2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7160 of them)

"lynching party"

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:33 (eighteen years ago)

er, which he says would be bad????

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:36 (eighteen years ago)

"this is a fantastic movie to see if you're brain-dead or a moron"

movie poster:

"a fantastic movie"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:37 (eighteen years ago)

bad... unless there's evidence that SHE HATES AMERICA

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:37 (eighteen years ago)

still a poor choice of words

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:37 (eighteen years ago)

gimme a break you guys

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:41 (eighteen years ago)

anyway, I bit the bullet and let the 90257816 skipped posts load and read the discussion, and I see it's been well covered. I still think it was an odd choice of words, but it's true that in the context he's being relatively decent.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:47 (eighteen years ago)

self-righteous Nader blamers, and proofs that he didn't cost Gore, can be found in the documentary film An Unreasonable Man.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 25 February 2008 14:50 (eighteen years ago)

Save-a-Ho'Reilly

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

morbs i'm all in favor of breaking up the two-party system but nader's a cult of personality - he doesn't build movements and he does no actual organizing.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:03 (eighteen years ago)

gabbneb unlike you i try to suppose that what people say is reasonable or unreasonable despite who they are, not because of it

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

self-righteous Nader blamers, and proofs that he didn't cost Gore, can be found in the documentary film An Unreasonable Man.

oh yeah? do they prove that Gore would have lost New Hampshire if Nader wasn't in the race?

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

only people say things

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

sorry i should have said "unlike deej"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

do they explain why New Hampshire was the only state to go red in 2000 but blue in 1992, 1996 and 2004?

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:09 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer, I don't disagree with your last 2 points. Even if Obama picks Sam Nunn for VP I'd rather vote for a socialist than Nader this time.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:11 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer, while I applaud your effort, O'Reilly has a history of saying and doing questionable things regarding race, so when he uses the phrase "lynching party" regarding a black candidate's wife it raises my eyebrow.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:13 (eighteen years ago)

mocking a caller for using racial innuendo is a-ok with me, you should be applauding o'reilly, not me

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

what is the scripture again? "when a loathesome toad tells the truth on fox news, ye shall give obeisance as unto the highest of my cohort"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.drudgereport.com/cc2.jpg

This picture says everything you need to know about Bill Clinton.

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:29 (eighteen years ago)

"I don't want to go on a lynching party, unless of course she does hate America. In that case, yeah, go for it, we'll hunt her down."

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:32 (eighteen years ago)

the caller does not use "racial innuendo," ("militant" is the closest she comes), O'Reilly does not "mock" her, and what he says is BARELY a defense of Michelle Obama. After which he defends Clinton against all those nasty Obama people.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

"mr. o, i have a friend who says that the muslims in his town are very angry, very militant"

"well before i go off on a crusade against the infidel i'd like to get a few more facts in place, evidence, to say that's how they really feel"

omg o'reilly is saying he wants to go on a crusade against the infidel!!!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

"If that's how she really feels -- that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that's legit. We'll track it down."

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

"that's legit" doesn't refer to it being a legitimate point of view on her part; it refers to the lynching party, doesn't it?

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

ffs

Tracer Hand, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:55 (eighteen years ago)

No, I think it just refers to the viewpoint being "legit." Even I don't think O'Reilly would actually imply that a lynching party - even metaphorical - is "legit." I just think it was a bad choice of words. Anyway, I think impugning both of the Obamas' patriotism is far more offensive than the use of that phrase, and CNN is guilty of that too.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

yeah i don't think he means literal lynching party obv.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 25 February 2008 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

Your search - "you can get anything you want at sylvia's restaurant" - did not match any documents.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:01 (eighteen years ago)

so the clinton campaign responds to the circulation of the "dressed" obama photo:

Enough.

If Barack Obama's campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed. Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.

This is nothing more than an obvious and transparent attempt to distract from the serious issues confronting our country today and to attempt to create the very divisions they claim to decry.

We will not be distracted.

Mark Clemente, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:09 (eighteen years ago)

fuck this shit

YGS, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

oh christ, that's just bullshit

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

morbs i'm all in favor of breaking up the two-party system but nader's a cult of personality - he doesn't build movements and he does no actual organizing.

-- Tracer Hand, Monday, February 25, 2008 9:03 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

tracer what did u think of the nation editorial i posted

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

i luv this "shame on you" "they should be ashamed" stuff going on now, right?

Mark Clemente, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:16 (eighteen years ago)

We will not be distracted.

from red-wine-drinking or job-hunting?

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:17 (eighteen years ago)

lol^^

in any case this photo's awesome:

http://drudgereport.com/bc.jpg

Mark Clemente, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:17 (eighteen years ago)

beyond the wizard's sleeve

dmr, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

im concerned about gw's muslim roots

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

If Barack Obama's campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed. Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.

I mean, wow. This is just so unbelievably, transparently disingenuous.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.drudgereport.com/oa.jpg
i can understand stupid ppl being like OMG TERRORIST at this but is anybody currently undecided about o vs hillary gonna take clintons side because of this? they are desperate as fuck!!

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:24 (eighteen years ago)

daria bailed out of this thread just in time. "Fail to defend the indifensible" etc

Rock Hardy, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:28 (eighteen years ago)

maybe not now but in the ge :-/ xp

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:28 (eighteen years ago)

if anything hillarys driving a stake in her own career w/ this shit, folks arent gonna be so quick to forgive this kind of dirty trick bs

deej, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

yeah but thats what im saying - im sure it could influence undecideds between mccain & obama, but not clinton & obama!! so why is she doing mccain's dirty work right now!?!

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

yeah i had been capn save-a-hillary with my obamaniac friends for months now but with this news today i seriously resolve not to vote for her

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:30 (eighteen years ago)

luckily it looks like i wont have the option

and what, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:30 (eighteen years ago)

I'm glad we're learning about all these amazing political skills in the primary not the general. HillaryCo doesn't seem to understand that the reason Bush gets away with this shit is because Bush is speaking the lines, not Rove.

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:32 (eighteen years ago)

and because they run all their bullshit through a red-face test first

gabbneb, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:33 (eighteen years ago)

m sure it could influence undecideds between mccain & obama, but not clinton & obama!! so why is she doing mccain's dirty work right now!?!

-- and what, Monday, February 25, 2008 11:29 AM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

This. And I've also been a capn-save-a-hillary.

Hurting 2, Monday, 25 February 2008 16:43 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.