ugh, that was a waste, down to the concluding butterfly
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 17 September 2011 16:44 (fourteen years ago)
Charley Varrick is a better, albeit less stylish, movie.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Saturday, 17 September 2011 16:45 (fourteen years ago)
Thx for reminding me of The American, makes any hesitations I have about endorsing Drive fall completely away.
― michael assbender (Eric H.), Saturday, 17 September 2011 16:46 (fourteen years ago)
I didn't like The American, or at least I didn't like a lot of it, but those kinds of film are like catnip to me.
― Gukbe, Saturday, 17 September 2011 16:57 (fourteen years ago)
it would've been a lot closer to a great movie if they hacked out the carey mulligan character. nothing against her, but the character's a big nothing and has no place in a lean-n-mean walter hill ripoff
Yeah, this. Her second September movie in a row in which she plays a wan nothing.
The racial politics in this thing are...interesting.
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:24 (fourteen years ago)
My 12:10 showing was out of a David Lynch movie: a half dozen men with severe mental retardation making nose in the right rear of the theater.
I was the only one who laughed hysterically at Albert Brooks' excellent delivery of his resume ("I used to make movies in the eighties...critics called them European").
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
naw, i think she's pretty important (xpost)
the thing is that carey is an object of affection, you know? she's not a very sexual person. i think that's why she works in this role, she's someone to love (ditto the kid), not someone to lust over.
that said, i was pretty shocked to learn that Refn isn't gay. i imagine most straight directors would have picked a more sexual actress for that role
LOVED this film btw
and want Ryan Gosling
― licking your challops (Tape Store), Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:34 (fourteen years ago)
that a movie is made for nerds who fetishize 'hypermasculine' slick violence is usu reason enough, Guk
don't think this is accurate? there's nothing Tarantino (ughh) about this violence. it's not "fun" and there's no cheering it on (the film is tracking terribly with audiences, a C-minus cinemascore--there's a reason they hate it)
― licking your challops (Tape Store), Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:46 (fourteen years ago)
C-minus cinemascore
Uggggh, audiences!
― michael assbender (Eric H.), Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:49 (fourteen years ago)
Like I said, beside the Dream Team in the corner, my audience didn't utter a peep, and I distinctly saw rustling and phone-consulting.
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:50 (fourteen years ago)
man, I really envy Gosling's toothpick.
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:51 (fourteen years ago)
lol cinemascores. if there was ever any evidence that audiences are easy as hell to entertain, there they are.
― Gukbe, Saturday, 17 September 2011 18:51 (fourteen years ago)
Unlike Isabelle Adjani in The Driver, which I assume in addition to the lacking of a police subplot is where Drive diverges (still haven't seen yet, maybe early this week.
― Status Update...in my Seether? (C. Grisso/McCain), Saturday, 17 September 2011 19:02 (fourteen years ago)
That limbless surfer movie got an A+ from Cinemascore, so, um, yeah.
― michael assbender (Eric H.), Saturday, 17 September 2011 19:20 (fourteen years ago)
As long as you don't confront the audience with anything weird, you're generally guaranteed a B (lol Solaris). I'd be shocked if excessive violence turned them off, unless the violence in this is really excessive.
― Gukbe, Saturday, 17 September 2011 19:22 (fourteen years ago)
It's pretty graphic.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Saturday, 17 September 2011 20:01 (fourteen years ago)
morbs otm re: most efficient ancestor - dont really understand what everyone else is babbling about
the wapo review of this described it as "very european" which i read as code for le samourai tbh
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, September 17, 2011 12:18 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark
it's very euro but in a more contemporary way. i didnt think of le samourai much. lots of knife violence in it - you know if an american director got their hands on this it would've been nonstop guns.
yeah, she's the object of affection, big deal - the character has a purpose but still sucks. they could've cut her out and just used the kid, but then you'd be reminding people how much they'd rather be watching Leon. get real, tape store!!
― licking your challops (Tape Store), Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:46 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
there isn't, huh? then why was i lustily cheering along the rest of the theater, huh pal
i think friedkin's Bug is the lowest scoring movie in cinemascore history
― http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i_qxQztHRI (Princess TamTam), Saturday, 17 September 2011 21:36 (fourteen years ago)
you and your theater are sadists!
my theater was pretty much dead silent, with the exception of some muttering from the old ladies behind me </midwest>
― licking your challops (Tape Store), Saturday, 17 September 2011 21:48 (fourteen years ago)
oh there were groans at a certain restaurant scene, too
― licking your challops (Tape Store), Saturday, 17 September 2011 21:50 (fourteen years ago)
the violence got a lot of lols when i saw it. terrible script though.
― am0n, Saturday, 17 September 2011 23:27 (fourteen years ago)
"what do you do?"*grin*"i drive... for movies"*grin**looks away bashfully**silence**shit-eating grin*
― am0n, Saturday, 17 September 2011 23:29 (fourteen years ago)
sounds existential
― the-dream in the witch house (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 17 September 2011 23:32 (fourteen years ago)
cue music ♫ a reeeal human being and a reeeal herooo ♫
― am0n, Saturday, 17 September 2011 23:38 (fourteen years ago)
^^^totally convinced i must see this soon^^^^
― Gukbe, Saturday, 17 September 2011 23:39 (fourteen years ago)
man to be the toothpick Gosling savors...
― Anakin Ska Walker (AKA Skarth Vader) (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 18 September 2011 00:19 (fourteen years ago)
...it's probably flavored!
― Status Update...in my Seether? (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 18 September 2011 00:55 (fourteen years ago)
Kind of a badge of honor.
― michael assbender (Eric H.), Sunday, 18 September 2011 06:01 (fourteen years ago)
loved this. puts the nail in bullshit slapstick post-post-post-Tarantino post-Ritchie SMOKIN ACES bullshit madcap gangster bullshit. crime is sad all up and down the chain.
loved the self-conscious retro vibe, the title typeface, the long holds, the complete absence of score, the vangelis-y soundtrack elements. There are really very few acts of violence. It's just that they're... violent, which seems a far more moral cinematic position to take than the typical spray of poorly aimed bullets and one-punch knockouts.
pace am0n the script was dope. our lead more or less speaks in monosyllables until... well, when his first consecutive sentences come out, everything changes. that's a very neat trick. very little dialogue at all, really.
reminded me, oddly (or not so oddly given that it's a noir with a lot of breathing room that captures LA's particular brand of loneliness) of BLADE RUNNER.
dunno what movie morbs saw but i don't get the nerd-fantasy aspect at all. great reminder of just how little you need to create suspense/horror/pity/catharsis. glad I saw it in a theater. made me like being at the movies for the first time in a long time.
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Sunday, 18 September 2011 06:55 (fourteen years ago)
I'd rather be Jake Gyllenhaal's bicycle seat.
dunno what movie morbs saw
I haven't seen it, I am gleaning the dissents.
YOU PPL WIN AGAIN, I'LL SEE IT, SOMEDAY, FUCK FUCK FUCK
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 18 September 2011 17:51 (fourteen years ago)
I think the only reason you come into these threads to say "I'm not going to see this" is so we can all badger you into a situation where you feel you absolutely MUST see it.
― Gukbe, Sunday, 18 September 2011 18:03 (fourteen years ago)
Almost everyone you normally trust is on the CON side with this, Morbs. Don't know why you feel the need to catch it.
― michael assbender (Eric H.), Sunday, 18 September 2011 18:51 (fourteen years ago)
Saw this today. I've hated every previous Refn movie except Valhalla Rising, and/but I own both The Driver and Thief on DVD. This movie pretty much had me the second I saw the neon pink opening credits and heard the synth score. Beautifully shot, zero unnecessary elements...loved it.
― that's not funny. (unperson), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:16 (fourteen years ago)
Eric, like Popeye Doyle, I don't trust anybody.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:40 (fourteen years ago)
morbs do you own any records from the italians do it better label? did you watch ALOT of hbo in 1983? look at the poster - that font, blow yr mind? if the answer to any of these questions is yes you might like drive, otherwise don't bother.
― balls, Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:48 (fourteen years ago)
didn't have cable in '83
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:54 (fourteen years ago)
not even for the telegraph?
― remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Sunday, 18 September 2011 19:58 (fourteen years ago)
holy shit the violence in this film!
― buzza, Monday, 19 September 2011 02:52 (fourteen years ago)
i don't think a morbs would really dig this
i liked the visual aesthetic, the noir-ish "precision" in dialogue, albert brooks' performance.
i thought the soundtrack choices were very ~euopean~
― buzza, Monday, 19 September 2011 02:57 (fourteen years ago)
Still collecting my thoughts, but really dug this on the whole.
Russ Tamblyn was the crime doctor!
― The Man With The Flavored Toothpick (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 19 September 2011 03:09 (fourteen years ago)
i noticed tambs in the credits and couldnt even remember him in the movie
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Monday, 19 September 2011 03:17 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, he's in the movie for literally 30 secs-1 min.
― The Man With The Flavored Toothpick (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 19 September 2011 03:26 (fourteen years ago)
YES! YES! YESHSHG! GO HOME TO SHITSYLVANIA, LOSERS!
― The sham nation of Israel should be destroyed. (Princess TamTam), Monday, 19 September 2011 03:43 (fourteen years ago)
wrong thread.
morbs skip it and rent 'bronson' instead
― am0n, Monday, 19 September 2011 03:49 (fourteen years ago)
I've had a screener disc of Bronson for 2-3 years.Will probably have time to watch it in January.
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 September 2011 05:07 (fourteen years ago)
Watch Bronson! It pretty much single-handedly sold me on Tom Hardy's potential.
― mh, Monday, 19 September 2011 14:41 (fourteen years ago)
yeah Bronson is flawed but Hardy is really impressive
― remembrance of schwings past (gbx), Monday, 19 September 2011 14:44 (fourteen years ago)
I'd say that as a whole movie it's uneven, but some of the set pieces in there are really great and, hey, if nude Tom Hardy is your thing then it's even better.
― mh, Monday, 19 September 2011 14:48 (fourteen years ago)
On thread topic, I actually saw Drive yesterday and will write something here after my thoughts come to a head.
― mh, Monday, 19 September 2011 14:50 (fourteen years ago)