Nathan Barley comes to TV

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1030 of them)
(Let's see, Morris and Brooker went to all-male, all-white public schools. Therefore of course the black female character is an embodiment of their collective guilty conscience. But not, alas, much more.)

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 19 February 2005 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)

(torrent on uknova.com)

zappi (joni), Saturday, 19 February 2005 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but they're not letting anyone new join up. Kicked away the ladders.

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 19 February 2005 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)

The second episode made Dan Ashcroft even less sympathetic/more pathetic, annoying [even more than Barley, SugarApes etc], and made Claire the main entry-point/sympathetic charecter. So we're not sposed to be cheering on the main charecter (Dan) anymore then? Okay. Wierd prog.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Saturday, 19 February 2005 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm loving this thread far more than the show - proof that Nathan Barley's better in print than visual?

The 8-Mile sequence was a bit fun though. Loved that line about "tending the garden", or whatever it was. I was high on honey and lemon and St John's Wort.

Deerninja B4rim4, Plus-Tech Whizz Kid (Barima), Saturday, 19 February 2005 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Nathan Barley might be a cunt, but I was impressed that his ringtone was the theme from The Prisoner.

caitlin (caitlin), Saturday, 19 February 2005 11:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I missed it cos I was in the pub and I don't have a uknova account.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Saturday, 19 February 2005 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

if you are in the UK, there is a repeat late tonight.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 19 February 2005 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't understand. If The Idiots are supposed to be so easy to distract with bright shiny things, why do they still give a shit about an article Dan Ashcroft wrote several weeks ago? Also, why couldn't anyone come up with a better collective title for them than The Idiots? It's an insult a small child would use. Is that the point?

My main problem with this programme is that they're all cunts (I'm not sure Chris Morris or Charlie Brooker knows how to write anyone that isn't), which is fine if that's the statement you're making, but I think that in order to sustain a sitcom over a whole series, you need at least some measure of sympathy for at least one of the main characters, and I can't see how you can have any sympathy for any one of those guys. I've given this a two-episode chance now, I don't think I'll bother with the third.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 19 February 2005 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, why couldn't anyone come up with a better collective title for them than The Idiots? It's an insult a small child would use. Is that the point?

(Barley voice over, reading from Ashcroft's terribly stilted and banal article) They use the word 'cool', it is their favourite word. The idiot doesn't think about what it is saying. Thinking is rubbish. And rubbish isn't cool. Stuff and shit is cool.

Barley aloud, admiringly Oh Ashcroft, Ashcroft!

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 19 February 2005 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

the funniest thing about the second ep was dan's editor making his long horse face, whend dan was pleading about his title as 'the preacherman'.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 19 February 2005 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

The trailers for this look great, especially the "15peter20" one.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 19 February 2005 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.sugarape.com

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 19 February 2005 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG LOOK AT THE CAPTIONS ON THE MAGAZINE

http://18hz.deid.net/sugarape/res/fountain.jpg

cutty (mcutt), Saturday, 19 February 2005 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I noticed that.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 19 February 2005 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that an official site linked to the show or a tribute site?

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 19 February 2005 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Barley's a bit more of a loud wideboy on this, isn't he, almost well-meaning at times, rather than the smug posho keeping up a constant facade of detached, amused intelligence as he was portrayed in TVGH.

Momus, I'm sure I've seen a few different 'welcome to our newest user...' things on UkNova recently, are you sure it's not just that you have to keep checking back until the membership's dropped below 25,000? They've been kicking off people who never upload recently so it ought to drop fairly often.

Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman v1.0 (Ferg), Saturday, 19 February 2005 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm pretty certain it's not official.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 19 February 2005 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I just managed to join UK Nova. Ta!

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 19 February 2005 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

holy shit, no one has mentioned choose your beggar? tramp racing? teeth pulling?

the junkie singing songs to little kids?

cutty (mcutt), Saturday, 19 February 2005 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

After two episodes Nathan Barley (the series) just seems toothless and unconvincing. Are the plot twists meant to be deliberately clunky and unbelievable? Having the bailiff come around take the camera or the internet connection be lost just as Dan's won the money is pathetic - these would be unconvincing on My Family or Joy of Bex. Similarly - has any article published in a style mag elevated the journalist into a 'preacher man' symbol of cool? Of course not, 'the idiots' would have bigger, although perhaps more pathetic, distractions to worry them. And say what you like about Barley, at least he gets things done - his party actually looked fun - Dan just lets things happen to him.

Things I did like: when Dan called his sis 'fat arms' during their argument - about the only thing that suggested real emotion; the junkie choir guy's song - XL or Rough Trade should sign him now.

Peep Show satirised this scene a lot better, and it wasn't even the main focus of that show. In Peep Show Jeremy and Super Hands' 'band' was more convincingly lame, and, especially, there was Super Hands getting addicted to crack to look cool ("Mmmm, this crack is so moreish".)

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Saturday, 19 February 2005 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)

'you've gone to piddle' made me laugh. as did vince noir's Kid 606 style music. NB came out of that episode quite well, was doing vaguely creative things passably well, pity about that hat. episode seemed to be over quickly.

(wasn't the prisoner theme part of the mashup in the club? had all sorts of things in there that i remember from my youth. blancmange?)

koogs (koogs), Saturday, 19 February 2005 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

After two episodes Nathan Barley (the series) just seems toothless and unconvincing. Are the plot twists meant to be deliberately clunky and unbelievable?

With respect, Mr Raw, convincing plot and real emotions is not the point of NB. Is it convincing that Dan Ashcroft has had Pete's Dragon out for seven years and owes £2492 and has to play Russian Tramp Racing to earn the money back? Of course it's not. But is it convincing that I went to my local video store on Avenue A on September 12th, 2001, only to be told that, even though they'd closed on 9/11, I still had to pay a fine? Would you believe that if you saw it in Nathan Barley? You probably wouldn't, it would just sound like typical farcical Brooker/Morris atrocity hokum. But it happened. It's 4 Real. Life has also lost the plot, which is why plot is irrelevant. What matters in satire is that we recognise our folly and laugh at ourselves. And, you know, writing for Vice magazine, do I recognise it when the Sugarape editor says to Dan "Stupid people think it's cool, smart people think it's a joke, also cool"? Yes, I do. Verifuckingsimilitude, right there, dude. I also think the hipster vocab is terrific, approaching Burgess and Orwell in its inventiveness:

"Hey you should come, dollsnatch, it's going to be totally fucking Mexico."

"Check this, m'niggas, online tramp racing from Russia, totally de-reg, yeah?"

"I'm going to sleep
Oh yeah, respect for that. Catch some susans.
Yeah, break a Chinaman, yeah?"

Lines like these aren't just funny and inventive, they tie hipsterism in to zones of disorder (Mexico, Russia, China), and that's been a crucial element to every subculture. The atrocity and poverty of these zones of disorder both offsets the privilege of the bourgeois kids who buy into them (by, for instance, gambling on tramp teeth-pulling) by making them seem worldly, and shows them up the moral abyss they live in. I'd put it to you that the verisimilitude of satire works at that kind of level, and not at the level of "Would he really have pulled out the plug just when he won all the money?"

Momus (Momus), Monday, 21 February 2005 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Shiznit. But it still ain't funny.

Masked Gazza, Monday, 21 February 2005 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree with those who've been saying that Barley becomes a more sympathetic character in Part 2. His main fault seems to be that he's too extravert, with Dan playing an introverted shrinking violet. But Dan's little speech about how the assembled crowd at the Trashbat party are all idiots falls very flat next to Barley's rather impressive rap -- "Fuck Enron, fuck Enron, fuck Enron cos it's fucking wrong". In the end, Barley seems wittier and more politically committed than Ashcroft, who again reminds me strongly of John Peel, stuck at some Radio 1 Roadshow from hell with a rather more talented Dave Lee Travis working the crowd.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 21 February 2005 08:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I saw it for the first time on Saturday night. I've got to agree with the AbFab comparison upthread (a show I never felt I truly "got" because I couldn't relate to the lifestyle). Sure I've met the odd hipster in my time but really this comedy is aiming at such a tiny demographic that it's in fact only the Greater London media types themselves who can really appreciate the characters. Shows like The Office, and even Brass Eye at least had some kind of universal reference point since everyone's seen Newsnight and most people have worked in tat kind of Office.
I also noticed there was a rather absurd lack of "funny" on there and it was more like watching a bunch of goons going around being obnoxious. "You can come, you can come, you can come multiple times" - that's like watching a 13 year old get his kicks. Nathan Barley barely appeared in the show and a lot of it was Dan Ashcroft looking like he had a cold. In fact from watching it, I couldn't really tell which one was supposed to be Nathan at all. In some ways I found Ashcroft to be the most hateful character in his whole "I'm above all of this" attitude while still being just as obnoxious as Barley et al(keeping the girl awake while doing the tramp-racing online and breaking the computer in a hissy-fit etc).
The crazy noise/drill music was quite funny but had been done before on Brasseye (the "Cake" music etc) and wasn't quite enough to send my diaphragm into gear, eventually getting quite annoying.
The whole thing reminds me of latter-day Harry Enfield moaning about young people all the time yet not quite getting it right. You end up feeling more embarassed for the writers rather than the characters they're satirising.

I'll carry on watching though and maybe it'll come clear later on.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 21 February 2005 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

The Trashbat party actually reminded me a bit too much of an Autofire gig.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 21 February 2005 09:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Similarly - has any article published in a style mag elevated the journalist into a 'preacher man' symbol of cool? Of course not, 'the idiots' would have bigger, although perhaps more pathetic, distractions to worry them.

yeah, jacques peretti, basically. sleaze nation (latterly the guardian) put this no-mark on an absurd pedestal based on his ability to hate on his peers.

NRQ, Monday, 21 February 2005 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't see how AbFab could only be funny if you 'got' the lifestyle. i was never a huge fan of it but appreciated the humour despite not being or having any experience of that sort of world directly.

NB works the same way. It may not be big on belly laughs but since when has Chris Morris gone out just to do that? It's usually just a side-effect of all the other stuff he's trying to do. I think a re-assessment of Brass Eye and all Morris output of the last eight years may be worthwhile now. It's him that has been chalked up as a preacher man of sorts himself with the hype and 'media terrorist' persona. In one Guardian interview way back he revealed how the only reason he hardly ever gave interviews is because people just ASSUMED he wouldn't want to (possibly untrue but I liked it).

"You can come, you can come, you can come multiple times" - that's like watching a 13 year old get his kicks.
that's because Nathan is 13 years old - do you see. Also this is exactly the kind of crap you hear some guys saying here and there so as reflection, however overstated, of real situations it's fair enough.

Ashcroft is indeed just as hateable as Barley at the moment. I'm not sure whether this is really intentional on Morris/Brooker's part but I wouldn't be surprised either way.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2005 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno. The Trashbat party almost made me *miss* my Hoxton years, which was quite an accomplishment. It looked like fun. How weird, Nathan Barley becoming more sympathetic as the programme goes on, but Ashcroft looking like more and more of the cunt.

Kate Kept Me Alive! (kate), Monday, 21 February 2005 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't see how AbFab could only be funny if you 'got' the lifestyle. i was never a huge fan of it but appreciated the humour despite not being or having any experience of that sort of world directly.

Yeh, but I was a 13 year-old schoolboy when this was at it's height and I'd never met a sloan-ranger. I just didn't get the humour or the references to LaCroix etc at all. I remember finding the whole AbFab experience to be rather painful tbh.

that's because Nathan is 13 years old - do you see. Also this is exactly the kind of crap you hear some guys saying here and there so as reflection, however overstated, of real situations it's fair enough.

I do understand this but I don't really find it funny when some goon in my office says stuff like this so why should I find it funny when it's on telly? It's a really obvious pun (and yes, that's the point) but what's it doing in a sitcom anyway? David Brent could have pulled it off because he's a man who's been put in a position of authority and he's acting like a child and that's funny because of the bemused silence and the way he digs himself further into a ditch. Something about the joke just fell flat. If there was a sitcom about chavs in Newcastle that relied mostly on them throwing kebabs at Pakistanis and generally being obnoxious, I don't think that would be very funny either because you can see this kind of behaviour simply by going out on the street. It's not even an exaggeration.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 21 February 2005 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)

If the last episode of The Prisoner were to be remade now it would look an awful lot like the Trashbat party sequence.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 21 February 2005 10:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I do understand this but I don't really find it funny when some goon in my office says stuff like this so why should I find it funny when it's on telly?

who says you're meant to find it funny? i think too much of is made of the 'Morris is here primarily to amuse' idea! this stopped being the case long ago for me.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2005 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeh, but I was a 13 year-old schoolboy when this was at it's height and I'd never met a sloan-ranger. I just didn't get the humour or the references to LaCroix etc at all.

erm, so was i! but i could see it was a well written show that did it's job well. some great turns from bit-players too including June Whitfield and Jane Horrocks obv. it wasn't complicated stuff humour-wise despite the world they inhabited seeming rather alien.

Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2005 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/N/nathanbarley/index.html

A six part comedy series written by Charlie Brooker and Chris Morris.

Masked Gazza, Monday, 21 February 2005 11:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Jeebus, the pretentiousness on this thread is far beyond even the norm for ilx on what is without a doubt simply one of the funniest programmes ever.

Hats off to channel 4 for providing us with more friday filthy tv greatness.

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 21 February 2005 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

pretentious? foie gras rodders!

Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2005 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

A six part comedy series written by Charlie Brooker and Chris Morris.

oh well if Channel 4 say it's comedy than it must be...

Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2005 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Not necessarily. But it does answer your question.

Masked Gazza, Monday, 21 February 2005 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, channel 4 calls Jimmy Carr a 'Comedian'.

Ed (dali), Monday, 21 February 2005 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)

He tells jokes, doesn't he?

Masked Gazza, Monday, 21 February 2005 12:03 (twenty-one years ago)

i think it is interesting that ashcroft is clearly at least as much of a cnt as barley. the trashbat party was slightly cringey mainly because i've played most of those songs at clubft (einstein a-go-go was the main spot), though admittedly not as [ahem] mashups...

...i'm also not sure about the "political" NB, the enron and george bush mentions in the rap were a little perplexing

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 21 February 2005 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)

NB's "political" rants were all about the hipster pose of politics as accessory. Do you think NB actually knows the faintest thing about either Bush or Enron? But apathy is no longer hip. It's hip to express vague political beliefs without actually understanding them.

Kate Kept Me Alive! (kate), Monday, 21 February 2005 12:40 (twenty-one years ago)

"trashbat is two people jumping out of the twin towers simultaneously and fucking on the way down"

of course NB's 'political' rants were empty, but you can bet your ass apathy would have been just as mercilessly pilloried if that were fashionable (ie as it was in the tvgohome versh -- the tv show has been faithful to the times).

NRQ, Monday, 21 February 2005 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, that's kind of what i was thinking kate, "oh look, he's picked up the big buzz words". not as good as the "parking the bentley" line though ;)

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 21 February 2005 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I was actually going to point that out - the interweb NB was apathetic, but has changed with the fashion. As he would, so that puts the "hip" in hipster. Heh.

x-post

Kate Kept Me Alive! (kate), Monday, 21 February 2005 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)

The TVGH NB always seemed bored by his own antics and never really carried things through, the plots always implied that nothing was ever achieved where as this NB actually seems to do things and be keen about them, cunt though he is.

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 09:41 (twenty-one years ago)

> (wasn't the prisoner theme part of the mashup in the club? had all sorts of things in there that i remember from my youth. blancmange?)

caitlin right, me wrong about prisoner ringtone.

other things i recognised mixed into that piece at the party:
'einstein a go go'
'i won't let the sun go down on me'
'it's in the trees, it's coming' from that kate bush song (hounds of love?) (although sample is from 'night of the demon' i think)
something by tears for fears
'centrefold' (j geils band?)
totp theme tune (thin lizzy? the one after?)

the 9/11 stuff used for shock seemed horribly dated already.

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)

new episode 3 answers?

koogs (koogs), Monday, 28 February 2005 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)

despite watching it twice i'm having trouble remembering anything about it. 15peter20 and his photos. restaurant. attempted seduction. er...

koogs (koogs), Monday, 28 February 2005 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.