http://i.imgur.com/i7ZGG.jpg
― dayo, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:13 (fourteen years ago)
feel like when you have a society that builds in exercise into its basic conception of how people should live, that's a good thing imo
― dayo, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:14 (fourteen years ago)
all bags of chips should have a 6lb lead weight at the bottom
― goole, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:15 (fourteen years ago)
"lead weight may settle during shipment"
― dayo, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:16 (fourteen years ago)
iatee otm re: arguments too. there are a lot of arguments to get rid of cars: environmental; health; cultural; political, etc. i prefer the cultural argument b/c people get really mad about it, but no one argument "undermines" another
― max, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:16 (fourteen years ago)
there are a bunch of demographic studies showing a correlation between obesity rates and rates of people who walk/bike/use public transpo
I'd like to see specific studies as opposed to generic write ups from the mayoclinc. Just because something was determined in a study doesn't mean it was a well designed study that will provide actual evidence.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:18 (fourteen years ago)
Jeff there are 12 citations for this part of the wikipedia article, maybe you could go through them and tell us what you think?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking#Health_benefits_of_walking
― dayo, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:20 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i was just kidding, theres no correlation, places where people spend 2 hours a day sitting down in their cars tend to actually be much skinnier than places where people get at least 30 minutes of walking in every day
― max, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:21 (fourteen years ago)
there are a bunch of studies about how driving is actually the healthiest activity there is
― max, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:22 (fourteen years ago)
physically, mentally... spiritually
or jeff, if you go down to the bottom of that Mayo Clinic summary page you can click the 'references' button and pull up 9 citations, some of which are probably available on pubmed?
― dayo, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:23 (fourteen years ago)
you don't need a study tbh it's true by mathematical proof:
1. walking is good for your health2. people in dense cities walk more
xp haha max beat me
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:23 (fourteen years ago)
I'll have a look later.
Or maybe I'm just bitter because I live car free in a dense city with public transportation yet I still can't get fit. I even run 30 miles a week.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:28 (fourteen years ago)
Didn't you just do a marathon?
― Octavia Butler's gonna be piiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiised (Laurel), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:29 (fourteen years ago)
ps I had a phone interview today for a job in...the suburbs (Nassau county) hopefully god will give me this job just to fuck w/ me. (I can still take a train + walk to the office because this is greater NYC.
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:29 (fourteen years ago)
)
I don't think you can expect to be skinny just cause you walk a lot. but you can definitely expect not to be if you get no exercise, and it's far easier to get stuck in that lifestyle in a car-centric area.
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:31 (fourteen years ago)
Yes, in May. But that was in Wisconsin so the amount of cheese consumed during that 2 day trip totally offset any amount of running I did.
― Jeff, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:36 (fourteen years ago)
everyone in nyc is skinny
― max, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:37 (fourteen years ago)
when i was a tourist in nyc, i knew not to ask directions from overweight people, they were clearly not from there and would know nothing
― goole, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:37 (fourteen years ago)
they would probably give you CAR directions
― max, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:38 (fourteen years ago)
yeah if you want to see fat people in NYC look for a non-taxi driver in queens or the bronx
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:39 (fourteen years ago)
(non-taxi) driver, rather
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:40 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/8/8/3/i/6/4/6/o/NewYorker.jpg
http://www.digitaljournal.com/photo/On6thAve.jpg
http://ronaldrenwick.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/fat-guy-on-scooter.jpg
http://www.worldofstock.com/slides/PHE2261.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4064/4403812547_343961a999_z.jpg
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:49 (fourteen years ago)
had no idea spending two hours in a car was the real culprit; thought maybe it was the 8 hours ppl spend sitting at a desk, my eyes have been opened!
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:53 (fourteen years ago)
PP are those people in hardcore bands? i've heard you can be big, in an nyc hardcore band
― goole, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:54 (fourteen years ago)
I think if you commuted in a car to a job where you walked all day you'd be fine!
― mh, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:54 (fourteen years ago)
http://last10pounds.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nyt-treadmill-desk.gif
― Aerosol, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:57 (fourteen years ago)
is it really difficult to believe that 2 hours in a car + 8 hrs at a desk would be worse than 0 hours in a car + some physical exercise + 8 hrs at a desk? and that that does not in any way suggest that 8 hrs at a desk is good for you?
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:58 (fourteen years ago)
it is literally those two hours in a car--people from nyc are really skinny because they dont take two hours in a car--this is like a known fact
― max, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)
feel like cities aren't the only dense thing itt
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)
^^ Needs one of these:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/6143p0L3kTL.gif
xp
― Pleasant Plains, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 18:00 (fourteen years ago)
― iatee, Tuesday, September 13, 2011 1:58 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lol it's not difficult to believe at all i just thought this was worth noting
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 18:03 (fourteen years ago)
desk jobs are shit for peoples' health, as is junk food, smoking, whatever - they have no inherent correlation w/ walkable urbanism.
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 18:07 (fourteen years ago)
omg lol
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 18:08 (fourteen years ago)
I walk quite a lot and I'm fat. And I'm healthy.
I've got one hand in my pocket, And the other won't fit b/c I'm too damn fatter than hell.
― it was as good of a time as any to show a lighter side of 9/11 research (Je55e), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 18:57 (fourteen years ago)
New York is one of the walkingist citieshttp://hr.blr.com/HR-news/HR-Administration/Commuting/10-Cities-Where-the-Most-Employees-Bike-or-Walk-to/
But not one of the skinniesthttp://www.bestplaces.net/docs/studies/energeticcities.aspxhttp://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/bplive/2008/top25s/qualitylife/skinniest.html
― the wheelie king (wk), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:13 (fourteen years ago)
that is because ppl walk from hot dog cart to hot dog cart
― Tal Berkowitz - Vaccine advocate (DJP), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:15 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.bestplaces.net/images/in-articles/energetic-cities.jpg
^^^ urban walking
― etsy buttez (buzza), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:15 (fourteen years ago)
new york city includes lots of car-oriented sprawl - staten island, outer queens/bronx/brooklyn. but more importantly it has lots of poor people and lots of minorities and there are correlations w/r/t income and race. that list = fairly dense rich white people places.
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:21 (fourteen years ago)
I wouldn't be surprised if south of harlem manhattan would top the list. at the very least, it would be on it.
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:27 (fourteen years ago)
rich ppl are always skinny
― Lamp, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:29 (fourteen years ago)
even if they live in the suburbs and take two hour helicopter rides 2 work everyday
note that most of the bay area makes it - just not the east bay - where there are poor people. and black people.
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:30 (fourteen years ago)
so what exactly is the correlation between skinniness and race/class that you are making here? (Note I'm not saying there isn't one, just as I never said walking wasn't healthier than driving, but I'm curious what connection you're making).
― the wheelie king (wk), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:42 (fourteen years ago)
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2011/07/07/the-connection-between-obesity-and-poverty/
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:44 (fourteen years ago)
http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/content.aspx?ID=6456
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:45 (fourteen years ago)
http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/content.aspx?ID=6459
― iatee, Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:46 (fourteen years ago)
manhattan:
According to the 2010 Census, 48.0% of the population was non-Hispanic White, 12.9% non-Hispanic Black or African American, 0.1% non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native, 11.2% non-Hispanic Asian, 0.3% from some other race (non-Hispanic) and 1.9% of two or more races (non-Hispanic). 25.4% of Manhattan's population was of Hispanic or Latino origin, of any race.
iatee, I'm not asking if there's a correlation between poverty and obesity. I'm asking what conclusion you're drawing from that correlation and how it relates to the context of this thread.
― the wheelie king (wk), Tuesday, 13 September 2011 20:47 (fourteen years ago)