Is it bad for a baby to see you masturbating?

http://www.planetdan.net/pics/misc/baby-tunnel.gif

looooooooool

I always thought of masturbation as more of a sprint than a marathon.

This thread is EPIC.

Liberals...

1st gis for "epic masturbation"

http://www.fototime.com/9C7CB5CD495FBB4/orig.jpg

That actually is some pretty epic masturbation if you need both a horse and a rifle!

that man was the baby.

nobody puts baby in a corner (and then jerks off)

It's only bad if it participates

happy new year, ILE

Good luck, Finland!

That terrified baby gif is amazing.

This is the sort of thing that I Love Baby-Making will be host to.

He was in and out and round about
He was in and out and round about
He was in and out and round about

Daddy's got a squeeze box
Baby never sleeps at night

http://www.lamebook.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/little-jerk.jpg

that's definitely the kind of thing that should be shared with your friends & colleagues.

ILE tackles the big questions that have confounded mankind for ages!

"Why are we here?"
"Where did we come from?"
"Is it okay to masturbate in front of the baby before we go?"
"Are those nachos?"

― Dan (And So On) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:57 (3 years ago)

classic for all time

is it bad for you to see your baby masturbating?

via iphone = in the process?

is it bad for a baby on television to see you masturbating?

is it bad for a baby NOT to see you masturbating?

is it bad for masturbating for you to see a baby?

is it bad for Dancing Baby to see you masturbating?

how is dancing babby formed

Is it bad for a baby portabella to see you masturbating?

is it bad for masturbating for you to see a baby?

um YES

you're just culturally conditioned to believe that

So it only took 5 years for this board to turn into "A Serbian Film"

All thing considered, that's an eternity in Internet tine so congrats to us all for staving off hell for that long.

is it bad for masturbating babies to see?

what a thread

Uh wow. No, help.

cultural conditioning has its points.

― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, December 5, 2005 6:49 AM (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol

only if it is the correct conditioning.

Also, this thread needs an overbearing Brooklyn father to come up, cuff it on the back of the head and say, "Jeeeesus Christ, what the FUCK is wrong with you?"

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, December 5, 2005 2:19 PM (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Is it bad for dick cheney to see you masturbating

During your baby's first month, she can focus only about 20cm to 30cm away

what if it's a boy?
i bet you he could see further. because boys are better. it's science.

"He was in and out and round about, doing this sort of thing all over the house, "

Impossible not to imagine this sentence as a lyric

During your baby's first month, she can focus only about 20cm to 30cm away

will make the future repressed memories of a shuffling blur moaning to itself in Finnish all the more mysterious

It's the rest of the song I worry about...

xpost You know what? The one big ILX fallacy (oo-er) is that Tuomas was the original poster...

i was trying to get at that if the baby can see you you're doing it too close to the baby

http://efukt.com/20614_Babysitting_Fail.html

ok, moving beyond vanilla stuff, would pissing/a2m/etc be ok in front of a child, 'because it woudln't understand'?
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, December 5, 2005 9:36 AM (6 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwsDI6VBWzs

this simon guy

buncha squares

FAMILY groups are demanding The Janoskians apologise for the baby skit Little Britain star Matt Lucas slammed as ''repulsive'' and ''witless''.

In the sketch, uploaded to YouTube, members of the Glenroy boy band are seen simulating lewd acts in bus shelters, shopping centres and under escalators, with one member telling a mother "your baby's sexy''.

Leza Sullivan, of child protection group Bravehearts said: ''Simulating sexual acts in front of a child, and exposing a child to that, can be classed as sexual assault.

''Then, to make fun of it, and trivialise it, is appalling. But they took it one step too far when they started engaging actively with children.''

Bravehearts and the Australian Family Association said The Janoskians record label, Sony Music, should force their act to take the video down.

''The Sony brand should not be associated with this behaviour,'' Ms Sullivan said.

Anti-abuse lobby group, Safe Australia Movement, said the clip contains ''paedophilic references aimed at a six-week-old baby and her mother''.

''To harass a mother in such a way is abusive. Anyone that accepts this behavior is accepting abuse,'' said spokesman William Fagan.

But the group defended the video in a series of tweets on Wednesday night from their official Twitter account.

The five-member group said it didn't regret filming the video.

"OK guys so the hole (sic) purpose of public wanking is to see unseen reactions,'' the Janoskians said.

"It's never been done before and it's interesting to see reactions.

"For the people who think we took it to (sic) far have really closed minds about the subject.

"It was acting and if you couldn't tell we weren't really wanking. Not only the baby would never understand what's going on.

"The hole (sic) purpose was to see the mother's reaction ... and it was good. Definitely our favourite video.''

But Terri Kelleher, of the Australian Family Association, said the clip was ''highly offensive''.

''They should have been arrested,'' Ms Kelleher said.

Ms Kelleher added to calls for Sony to take action against the boy band and also urged parents to discourage their children from supporting The Janoskians, who are performing shows for touring giant, Live Nation, later this month.

Little Britain's Lucas took to Twitter on Wednesday night to slam the video.

''The group member claims that the baby sexually excites him and proceeds to stand by the pram while pretending to masturbate, to the obvious and not unreasonable distress of the baby's mother and grandmother,'' Lucas said.

''Am I too old to get it? Maybe I am. If so, I'm glad. It's repulsive.

''It's probably already criminal. It's certainly utterly witless.''

Sony Music did not respond to calls for comment before deadline.

christ when Matt Lucas calls you out on being repulsive and witless

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/8554188288/h1477ED46/