The Sopranos Vs. The Wire

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2017 of them)

yeah it should be a smellovision poll

TOMBOT, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:05 (seventeen years ago)

Was Deadwood the one where everyone was always all "you have to watch it for the language and dialect, they're so unique and almost Shakespearean?" Because that does sound up my alley, but on the other hand (a) it is Deadwood and (b) I don't often get along with westerns.

nabisco, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

i dunno, nabisco, aside from some stuff in season 1 w/wild bill hickok it doesn't really feel like a trad western in any way.

the stickup man from the gripping "wire" television show (omar little), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:31 (seventeen years ago)

the language is amazing

joule kilcher (goole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:35 (seventeen years ago)

the amazing shakesperean awesomeness of the language, or whatever, was fun at first but i eventually got really, really weary of it.

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:38 (seventeen years ago)

it feels like the language got denser as the series went on, if that makes sense. Farnum's language and raps and stuff=the highlight of the series for me.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:41 (seventeen years ago)

nothing like a good western-style shakesperean rap!

s1ocki, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:42 (seventeen years ago)

they have those at subway now right

TOMBOT, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)

in the first season the language was really natural in a way, extremely well written but not show-offy in a noticeable way. the second season is where it started to get just a little bit too mannered, season 3 was admirable for being so weird but i can't say i enjoyed it, exactly. it mostly had to do with the dialogue.

the stickup man from the gripping "wire" television show (omar little), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:45 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i really got into the dialogue and the ideas at play about social order etc -- how people make a character of themselves in public, how language responds to and creates power. i can see how this would be really unenjoyable to ppl but i loved it.

joule kilcher (goole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

I am torn between my love of weird mannered dialogue and that thing where all western-type programs just remind me of boring middle-school field trips to local forts and sites of Indian massacres.

xpost - haha okay, "Foucauldian western" is possibly an exception I can make

nabisco, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:50 (seventeen years ago)

we all remember when hal called falstaff a 'cunt-crazed maniac'

special guest stars mark bronson, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:54 (seventeen years ago)

yes they swear a lot too! tee hee

joule kilcher (goole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

lol ive never watched rome nor had the desire to but a fashion design friend of mine went fuckin crazy on it for using spaghetti straps on some of the costumes

johnny crunch, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:56 (seventeen years ago)

cunt-crazed maniac

sub-Gregory Corso at best

nabisco, Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:57 (seventeen years ago)

in the commentaries milch goes on this long rambling riff about westerns and hollywood and the hays code and how it fucked up our perception of the west. the 'laconic cowboy' was an invention since everyone knew, or used to know, that cattle people and miners and settlers and all that were outrageously verbose, like every other victorian, even tho they were filthy. the same kids writing those amazing civil war letters home grew up and went west, etc.

i don't know if i buy it or if it's even true but it's interesting

joule kilcher (goole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i kinda always figured it was true

the stickup man from the gripping "wire" television show (omar little), Thursday, 18 December 2008 19:02 (seventeen years ago)

i think i have to watch deadwood, if it's all about mannered dialogue. it's a good thing tim olyphant is dreamy.

horseshoe, Thursday, 18 December 2008 19:19 (seventeen years ago)

he's got this perfect hollywood grill that sticks out completely

joule kilcher (goole), Thursday, 18 December 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)

trixie's use of cursing seemed oddly forced to me and overdone. but I loved the dialogue for the most part.

android army (Kitties!!!), Thursday, 18 December 2008 19:22 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

Ok, so I've been watching The Sopranos in order because I'd only ever seen the occasional episode and hadn't seen it properly and this thread reminded me I needed to see it all. It's not as good as The Wire, because of all the stupid dream sequences etc. but up until the end of season 2, it's still almost perfect. And then, without knowing, the start of season 3 is fucking odd. The pacing is all wrong, the storyline just seems rehashed (oh, so another person not as important as tony but still important is more ruffless and crazy and seems unsure of tony's position etc) and most importantly, the livia episode! I never knew what had happened (spoiler: .............................she dead) so watching that scene of just rehashed livia quotes put on a fake body was the creepiest and oddest experience i can remember on fictional television. I'm sure there are great episodes coming so I'm going to continue but, really, people think this is better than The Wire?

. (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 7 February 2009 15:06 (seventeen years ago)

oh, so another person not as important as tony but still important is more ruffless and crazy and seems unsure of tony's position etc

is to 'the sopranos' what 'what? the top brass want to shut down the investigation? just as we're getting close?' is to 'the wire'.

special guest stars mark bronson, Saturday, 7 February 2009 15:12 (seventeen years ago)

ha, ok, i totally agree.

. (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 7 February 2009 15:14 (seventeen years ago)

I think it's better, yes. Keep watching, because season 3 is the best of the lot, I think. I never believed in any of the Wire's characters (even though I do like it a lot) in the same way as I believed in The Sopranos - still, what the fuck do I really know about any of these people, living in Cardiff?

nate woolls, Saturday, 7 February 2009 15:15 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, it was more about me wanting to comment on how creeped out i got after watching that scene with tony talking to old livia clips was than anything.

. (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 7 February 2009 15:20 (seventeen years ago)

yeah it is a shame that scene is so weird. i'm amazed nobody noticed that her parting keeps changing sides.

nate woolls, Saturday, 7 February 2009 15:55 (seventeen years ago)

"season 3 is the best of the lot"

Totally and completely untrue.

Alex in SF, Saturday, 7 February 2009 16:11 (seventeen years ago)

ya fully untrue.

i'd say 5 at this point.

watch something like the opening montage of season 6 and compare it to the workmanlike filmmaking of the wire and it amazes me that anyone would thing the latter is a better show.

and if you think the sopranos is good despite "all the stupid dream sequences" you might as well give up now.

s1ocki, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:10 (seventeen years ago)

unfair, or at least missing the point to compare cinematography of these shows - sops eps were often used as showcase portfolio pieces by whatever director was doing that particular ep, so full of arty swoopy stuff - they usually kinda wanted to be film-like, the wire never did (i.e. the wire knows it's tv, wants to be tv, i.e. is better tv)

Tracer Hand, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:17 (seventeen years ago)

i'm not talking about cinematography.

s1ocki, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:24 (seventeen years ago)

i'm talking about visual ideas, staging, editing, direction. if you think it's better tv to throw those things out the window you might as well acclaim three-camera sitcoms as the best of tv.

s1ocki, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:25 (seventeen years ago)

the wire didn't throw those out the window, the sopranos just had more obvious cinematic tics.

John Hyman (misspelled intentionally) (omar little), Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:28 (seventeen years ago)

i mean you can compare the two if the wire was trying to do the same thing as the sopranos, but it wasn't so in the end the comparison on those grounds is a little off-base. i think at some point it's just a matter of personal taste. do you prefer the style of the sopranos or the style of the wire? plus i think a lot of the preferences come down to characters w/r/t these two shows. it makes total sense why someone would prefer the wire imo!

John Hyman (misspelled intentionally) (omar little), Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:30 (seventeen years ago)

you are obviously biased OMAR

s1ocki, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:30 (seventeen years ago)

naw it's just buggin' me how ppl dismisss the sopranos so out of hand when it so clearly, to me at least, such a monumentally fuckin awesome work of art

s1ocki, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:31 (seventeen years ago)

watch something like the opening montage of season 6 and compare it to the workmanlike filmmaking of the wire and it amazes me that anyone would thing the latter is a better show.

i no what u mean and maybe agree with u in general but i think "workmanlike" is really unfair here. like, just thinking of there's a shot in the third season of the wire where it goes from something static and tv to swooping out to track all the beer cans on the roof of the western that was really beautiful. the wire had fewer of these moments but they were there its not like its 2.5 men or w/e

Lamp, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:31 (seventeen years ago)

shit gettin heated

John Hyman (misspelled intentionally) (omar little), Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:31 (seventeen years ago)

slocki is so blatantly o the fucking m here.

special guest stars mark bronson, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:31 (seventeen years ago)

my real complaint with visual stuff re: the wire is that the symbolism was pretty heavy-handed like just super-composed shots of ppl being framed by metal detectors in the FBI building or those under the overpass drinking shots

Lamp, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:33 (seventeen years ago)

unfair, or at least missing the point to compare cinematography of these shows - sops eps were often used as showcase portfolio pieces by whatever director was doing that particular ep, so full of arty swoopy stuff - they usually kinda wanted to be film-like, the wire never did (i.e. the wire knows it's tv, wants to be tv, i.e. is better tv)

completely untrue about 'the sopranos' which was pretty consistent tbh anyway. one of the sops' main directors, tim van patten, also directed on the wire. anyway it's complete, ahistorical bs to say there is a 'cinematic' look and a 'televisual' look and ne'er the twain shall meet.

special guest stars mark bronson, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:36 (seventeen years ago)

the idea of preferring mediocrity because it's somehow realer tv is bizarre dude, it's approaching rockist levels of misguided authenticity worship

s1ocki, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:38 (seventeen years ago)

wait slocki if you're not talking about cinematography what are you talking about?

horseshoe, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:39 (seventeen years ago)

ALSO WHY ARE YOU CALLING THE WIRE MEDIOCRE I'LL KILL YOU

horseshoe, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

to prove a point

s1ocki, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

morbs bait xxxpost

the shows are trying to do two different things, and their visual characteristics reflect that. I think there are duff moments in the Sopranos for time to time, but overall, it is a pretty amazing piece of work. Sopranos might be bit more rewarding on 4th or 5th rewatch than the Wire, but both shows are just too good to really put into an 'either/or' context.

Gukbe, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

basically it's a good thing that tv has busted out! in the same way that it was a good thing that, some time in the 1910s, people figured out that you didn't have to shoot people feet-to-head; or, in the 1920s, that you could move the camera.

xposts

when people say 'cinematography' they usually mean it like it's an additional extra, rather than the actual texture of the thing we're talking about.

special guest stars mark bronson, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:42 (seventeen years ago)

i am genuinely interested to know what you meant, slocki! i am stupid about this stuff.

horseshoe, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:43 (seventeen years ago)

mise en scene?

Gukbe, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:46 (seventeen years ago)

oh okay i think it's what enrique said. i agree with Lamp that there was a lot that was artful about the way the wire looked. i guess the differences are down to the formal stuff that got discussed upthread; i agree that the differences aren't about movies v. tv.

horseshoe, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:48 (seventeen years ago)

(i will say that i grew to kind of hate david simon listening to a season one commentary where he sneers about tv and basically spends a lot of time belaboring how the wire is so very not tv like. both false and made him sound like an insecure dick.)

horseshoe, Saturday, 7 February 2009 17:49 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.