
― da croupier, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:21 (fourteen years ago)
i mean we can sit on the thread and trade anecdotal "well everyone i know does *this* with their netflix subscription" but my guess is that the big multinational probably has pretty good data on how many people use streaming exclusively vs mail exclusively vs both (and in the latter case how frequently for each)--as joe points out they have a long history of making the right moves on this stuff, and while im willing to believe that they might be killing off their business my guess is that theyve got reams of data backing up this decision
― max, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:26 (fourteen years ago)
i mean i think the biggest misstep they made in their history was underestimating how childish the internet noise machine can be when its asked to pay a little bit more for something
Really looking forward to fielding all the confused calls from older relatives.
― Spencer Chow, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:32 (fourteen years ago)
je55e i have a vga-to-rca converter that is absolutely terrible and might negate the whole point of having an HDTVbut it must be very very cheap right now. (i see a sketchy-looking one on ebay for about $15)However there are also $2 cables if your vaio can output TV-out through VGA.
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:33 (fourteen years ago)
I actually thought they seemed to be making some rational business decisions and then the term 'qwikster' appeared
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:34 (fourteen years ago)
people complaining about the cost just don't remember what it was like in the 'the only store you can go to is blockbuster' era
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:36 (fourteen years ago)
While I took the news of the price increase with a bit of a shrug and was far from outraged, I do understand why people might have been miffed at the price increase announcement being tied to a reduction in services. I think its a little reductive to consider it just entitled people bitching about having to pay more.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:42 (fourteen years ago)
― max, Monday, September 19, 2011 3:26 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
is it "childish" for me to complain that a service i'm currently happy with (and i didn't bitch about the price increase at all fwiw) is now way worse and more complicated?
i just added a bunch of movies i wanted to see to my dvd queue, and none of them were available streaming?
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:45 (fourteen years ago)
whiney otm itt, i didn't even realize there was a price raise or that i should change my plan because whatever dvd i want just showing up in my mailbox is still magical and incredibly cheap to any child of the blockbuster era, who gives a damn if the price goes up a little
― run jaymc & jam-master jaymc (some dude), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:46 (fourteen years ago)
heh iatee also otm i guess
oh i was talking more about the "outcry" from earlier this summer
i "get" people being mad about the qwikster thing now though i still am sort of like *rolls eyes, makes jerkoff motion*
― max, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:47 (fourteen years ago)
xp exactly!
like, sorry that netflix made your incredibly easy life slightly harder for a couple years, what are you going to do, go to blockbuster?
i get finding the qwikster name change funny and pathetic but i don't know why it would make anyone mad
― run jaymc & jam-master jaymc (some dude), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:48 (fourteen years ago)
other than in a "please don't make me say 'qwikster' on a daily basis you morons"
― run jaymc & jam-master jaymc (some dude), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:49 (fourteen years ago)
it doesn't make me mad it just makes me question some people in charge in a way I hadn't before
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:49 (fourteen years ago)
ppl need to get in visionary mode on this, by 2015 *95% of what you watch will be streamed* [if u are not a film nerd], you can be on the apple inc "5.99 a movie for 24 hours" or the cable channels "$35 a month for a huge amount of bullshit, impossible hardward and horrible customer service" or the netflix "$10 for a huge library of streaming video"
right now there are no other options! and i dont see any coming along anytime soon
― max, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:49 (fourteen years ago)
yr right i mean ppl are STARVING IN AFRICA RIGHT NOW
it's a service that i am a customer of, it is now less appealing and costs more, that's perfectly rational reason to complain
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:50 (fourteen years ago)
otoh their evil goal is everything streaming one day, right? so it's good that they're giving the dvd service a retarded name on purpose. xp
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:50 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i mean its "rational" to complain you just sound like an ass. no offense matt i like you.
― max, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:51 (fourteen years ago)
plus the streaming contract w/starz is expiring in february which means the streaming content is going to get worse in a big way
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:51 (fourteen years ago)
I miss my cool local video stores. :(
― polyphonic, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:51 (fourteen years ago)
you can only complain if it costs more than you would willingly pay for what you're getting. as long as it costs less - and, I think for most people, it still does? - people are getting a lot of consumer surplus from this service
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:52 (fourteen years ago)
xps
not a film nerd but personally i don't see myself watching most movies on the internet within the next 3 years. unless someone knocks on my door with a cool linkup between my laptop and my tv and installs it for me for free.
― run jaymc & jam-master jaymc (some dude), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:52 (fourteen years ago)
they should have just renamed quikster 'netflix for old people'
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:53 (fourteen years ago)
― max, Monday, September 19, 2011 3:51 PM (33 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
is there a way i can express my displeasure with this decision on the part of netflix without "sounding like an ass"?
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:53 (fourteen years ago)
i wonder if a porn site has trademarked 'dikster' yet
― run jaymc & jam-master jaymc (some dude), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:53 (fourteen years ago)
it just annoys me that people fail to see "the big picture" which is that this is an *ideological battle* about how you will receive and pay for content via the internet, if netflix dies there will be no "new netflix," there wil just be the 20th century fox streaming site at $10 a month and the NBCUNiversal streaming site at $10 month if you get comcast too and so on
― max, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:54 (fourteen years ago)
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, September 19, 2011 4:53 PM (12 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
probably, i would use the syllable "eh" and shrug your shoulders a bit, as in, "eh, i see what theyre trying to do, but it sucks to pay more for a worse service *shrugs shoulders*"
btw it pains me to be defending a big multinational corporation but i am 2xmo and illiterate so the only way i can entertain myself is on the computer
― max, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:55 (fourteen years ago)
Yesterday I was telling some friends about how much I liked "The Woman in the Dunes", and they were like "Is it on Netflix", and I said "on disc, not streaming" and they were like "uuuuuuggggghhhhh too much effort" and it sort of made me want to die.
― polyphonic, Monday, 19 September 2011 20:56 (fourteen years ago)
*eh* is it "childish" for me to complain that a service i'm currently happy with (and i didn't bitch about the price increase at all fwiw) is now way worse and more complicated? *eh* whatever...i guess
i just added a bunch of movies i wanted to see to my dvd queue, and none of them were available streaming? tevs sucks 2 b me i guess but whaddya gonna do?
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, September 19, 2011 3:45 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:57 (fourteen years ago)
― polyphonic, Monday, September 19, 2011 4:56 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
haha yeah that is bizarre -- like ok longer wait but effort!?
― run jaymc & jam-master jaymc (some dude), Monday, 19 September 2011 20:59 (fourteen years ago)
I think you have to do a mental experiment, like, take yourself back to 1998 and imagine that a genie appeared and said 'I can have basically any movie, except some shit only morbius cares about, appear in your mailbox the day after you ask for it, are you willing to pay 10 bucks a month for this? ps you will also have the option to watch trashy b-movies on your computer if you pay extra money'
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 21:00 (fourteen years ago)
cable tv back in 1998 was way more awesome and way cheaper but on downside, no wire, no curb your enthusiasm.
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 19 September 2011 21:01 (fourteen years ago)
cable tv probably cost a lot more than 10 bucks back then too
― Mr. Que, Monday, 19 September 2011 21:02 (fourteen years ago)
that was when people were paying like $4 for a blockbuster movie w/ a $3248712 late fee
― iatee, Monday, 19 September 2011 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
lol matt
― max, Monday, 19 September 2011 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
streaming skinemax
― buzza, Monday, 19 September 2011 21:05 (fourteen years ago)