― gem (trisk), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 03:10 (nineteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 03:11 (nineteen years ago)
― gem (trisk), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 03:13 (nineteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 03:15 (nineteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 03:22 (nineteen years ago)
― gem (trisk), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 03:26 (nineteen years ago)
― cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 03:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 04:05 (nineteen years ago)
I have enjoyed reading the theories as to how easy it is to get a job, how unimportant grades are, and how the practice of law is from people who are still students, though. How enlightening. I'll enjoy your updates upon graduation, and during your job search.
Being a lawyer may make you bitter.
― lawmclawlaw (allie b), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)
― lawmclawlaw (allie b), Wednesday, 27 September 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)
― gem (trisk), Thursday, 28 September 2006 00:37 (nineteen years ago)
I'm sure some do, but I woudn't say that's a given - the firm where I clerk starts associates at $50k. You are absolutely correct that $70,000 is more than $34,000, though.
― Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Thursday, 28 September 2006 01:34 (nineteen years ago)
― c('°c) (Leee), Thursday, 28 September 2006 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Thursday, 28 September 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
Bottom line - go to top 10 school, be in top 25-10% of your class, schmooze hard, get posh job in posh firm, work 70 hours a week monday through sunday.
― Stuh-du-du-du-du-du-du-denka (jingleberries), Thursday, 28 September 2006 17:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Thursday, 28 September 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
No billable hours? Dare to dream. Billable hours can eat me.
― lawmclawlaw (allie b), Thursday, 28 September 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Thursday, 28 September 2006 21:53 (nineteen years ago)
Don't go to law school for the money unless you're willing to work insanely long hours both during and after you graduate and are willing to do work for clients that you might find distasteful and make arguments you might find equally distasteful.
― J (Jay), Thursday, 28 September 2006 22:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Friday, 13 October 2006 18:30 (nineteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 22:10 (nineteen years ago)
I also fear that my interest may be too academic, if that makes sense. At times that makes me consider legal academia as an option. I know from previous grad school that I have the temperament for acedemic work, and my exposure to legal scholarship gives me the (possibly false) impression that it favors a wider-ranging and more interdisciplinary approach than other quarters of the academy. But is the job market as dire as in the humanities/social sciences? And is the choice between practice and scholarship one I'd have to make in my first year of school? Please to make my life decisions for me, ILE.
― xtof (xtof), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 06:47 (nineteen years ago)
there might be more choices than just practise or academia if you are interested in black letter law, which i suppose is what you mean about the academic interest. for example, you might look for work at whatever organisation drafts legislation in your country, or the local law reform commission, or go into some kind of legislative policy type work. i have just commenced as an associate to a supreme court judge and it is ALL scholarly stuff. which is cool and completely different to what my mates in firms are doing.
― gem (trisk), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 10:33 (nineteen years ago)
Become a law librarian. Get a joint J.D./M.L.S. and work in an academic law library.
― Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 16:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)
― gem (trisk), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 23:51 (nineteen years ago)
Some schools have tuition repayment programs that help you A LOT with your debt if you choose public interest or something low-paying. You should look into this more if debt is the only thing keeping you from doing it.
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 22 November 2006 23:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 23 November 2006 08:48 (nineteen years ago)
― paper.prentice, Sunday, 25 February 2007 21:22 (nineteen years ago)
― gem, Sunday, 25 February 2007 22:24 (nineteen years ago)
Funny to read my old posts on this thread. I think I'm already in a pretty different mental place than I was 1-2 years ago. Still thinking law school - Fall 2008 at this point - but feeling less entangled with other peoples' ideas of what I should do and more able to sort it out for myself. Starting to think music/entertainment/IP law might be a good field and have been speaking to a few people who have done it.
One question - I have a 170 LSAT from last year and not very good grades (though I'll be 5+ years out of school when I apply). I know I didn't do my best (I scored 175 on my last practice test, and I think I could prepare more than I did) - should I retake the LSAT or is it not worth it?
― Hurting 2, Sunday, 10 June 2007 20:01 (nineteen years ago)
170 is good
― cutty, Sunday, 10 June 2007 20:20 (nineteen years ago)
Yeah, I'm just wondering if I should try to edge up a few points to help make up for my bad grades
― Hurting 2, Sunday, 10 June 2007 20:25 (nineteen years ago)
i'm not sure you want a better score
― gabbneb, Monday, 11 June 2007 04:40 (nineteen years ago)
You mean it won't do me any good? Or you mean you don't think I really want it?
― Hurting 2, Monday, 11 June 2007 04:44 (nineteen years ago)
i mean it might even hurt your chances
― gabbneb, Monday, 11 June 2007 04:45 (nineteen years ago)
i might depend on what you mean by 'bad grades' tho
― gabbneb, Monday, 11 June 2007 04:46 (nineteen years ago)
2.9
― Hurting 2, Monday, 11 June 2007 04:49 (nineteen years ago)
so yeah, what i said. i mean yes, there is to some extent such a thing as 'make up for', but a disparity can send a certain message and the greater the disparity the stronger the message.
― gabbneb, Monday, 11 June 2007 04:53 (nineteen years ago)
Interesting point.
― Hurting 2, Monday, 11 June 2007 04:57 (nineteen years ago)
on the other hand, from a numbers perspective, either way the school would have to be willing to accept your grades, and the marginally higher the LSAT, the marginally higher their average.
― gabbneb, Monday, 11 June 2007 05:04 (nineteen years ago)
(not like i really know what i'm talking about in any event here)
(also, it helps that you're not applying out of school/there's distance between your LSAT and your grades)
― gabbneb, Monday, 11 June 2007 05:14 (nineteen years ago)
((temporally))
or just dont go to law school at all
― cutty, Monday, 11 June 2007 11:31 (nineteen years ago)
fine then
― RJG, Monday, 11 June 2007 11:39 (nineteen years ago)
go to the best school that you can get into (fordham is def. w/n reach w/ great LSAT and shitty GPA) -- and, IF you kick ass 1st year, transfer to another school.
― Eisbaer, Monday, 11 June 2007 15:48 (nineteen years ago)
i know this for a fact b/c i had a good LSAT and shitty GPA, and fordham accepted me (though i turned them down). i am also aware that there's been some "bracket creep" in the law schools since i've been out.
― Eisbaer, Monday, 11 June 2007 15:49 (nineteen years ago)
I'm applying. The ball is rolling. FTW
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 2 August 2007 04:41 (eighteen years ago)
Requests are out for rec letters and I have some idea of how I'm going to do my essay. My LSDAS account is set.
Is there any reason not to use LSDAS for as much shit as possible? Also is there any really good reason to *target* rec letters to specific schools?
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 2 August 2007 04:43 (eighteen years ago)