My little sister got a new job finally. At Hooters.

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (787 of them)

I was about to say "because they're at eye-level" but thought people might miss the joke and think I was even shorter than I actually am.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Dan after an unsuccessful pass:

http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/cov200/drc400/c491/c49130q5dym.jpg

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)

which of the 1000 answers would you like us to start w/Nichole?

How about #95? That way, we can skip the repetitive answers.

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

# 95. we can't eat them, but we can put them in our mouths, which is almost as good

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:04 (twenty-two years ago)

oh my god I can't believe I actually posted that. forgive me, everyone

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm too busy laughing my ass off to forgive you.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Me too. That's what I get for hanging around men, all the time.

Matos, with that line, you've just become the hero of (most of) the Male ILX contingent.

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 22:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Indeed.

I get frustrated when I hear my female friends talk about how they wish they had bigger breasts (though I suspect this is occasionally a fishing for compliments thing, but I'm not going to insert "no, you've got great breasts, really" in a normal conversation). DON'T listen to the media and ignore the frat boys. 95% of men are not obsessed with "large" breasts.

Okay, maybe 50%.

25%?

But we do exist, honest!

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 26 June 2003 04:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not obsessed w/them at all, like I mentioned above! I just know a lot of real good reasons that one might be

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 26 June 2003 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

A good section of you act like breasts are the second coming...

In my experience, there is often a connection.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 26 June 2003 20:25 (twenty-two years ago)

In my experience, there is often a connection.

Well sure, but your drooling occurs well before milk can squirt out of them.

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 26 June 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not sure he was talking about milk.

― JuliaA (j_bdules), Thursday, 26 June 2003 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, I know what he meant, hence my post.

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Thursday, 26 June 2003 20:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not obsessed w/them at all, like I mentioned above! I just know a lot of real good reasons that one might be

My reference was not to breasts-in-general, but large breasts.

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 26 June 2003 23:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Ally, Fredericks of Hollywood sounds like a big improvement cuz they're all classy.

"Fredericks of Hollywood" and "classy" in the same sentence? Does. Not. Compute. (brain blows out; smoke vents from ears)

As for men and large breasts, my experience is that outside of the frat house the 5/50/75% of men who are obsessed with them appear to keep quiet about that, unless they happen to be paranoid schizophrenic homeless guys.

― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 27 June 2003 01:11 (twenty-two years ago)

hahaha you haven't been in my band

― Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 27 June 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

J.Lu, is Frederick's not classier than Hooters?

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 27 June 2003 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Nothing is classier than Hooters.

― NA. (Nick A.), Friday, 27 June 2003 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)

it's like failed-cheerleader sleaze vs. failed call-girl sleaze. two flavors, seperate and distinct, like kids you can't really pick your favorite.

― teeny (teeny), Friday, 27 June 2003 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)

You know, they've got silky things at Fredericks and surely that's classier than shorts?

― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Friday, 27 June 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I dunno, aren't Hooters shorts sorta fake-satiny?

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 27 June 2003 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Would Hooter's be better or worse if the waitstaff's uniforms were edible?

Also, did we have the conversation about opening a competing restaurant chain called Johnsons?

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 June 2003 18:13 (twenty-two years ago)

a.k.a. "and can we eat them?"

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 27 June 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

There was a male-version of Hooters (I think it was with a rooster-motif, maybe not) in College Station a few years back.

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 27 June 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha "Cocks"!

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 June 2003 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)

[adopts baritone]: "Hi, welcome to Nads. May I seat you?"

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 27 June 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow, a restaurant with only beanbag chairs!

― nickn (nickn), Saturday, 28 June 2003 04:23 (twenty-two years ago)

but what's this fuzzy stuff poking out from under the surface...EWWWW!!!

― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 28 June 2003 04:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Would you like the special sauce with that?

― nickn (nickn), Saturday, 28 June 2003 04:32 (twenty-two years ago)

you want seconds? well, it'll take about ten minutes minutes just to get it ready....

― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 28 June 2003 04:33 (twenty-two years ago)

(yes, not just seconds minutes but minutes minutes, thank you all goodnight)

― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 28 June 2003 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)

God, I hope my little sister never reads this thread.

― Ally (mlescaut), Saturday, 28 June 2003 23:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, did we have the conversation about opening a competing restaurant chain called Johnsons?

The Howard Johnsons people would be all over you for trademark infringement. I previously mentioned my "Buns" concept, which could be gender-neutral (as long as you look good in a half shirt and bike shorts...)

― j.lu (j.lu), Sunday, 29 June 2003 00:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Johnsons are everywhere. Nobody owns them.

― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Monday, 30 June 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)

two months pass...

Ally, Fredericks of Hollywood sounds like a big improvement cuz they're all classy. Out of curiousity, would she have to model underwear if asked? I always wondered this about Victoria's Secret.

I found out today that the answer to this question is apparently "YES!" What in the world?

― Ally-zay (mlescaut), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)

She should have a tip jar. And her amazon wishlist hanging on the dressing room door.

― Carey (Carey), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)

she should have a tip jar strapped to her thigh.

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)

that sounded 10x worse than intended.

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I found out today that the answer to this question is apparently "YES!" What in the world?

Since Frederick's uses mannequins, why would you ask the assistants to model? Wouldn't that equal sexual harassment?

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I have a hollow leg. But I never thought to put money in it.

― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Hollow leg = best place to hide liquor, jewelry, etc

― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)

RUM!

― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:53 (twenty-two years ago)

yo ho, yo ho, a pirate's life for me...

― luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Apparently they are meant to wear the underwear under their clothes so that if a customer wants to see things in action, they can. ??? Why can't the customer just put on the clothes themselves? Weird. Whatever, Im all for it.

― Ally-zay (mlescaut), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Wait, so I can walk into Frederick's and get a free show? Best news all day. ;)

― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:16 (twenty-two years ago)

How do these places get away with not hiring men, while getting around the million discrimination suits that would come from horny fratboys and "men's rights" orgs?

Have there been no men shameless enough to argue their right to sell lingerie in court?

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:17 (twenty-two years ago)

They DO hire men. I've seen a lot of guys working in the Victoria's Secret not two blocks from my house, for example.

― Ally-zay (mlescaut), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)

!!!!

Do they have to model the underwear, too? I will be haunted by a burly man in a teddy for weeks (and that burly man is Ned Raggett).

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't want to know the answer to that question because it just put a horrible horrible image suggested to me this weekend in my head. It involves lace teddies, an air force boy, the Count from Sesame Street, The Blob theme song, and Donnie Osmond. Oh my god.

― Ally-zay (mlescaut), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:22 (twenty-two years ago)

(before someone asks, no, not Millar, jackasses)

― Ally-zay (mlescaut), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Skipping 687 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.