"Hipster" as pejorative.

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2399 of them)

I was just pretending it still existed.

xxpost

― Abbott, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:09 (nineteen years ago)

you guys are getting all wound up unnecessarily, maybe? I like fashion, I like clothes - it's interesting to see how people put things together.. I mean, it makes the morning kind of fun, sometimes, if I'm looking around thinking OK I have these dark caramel trousers and black top and *some* bright color wants to go with this to make it unusual.. hmm.. a-ha! bright peri blue! that's it. don't take it so seriously.

those wild psychedelic maxi dresses from the 70's are about to be right back in style so maybe the "vintage" shops will be able to sell 'em off finally. (I woudn't wear them, they don't suit me)

― daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

i know this is getting quite far now from the concept of hipsterism but if you think about it in terms of peoples homes wouldnt you be really impressed if you visited a friend who had all this cool stuff - some of which was found on the street and some of which was from thrift stores, or from ikea, and they had a few nice expensive pieces that they could afford to get partly because the rest of it cos next-to-nothing, rather than they they had this nice mid-range good tast environment that they lived in (that was equivelent to a nice pressed shirt and well shined shoes)? would you think those people with the somewhat individual living space were "trying too hard" and that it was something that was worth "growing out of"?

― jed_, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:34 (nineteen years ago)

i take people on a case by case basis. seriously. though i end up hating most of them.

― scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:35 (nineteen years ago)

yeah and to follow up on what jed said, would you think that people who are really into art and have gone to great effort to collect interesting art etc etc.

― s1ocki, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:37 (nineteen years ago)

Let's not short-shrift stuff, though, Daria. This stuff definitely has meaning beyond being just fun, even if its only because we assign it meaning: we're assigning it collectively, so it means something to us.

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:38 (nineteen years ago)

jed otm

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:40 (nineteen years ago)

another response regarding thrift stores: you can't get a Halston, or any other name-brand couture suit, for $4 anywhere... except in the Midwest. Reason: those who run thrift stores on the coasts know that they can mark up like crazy and people will still buy. It's simple.

Also, the 7 am thing is true... also true is knowing which day they restock the shelves. At the thrift stores of greater Cleveland, this is Tuesdays. Dumbos go on Mondays, when everything is 50% but there's nothing there. On a Tuesday, one can find Dior, Ferragamo, even Gucci. (I'm not some crazy fashion dude, either. That is, I also shop at Target, Ross and the Dollar Store, too).

― the table is the table, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:43 (nineteen years ago)

the east and west coasts are very large areas! give me a month and i will find you a halston suit!

― scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:46 (nineteen years ago)

but, yeah, don't get me started on the whole marking up the price on "collectables" thing. don't get me started!

― scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 01:47 (nineteen years ago)

But jed, what about people who purchased every single object in their home from a single modernist boutique, just looked through the catalogue/store and bought three rooms worth?

Whenever I hear people rag on hipsters, they aren't talking about bohemians who build their own furniture and dumpster dive for recontextualized art - they're talking about people who've purchased, sometimes at large cost, an entire lifestyle or trendy fashion sense or home or record collection, etc..

― milo z, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:11 (nineteen years ago)

Which is to say that anti-hipsters are probably battling strawmen for the most part, but so are anti-anti-hipsters here.

― milo z, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:13 (nineteen years ago)

the only think worse than that is when buyers fall for the price markup/hype and prices soar due to the "collectibility" vicious cycle feedback.

― ▒█▄█ ▄▄ ▒█▄█, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:13 (nineteen years ago)

i am all for fickle hipsters too, cuz they trade their new records back in when they get bored and i can get them cheaper.

― scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:14 (nineteen years ago)

motherfuck a scott seward xpost (code this shit right britishes)

― ▒█▄█ ▄▄ ▒█▄█, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:14 (nineteen years ago)

oh, i guess he understood i was speaking to his point

― ▒█▄█ ▄▄ ▒█▄█, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:14 (nineteen years ago)

How do we (socially) create the monolithic idea of The Norm?

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:15 (nineteen years ago)

don't get me wrong, i definitely preferred it when thrift stores were frequented by the insane, the elderly, and the infirm. they were just looking for belts to hold their trousers up. antiques friggin' roadshow fucked a lot of stuff up for a lot of people.

― scott seward, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:16 (nineteen years ago)

haha fuck a sociology essay question, looked like the thread slowed and i wanted to stir up some shit.

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

some people want to stand out, visually i guess you would say, by wearing fashionable or expensive or cheap-o or whatever clothes. some people don't. if that's the only element of their personality you're going to judge them by, you are being dumb.

The thing is, I think I generally dislike people who "want to stand out", particularly on a day-to-day basis. Then again, I think I have an overall aversion to attention-getting behavior -- it just makes me think of highly self-involved theater majors who talk too loud. For the most part, I prefer understatement -- and/or, when people do stand out, I want it to be (or at least seem) unselfconscious.

― lurker #2421, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:28 (nineteen years ago)

when people do stand out, I want it to be (or at least seem) unselfconscious.

thank god for acid.

― the table is the table, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:39 (nineteen years ago)

brokeN?

― daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

halston is designer, not couture. couture is a very specific type of collection all hand sewn.. futhermore halston did a lot of bridge line pieces that were sold in dept stores all over the place (halston III for example) so if you include that the stuff is everywhere on thrift/resale

― daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

i've only thrifted on east coast and the staff just miss things. they look for known names, like coach bags and gucci bags, and sometimes they just don't check is all. for example the armani dress was $10, and it's top line giorgio armani and in perfect condition, not out of style. they just tagged it as a regular dress. i guess if you can tell good fabric after a while it's not hard to pick out nice things

i don't mind the hipster/trendy people buying vintage though. what that means is, i can sell an old hobo slouch bag or babydoll dress that's just an 80's fast fashion piece on ebay for $100 because it's a hot trend, and take that $100 and buy a few beautifully cut and sewn vintage 40's dresses that fit amazingly.. or maybe take half of it and buy these narciso rodriguez shoes i've been eyeing b/c apparently hardly anyone on ebay wants em

― daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:49 (nineteen years ago)

also re: hipsters I appreciate when people take ugly clothes and ugly things and make them interesting and sort of stylish..

the trouble is they just take it too far..

sometimes it's awesome like this guy

― daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:52 (nineteen years ago)

i meant designer, not couture... my bad. my mind was awash with the new yorker article on lagerfeld.

also, agreed to your xpost. peoples is dumbos.

(i bought a pair of amazing Armani trousers in a shade of tan that are sooo soft-- but they looked like crap as pants, on me at least. so i made them cut-offs. $2 spent, a few years of Armani cutoffs gained)

― the table is the table, Saturday, 17 March 2007 02:55 (nineteen years ago)

oh i haven't read that yet, i should. lagerfeld is awful. i mean i like some of his work but.. i don't know.. totally opposed sensibility & worldview, I think

― daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 03:01 (nineteen years ago)

skot: don't get me wrong, i definitely preferred it when thrift stores were frequented by the insane, the elderly, and the infirm. they were just looking for belts to hold their trousers up. antiques friggin' roadshow fucked a lot of stuff up for a lot of people.

yes

daria: what that means is, i can sell an old hobo slouch bag or babydoll dress that's just an 80's fast fashion piece on ebay for what that means is, i can sell an old hobo slouch bag or babydoll dress that's just an 80's fast fashion piece on ebay for $100 because it's a hot trend, and take that $100 and buy a few beautifully cut and sewn vintage 40's dresses that fit amazingly00 because it's a hot trend, and take that what that means is, i can sell an old hobo slouch bag or babydoll dress that's just an 80's fast fashion piece on ebay for $100 because it's a hot trend, and take that $100 and buy a few beautifully cut and sewn vintage 40's dresses that fit amazingly00 and buy a few beautifully cut and sewn vintage 40's dresses that fit amazingly

i realize the thread here is some bullshit analysis of style and conformity, but the two of you are dead otm on another point, that fleas and thifts used to be a goldmine of sorts, and now less so, because people are not just buying for themselves, they're also buying what they they know they can flip for $$ to justify other, bigger purchases. the net effect is that the store owner with overhead can't just expect to breeze into a flea or some craigslist ad and make easy 11am scores, because the playing field has subtly changed.

― ▒█▄█ ▄▄ ▒█▄█, Saturday, 17 March 2007 03:20 (nineteen years ago)

But jed, what about people who purchased every single object in their home from a single modernist boutique, just looked through the catalogue/store and bought three rooms worth?

what about them?

― s1ocki, Saturday, 17 March 2007 04:01 (nineteen years ago)

First of all they've have to be fucking wealthy, have you seen what Bertoia and Rissom go for these days? Christ. So basically that's nobody I know, and nobody I've been thinking about in connection to this thread.

― Laurel, Saturday, 17 March 2007 04:03 (nineteen years ago)

or live within 800 miles of an Ikea (replace boutique with superstore if you choose)/West Elm/etc.

what about them?

They're the archetype hipster-haters are thinking of (in terms of public presentation, not interior design), as I said in my next post: mostly strawmen, but hardly the "oh god everyone hates creative people" counterpoint anti-anti-hipsters offer up.

― milo z, Saturday, 17 March 2007 04:26 (nineteen years ago)

hipsters:Dwell Mag aesthetic::"nice pressed shirt and well shined shoes":The Room Store

― milo z, Saturday, 17 March 2007 04:30 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, whatever. A room full of all-new furniture from the same (or same family of) catalog/boutique is still fucking boring no matter who designed the pieces. That's not hip, it's just...aspirational.

I can't even tell what argument we're having anymore! Is that just my fever talking or has this thing jumped the daybed?

― Laurel, Saturday, 17 March 2007 04:53 (nineteen years ago)

i dunno! i guess i just have a hard time getting worked up about this stuff. i'm sure some people order rooms by the catalog just cuz they're too busy to think about every individual piece and they can feel comfortable knowing everything will look ok together. not what i would do, but i can't hate 'em for it.

― s1ocki, Saturday, 17 March 2007 05:23 (nineteen years ago)

the store owner with overhead can't just expect to breeze into a flea or some craigslist ad and make easy 11am scores

well no, but given that the thrifts ostensibly are there in the first place so ppl without a lot of $$ can buy clothes.. i'm not feeling real bad about, say, the guy in alexandria va who runs a vintage shop & picks a good part of his wares from several thrifts around the block.. personally i only buy what i wear unless it's something incredibly special. or *maybe* a really hot trend. the stores with inventory and overhead don't turn around their merch as fast as the trends, often, or else don't even pay attention.. being accustomed to pulling wild 70's polyester and passing over hideous 80's glitter tunic tops.. but guess which one the hipsters might actually want

i'm kind of fascinated by it. there are vintage sellers who are super knowledgeable and particular about vintage & i do feel like it's too bad when carefully restored older pieces with amazing detail don't command the same prices as the item of the moment.. take ebay seller mama stone vintage.. most of that stuff is basically h&m style/quality, but they put it on pretty models and rake in the cash

― daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 17:10 (nineteen years ago)

thrifts are still goldmines you just have to know what the gold is today & how to advertise, is all.

― daria-g, Saturday, 17 March 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)

Where's the "hipster superhero" thread? I can't find it. It was funny.

― Sundar, Saturday, 17 March 2007 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...

http://www.zoilus.com/rsz_cg0455riddle.jpg

― jaymc, Tuesday, 29 May 2007 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://www.adbusters.org/magazine/79/hipster.html

― am0n, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)

christ

― latebloomer, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:53 (seventeen years ago)

SOMEONE didnt get invited to the gallery opening!!!!

― max, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)

omg, i am only a few paragraphs in and...wow

― dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:56 (seventeen years ago)

Gavin McInnes, one of the founders of Vice, who recently left the magazine, is considered to be one of hipsterdom’s primary architects.

― and what, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:56 (seventeen years ago)

“If only we carried rocks instead of cameras, we’d look like revolutionaries.”

― kingkongvsgodzilla, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

no momus no credibility

― max, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

Hipster Dom

― J0rdan S., Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

& adbusters has the temerity to subtitle their march issue 'the reconquest of cool'

― goole, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

explain to me adbuster

― deej, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:59 (seventeen years ago)

Is that a Thomas Frank ref?

http://www.whsmith.co.uk/Images/Products%5C226%5C260%5C9780226260129_m_f.jpg

― jaymc, Thursday, 31 July 2008 19:59 (seventeen years ago)

Punks wear their tattered threads and studded leather jackets with honor, priding themselves on their innovative and cheap methods of self-expression and rebellion. B-boys and b-girls announce themselves to anyone within earshot with baggy gear and boomboxes

what?

― dell, Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:00 (seventeen years ago)

Skipping 2299 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.